Check In / Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Challenging Behavior
Advertisements

Tier Two at CFMS Check-In/Check-Out (CICO) Adapted from Rob Horner, et al.
Check In / Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon.
An Evidence-based Intervention for Tier II Supports
Check In Check Out: A Targeted Intervention
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Tier 2/Secondary Interventions
Advanced Topics in PBS: Secondary/Tertiary Interventions George Sugai University of Connecticut Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Check-in/ Check-out with PB4L Schools
Group-based Behavior Interventions: Tier 2
Building Effective Classroom Management
Check In – Connect – Check Out Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director October 25, 2007.
TIER TWO INTERVENTIONS Jim Artesani, Ed.D. 304 Shibles Hall Orono, ME 04469
Positive Behavior Supports
Quick Sort Matrix 1 Check-In Check-Out Check & ConnectSocial Skills Group Organizational Skills Newcomers Club Adult Attention XXXXX Peer Attention XX.
Hello, Update, and Goodbye Program Presenters: Pam Hallvik, Administrator Sally Helton, EBIS Coordinator Sally Helton, EBIS Coordinator Nancy Brown, Counselor.
March 15, 2012 APBS, Atlanta, Georgia Megan Cave & Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.
Advanced SWIS Facilitator Training October 17, 2007 Rosemont, IL Anne Todd, Nadia Katul Sampson, Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon.
Tier 2 PBIS: Check-In / Check-out
Tier 2 Support The Behavior Education Plan. 2 Objectives Identify the BEP and its place in SWPBS Identify daily, weekly, and quarterly features of the.
Check In – Connect – Check Out A Systematic Approach to Behavior Management for At- Risk Students Dr. Zaf Khan PBSI Project Director MTSU.
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
Check In / Check Out Sussex Elementary School’s Duck Creek Club.
Embedding Bully-Proofing in School-wide PBS Scott Ross Rob Horner Bruce Stiller University of Oregon
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
Check-In/Check-Out Introduction: CICO Point Staff An Intervention for Tier II Students.
PBIS Tier 2 Check-In/Check-Out Program Franklin Flyers
Check-In/Check-Out Staff Introduction. CICO (Check-In/Check-Out) Designed for Students with moderate problem behaviors Most appropriate when problem behaviors.
Tier Two and an Evidence-Based Practice: Check-In/Check-Out Janice Morris, Barbara Mitchell and Nicole Reifesel Columbia Public Schools.
Checking in on Check In/Check Out DEBORA LINTNER MO SW-PBS TIER 2/3 CONSULTANT SUSAN LONG ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SIKESTON 5-6 GRADE CENTER.
Secondary Behavior Interventions ABRI Terrance M. Scott, Ph.D.
Strategies to Support Yellow-zone students Specialized Group-based Approach.
Secondary Interventions Function-based Strategies to Support At-Risk Students.
Developing Feasible and Effective Interventions based on Functional Behavioral Assessment Cindy Anderson and Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Dr. Dana Morris Jessica Barrett Alcott Middle School.
PBIS Opening Day Check-in/Check-out Re-designing ISS.
Check-in/Check-out koi-education.com. Students who are not successful with Tier 1 interventions alone, need additional behavioral supports.
Assessing the Impact of A Targeted Group Intervention The Middle Part of the Triangle What is BEP? BEP at Indian Head ES.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013.
Tier II Interventions Check-In Check-Out Overview & Review Presented by: Todd Nicholson, MS, NCSP Positive Behavior Intervention Specialist.
CHECK IN-CHECK OUT – A SECONDARY BEHAVIOR PLAN Elizabeth Roberds A PLAN PROPOSED FOR GRISSOM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL – MUNCIE, IN.
Secondary Interventions Applying Function-based Support Adapted from Crone, Horner, & Hawken, 2004 Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools The Behavior.
Check-In / Check-Out (CI/CO): Overview for Staff.
Planning for Tier 2. TIER 1, 2, or 3? Are there ANY schools that aren’t motivated to support the difficult, at-risk kids? Answer = NO So, why don’t we.
© 2005 by The Guilford Press Check In, Check Out (CICO) Piloting A Tier 2 Intervention.
Leading a Team from a Functional Behavioral Assessment to a Practical and Effective Behavior Support Plan Rob Horner University of Oregon TA-Center on.
Check In Check Out Technical Assistance. Think and Respond  Where are you at with your development and implementation of CICO?
Secondary Interventions: Check-in/ Check-out as an Example Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman-Campbell, Jessica Swain-Bradway University of Oregon
The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An additional intervention to complement school and classroom managment The Behavior Education Program (BEP): An.
Behavior Education Program (BEP): Overview for Staff Leanne S. Hawken, Ph.D. University of Utah.
5.0 Tier Two Practice: Check-In Check-Out
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
What We’ve Learned About PBIS
Check In/Check Out A Tier 2 targeted system for providing behavioral support to groups of students at risk MCPS “Bone” Evidence Based Practices Training,
What’s ahead? PBIS Year 2 Chris Borgmeier, PhD
Wyoming Department of Education
Building Effective Classroom Management
MiBLSi State Implementers’ Conference
Keeping Tiered Instruction Vital
6/27/17.
What to Do When Check-in, Check-out Doesn’t Work: Next Steps
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Southwest Junior High School CICO Handbook
Embedding Bully-Proofing in School-wide PBS
Swift at SWIS for Check-In/Check-Out (CICO)
Module 5: Overview of CICO and other Tier II Interventions
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
Liberty Elementary staff training
Presentation transcript:

Check In / Check Out: A Targeted Intervention Rob Horner, George Sugai, Anne Todd, Celeste Rossetto Dickey, Cindy Anderson, Terry Scott University of Oregon and University of Connecticut

Goals  Define the logic and core features of Targeted Interventions, and the specifics of the Check- in/Check-out (CICO) approach.  Provide empirical evidence supporting CICO, and practical examples from local schools.  Self-assess if CICO is appropriate for your school  Build action plan for CICO implementation

CICO within School-wide PBS  All specialized interventions are more effective, and more durable, if they are done with school-wide behavioral expectations as a foundation.

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Targeted Interventions *Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized *Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT 

Major Features of Targeted Interventions  Intervention is continuously available  Rapid access to intervention (72 hr)  Very low effort by teachers  Consistent with school-wide expectations  Implemented by all staff/faculty in a school  Home/school linkage  Flexible intervention based on assessment Functional Assessment  Adequate resources (admin, team) weekly meeting, plus 10 hours a week for coordination  Student chooses to participate  Continuous monitoring for decision-making

BEP/Check-in Check-out Cycle Weekly BEP Meeting 9 Week Graph Sent Program Update EXIT BEP Plan Morning Check-In Afternoon Check-out Home Check-In Class Check in Class Check out Teacher Checks

CICO Record Name: ____________________________ Date: ______________ 0 = Need work, 1 = “OK” 2 = Nice Job SafeResponsibleRespectful Check In0 1 2 Before Recess Before Lunch After Recess0 1 2 Check Out0 1 2 Today’s goalToday’s total points Comments:

HAWK Report Date ________ Student _______________ Teacher___________________ 0 = Not Yet 1= Good 2= Excellent Be Safe Be Respectful Be Your Personal BestTeacher initials Keep hands, feet, and objects to self Use kind words and actions Follow directions Working in class Class Recess Class Lunch Class Recess Class Total Points = Points Possible = 50 Today ______________% Goal ______________%

Daily Progress Report

Why does CICO work?  Improved structure Prompts are provided throughout the day for correct behavior. System for linking student with at least one positive adult. Student chooses to participate.  Student is “set up for success” First contact each morning is positive. “Blow-out” days are pre-empted. First contact each class period (or activity period) is positive, and sets up successful behavioral momentum.  Increase in contingent feedback Feedback occurs more often. Feedback is tied to student behavior. Inappropriate behavior is less likely to be ignored or rewarded.

Why does CICO Work?  Program can be applied in all school locations Classroom, playground, cafeteria (anywhere there is a supervisor)  Elevated reward for appropriate behavior Adult and peer attention delivered each target period Adult attention (and tangible) delivered at end of day  Linking behavior support and academic support For academic-based, escape-maintained problem behavior incorporate academic support  Linking school and home support Provide format for positive student/parent contact  Program is organized to morph into a self-management system Increased options for making choices Increased ability to self-monitor performance/progress

Logistics for Setting up a CICO program  Faculty and staff commitment  Is problem behavior a major concern?  Are staff willing to commit 5 min per day?  Is CICO a reasonable option for us? More than 5 students need extra support CICO is designed to work with 10-12% of kids in a school CICO typically “works” with 67% of students. CICO does NOT replace need for individualized supports.  Team available  Team leader  CICO coordinator (morning, afternoon)  Team (meets at least once every two weeks)

Logistics for Setting up a CICO program  School-wide PBS in place  School-wide expectations defined and taught  Reward system operating  Clear and consistent consequences for problem behavior  Process for identifying a student who may be appropriate for CICO  Student is not responding to SWPBS expectations Request for Assistance  Student finds adult attention rewarding  Student is NOT in crisis.

Logistics for Setting up a CICO program  Daily CICO progress report card  Same expectations for all  Common schedule  All staff taught rules for accepting, completing and returning the card.  Home report process  Can be same as progress card  Can be a unique reporting form

CICO Home Report Name: _____________________________ Date: _____________ ______ I met my goal today ______ I had a hard day One thing I did really well today was:_______________________ Something I will work on tomorrow is: _______________________ Comments: Parent/Guardian Signature: ________________________________________________________ Comments:

Logistics for Setting up a CICO program  Trading menu  Reward for collecting and turning in daily progress card  Reward for meeting daily goal  Exchange system for points earned  Collecting, summarizing and using data  Daily updates  Weekly review by team  Referral to BISCC structure for individualized interventions. 28

Daily Data Used for Decision Making

Building the Basic Cycles  Morning Check-in Routine  Teaching students when, when, how  Teaching check-in coordinator  Assess  Reward  Set-up or Redirect  Teacher Check-in/Check-out Routine  Teach students when, when, how  Teaching staff/faculty  Reward  Set-up for success, positive momentum  Evaluation

Building the Basic Cycles  Afternoon Check-out Routine  Teach students when, where, how  Teach CICO coordinator data collection, acknowledge success, encourage improvement.  Consider self-recording system for older students  Family Review Routine  Teach students when, where, how  Teach family only to acknowledge success, sign

Building the Basic Cycles  Trading Menu/ Process Reward for collecting and turning in daily progress report information Reward for meeting daily goal Exchange system for points earned?

Building the advanced cycles  Planning for success  How does student move off CICO?  Adding self-management options to CICO  Moving from CICO to individualized behavior support.  Functional behavioral assessment  Comprehensive behavior support  Substitute Teacher use of CICO  How will substitutes learn about CICO routine?  Extending CICO to playground, cafeteria, bus area

Linking CICO with Function-based support  Leanne Hawken  Robert March  Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman

BaselineCheck-in Check-out Percentage of Intervals with Problem Behavior Peer Composite Trevor Chad Kendall Eric Todd, Kauffman, Meyer & Horner

Plan for the future: We want self-managers  Embed self-management strategies as driven by the data Use natural signals for monitoring as much as possible Self-monitor Self-record, check for accuracy Fewer check points during the day  Maintain AM and PM times for awhile Manage own CICO account  More on self management in the future…..

Implement Basic CICO Is Is the Basic CICO Working? Continue with Basic CICO Transition to self- management Yes No Conduct Brief Functional Assessment (e.g., use FACTS) Where does the problem behavior occur/not occur? Why does the problem behavior keep happening?

Check-in Check-out Embedded Within SWIS

Check-in/ Check-out Self-Assessment  Individually score the elements of the CICO Self- Assessment  In place; In progress; Not in place  As a team review your ratings, and agree on a single summary for the school  For elements not scored as “in place” define the actions that will move you toward implementation. Who will do what, when?  Define a schedule for meeting to review progress and implement your CICO plan.

Assessing of CICO is right for your school  What do Targeted Interventions do?  Increase access to adult attention  Increase access to peer attention  Increase access to activity choice  Acceptable options for avoiding aversive activities  Acceptable options for avoiding aversive social  Increased structure (prompts for approp behavior)  Structured times for feedback (5 per day)  Enhanced home-school communication  Development of self-management skills CICO Self-Assess

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior Assumed FBA Summary Statement When CICO is used Unknown An arrange Of situations (In class, Given work, On playground Talk out, Out of seat Tease Make Noise, Etc. Obtain Peer or Adult Attention Note: CICO was designed on the assumption that problem behavior is being maintained by attention. And a KEY ASSUMPTION is that attention from at least some adults is highly valued.

Within CICO Increase predictability a)Schedule of events during the day b)Planned time to connect with adults c)Clarity of expectations Two New Skills a)Approach Adults b) Self-evaluate Three Feedback Cycles a)Morning/ Afternoon CICO b) Class Checks c) Home Checks

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior FBA Summary Statement: Would you expect CICO to be Effective? Just return from recess Request to do seat work alone Whine, fall out of seat, break pencil Maintain teacher attention Third Grader

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior FBA Summary Statement: Would you expect CICO to be Effective? Lunch time Eating lunch with peers Loud noises, rude comments, swearing Peer attention Fourth Grader who Finds Adult Attention Very Rewarding

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior FBA Summary Statement: Would you expect CICO to be Effective? Conflict at home prior to coming to school Request to do very difficult instructional tasks Non-compliance, rudeness, disrespect, swearing Avoid work Fourth Grader who is very isolated, and does not interact with adults unless required to do so.

Setting EventsTriggering Antecedents Maintaining Consequences Problem Behavior FBA Summary Statement Provide Two Hypotheses: One that is a “fit” for CICO and one that is not a “fit”

Summary  Targeted interventions Highly Efficient, structured support  CICO is one option Assess for whom it will work Enlist whole faculty involvement  CICO will still need supplement from Tertiary, Function-based support system