Case Study 1: Grading Rubric

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IR2501 Theories of International Relations
Advertisements

WORLD POLITICS – Lecture 4
International Relations Theory
RealPolitik or Power Politics
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
Chapter 5 Power, Conflict, and Policy
Institutions and their role in shaping European Security
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Player 2 Player 1.
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
Institutions and Environmental Cooperation. Today Types of global environmental problems The role of international institutions (regimes): realist vs.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
International Relations
Outline News items Iran nuclear agreement How to prepare for quizzes Main takeaways for today Revisit power from end of last class Structure for comparing.
Outline Intro to feminist/disenfranchised theories of IR Feminist/disenfranchised theories in a nutshell Facts that need explaining Six tenets of feminist/disenfranchised.
Midterm Eval of Teaching Get out piece of paper Do NOT put your name on it What should Prof. Mitchell – Start doing? – Stop doing – Continue doing.
Midterm Review. RealismInstitutionalismFeminist Theory Focus – what is being explained? ConflictCooperationGender/racial conflicts rather than interstate.
Liberalism: Conclusion Lecture 14. The Question of the Month How Can Countries Move from Anarchy, War of All Against All, to Cooperation? Security Dilemma.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: PLURALISM OR LIBERALISM
Homework 1. What is this study based on? How did the group determine levels of corruption? 2. How have the countries at the top of the list (least corrupt.
 10 questions  1 minute per question  Quiz ends at 10:10am  If you have any concerns that your I>clicker is not working, get out a piece of paper.
Review for final exam. Structure of essay Your thoughts?
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
International Relations: Perspectives, Approaches and Influences.
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism Idealism tainted by Realism.
Foreign Policy III February 9, Examples of Domestic Policy Issues List the 5 you think are most important  Federal Budget  Constitutional Rights.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
International Relations
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO? THE REALIST (I.E., THE DOMINANT) PERSPECTIVE States have primacy as unitary intl. actors (while leaders come and go, states.
Liberal Approaches to International Relations POL 3080 Approaches to IR.
WHY DO ALL STATES FIGHT? THE THIRD IMAGE -Even nice leaders and nice states fight. -Very different states and people behave similarly and predictably -Some.
1. Interstate system is not anarchic. 2. Actors (states) are not unitary in nature. 3. Behavior is not (fully) rational. 4. Military force is not all-
Unit 3 Seminar.  You will be getting a break during Unit 4- there are no grade assignments due  The exam that you took for Unit 3 was not graded-I am.
NEO-REALISM AND NEO-LIBERALISM THEORIES
The Great Debates in International Relations 1 st Great Debate (20s & 30s) 2 nd Great Debate (50s-80s) 3 rd Great Debate (80s & on)
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.
Presentation by Dr. Kevin Lasher. TrumanKennan.
International Relations
International Security and Peace
Outline QUIZ at start of this Thursday’s class
International Relations
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
Please fill them out. Thanks!
With William Kim and Friends
Lecture 8.1 LIBERALISM A. Alternative to realism
Lecture 3.1 THEORIES Realism
Introduction to International Relations
Midterm Review Midterm online office hours TONIGHT 8-9pm via CHAT link on Canvas – see you there.
PS 420/520 International Organization
Introduction to Global Politics
Outline for today Midterm Review
Outline QUIZ at start of next Tuesday’s class
Midterm Eval of Teaching
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
Outline “International institutions” readings takehomes
Lecture 3: Realist Theory of IR
Outline Case Assignment 1 Summarize institutionalism
CREATE REPLACEMENT FOR SYRIA EXERCISE AT START OF CLASS
Goal of Today’s Class Goal: Get you thinking about how
Writing a strong thesis statement
STATES & NON-STATE ACTORS
Theories of International Relations
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
Peter Nunnenkamp Kiel Institute for World Economics
Introduction to Global Politics
Midterm evaluation of teaching
Theories of International Relations
The FP Plan!.
Lecture 3: Realist Theory of IR
Presentation transcript:

Case Study 1: Grading Rubric Structure paper by explanations NOT wars (10 points off papers that structure by wars) Develop arguments using Goldstein. Cite course textbook and/or other course articles that are relevant Provide evidence AND interpret it in your own words so that it links to the arguments made by Goldstein. Select *good* evidence to illustrate theoretical points. Show how evidence you chose supports claims you make. Read Wikipedia pages well and accurately. Use headings Strong intro, noting Goldstein’s argument and your assessment Conclusion that summarizes more and less important causes of war based on evidence (and summarizing your argument)

News item: Senator Rubio on Iran & capabilities As part of this deal … the Iranians get rid of a vast amount of enriched uranium, almost all they have. They limit the amount of enrichment that they will have. They limit the number of centrifuges they will operate and they will allow inspections for decades, actually. So you would say, all that, forget about it, it's done. They retain not only just infrastructure, they retain centrifuges, too. They may not be spinning them, but they will retain them in their possession. They continue to develop their long range missile capabilities, which are unstopped. There's no prohibition on them acquiring a weapon design as they probably, may even already have. They continue to sponsor terrorism all over the world. … They continue to be run by a radical Shia cleric who has apocalyptic views of the future and of their role in it. … Their infrastructure will remain in place and at some point, they could follow the North Korean model very easily, … they can cook up an excuse for why they need to have a weapon program and move forward on it. Is war inevitable then? I hope not. My hope is that we can delay a program long enough and you would hope that there would be some sort of change in leadership in Iran that would at least allow them to decide that they would rather have an economy than have a weapon. You can't guarantee it. But at the end of the day no one wants war, but I actually think that this deal could advance the prospects of war.

Before we Start Institutionalism

Iclicker Survey What percent of discretionary US Budget (non-Social Security, non-Health-Medicare) is spent on US Military? 25% 40% 55% 70%

Institutionalism

Outline Institutionalism in a nutshell Six tenets of institutionalism Power of institutions Interests: realists vs. institutionalists How states create cooperation within anarchy Institutionalism summarized

Institutionalism in a Nutshell States can cooperate if they have or create interdependence. States sometimes take interdependent action to achieve long run interests Interdependence: reciprocal costly effects of transactions Sensitivity: costs before country changes policies Vulnerability: costs even after has changed policies Interdependence need not be symmetric or beneficial Sometimes referred to as “liberal institutionalism” or “liberalism” but for this class please simply use institutionalism

Examples to think about Syrian chemical weapons treaty: Did this treaty make any difference in behavior? That is gist of institutionalist vs. realist debate. Do you worry that the Paris Climate Agreement isn’t strong enough? Do you worry that it will cripple the world economy if we really address climate change through this treaty? BOTH perspectives are fundamentally institutional – they both believe institutions matter. If there were a Israel/Palestinian peace treaty, do you think it would stop the conflict in the Middle East? Bailout of Greece by many other countries who receive few direct benefits from doing so.

Realism Institutionalism Disenfranchised Focus – what is being explained? Conflict Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self-help Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power

Realism Institutionalism Disenfranchised Focus – what is being explained? Conflict Cooperation Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self-help Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power

Realism Institutionalism Disenfranchised Focus – what is being explained? Conflict Cooperation Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Multiple actors (states, MNCs, NGOs); not always unitary or rational Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self-help Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power

Realism Institutionalism Disenfranchised Focus – what is being explained? Conflict Cooperation Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Multiple actors (states, MNCs, NGOs); not always unitary or rational Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Econ & social goals as well as security Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self-help Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power

Realism Institutionalism Disenfranchised Focus – what is being explained? Conflict Cooperation Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Multiple actors (states, MNCs, NGOs); not always unitary or rational Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Econ & social goals as well as security Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Asymmetry in interdependence; issue-specific power Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self-help Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power

Realism Institutionalism Disenfranchised Focus – what is being explained? Conflict Cooperation Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Multiple actors (states, MNCs, NGOs); not always unitary or rational Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Econ & social goals as well as security Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Asymmetry in interdependence; issue-specific power Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self-help Anarchy mitigated by norms, rules, & institutions Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power

Realism Institutionalism Disenfranchised Focus – what is being explained? Conflict Cooperation Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Multiple actors (states, MNCs, NGOs); not always unitary or rational Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Econ & social goals as well as security Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Asymmetry in interdependence; issue-specific power Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self-help Anarchy mitigated by norms, rules, & institutions Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power Alternation of cooperation & conflict

The Power of Institutions Realists: Institutions REFLECT power Institutionalists Yes, institutions REFLECT power BUT… Might be “selection effects” – good states join, bad states don’t join BUT they also can and sometimes do CONSTRAIN power Institutional rules and norms Decrease uncertainty Avoid misperceptions Foster interdependence (iteration, linkage) Stabilize expectations

Interests: Realism vs. Institutionalism In BOTH views, states are pursuing their self-interests!!! Realists: States pursue short-term myopic interests with fear of cooperation Institutionalists States often pursue short-term myopic interests BUT they also may pursue long-term interests that can only be achieved through cooperation and they attempt to do so by creating institutions that will address the risks that cooperation entails

How do states create cooperation within anarchic international realm Permissive conditions that foster cooperation Survival not at stake Interactions are iterative Easier problems, e.g., coordination (air traffic control) vs. collaboration (arms races, trade wars) Fewer players Conscious strategies to promote cooperation Reciprocity: Tit-for-Tat, linkage and contingency Transparency and information Iteration or "Shadow of future“ Reduce transaction costs Rules of thumb Norms: require actors to explain themselves

Institutionalism summarized Ideals, norms, and rules, as well as power and interests, determine outcomes Structure matters but states can influence structure to some extent States seek solutions to their problems and attempt to make absolute welfare gains through cooperation that seeks to mitigate anarchy’s effects

QUIZ 10 questions 1 minute per question Quiz ends at 10:10am If you have any concerns that your I>clicker is not working, get out a piece of paper and: Write your name on the top Write Question # and answer for all 10 questions Hand in at end of quiz