PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM. A school district shall ensure that all teachers are provided with an orientation of the Professional Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Foundation A Look at the Evaluation Process by The Teacher Foundation (TTF)
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
The Teacher Work Sample
PORTFOLIO.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Professional Development and Appraisal System Teacher Orientation.
Professional Development and Appraisal System. Rules To Know From Commissioner’s Rules Chapter 150.AA Subchapter  Each teacher must be appraised.
PDAS Update Training “The goal of PDAS is to improve student performance through the professional development of teachers.” Review the Slide: Have participants.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
PDAS Overview La Porte ISD
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT APPRAISAL SYSTEM TEACHER ORIENTATION UPDATE POWER POINT PRESENTATION Developed by Carlene Lenox Division of Administration Region.
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning. ElementUnsatisfactoryBasicProficientDistinguished Knowledge of content and the structure of the discipline In planning.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Website I can not live without books. Thomas Jefferson 1.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
Teacher Orientation August, 2011 Brazosport Independent School District Professional Development and Appraisal System
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Cathy Taylor Teaching children to count is good, but teaching what counts is better.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Laura Blake Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation “The shell must break before the bird can fly” ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson Website .
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Teacher Orientation August, 2012 Brazosport Independent School District Professional Development and Appraisal System.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Measuring Growth Mindset in the Classroom
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Domain 1: Preparation and Planning
Professional Development and Appraisal System
  Intended Competences in Primary Education Curriculum: Are we Jumping or Pushed? Wilberforce E Meena.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
DepEd Order No. 42, s Presentation Prepared by:
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Welcome Journey to Excellence.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Personal Growth and Professional Development
TKES and SLO assessments
Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
Cooperating Teacher In-Service
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Mentor Workshop September 8, 2009
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Colorado Department of Education
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Groveton ES Our Local Level iv Journey
Presentation transcript:

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM

A school district shall ensure that all teachers are provided with an orientation of the Professional Development and Appraisal System (PDAS) no later than the final day of the first three weeks of school and at least three weeks before the first observation. PDAS TEACHER ORIENTATION

Learner Centered Aligned High Standard of Proficiency Teacher Growth and Teacher Improvement Collaboration PDAS CHARACTERISTICS

Research based instruction Students thoroughly engaged Technology integration Teachers actively participating High levels of thought Students using new learning to create and solve Classroom atmosphere that is conductive to learning EXPECTED OBSERVATIONS

Teacher Orientation Teacher Self Report (TSR) Formal Classroom Observation Walkthroughs Student Performance as seen in Campus Performance Rating Summative Annual Report/Conference Appraisal Process Steps

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PROCESS

► Critical Attributes ► Quality of the lesson ► Quantity – In what percentage of the lesson can the critical attributes be observed? Scoring Factors and Performance Level Indicators

Domain I – Quantity and Quality of active students participation in learning process Domain II – Learner-Centered instruction, including appropriate goals and objectives, research based strategies, high level thinking, student engagement. Domain III – Assessment of student progress towards meeting the objective being taught- How do you know they got it? Critical attributes

Domain IV – Student and classroom management. Efficient and effective use of class time involving all students. Domain V – Professional communication- Do you communicate effectively and positively with students, parents, co-workers, community members? Do you represent our school well? Critical attributes cont.

Domain VI – Professional Development – Are you constantly looking for ways to improve yours teaching. Prof. Dev., research, innovation. Domain VII – Compliance and directives, policies, rules, etc. How committed are you to taking an active role in making our school safe and excellent? Domain VIII – How effective is your work toward improving student performance? Critical attributes cont.

S trength I mpact V ariety A lignment Quality Scoring Standards

Thinking at high cognitive levels Depth & Complexity Significant Content Connecting within/across disciplines & work/life applications Effective, clear & substantive S trength

Promotes student success Effective use of assessments Data-driven decision making Responsibility Reflection Challenging Impact

Varied student characteristics Differentiated instruction Support strategies & services Variety

Curriculum, instruction and assessment aligned with TEKS & district objectives Targeted instruction Congruent Alignment

Remember, “The goal of PDAS is to improve student performance through the professional development of teachers.” Professional Development and Appraisal System