National Center for State Courts VCCJA Baseline Recidivism Study Fred Cheesman, Ph.D. Tara Kunkel, MSW The National Center for State Courts August 16,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Números.
Advertisements

1 A B C
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Dallas County SAFPF Re-Entry Courts Outcome Study
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
1
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
& dding ubtracting ractions.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Sequential Logic Design
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Addition and Subtraction Equations
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
Remediation Outcome Study Elizabeth H. Zhong, PhD Kevin Kenward, PhD.
DIVERSE COMMUNITIES, COMMON CONCERNS: ASSESSING HEALTH CARE QUALITY FOR MINORITY AMERICANS FINDINGS FROM THE COMMONWEALTH FUND 2001 HEALTH CARE QUALITY.
NTDB ® Annual Report 2010 © American College of Surgeons All Rights Reserved Worldwide National Trauma Data Bank 2010 Annual Report.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
HIV Surveillance Report, 2007
HIV Surveillance Report, 2001 Minnesota Department of Health HIV/AIDS Surveillance System Minnesota Department of Health HIV/AIDS Surveillance System.
Challenge Incarceration Program (CIP)
Converting Data to Information. Know your data Know your audience Tell a story.
The 5S numbers game..
Sampling in Marketing Research
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
MM4A6c: Apply the law of sines and the law of cosines.
Bright Futures Guidelines Priorities and Screening Tables
Contingency tables enable us to compare one characteristic of the sample, e.g. degree of religious fundamentalism, for groups or subsets of cases defined.
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Sexual Behaviors that Contribute to Unintended Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Including HIV Infection.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
1..
1 TV Viewing Trends Rivière-du-Loup EM - Diary Updated Spring 2014.
Name of presenter(s) or subtitle Canadian Netizens February 2004.
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Asthma in Minnesota Slide Set Asthma Program Minnesota Department of Health January 2013.
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Foundation Stage Results CLL (6 or above) 79% 73.5%79.4%86.5% M (6 or above) 91%99%97%99% PSE (6 or above) 96%84%100%91.2%97.3% CLL.
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Women’s Health in Massachusetts Center for Health Information, Statistics, Research, and Evaluation Center for Community Health Massachusetts Department.
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Weisburd, Lawton, Ready, Rudes, Cave, and Nelson Presented by Breanne Cave 1.
Northern Lakes Community Mental Health CS Research & Consulting Cathlyn Sommerfield, Ph.D. October 2013.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
PSSA Preparation.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
 Race/Ethnicity: Black (9); Asian (12); White (32); Latino (43); Other (3)  Employment: Employed (54); Student (11); Homemaker (10); Retired (14); Unemployed.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Recidivism Rates for DCJ Offenders Exiting Residential Treatment June 2007 Kim Pascual Research & Evaluation.
Presentation transcript:

National Center for State Courts VCCJA Baseline Recidivism Study Fred Cheesman, Ph.D. Tara Kunkel, MSW The National Center for State Courts August 16, 2013

National Center for State Courts Purpose of the Study To complete a baseline outcome evaluation of all Community Corrections probationers who completed supervision in FY04.

National Center for State Courts Key Questions for the Baseline Study What was the demographic profile of probationers who completed Community Corrections supervision in FY04? Did the probationers being supervised in FY04 by the 20 sites that would become the EBP sites differ demographically from the probationers supervised in the non-EBP sites in a statistically meaningful way? What was the average length of supervision in FY04? By offense category and offense level, what were the placement charges for the FY04 completers? What was the average number of office contacts per probationer for the FY04 completers?

National Center for State Courts Key Questions for the Baseline Study What services were local probationers ordered to complete in FY04? What were the case closure types for local probationers whose cases were closed in FY04? If unsuccessful, why? What percentage of FY04 local probation completers were re- arrested or received a new conviction while under supervision? What percentage of FY04 local probation completers were re- arrested or received a new conviction post-program three years from exit date?

National Center for State Courts Key Questions for the Baseline Study What types of new offenses were committed by local probationers after exiting in FY04? What, if anything, predicted whether a probationer would complete local probation supervision successfully in FY04? What, if anything, predicted whether a probationer would be convicted of a new crime post-program in FY04?

National Center for State Courts Sample Size Approximately 33,655 probationers in the total sample (# of defendants whose cases were closed in FY04) For the recidivism analysis a smaller group was studied 4,705 probationers

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 1 What was the demographic profile of probationers who completed Community Corrections supervision in FY04?

National Center for State Courts Age of FY04 Case Closures Average age = 30 years old N = 29,072

National Center for State Courts Race of FY04 Case Closures N = 33,655

National Center for State Courts Marital Status of FY04 Case Closures N = 33,555

National Center for State Courts Last Grade Completed – FY04 Case Closures N = 33,518

National Center for State Courts Prior Convictions – FY04 Case Closures

National Center for State Courts Average # of Prior Convictions - FY04 Case Closures

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 2 Did probationers being supervised in FY04 by what would become the 20 EBP sites differ demographically from probationers being supervised by the non-EBP sites?

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question #2 Quality Evidence-Based Practice Sites Non-EBP Sites Difference (EBP – Non-EBP) Female (%) 26.17%26.90%-0.73% Asian (%) 0.89%0.56%0.33% Black (%) 39.15%43.99%-4.84% Hispanic (%) 3.78%3.41%0.37% Native American (%) 0.10%0.07%0.02% White (%) 55.03%50.71%4.32% Race and Ethnicity Unknown/Other (%) 1.06%1.26%-0.20% Age (Average) There were no statistically significant differences in the demographics between the EBP sites and the non-EBP sites in the FY04 sample.

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 3 What was the average length of supervision for probationers who completed supervision in FY04?

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 3 Average length of supervision for the entire sample: 8.6 months Average length of supervision for a successful probationer: 8.2 months Average length of supervision for an unsuccessful probationer: 9.4 months

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 4 By offense category and offense level, what were the placement charges for the FY04 probation completers?

National Center for State Courts Placement Type by Offense Level N = 28,969 N = 2,184

National Center for State Courts Placement Offenses - Misdemeanors N = 8,327N = 5,121N = 7,564N =1,707 N = 2,878 N = 3,263N =110

National Center for State Courts Placement Offenses - Felonies N = 352 N = 919 N = 95 N = 225N = 4N = 10

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 5 What was the average number of office contacts per probationer for the FY04 completers?

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 5 Average number of office contacts for successful completers: 8.9 contacts Average number of office contacts for unsuccessful completers: 10.6 contacts NOTE: Data quality was questionable with some sites not documenting this information in FY04.

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 6 What services were probationers ordered to complete in FY04?

National Center for State Courts Court-Ordered Conditions in FY04

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 7 What were the case closure types for local probationers whose cases were closed in FY04? If unsuccessful, why?

National Center for State Courts Case Closure by Type

National Center for State Courts Reason for Unsuccessful Closures

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 8 What percentage of FY04 probationer completers were re-arrested and/or had a new conviction while under supervision (by program completion type)?

National Center for State Courts Re-Arrest and New Convictions In- Program

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 9 What percentage of probationers were re-arrested and/or had a new conviction post-program three years from exit (by program completion type?

National Center for State Courts Re-Arrests and New Convictions Post-Exit Differences between the successful and unsuccessful completers all measures are significant at..001 level. Arrest

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 10 What types of new offenses were committed by local probationers post-program in FY04?

National Center for State Courts Statewide Total Estimated Offense Types of New Convictions Within 3 Years

National Center for State Courts Number of New Offenses within 3 Years Average of 2.18 misdemeanor arrests and 1.81 convictions within three years among all recidivists Average of 1.76 felony arrests and.73 felony convictions within three years among all recidivists

National Center for State Courts Recidivism Rates by Placement Charge

National Center for State Courts Statewide Estimated Offense Types for New Convictions within Three Years for Person Offenders

National Center for State Courts Statewide Estimated Offense Types for New Convictions within Three Years for Property Offenders

National Center for State Courts Statewide Estimated Offense Types for New Convictions within Three Years for Drug Offenders

National Center for State Courts Statewide Estimated Offense Types for New Convictions within Three Years for Public Order Offenders

National Center for State Courts Statewide Estimated Offense Types for New Convictions within Three Years for Technical Offenders

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 11 What, if anything, predicted whether a probationer would successfully complete supervision in FY04?

National Center for State Courts Methodology Multivariate analyses were conducted to provide valid answers to Baseline Questions 11 and 12. Because Type of Completion and Recidivism are complex phenomenon, any number of factors could explain variation in these two variables (e.g., age, race, sex). To determine each of these factors unique contribution to explaining such variation, it is necessary to simultaneously control for the influence of all the other explanatory factors. Multivariate analysis is the vehicle to ascertain each explanatory factors unique contribution to explaining variation in each of the two variables, controlling for the influence of all the other explanatory variables.

National Center for State Courts Predictors of successful completion African Americans were 31% less likely to successfully complete than Caucasians. Probationers placed on a felony-level charge are 53% less likely to successfully complete than those placed on a misdemeanor charge. Probationers with a prior misdemeanor conviction at placement are 42% less likely to successfully complete than those with none. Probationers with a prior felony conviction at placement are 38% less likely to successfully complete than those with none. Every year of education beyond the average increases the odds of successfully completing by 6%. Only includes statistically significant predictors

National Center for State Courts Baseline Question 12 What, if anything, predicted whether a probationer would reoffend (as measured by a new conviction within three years) post-program in FY04?

National Center for State Courts Predictors of Recidivism Women are 35% less likely to have a new conviction in three years then men. African Americans are 43% more likely to have a new conviction than Caucasians. Probationers with prior misdemeanor convictions at placement are 117% more likely to have a new conviction than those without prior misdemeanor convictions. Probations with a prior felony conviction at placement are 39% more likely to have a new conviction than probationers without a prior felony conviction. Probationers who successfully complete probation are 47% less likely to have a new conviction.

National Center for State Courts Other Items of Note – not for the report! 18 programs in FY04 showed a statistical difference in the recidivism rates of probationers who successfully completed versus unsuccessful completers.

National Center for State Courts Next Steps Each program will receive program-specific data in the next two weeks.

National Center for State Courts Next Steps Your site specific data will include: Age, race, gender, marital status and educational breakdown of your sample Length of supervision and # of office visits for your sample Breakdown of closure type for your sample Reason for unsuccessful closures in your sample Reconviction rates for your sample

National Center for State Courts Next Steps A note about your recidivism rates: Percent of Probationers Re-Convicted within Three Years of Program By Site and Statewide Estimate Site Re-Convicted (%) XXXXXX16.0*** Statewide Average21 Difference significant at: *** p <.001; ** p <.01; * p <.05 NOTE: If there is a *, ** or *** next to your site, your site performed statistically better or worse than the state average. If there is no *, ** or *** next to your site, your site performed no differently (statistically) than the state average.