Newburg WI January 28, 2009 Mark W. Mayer, Dairy & Livestock Agent, Green County David W. Kammel, Biological Engineering, UW-Madison Wisconsin Dairy Modernization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Números.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
PDAs Accept Context-Free Languages
Reflection nurulquran.com.
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Seven Costs.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
1 When you see… Find the zeros You think…. 2 To find the zeros...
Western Public Lands Grazing: The Real Costs Explore, enjoy and protect the planet Forest Guardians Jonathan Proctor.
CALENDAR.
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions
WARM UP What is the value of 4 5 x 4? Explain. WARM UP What is the value of 4 5 x 4 3 ? Explain.
Marisol Marcin
1a. Construction employment in the United States, (All types of employment) Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
The basics for simulations
Multiplication Tables Test 3 and 5 Times Tables 3 and 5 times tables There are 10 questions. Each one will stay on the screen for 15 seconds. Write down.
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
Green Eggs and Ham.
VOORBLAD.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
ST/PRM3-EU | | © Robert Bosch GmbH reserves all rights even in the event of industrial property rights. We reserve all rights of disposal such as copying.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
Foundation Stage Results CLL (6 or above) 79% 73.5%79.4%86.5% M (6 or above) 91%99%97%99% PSE (6 or above) 96%84%100%91.2%97.3% CLL.
Subtraction: Adding UP
Week 1.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
Wisconsin Herd Expansion Wisconsin Dairy Modernization Survey Roger W. Palmer and Jeffrey Bewley UW-Madison Dairy Science Department UW-Extension.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Ethnicity Category2 Years3 Years4 Years5 Years6 Years Asian or Pacific Islander (N=84) 10%11%17%27% Black Non-Hispanic (N=28) 0%7% Hispanic (N=316) 2%10%24%34%36%
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
UNDERSTANDING THE ISSUES. 22 HILLSBOROUGH IS A REALLY BIG COUNTY.
Comparison between tillage transect and supplementary data GLPF Grant- Team meeting #5 July 23-24, 2013.
úkol = A 77 B 72 C 67 D = A 77 B 72 C 67 D 79.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Mark W. Mayer, Dairy & Livestock Agent, Green County David W. Kammel, Biological Engineering, UW-Madison Wisconsin Dairy Modernization Survey UW-Extension.
The Foundations of Farmstead Planning Brian J. Holmes Extension Agricultural Engineer Biological Systems Engineering Dept. College of Agricultural & Life.
Low Cost Modernization Low Cost Modernization “Efficiency without the big price tag” Nolan Andersen Mark Mayer Dairy & Livestock Agents.
Modernizing Wisconsin’s Dairy Farms Train the Trainer Workshop June 20 – 21, 2002 Dairy Expansion Financial Case Studies by Scott Gunderson, Manitowoc.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2009 Lecture # 4.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2007 Lecture # 3.
Larry Tranel received his B. S. and M. S
Presentation transcript:

Newburg WI January 28, 2009 Mark W. Mayer, Dairy & Livestock Agent, Green County David W. Kammel, Biological Engineering, UW-Madison Wisconsin Dairy Modernization Survey UW-Extension 2008

30 Counties Represented 104 Surveys Received 99 Surveys In Data Set

General Farm Information PreModernization Post Modernization Herd Size (Milk Cows)82203 Average Milk Production /Cow 20,245 lbs.21,684 lbs. Acres of Land Owned Acres of Land Rented Acres/Cow (owned & rented) Full Time Labor Equivalents for Dairy Milk Cows per F.T.E.3550

Parlor Construction &Type n = 92

New vs. Used n = 89 n = 91

Labor for Parlor Average Time For Parlor Conversion: 17 weeks Range of Time to Convert: 4 to 104 Weeks

Labor Provided for Parlor New Construction vs. Retrofit

Time for Parlor Conversion

Parlor Construction &Type n = 55 n = 34

Parlor Cost per Milking Stall 2008 Dollars Parlor Stall Type Retrofit Construction (n=55) New Construction n= 31 Flat barn$3,360 (n=6) NA Herringbone$9,657 (n=8) $18,769 (n=3) Parabone$3,845 (n=30) $6,016 (n= 10) Parallel$7,478 (n=11) $22,361 (n=18)

Cow Housing Facility n = 78

Manure Handling and Storage n = 107 n = 112

Manure Storage and Bedding n = 77 n = 101

Replacement Housing n = 101 n = 86

Milking System Throughput Change = 21.4 cows/person/hour P = 0.000

Pre and Post Labor Requirements Average Per Cow/Day **P= <.001 *P= <.01

Pre and Post Labor Requirements Average Per Cow/Day **P= <.001 *P= <.01

Reduced Labor Requirements Minutes Per Cow / Day Total Reduction Per Cow / Year Milking Setup/Cleanup.19 x 365=1.16 hours Milking Time 1.98 x 365=12.05 Feeding Time per Cow.94 x 365= 5.72 hours Handling Cows.26 x 365= 1.58 hours Maintaining Stalls.48 x 365= 2.92 hours Handling Manure.39 x 365= 2.37 hours Totals: 4.24 minutes/day hours/year

Economic Impacts from Reduced Labor Per Cow Economic Impacts from Reduced Labor Per CowReduction/Cow/Year Dollar Impact Milking Setup/Cleanup1.16 $12/Hour= $13.92 Milking Time12.05 $ Feeding Time per Cow 5.72 $12/Hour= $68.64 Time Handling Cows1.58 $12/Hour= $18.96 Maintaining Stalls2.92 $12/Hour= $35.04 Handling Manure2.37 $12/Hour= $28.44 Totals: Hours/Cow/Year $309.60/Cow/Year

Cow Benefits Observed

Ranking of Cow Benefits Less Important More Important

People Benefits Observed

Ranking of People Benefits

Educational Resources Used

Ranking of Educational Resources

Professional Resources Used

Ranking of Professional Resources

UW-Extension Impacted Decisions with Dairy Modernization n = 99 Average Planning Time: Months Range: Months

How Did UW-Extension Help? (27) Assisted in Parlor Location and Design (20) Organized Tours and Farm Visits to Observe Modernization on other Farms (15) Presented new Ideas and Options for Parlor Design and Construction (12) Design and Layout of Cow Housing Including Cow Flow and Stall size (9) UW-Extension Dairy Modernization Presentations (Meetings and Pasture Walks) (5) UW Publications (Low Cost Parlor CD and Retrofit Parlor Paper) (5) Received reinforcement of ideas and plans (4) Assisted in the Permitting Process (4) Assisted in Preparing Budget for Modernization Project (3) Assisted in Manure Handling and Storage plans (3) County Agents and State Specialists answered all our questions (3) Assistance with Ventilation 117 Responses

Economic Investment Since 1993 (2008 Dollars) Milking Parlor Facility – $17,144,281 Dairy Cow Housing – $30,529,855 Dry Cow Housing – $1,722,057 Heifer Housing – $1,610,210 Calf Housing – $1,480,703 TMR Feeding – $1,981,566 Feed Storage – $4,153,360 Manure handling – $2,149,120 Manure Storage – $4,536,318 Total Investment for 99 farms in Survey $65,307,470 Total Investment for 99 farms in Survey $65,307,470

Dairy Modernization Impacts Pre Modernization Post ModernizationChange Average Herd Size Average Production per Cow (lbs) 20,245 21,684 +1,439 Milk Production per Farm Annually (lbs.) 1,660,090 4,401,852 +2,741,762 Annual Hours of Labor per Cow Milk Cows / F.T.E

Modernization Economic Impacts Change Dollar Impact Average Increased Milk Income per Cow +1,439 lbs x $17/cwt = $245 Ave. Increased Gross Milk Income per Farm x.17= $748, x.17 =- $282,215 = $466,100 Increased Annual Milk Income for the State +2,692,274 lbs. x 99 farms x $.17 = *$45.3 Million Increased Economic Activity from more Cows per Farm 121 Cows x $17,000= $2.06 Million Economic Impact from more Cows in the State +11,766 cows x $17,000= *$200 Million * Total for 99 Herds **UW Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics

Biggest Challenge in Modernization (16) Working with the Contractors/Serving as General Contractor (10) Deciding what system & number of cows would work best for my farm (10) Budgeting & Financing for Expenses (8) Milking in Existing Facilities During Construction (8) Design of Milking Facility & Housing (6) Cost Over runs (5) Finding Good & Knowledgeable Contractor (4) Manure Storage & Handling (4) Confidence & Motivation to do it (3) Permitting Process for Building/Expanding (3) Getting Honest Opinions from Equipment Dealers (3) Did too much of my own labor (3) Changing the Management System of Feeding/Breeding/Housing

What Would You Change? (14) Wish we would have done the expansion sooner. (11) Wish we would have made the parlor/freestalls bigger (6) Start expansion at another site to allow for additional future expansions (5) Spend more time planning and seeking help in design (4) Start with new building and equipment right away (4) Would not start building in the fall, start earlier in the year (4) Design of Parlor (3) Add a dry cow and calving facility (3) Change from mattresses to sand for bedding (3) Hire a more experienced and honest contractor

Would You Still be in the Dairy Business if you had not Modernized? n = 94

Programs and Grants Utilized Programs and Grants Utilized

Full Paper Available on the Dairy Modernization Web Site at: Wisconsin Dairy Modernization Survey UW-Extension 2008

Questions!

How Could Assistance from UW- Extension be Improved ? n = 99