Organization of Primary Entities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presenters Scott Gaudineer, Program Executive Caldwell Flores Winters
Advertisements

Robert L. Moultrie Chairman & CEO
CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
1.1Definition of Construction:. Is the process by which material, equipment, machinery are assembled into a permanent facility. Is the process by which.
Benefits of Construction Management
Construction Project Coordination Presented by: Philip H
Bob Smith, P.E. Region 1 Benjamin Acimovic, P.E., Region 1
Potential Second Access Currently we are working on approval access to 2 nd Avenue under CP tracks as shown in top left photo. Our entrance would be across.
Lessons Learned: CM at Risk & Design Build
Design-Build: RISKS OR REWARDS for the Consulting Engineer?
Project Delivery Approaches for Wastewater Utilities in Minnesota June 24, 2008 Metropolitan Council Environment Committee.
P ROJECT M ANAGEMENT The FORE SIGHT Partners. The FORE SIGHT Partners 2 Owner Support Professional Services The FORE SIGHT Partners.
Airport Owner’s Guide to Project Delivery Systems Prepared by: The Joint Committee of ACI-NA, ACC and AGC.
1. A project delivery method describes the process of how a project will be designed and constructed. A project delivery method can be characterized in.
Your Deliver Method... …Pick it Early
Facilities Institute July , 2012 Houston, Texas Click to edit Master title style
Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build. Extensive master planning preceded this phase 2003 – Dagit Saylor Master Plan Hanbury Evans Update.
Delivery Methods  The Players from Handbook of Architectural Practice, Chapter 9.1 by Phillip Bernstein FAIA  Variables from Handbook of Architectural.
Prof Awad S. Hanna C HANGING P ROJECT D ELIVERY S YSTEMS by Awad S. Hanna, Ph. D., P. E. The University of Wisconsin, Madison Department of Civil and Environmental.
Using QBS A Qualifications-Based Selection Process Presenters: Ron Brenke, PE - QBS Manager.
CVE 1000 Construction Engineering The Project Delivery System Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE.
The Importance of the Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) Process
Army Directorate of Public Works Support Contractor of the Year Carlos Garcia Owner/CEO KIRA Maximizing Return on Investment in Business Development.
Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix.
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
PM/CAM Training H. Jeff Moore May 11, AGENDA Overview CM at Risk Design (Completion) / Build Lunch Break / Discussion – 11:30 AM – 12:30 PM CM Agency.
Design Build, Job Contracting, or Construction Manager at Risk In early 2000 the legislators added an alternate way to accelerate construction project.
Construction Management: At Risk. PROJECT MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE: Contractual Relationships Owner Architect/Engineer General Contractor Sub Construction.
Procurement and Construction Management and Oversight What Board Members Need to Know Jerry Smiley, AICP 24 July 2013.
Best Value for Clients Presented to the Canadian Public Procurement Forum by Glenn Martin, Executive Director Consulting Engineers of BC November 4, 2009.
Project Delivery Options in the California Construction Market CSI Fresno Chapter - February 16, 2010 PROJECT DELIVERY OPTIONS in the CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION.
Assessment of General Contractor/ Construction Manager Contracting Procedures Preliminary Report Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee Jill Satran.
Construction Contracts and Project Delivery Methods
Managing Engineering Design - Infrastructure. Presentation Overview 1.Tools and Techniques 2.Design and Documentation 3.Estimating and Scheduling.
Risk Assignment in The Delivery of a Project  RISK! –Construction projects have lot of it –Contractors manage it –Owners pay for it.
January 24, …a delivery method which entails a commitment by the Construction Manager to deliver the project within a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).
January 31, …a delivery method in which the construction team is known as the design-builder…and is responsible for taking a concept developed by.
CE 366 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS Robert G. Batson, Ph.D., P.E. Professor of Construction Engineering The University of Alabama
Agency Construction Management :CM NOT AT-RISK
Project Delivery Methods Part I. What is A Project Delivery Method? The owner’s selection of the organizational structure of the project. Three popular.
You passed the Bond or secured some funds What do we do now? 2014.
Project Delivery Methods CM CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Kevin A. Delorey 11 Feb 2010.
UTILIZING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK IN GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA.
LACCD Building the Future THOMAS HALL Director Facilities Planning and Development.
College of Engineering CIVE 4750 Using QBS A Qualifications-Based Selection Process Adapted from a presentation by QBS, Inc. 215 N. Walnut St. Lansing,
© 2011 Orbach Huff & Suarez 1 Lease Leaseback Project Delivery Method Kimble Cook Orbach, Huff & Suarez.
Richland Creek Water Supply Program Contract for WTP and Pump Stations CMAR Services and Program Update Paulding County, Georgia Board of Commission Work.
The Design/Build Contract. What Is A Design/Build Contract? Contract that combines design & construction into one agreement The design/build team provides.
Construction Management At Risk Process
Capital Facilities Program Update San Rafael City Schools 10 May 2016.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AT RISK Prepared by: Nancy Fouad Carey Attorney AGC Alabama Birmingham Section Meeting November 5, 2012.
PWGSC - KOREA 2nd JCC Meeting Canadian Federal Real Property Construction Contracting Presentation by Bruce Fletcher Director General – CASMS - PWGSC November.
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
by Awad S. Hanna, Ph. D., P. E. The University of Wisconsin, Madison
What Small and Emerging Contractors Need to Know Introduction to Project Delivery Methods © Copyright 2017 NASBP.
Lease-Leaseback Project Delivery Method
Class #1 Contract Delivery Systems
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
CM at Risk v. Design-Bid-Build
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
CHANGING PROJECT DELIVERY SYSTEMS
Project Delivery Systems
The Best Decision by Design: Professional Services Selection
Design-Build Process Utilizing Negotiated Selection
Design-Bid-Build (Ch. 149) vs. Construction Manager at Risk (Ch. 149A)
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
Add Engineering Value to your Project through BIM Preconstruction Services Preconstruction Services BIM Engineering U.S., L.L.C. – Best Preconstruction.
#BIM TOP BENEFITS OF IMPRESSIVE BIM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FIRMS & BIM PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES #BUILDINGINFORMATIONMODELING BIM Engineering U.S.,L.L.C.
Cost Containment Working Group Board Update
Honoraria for Design Build Projects Methodology Assessment Matrix
Presentation transcript:

Construction Management @ Risk

Organization of Primary Entities Traditional Design/Bid Build Organization CM@ Risk Delivery Organization Pricing Competition

Delivery Method Schedule Comparison Design/Bid/Build Approach Planning Design Bid Construction Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Sep Oct Nov Dec Firm Price & Schedule Established Construction Management @ Risk Approach Planning Design Bid Trade Packages Time Saving – as much as 50% Construction Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun July Sep Oct Nov Dec Firm Price & Schedule Established

Design/Bid/Build vs. CM @ Risk - Attributes Construction Manager (CM) part of selected project team Construction Manager is at Risk to perform the project within the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) CM’s Cost Accounting is OPEN BOOK for Owner & Architect. Industry consensus is the quality level of workmanship is higher Trade Contractors are pre-qualified and low bid competition takes place at Trade Contractor level No need for Separate Cost Estimator as CM provides this as part of preconstruction services (This pricing is also based upon real-world trade contractor input versus standard cost analysis which is typically not suited for the specific project) GMP determined at early stage of Construction Document Completion (Reduces architectural fees resulting from drawing rework and lessens impact to overall project schedule) Project can be fast tracked (see following slide) to minimize overall project duration Construction Manager reviews Construction Documents for errors and omissions such that cost for necessary work is included in the GMP as the documents are being completed Reduces the risk of claims and change orders Design/Bid/Build Traditional contract procurement method Can work well with an excellent set of construction documents and experienced Owner, and even better with pre-qualification of the general contractors and major scope trade contractors Competition of general contractors based upon “completed” construction documents Firm price determined at selection of general contractor Owner retains selection leverage until “complete and enforceable” Contract Documents are completed Owner can “control” the general contractor’s quality and action through a highly enforceable contract

Design/Bid/Build vs. CM @ Risk - Challenges Potential for change orders is maximized due to inevitable errors and omissions in the Contract Documents (drawings) (11% to 15% typical on state D/B/B projects) Document rework typically necessary to bring project within budget Without prequalification – risk of unqualified general contractor providing low bid. (potential for schedule over-runs or default – State D/B/B projects average 3 to 6 month schedule over original duration Trade contractors selected on bid day based upon low bid price ONLY. Typically leads to forced selection of at least several unqualified trade contractors and unforeseen costs to general contractor Adversarial relationship typically develops between general contractor, architect and Owner regarding change orders and incomplete Construction Documents Low price at bid day may not be low price and will certainly not be final cost Quality is typically lower than other delivery methods Assumes that architects, engineers and cost consultants have the best knowledge of construction technology and cost effective construction methods. Yet this is not true. CM @ Risk Owner will most likely pay a little more for the initial cost of construction management services when compared to a low bid scenario (However typically these additional costs are recouped through change orders) To obtain the best pricing, the Owner and/or architect must ensure that Construction Manager is providing a competitively bid atmosphere for the trade contract competition Owner must be comfortable with a “Team” procurement approach

Findings from the Construction Industry Institute Design/Bid/Build systems have the greatest design and construction schedule growth. Any Design/Bid/Build project has a 50% likelihood of realizing cost growth between 2% and 11% 0% and 8% cost growth for CM @ Risk Projects Nearly half of all Design/Bid/Build projects experience cost growth of greater than 5% Survey and analysis proved that Design/Bid/Build provided the lowest quality level.

Industry Information on CM @ Risk Construction Management becomes “mainstream” in ENR’s (Engineering News Record) assessment of top design-build, Construction Management firms Construction and Program Management have made a strong move into the construction industry’s mainstream in the last year, reports Engineering News-Record in its annual compilation of top CM, PM and design-build firms.    The “management precepts underlying CM and Program Management have become pervasive in the industry,” ENR said in its June 14 issue. “As construction firms became more sophisticated and clients increasingly looked outside their own staffs to plan and oversee large construction programs, the concept of program management took off.” CMs are also being involved earlier in projects. Joseph Seibold, vice president of construction management for CMAA member Carter & Burgess, is quoted in the magazine saying “Once, owners thought that they needed a CM firm but waited until the contracting phase to hire one. This prevented the CM from helping oversee planning and design.” A large part of the momentum behind Program Management is coming from school systems that have received large bond issue revenues and are pressed to spend the money wisely. “I continue to be impressed by the level of confidence the public has in passing these bond issues,” says James Moynihan, CEO of Heery International, another CMAA member. Seibold notes, though, that “public agencies generally aren’t staffed to handle a sudden surge in capital spending authorizations,” and this is another reason why Construction and Program Management have come so strongly to the forefront of the industry recently.