Education Personnel Information Management System (EPIMS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
EPIMS: ID Maintenance Tuesday & Wednesday April 24–25, 2007 Web-Conference Training.
Hawaii Department of Education Hawaiis NCLB – Title IIA Highly Qualified Teacher and Equity Plans Leadership Update - Outreach September/October 2007.
Staff EMIS Overview for Beginners OAEP Conference May 7-8, 2012.
Implementation of NCLBs Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements November 2003.
1 Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
EPIMS Lessons Learned Maureen Lovett Brockton Public Schools.
1 Implementation of NCLB’s Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements November 2006.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
State Licensure vs Federal Highly Qualified Teachers.
Randall Kirk, WVEIS Programmer Extraordinaire (Shawn L. Hawkins, Teacher Quality Coordinator June 23, 2011)
Data Tracking for Teacher Student Data Linkage (TSDL) DATAG March 15, 2013 Jami Kogler and Marti Mauro.
Data Collection An overview of how data are collected and used in Washington state.
Massachusetts Department of Education EDUCATOR DATABASE Informational Sessions Overview: September 2005 Web:
Updated Principal Training October 15, 2014 Part 3 Attestations – Section 1119 Hiring requirements & Use of Funds Part 2 GA PSC CAPS Tool Part 1 HiQ Overview.
CIVIL RIGHTS DATA COLLECTION National Forum: PPI Committee: 2011 MIS Meeting.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
Agenda Teacher Certification Overview New Human Capital Profile System
1 EPIMS School District Staff Training Helene Bettencourt & Maryann Donie August & September 2008.
Elementary Implementation of NCLB’s Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements Presented by Kate Fenton September 2004.
Implementation of NCLB’s Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements Secondary Presented by Kate Fenton September 2004.
Federal Programs Directors Conference Office of Professional Preparation WVDE.
ROADMAP TO ENSURE FUNDING Certification/Endorsement, Highly Qualified Status and Assignment Codes Cina Lackey, Certification/Professional Standards Coordinator.
Demonstrating Comparability School Year October 2014October 2014.
Preparing for the 2015 October Collection Melissa Marino Data Collection Supervisor August 2015 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
DOE STAFF DATABASE: Overview of Changes Presenter : Teresa R. Sancho FAMIS 2011 CONFERENCE Tallahassee, Florida June 2011.
Improving Data Quality Tuscaloosa County School System STI Office/District, McAleer PR.
New EMIS Coordinator Training 12/13/13 Presenters: Brenda Hartley – OMERESA EMIS Support Tammy Hrosch – MDECA EMIS Services Manager.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Data Collection Changes for the school year
CTE PEIMS Coding Steve Neal Educational Consultant for CTE
Staff Interchange Updates
Dedham Public Schools proposed FY14 operating budget
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Intro of the presenters.
Effective Educators Title II, Part A
Data Collection Contact
Special Education Teachers and Highly Qualified Requirements
Implementation of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Highly Qualified Teacher & Paraprofessional Requirements December 2010.
Instructional Technology Plan Overview
Staff EMIS Beginning Staff
Demonstrates In-Field Status Overview
Teacher Student Data Link (TSDL)
SPECIAL EDUCATION DECEMBER COUNT REPORT WEBINAR
Staff category changes
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability
School District Staff Training Helene Bettencourt & Maryann Donie
Professional Development Guidance
Staff Approval Matrix (SAM) December Count
BCSD Federal Time -accounting Guidelines & procedures
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
CTE EMIS Conference October 19, 2018
Tuesday & Wednesday April 24–25, 2007 Web-Conference Training
BCSD Federal Time -accounting Guidelines & procedures
SPECIAL EDUCATION DECEMBER COUNT
TSDS Classroom Roster Collection
CSI Human Resource (HR) Data Collection Prep
Disclosure This presentation is intended as a high level overview of TRS reporting. This presentation should not be viewed as a comprehensive overview.
August 25, 2016 Dr. ScharbreniaLockhart Principal
Curricular Practical Training
IDEA Part B Annual Personnel Data Reporting
State Reporting Updates
EEO MIS Reporting Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO)
Staff category changes
What Every Family Needs to Know! Date
Presentation transcript:

Education Personnel Information Management System (EPIMS) October 12, 2018

Agenda National Perspective Project Overview EPIMS Data Elements Overview of the EPIMS System Best Practices — Pilot District Perspective Statewide Implementation Schedule Q&A October 12, 2018

National Perspective October 12, 2018

Massachusetts Educator Data: A National Perspective Map is credited to EPE Research Center, 2006. October 12, 2018

Massachusetts Educator Data: A National Perspective Map is credited to EPE Research Center, 2006. October 12, 2018

Massachusetts Educator Data: A National Perspective Map is credited to EPE Research Center, 2006. October 12, 2018

What is EPIMS? A data collection of demographic and work assignment data for education personnel on an individual basis Assigns unique identifier to education personnel Reports a “snapshot” of active employees on October 1 October 12, 2018

Why this Data Collection? Strengthen our ability to use quality data to inform policy and program improvement, e.g.: Evaluate current education practices and programs Anticipate district employment needs Collect accurate data on HQ status Meet specific reporting requests already being made by state and federal government (including NCLB requirements), the media, and the public For too long, POLICY and PRACTICE have been driven more by ANECDOTES and ASSERTION than by DATA. This is due in part to the INCOMPLETENESS of the DATA available to us and how DISCRETE and DISCONNECTED much of that data is. For example, the Department has ELAR, our LICENSURE DATABASE and it collects a great deal of information regarding EDUCATIONAL PERSONNEL – but, there is NOW WAY TO CONNECT this information leaving GAPING HOLES in the information we need to drive POLICY and PRACTICE. October 12, 2018

Major Challenges To close the information gap between educator licensure and employment To plan for a sufficient supply of highly qualified educators for each role and venue To better understand which educator preparation and professional development programs and investments yield the best results To ensure that ALL students are proficient or above Also work in: Confirming that our HIGH STANDARDS are set at the most APPROPRIATE level. Which policies and practices help us to RETAIN effective educators. October 12, 2018

Current Picture 3 Separate Data Sources: “ELAR” — the state’s licensure database District/School Staffing Report (DSSR) — aggregate counts of educational personnel by assignment Schedule 13 — staff counts in EOY financial report No ability to relate licensed educators to their work assignments in schools/districts This disconnected approach to collecting data leaves many important questions unanswered On to Maureen. Ps: I used 14 pt font to make my NOTES more easily readable while presenting. You can print them out using FILE / PRINT / PRINT WHAT? / NOTES PAGES. October 12, 2018

Full EPIMS Implementation Will Answer... What is the retention rate for new and current educators? How long do educators stay in the education field? How does educator retention relate to educator preparation? How many Massachusetts educator prep program completers end up working in Massachusetts as educators after completing their degree? And in what field? What is the demographic makeup of our educator workforce? (age, race-ethnicity) Is an educator “Highly Qualified”? And more as EPIMS is integrated into the Data Warehouse. Site Boston’s study which showed that 47% of educators leaving the system during the 1st 3 years at a cost of $3.2 million and lost student performance. October 12, 2018

EPIMS Project Timeline December 2004 – needs analysis Fall 2005 – statewide survey and info sessions January – May 2006 Meet with pilot districts (vendors at May meeting) Determine data elements August 2006 Pilot training October – December 2006 Data submitted by 29 pilot districts January 2007 – December 2007 Statewide rollout October 12, 2018

Project Overview October 12, 2018

Identification of EPIMS Data Elements Goal: Identify and collect data elements that will provide necessary information for reporting and planning purposes… without overly burdening districts to collect data that is unnecessary or duplicative October 12, 2018

Process to Identify EPIMS Data Elements EPIMS project staff researched how other states collected educator data EPIMS project staff worked closely with pilot districts to identify what data elements were necessary and available 4 all day sessions held in January, March, and May October 12, 2018

Process to Identify EPIMS Data Elements Internal working subcommittee established representing: Commissioner’s Office Licensure & Certification Special Education Educator Preparation Additional meetings with representatives from other offices to review data requirements Legal Office Finance Office Charter Schools Some districts wanted more data elements—hoping EPIMS would become their personnel management system. Some staff wanted more data elements. If data element did not prove valuable to collection, DOE did not add. October 12, 2018

Scope of EPIMS Data Elements This list of data elements will: provide needed information for reporting and planning purposes eliminate need for DSSR and Schedule 13 Financial Reporting provide framework for the future linking of educator data to ELAR and Student Information Management System (SIMS) October 12, 2018

Coordinated Collection of Educator Data Modifications will be made to take advantage of ELAR’s capacity to collect information directly from educators Proposed modifications include: Mandatory reporting of all degree type, degree institution, and degree subject area information Ability to link ELAR to EPIMS for reporting Last Maureen October 12, 2018

EPIMS Data Elements October 12, 2018

Scope of Collection Who will be submitting EPIMS information? All public schools including charter schools Collaboratives, and private schools will not be submitting EPIMS data at this time Who will be reported? All staff reported in the DSSR except DSSR Section B (Service, Operations, and Maintenance), coaches, and daily subs October 12, 2018

Scope of Collection You should report... Academic instructional staff District and school administration Instructional paraprofessional staff Career and technical education staff Special education staff Professional support staff October 12, 2018

Scope of Collection You should not report... Food service staff Custodial staff Transportation staff Coaches Daily subs October 12, 2018

MEPIDs What’s a MEPID? Massachusetts Education Personnel ID Unique ID assigned to reported staff One per person over entire MA career Randomly assigned 8-digit number (distinct from SASIDs) EPIMS will not use SSN or replace license number You will get MEPIDs by uploading a batch file OR entering individual people into a web form Explain why are not using SSN – legal reasons Certification # - noncertified personnel, implications for ELAR October 12, 2018

MEPIDs Required information to assign a MEPID: First name Middle name or middle initial or NMN Last name Date of birth Gender License number (when applicable) Local employee number October 12, 2018

Data Collection Structure Two kinds of information Who are they? Staff Roster Record (SRR) One staff roster record per employee per district Data elements relate to individual, not job What are they doing? Work Assignment Record (WAR) Multiple records per individual Data elements relate to job function, not individual Cite example of what one per means October 12, 2018

Staff Roster Record (SRR) MEPID Local Employee Number License/Cert. Number First Name Middle Name/M.I. Last Name Date of Birth Race-Ethnicity Employment Status at Time of Data Collection Reason for Exit Date of Hire Federal Salary Source (up to 3) Percent of Federal Salary Source (up to 3) Degree Type (up to 3) Degree Institution (up to 3) Degree Subject (up to 3) October 12, 2018

Staff Roster (ctd) SR01: MEPID (Massachusetts Education Personnel Identifier) SR02: Local Employee Number District’s local employee ID Requested by Districts for ease of local identification of individuals SR03: License/Certification Number Simplify identification of certified individuals Primary link to ELAR October 12, 2018

SR04–SR07 These Data Elements: SR04: First Name SR05: Middle Name/M.I. Link to MEPID data Link to Work Assignment Easy identification for error correction SR04: First Name SR05: Middle Name/M.I. SR06: Last Name SR07: Date of Birth format: mm/dd/yyyy October 12, 2018

SR08: Race-Ethnicity MADOE used the 62 new federal race-ethnicity categories for the October 2005 SIMS data collection Change was made to comply with federal OMB reporting guidelines EPIMS will use these same categories Refer to the FAQ for detailed information: http://www.doe.mass.edu/infoservices/data/guides/race_faq.html October 12, 2018

SR08: Race-Ethnicity (ctd) Ethnicity (select one): Hispanic/Latino Not Hispanic/Latino Race (select one or more): American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (New) White October 12, 2018

SR08: Race-Ethnicity (ctd) Do not need to survey all students Provide info. To parents and give them the opportunity to update

SR09: Employment Status at the Time of Data Collection The two-digit code that describes an individual’s employment status at the time of the collection. 01 = Working 02 = On Paid Leave 03 = On Unpaid Leave 04 = Exited Necessary to ensure data accuracy and understand employment patterns. October 12, 2018

SR10: Reason for Exit 00 Not Applicable 01 Personal 02 Layoff 03 Contract Not Continued/Renewed 04 District Discharge 05 Death 06 Retirement 07 Reason Unknown/Other 08 Other employment in Pre K–12 public education 09 Other employment in education 10  Other employment outside education October 12, 2018

SR11: Date of Hire The date of the individual’s most recent hire in the district The last date of hire resulting in continuous service to the district in any capacity Examples: If individual hired as a paraprofessional then as a teacher, report original date of hire If individual hired as teacher, left the district and returned, report second hire date October 12, 2018

SR12, SR14, SR16: Federal Salary Source 1–3 Specific federal grant codes funding an individual’s job position. Up to 3 different federal funding sources can be provided for an individual’s job position Use 3-digit federal fund code October 12, 2018

SR13, SR15, SR17: Percent of Federal Salary Source 1–3 For each federal funding source provided, districts will indicate what percent of the job is funded by that federal grant Necessary for federal reporting requirements October 12, 2018

SR18–SR26: Degree Type, Degree Institution, Degree Subject Included for policy planning purposes What: Multiple Degree Types, Institutions, & Subject Areas Up to three degrees per individual Degree institution codes will be provided Who: Certified personnel: will be collected through ELAR Paraprofessionals and non DOE-licensed personnel such as SPED and other administrative staff: submit through EPIMS October 12, 2018

SR20, SR23, SR 26: Degree Subject 1–3 Major subject area for all degrees Double majors represented as two degrees Not collecting information on subject areas of minor concentration October 12, 2018

Work Assignment Record MEPID Local Employee Number First Name Middle Name/M.I. Last Name School ID Number Job Classification Assignment Grade Subject Area-Course Class Section Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Instructional Paraprofessional Qualifications Highly Qualified Status Subject Matter Competency (SMC) October 12, 2018

Work Assignment (ctd) Number of Work Assignment Records One work assignment record for every work function or teaching assignment One per section of students taught October 12, 2018

WA01–WA05 WA01: MEPID WA02: Local Employee Number These Data Elements: WA03: First Name WA04: Middle Name/M.I. WA05: Last Name These Data Elements: Link to MEPID data Link to Staff Roster Easy identification for error correction October 12, 2018

WA06: District/School ID Number 8-digit ID District Personnel—the last 4 digits are 0000 School Personnel—the last 4 digits identify the specific school October 12, 2018

WA07: Job Classification A description of the specific duties and responsibilities of a position Examples: Superintendent Principal Teacher Guidance Counselor October 12, 2018

WA08: Teacher/ Paraprofessional Assignment The specific educational or educational support activity in which teachers and paraprofessional staff are involved and employed on a daily basis. Examples: Non-Secondary Level Classroom Teacher Mild/Moderate Disabilities Sole Content Instructor in Core Academic Areas Severe Disabilities Consultative Content Instructor Career and Technical Education Paraprofessional October 12, 2018

WA09: Grade The predominant grade(s) that the specific assignment provides educational services for Coding Options: Indicate the predominant grade each assignment intends to serve Or – For elementary: the grade, or range (K–1, 1–2) Multiple (school XXX teacher serves multiple grades) All (gym teacher serves all grades in a school) October 12, 2018

WA10: Subject Area-Course A code to describe the subject area and course for which an individual has responsibility to teach or assist a teacher. Based on NCES course codes framework Examples: Mathematics (code 02) General Math (02002) Pre-Algebra (02051) CIP codes used for Chapter 74 Approved Pgms October 12, 2018

WA11: Class Section Identifies each class taught by educator Unique code within that school Format not specified by DOE Examples: Mathematics (code 02) General Math (02002) AAA General Math (02002) BBB Pre-Algebra (02051) CCC Used to report % of classes taught by not highly qualified teachers Be prepared to use the same code in the future when you link teachers and students. October 12, 2018

WA11: Class Section (ctd) Excerpt From NCLB Guidance: http://www.ed.gov/programs/titleiparta/reportcardsguidance.doc From US D.E.’s initial rejection of Mass.’ HQ plan: “The MA DOE does not have a comprehensive state data system to collect and analyze individual teacher information. Therefore its work to meet the requirements for HQT equitable teacher distribution and providing targeted assistance plans is severely hampered. Specifically, without accurate school/classroom level data, MA DOE cannot focus on the staffing needs or particular groups of teachers or courses taught by HQ teachers, and therefore cannot ensure that HQT and experienced teachers are being equitably assigned.” October 12, 2018

WA12: Full Time Equivalent (FTE) [as per DSSR] The ratio between the hours expected of a full-time position and the number of actual hours being provided by an individual i.e. the percent of a workday staff perform an assignment 1.00 is a full-time employee; a half-time employee is a .50 FTE, etc. October 12, 2018

WA13: NCLB Instructional Paraprofessional Requirements (Title I Only) 00 = Not employed as a paraprofessional 01 = Associate’s (or higher) Degree; or 2 years/48 credit hours of study at an institution of higher education 02 = Formal Standardized Tests: Parapro or WorkKeys October 12, 2018

WA13: NCLB Instructional Paraprofessional Req. (ctd) (Title I Only) 03 = Formal Local Assessment: Individual Paraprofessional Training Plans that include end-of-year course assessments or products Aligned with the Learning Guidelines for Title I Instructional Paraprofessionals and Guidelines for Creating Local Assessment Programs for Title I Paraprofessionals 04 = Paraprofessional, not qualified by the above categories 05 = Paraprofessional, not required to be qualified (not a Title I school) October 12, 2018

WA14: Highly Qualified (HQ) Teacher Status Why collect it: Federal Reporting Requirements Answers if this individual is highly qualified for this position 00 = Not required to be highly qualified for this position 01 = Yes 02 = No October 12, 2018

WA15: Subject Matter Competency (SMC) How has this individual demonstrated subject matter competency for this position? 00 = Not applicable for this position 01 = Has not yet demonstrated subject matter competency 02 = Passed the Massachusetts Test for Educator Licensure (MTEL) appropriate Subject Matter Test and licensed in the area that you are teaching October 12, 2018

WA15: Subject Matter Competency (ctd) 03 = Completion of an appropriate academic major 04 = Completion of an appropriate graduate degree 05 = Completion of comparable coursework equivalent to an undergraduate academic major 06 = Advanced certification or credentialing. 07 = Massachusetts High Objective Uniform State Standard of Evaluation (HOUSSE*): an approved Individual Prof. Dev. Plan (IPDP) aligned with HOUSSE requirements Note: 03–06 valid for middle/secondary teachers only October 12, 2018

EPIMS System Components October 12, 2018

EPIMS System Components ID Maintenance Data Collection Reports District and DOE Review Summary Reports Transmit Data Validate Data Submit Data Certify Validate across district collection Correct Records View Errors / Reports Enter Single Records Enter Multiple Records Certify Collection View Certifications Submit Collection View status & history of submissions October 12, 2018

How will EPIMS verify my data? As files are transmitted to the DOE, an automatic error check will answer these questions: Is the format of your file OK? Do the values in each record make sense? Once all files are transmitted and the answers to these questions are yes for each file, it is time to validate the collection. The validation step will answer these questions: Do the data across this collection look right? Does this data set make sense compared to your previous submissions for this collection? October 12, 2018

EPIMS Data Collection Step 1: District Transmits Single or Multiple Records (in a File) to EPIMS EPIMS Error Check No Errors AND All Records Transmitted Yes Errors Step 2: Validate Collection Error Report Error Check and Validation continue until Error-Free EPIMS Validation Yes No Errors District Updates Records in EPIMS Yes Errors Validation Report District Corrects Records in district system and Re-Transmits Updated File Step 3: Submit Collection No Review Reports Yes Step 4: Certify Collection (Superintendent only) Collection Complete No Step 1:

Best Practices Pilot District Perspective October 12, 2018

Statewide Implementation Schedule October 12, 2018

Statewide Implementation January 2007–March 2007 Statewide Rollout 2/2 & 3/23 — DOE, Malden 2/7 — Ayer 2/9 — Springfield 2/14 — Brockton 3/9 — Bourne Vendor Meeting, 3/2 Data Handbook distributed and posted on website October 12, 2018

Statewide Implementation Early Spring MEPID training MEPID application open Spring – Summer Data Collection training and on-site support Fall — Data Collection opens October 12, 2018

Preparing for EPIMS Form working group: HR, Information Services, and Curriculum Review each data system and data quality Gap analysis Determine method/process to acquire new data Modify internal procedures? October 12, 2018

Preparing for EPIMS MEPID assignment Review and verify information First name, middle name/initial, last name, DOB, gender, license number New race-ethnicity categories Confirm staff license numbers DOE Educator Licensure Status Drop Box October 12, 2018

Summary You will need to submit EPIMS data instead of the DSSR in the fall of 2007 EPIMS may require you to report data from multiple data sources and may require you to report data you currently do not have EPIMS will require a great deal of time and effort from multiple disciplines within a district Contact your HR and student scheduling software vendors as soon as possible to find out how and when they will comply with EPIMS reporting requirements You need to start NOW to prepare for the EPIMS data collection October 12, 2018

Resources Available EPIMS Web Site Information / FAQs will be posted at: http://www.doe.mass.edu/infoservices/data/epims/ Licensure Web Site http://www.doe.mass.edu/educators/e_license.html HQ Web Site Information will be posted at: http://www.doe.mass.edu/nclb/hq/ October 12, 2018

Contact Information EPIMS epims@doe.mass.edu Melinda Coneys 781-338-6894 John Shontell 781-338-6614 Helene Bettencourt 781-338-3639 Licensure Dropbox sahmad@doe.mass.edu Sabina Ahmad 781-338-6835 HQ HQTHelp@doe.mass.edu Maureen Rozanski 781-338-3879 October 12, 2018

Questions October 12, 2018