Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Quality Assurance July 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Richard Mole, Skills Funding Agency Emphasise for contractors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Key Stage 3 National Strategy
Advertisements

Developing the governors’ role in school improvement A Lancashire perspective.
David Taylor Formerly Director of Inspection, Ofsted
HM Inspectorate of Education 1 The Quality Framework for Scottish FE Colleges Angus Allan, HMIE.
Curriculum for Excellence Numeracy and Mathematics 18th September 2010
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,
Important Information Have you got a username and password for the school SRF account? If your school has not registered before then you can do this if.
Ofsted Good Practice South East Provider Event Matthew Coffey HMI Director, Further Education and Skills 11 July 2013.
Transforming lives through learning Evaluating and improving our curriculum S1-S3 This resource provides a clear and concise.
RARPA: Quality Assurance Peer Review Triangles This Education & Training Foundation funded project builds on the success of ‘Improving the quality of provision.
Presentation to the BANKSETA Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) with a Focus on RPL in the Workplace Carmel Marock and Candice Harrison-Train 14 March.
Mindset 2000 LtdSlide 1 Train to Gain Provider Support Programme October 2007 Self assessment - introduction.
MODULE 3 SELF STUDY: TRACKING AND SUPPORT. Lifelong process whereby individuals acquire attitudes, values, skills and knowledge from daily experience.
Link Tutor Update 17 th March Inspection of Leeds Beckett ITE We anticipate being inspected this year as an ITE provider The Ofsted window opens.
Using Data Effectively to Improve Quality in Work-based Learning With a focus on the Data Service Training and Briefing Resource.
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Risk Management for Partnerships Chris Bealey, LSIS Partnership Adviser Terry McHale, Open4learning Partnership.
Aviation Ground Handling Trailblazer Assessment Activity consultation Aviation ground operative Aviation ground specialist Aviation operations manager.
The Exeter Model of ITE Induction for Initial Teacher Education Coordinators, Mentors, Principal School Tutors, University Visiting Tutors and External.
Minimum Contract Level Partnership Planning Cycles November 2011 Barry Langfield, LSIS Partnership Adviser.
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Minimum Contract Level Policy Milestones and Guidance July 2011.
Developing classroom practice to raise standards Rosemarie Sadler, Primary Performance Adviser Val Phillips – Primary Performance Adviser.
Building Our Curriculum Louise Turnbull Head Teacher Livingston Village Primary School All for the children, for all of the children!
Minimum Contract Level Key issues on management information Online seminar – July 2011 Carolyn Medlin, LSIS Adviser Stephen Howard, Learning Plus Richard.
Subject specialist mentoring on the DET
MODULE 15 – ORGANISATIONAL COMMUNICATION
SCEL Framework for Educational Leadership
Statutory induction arrangements for newly qualified teachers commencing induction on or after 1 September 2017 Please refer to WG guidance.
Priorities for the Success AT Strategic Action Plan: SUMMARY
Self Assessment for Pastoral Care
Minimum Contract Level Data, Management Information and Data Sharing January 2012 Barry Langfield, LSIS Partnership Adviser Emphasise for contractors.
AELP Dissemination of Chief Inspectors Report 29th November 2011
Introduction to evaluating and measuring impact in career development Presented by – Date – Doubt, the essential preliminary of all improvement and.
Self-Evaluation Cycle for Governing Bodies
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Shared Leadership and Governance Michael Gray, LSIS Adviser, December
Education Council Work Programme
Improvements following Inspection-Capacity to Improve
NLDC information meeting
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Collaborating for Learner Benefit Michael Gray, LSIS Adviser Jim Austin, Head of Adult Education Service,
Training and Learning Together
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Lead Providers and Performance Management Michael Gray, LSIS Adviser Jim Austin, Head of Adult.
OFSTED and the role of Teaching Assistants
Minimum Contract Level Delivery Models January 2012 Barry Langfield, LSIS Partnership Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
Study Programmes: Modelling & Operation Project
School Self-Evaluation 
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Peer Review & Enhancement Promoting enhancement through reflective critical friendship Quick guide Version 2, LEAD, October 2017.
Central Training Group - background
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Self Assessment October 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of change plans
Apprenticeship Quality
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit
Improvement through Self-Assessment
Professional development
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Quality Improvement December 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors):
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Experiences of school evaluation in Ireland a presentation to Inspectorate of Education in the Basque Country 1 5 Pádraig Mac Fhlannchadha, Assistant.
Minimum Contract Level Support Programme Partnerships ‘Beyond the Honeymoon’ 13 December 2011 Caroline Wilkinson - LSIS Partnership Adviser.
Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Self Assessment October 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing.
To critically review aspects of your provision to an agreed criteria
The MODERATION cycle.
RBWM SCITT Mentor Meetings 2017.
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Mentor training update
The National Approach to Professional Learning
Gillian o’Rourke & Isla Finlayson Qieos-early years
Presentation transcript:

Minimum Contract Level Collaborative Quality Assurance July 2011 Chris Bealey, LSIS Adviser Richard Mole, Skills Funding Agency Emphasise for contractors (lead/sub –contractors): existing and at different levels of maturity Panel intros – CM ref to working with various groups to help them put together their contracts and specifying who does what Colin to remind group about written comments/questions … eg panel will respond after Stephen’s presentation 1

Outcomes Develop a recognition of your responsibilities in CQA Share the key principles of QA and CQA To review a simple model of CQA and determine how evidence can be shared and analysed Quick poll after this to establish if participants are lead providers, sub contractors or both – tick the box type 2

Responsibilities – an external view Ofsted and other agencies will hold the lead contractor responsible for provision under that contract whether sub-contracted or not. This responsibility includes the quality of provision, quality of outcomes and overarching self-assessment processes, judgments and improvement plans. Make this quite bald – lead contractors must be aware that they have full responsibility and cannot use the ‘we didn’t know’ excuse A provider may be sub-contracted to more than one lead contractor and external agencies will be able to make a judgement about the overall work of this provider in their funded provision. Link this back to the UPN 3

Key Principles of CQA Trust founded on clear and reliable communication A shared understanding for quality shared by all partner organisations Review and audit as part of a clearly communicated quality cycle Emphasise the need for trust and professionalism. Eg CQA relies on professionals working together positively and effectively in an open and mature manner for the benefit of learners, the organisation(s) and the public good. Could give examples here like Stephen Howard at learning plus – he was very clear about his role having an ‘inspection’ function and where necessary invoking sanction 4

A simple model of QA and its CQA context This is a version of EQM, to give a clear context for discussion. A business model but all elements are relevant and useful for the next QI seminar, some terminology should just be unpicked. Core values of the model: Outcome oriented Customer/stakeholder focus Leadership and constancy of purpose Management by process and facts People development and involvement Continuous learning, innovation and improvement Partnership development and responsibility We focus on the processes bit interpreted as the learner journey 5

Processes – the learner journey Recruitment Initial assessment Induction Individual learning plans Teaching and learning Assessment Progress reviews Achievement Progression This is the key element to provoke discussion and will feed from Ofsted training, notes to come. 6

Evidence gathering and analysis Documentation Data Observations Learners work Stakeholder feedback These are generic form of evidence, the key questions are how they are gathered honestly and accurately, how they are analysed and ultimately what is the impact on the learners? Poll after this slide and initial dialogue to identify which areas are considered the most difficult to evidence, ranking activity or most difficult 3 or 4, whichever works out easiest. This to prompt next discussion. We also have available the slides from the Ofsted update. These cover both the updating of the CIF and specific references to data and T&L. We can use these here as appropriate The subject of observations could be an hour on its own. If a key discussion point ensure coverage of: management of the process eg structure, sufficiency and quality, staff development, themes (use of ICT etc) Records - type and usage Validity – moderation – internal/external Grading – common patterns/disparities 7

A sample Quality Cycle

Any questions? Questions if required from panel to stimulate discussion… ·       Future challenges:   ·        

Wrapping Up We’ll send you now These slides Evaluation link You maybe be interested in further support from the LSIS MCL Support Programme. A range of resources are available on the Excellence Gateway site www.excellencegateway.org.uk/MCLsupport  Further web seminar events are planned,  you can find details and registration on events.lsis.org.uk/Pages/Event/Stage1/Events.aspx If you would like to talk to an MCL Partnership Adviser please send an e-mail to mclsp@lsis.org.uk