INTRODUCTION TO UNI DEBATING Part 2. Plan! 1. Using prep time effectively 2. Case construction 3. Thinking of arguments 4. Info about trials.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Libertarianism and the Philosophers Lecture 4
Advertisements

The Socratic Seminar. Debate and Dialogue Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared understanding. Debate is oppositional: two opposing.
1st Proposition Speech 1.Statement of the Resolution 2.Definition of Essential Terms (should be clear to the average person) 3.Outline Arguments/Pillars.
Building Relationships
Promoting Behaviour Change – An Introduction
Debate Judges Orientation. Volunteers make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. YOU are making an investment. YOU are performing a teaching role.
Lincoln – Douglas Debate
BHMS 2011 Decision-Making Presentations. We Are Faced with Making Decision Everyday Some are more important than others Minor What am I eating for lunch?
MAKING GOOD DECISIONS Somik Raha 4/16/2011
Hard and Soft Models & Some First Principles. How you are going to implement the motion The job of the first speaker to outline clearly The level of depth.
Euthanasia Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
A few tips on everyone’s favourite position.. Two main types of debate: policy and analysis. In an analysis debate, there is no need to specify a mechanism.
Healthful Friendships
Should Gun Makers Pay The Cost Of Gun Violence?
USING AND PROMOTING REFLECTIVE JUDGMENT AS STUDENT LEADERS ON CAMPUS Patricia M. King, Professor Higher Education, University of Michigan.
THE BASICS COACHING SESSION. WHAT DO YOU NEED TO KNOW? What happens in a debate? What do you say in your speech? How do you give a good speech? How do.
Template for a Case Analysis
Tips for Working Successfully in a Group Disclaimer: This is not a “good” format for a presentation. There is too much text on the pages.
Influencing Decision Makers Directory of Social Change.
Everything you need to know about French language acquisition
Conflict Resolution.
thinking hats Six of Prepared by Eman A. Al Abdullah ©
Debates LG 2014.
Introduction to Ethics in Health Sector. 2 Why Is Ethical Analysis Needed? Problems are not just technical How do we know which problems are important?
Footballers are overpaid. I’m going to argue about why Footballers are overpaid. By Mason Barclaywood/ Celticdontbedaft.
A Defense of Utilitarianism
Week 2 More on Debating. QandA Any questions from last week’s debate?
1 Chapter 3: Ethics and Social Responsibility Copyright Cengage Learning 2013 All Rights Reserved Introduction to Designed & Prepared by Laura Rush B-books,
All Party Parliamentary Group for
Ever since the painted apple moth arrived in New Zealand, it has started to take over our native forestry. MAF had an idea to spray over thousands of hectares.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF THE SPEECHES
Preparing for, planning and implementing change Practical tips for managing projects Christian Fielder 17 November 2014.
What Makes a Debate? Although millions of people all over the world enjoy a good debate, they do not all debate in the same way, in the same format, or.
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
REBUTTALS (the second speech for your team…) David Childree.
LINCOLN DOUGLAS DEBATE. Table of Contents  What is it  LD Debate Structure  Terms to Know  Constructive Arguments  Affirmative  Negative  Cross.
Debate is an exercise in logic. In a debate, you use facts to support ideas. Hence, in most contexts, Debate is also about research. Debate is also an.
Listen Think Debate. Why formal debating? Develops on the spot critical thinking skills Huge amounts of speaking practice, building confidence & presentation.
BP DEBATING: STRUCTURE & ROLE FULFILMENT Speaker’s Development, Week 2 Karolien Michiels.
| Rights + Morals.
AN INTRODUCTION COMPETITION DEBATES. DEBATE Debate is essentially the art of arguing a point, policy or proposition of value. When participating in a.
Rules of Debate We want this! We don’t want this!.
Debating 101. What’s the deal?  3v3  Affirmative team and Negative team  30 minutes prep  Each team comes up with arguments to support or oppose the.
Introduction to University Debate Dylan Williams – Fall 2015 University of Alberta Debate Society 1.
Debating Rules, Roles & Regulations Sponsored by:.
 Mill believes liberty is needed for full development of human nature.  Having liberty and being able to make your free choice will flourish your capacity.
DEBATE Mrs. Bruner DEBATE Mrs. Bruner. Remember.... ARE A – Assertion (Your side) “We are against Year Round Schools!” R – Reasons (WHY?) It costs a lot.
“Analysis” Training Session 6 Feb Why do I need analysis? Most of the things debaters say are true (or at least plausible) Therefore both sides.
BES-t Practices Training Phase 3 Counseling – Behavior Modification.
© 2015 albert-learning.com How to talk to your boss How to talk to your boss!!
{ Imperialism Debate Modern World History – December 2015.
KANTIANISM AND EUTHANASIA ATTITUDES TO KEY ISSUES.
Done by: Kurbanov Jamol Effective writing is like going on vocation. That’s why it is important to know where you are going In other words you.
Welcome to Debating  Introduction  2008 changes  Speaker roles  Types of debates  Coaching tips  Draw announcement for the Senior Competition.
Verbal listening: Listening.
“Comparative Analysis” Training Session 28 Feb 2014.
Affirmative vs. negative
Motion Focus : Banning things
Prep time and content generation Training Session
Academic Skills Week Workshop 1: Essay Planning and Academic Writing
Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation
Chapter 18: Supporting Your Views
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Chapter 7: The Ethics of Immigration
Roles In Debating Week 2.
Congressional DB8 Don’t stress.
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Public Forum Debate.
National University Debating Championship Kopertis IV 2019
Presentation transcript:

INTRODUCTION TO UNI DEBATING Part 2

Plan! 1. Using prep time effectively 2. Case construction 3. Thinking of arguments 4. Info about trials

Prep time 5-10 minutes: walk to debate room, individual thinking/ brainstorm time minutes: share your ideas, no interruptions minutes: discussion and case construction 25 – 30 minutes: writing out any left over notes 30 minutes: debate!

Prep time Start thinking about the topic immediately Listen patiently to your team mates ideas Be open to changing your mind Take good notes during discussion time Have someone keep an eye on the time

Case construction (broadly) Problem Solution Principle Last week…

Case construction in depth Prepping properly – a formula This week…

Case construction - Individual prep 1. Why is this a thing? Why are we having this debate What is the context? What is the imperative? Is there a problem we need to solve? 2. What is our solution? Definition Model Stance

Case construction - Individual prep 3. Who are we in this debate? Core principles/ values? Ideology? Philosophy? Eg. Clash between individual freedom and group rights pro individual freedom = Liberalism Put more simply – what would John Rawls say?

Know who you are… Harm minimisation and government regulation OR Libertarian Why cant you be both? Universal rights Cosmopolitanism Can you be both? Affirmative: That we should legalise drugs Affirmative: This house supports humanitarian intervention

Case construction - Individual prep 3. What is the clash? What are the core principles/ values of the opp? Eg. Individual freedom vs group rights/ state intervention = Liberalism vs. Utilitarianism vs. Communitarianism vs. Socialism 4. List your arguments (finally!) 5. Rebuttal ideas

Team case construction – template! Take those 6 steps, discuss them and put them together into a case 1. Context/Imperative 2. Definition and Model 3. Team Values/ World View 4. Clash of the debate 5. Arguments – aim for 4/5 6. Rebuttal

Cant think of 4 arguments? Forgotten Stakeholders: Who are the stakeholders? Who would benefit/who might be harmed? Counter-intuitive arguments: What are the main arguments against the proposal and what assumptions do they rely on? Outcomes of your case? What will the community reaction be? Will there be a backlash? What will the practical effects be immediately? What will the long term consequences be? How does this affect other countries?

Arguments to avoid Any argument that its just wrong Eg. Polygamy, incest Doesnt mean you cant use morality but needs to be thought through further with analysis Their model just wont practically work There is a fine distinction between a good & reasonable argument on efficacy and a crap & petty argument on practicality Eg: Good to say a proposal to fix Zimbabwe by assassinating Mugabe wont work because the nature of politics there means someone will just take his spot, not so good to say it wont work because no government would do it, or he would be hard to find an kill

Arguments to avoid Opportunity Cost Arguments: ie. we shouldnt do this because it will cost lots of money that could go to other stuff like health and education However.. There is a place for this type of argument but it needs to be targeted – specific to the debate The alternative use of money is mutually exclusive with the other teams model and will solve the problem Eg. legalising drugs is a good idea because instead of wasting money on a war on drugs we can help addicts and actually reduce demand, better solving the problem

Tips for trials Dont stress Dont be a selfish team member, share your ideas with the people speaking before you Judges can tell when you are being a little biatch Keep an eye on the basics, structure & timing You are allowed to use a timing device

Trials Admin We will you with the list of teams and judges by tomorrow You must confirm you attendance by this Friday the 16 th of March You must pay registration by the 27 th of March, $355 if you have sponsorship and $485 for everyone else NOTE: Once you have confirmed your attendance you are committing to being a part of the contingent and will be expected to pay your registration in the event you pull out last minute.

THANKS Good luck with trials