Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2018)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Charlotte Hodson, Andrew Purkiss, Jennifer Anne Miles, Helen Walden 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Structural Basis for the Differential Effects of CaBP1 and Calmodulin on CaV1.2 Calcium-Dependent Inactivation  Felix Findeisen, Daniel L. Minor  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e5 (April 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2019)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Basis of Mutual Domain Inhibition in a Bacterial Response Regulator
Presentation transcript:

Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 640-648.e5 (April 2018) Structural and Functional Insights into Bacillus subtilis Sigma Factor Inhibitor, CsfB  Santiago Martínez-Lumbreras, Caterina Alfano, Nicola J. Evans, Katherine M. Collins, Kelly A. Flanagan, R. Andrew Atkinson, Ewelina M. Krysztofinska, Anupama Vydyanath, Jacquelin Jackter, Sarah Fixon-Owoo, Amy H. Camp, Rivka L. Isaacson  Structure  Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 640-648.e5 (April 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2018.02.007 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Anti-sigma Factor CsfB Helps to Orchestrate the Switch from Early to Late Gene Expression during B. subtilis Sporulation (A) Cartoon depiction of the role of the dual-specificity anti-sigma factor CsfB in regulating the transition from early to late gene expression during B. subtilis sporulation. Early in sporulation (reviewed in Tan and Ramamurthi, 2014), an asymmetric cell division event produces two cells: a smaller forespore (the nascent spore) and a larger mother cell. Initially, these two cells lie side-by-side; the mother cell then engulfs the forespore in a phagocytic-like process. At early times, σF and σE drive gene expression in the forespore and mother cell, respectively. Among the genes activated by σF and σE are those encoding the late-acting sigma factors, σG and σK, respectively (dashed arrows). The anti-sigma factor CsfB is expressed in both compartments under the control of σF and σK (dashed arrows). In the forespore, CsfB antagonizes σG at early times (barred line). In the mother cell, CsfB antagonizes σE at later times (barred line). (B) 1H-15N HSQC spectrum of CsfB (orange). Full assignment of the cleaved CsfB version appears in black (CsfB1−48), partial assignment of the residual full-length CsfB in blue and the tag residues in gray; sc denotes side chain resonances. The C-terminal residue from the cleaved version (A48) is highlighted by a green square. Structure 2018 26, 640-648.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.02.007) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Interactions of CsfBA48E with σG and σE (A and B) Overlay of 1H-15N SOFAST HMQC spectra of 15N-labeled CsfBA48E alone (blue), and in presence of 2-fold molar excess of (A) σG (red) or (B) σE (purple). Extra peaks appearing upon titration with σE are highlighted by a green square. (C and D) ITC thermograms of interaction between CsfBA48E and (C) σG or (D) σE. Raw data (upper panels), binding isotherm (lower panels). Fitted data for CsfBA48E-σE interaction: ΔH = −8.04 ± 0.04 kcal/mol; ΔS = 9.19 ± 0.50 cal/(mol·K); N = 1.01 ± 0.00 sites. Structure 2018 26, 640-648.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.02.007) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 NMR Solution Structure of the CsfB1−48 Dimer and Functionality of Dimerization-Deficient CsfB Variants (A) Orthogonal views of ensemble backbone (left) and cartoon (right) representations for the 20 lowest energy ARIA-calculated structures as deposited in the PDB (PDB: 5N7Y). (B) Detailed view of the dimer interface; hydrophobic buried residues are depicted using ball and stick representation. (C) Detailed view of the zinc finger coordination shell showing the cysteine residues and the Sγ(i)-HN(i+2) hydrogen bonds (green dashed lines) in the first and second spheres of coordination. (D and E) CsfB variants lacking putative dimerization residues V37 and/or I38 are deficient for sigma factor inhibition in vivo. Vegetatively growing B. subtilis cells were induced with IPTG to express (D) σG or (E) σE alone or in combination with wild-type or variant CsfB. Sigma factor activity was monitored by light production (measured in relative light units [RLU]) from σG- or σE-dependent luciferase reporter genes (PsspB-lux or PspoIID-lux, respectively). Control strains lacking inducible constructs (“Reporter alone”) are shown for comparison in each graph. Error bars indicate SD. Strains used in this assay are listed in Table S5. Structure 2018 26, 640-648.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.02.007) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structural and Sequence Comparison of CsfB with ClpX_NTD (A) Sequence alignment of CsfB and ClpX_NTD from different species. Cartoons above the sequences represent the positions involved in secondary structure formation in CsfB. (B and C) Structural comparison of dimer interfaces in CsfB (orange and blue, top) and ClpX_NTD (PDB: 2DS6, light yellow and cyan, bottom). Zinc cations shown as gray spheres. Residues involved in (B) antiparallel helices packaging and (C) loop contacts are shown for each. Structure 2018 26, 640-648.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.02.007) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Structure 2018 26, 640-648.e5DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2018.02.007) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions