TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission Proposed Changes to Simulation Scenario Date: 2015/01/12 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Authors: January.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0319r1 Submission March 2015 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Impact of TPC coupled to DSC for legacy unfairness issue Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in ac Authors: Date:
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1172r2 Submission September 2014 Eisuke Sakai, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Multicast Performance in OBSS Date: 2014/9/15 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
11ax PAR Verification using UL MU-MIMO
TGax SLS MAC Calibration Test 4 Results
Verifying 11ax’s PAR by UL MU-MIMO
Fractional-Backoff Procedure and Dynamic CCA
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
2 South Taibai Road, Xi’an Shaanxi, , P.R.China
Simulation results for
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation Results for Box5
Channel Access Efficiency
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
Multi-BSS Association for Edge Users’ Throughput Improvements
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Simulation Results of Box5
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Contention Based UL-OFDMA Random Access without back-off
Preliminary 11ax PAR Verification
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
Channel State Estimation based Bidirectional Initialized Random Access
OBSS Preamble Detection
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Simulation results for
Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2
OBSS Preamble Detection
Simulation Results for Box5
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
Month Year doc: IEEE /xxxxr0
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box 5 Calibration Result
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Simulation results for
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
Simulation results for
Coex Simulation and Analysis
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Performance on Multi-Band Operation
DSC Calibration Result
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment December 2017 TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment Date: 2017-11-5 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Phone Email Hongyan Li Xidian University 2 South Taibai Road, Xi’an Shaanxi, 710071, P.R.China  +86-13709218225 hyli@xidian.edu.cn Ronghui Hou rhhou@xidian.edu.cn Xiaoyao Ma str2num_mxy@126.com Hongyan Li, et al. (Xidian)

December 2017 Background The next generation WLAN is mainly used in high dense deployment scenario. There are many overlapped areas in this scenario. Therefore, the receivers in this area will suffer severe  co-channel interference which leads to a decrease in throughput. Channel allocation method can improve the co-channel interference. However, the number of the orthogonal channel is limited. In many presentations, transmit power control has been proved that it can improve the spatial reuse and network performance. In this contribution, A transmit power control combined with channel allocation method is proposed The comparison is shown in the simulation Hongyan Li, et al. (Xidian)

TPC combined with channel allocation method December 2017 TPC combined with channel allocation method Step 1: Each AP divides the STAs into two groups based on their RSSI. If RSSI > RSSI_Threshold, the STA is a central user If RSSI < RSSI_Threshold, the STA is an edge user Hongyan Li, et al. (Xidian)

TPC combined with channel allocation method December 2017 TPC combined with channel allocation method Step 2: AP divides the whole band into two channels. All the central users operate on the both channels The edge users of adjacent BSS operate on different channels Hongyan Li, et al. (Xidian)

TPC combined with channel allocation method December 2017 TPC combined with channel allocation method Step 3: AP sets two different transmit power level based on a target SINR of central users and edge users. When the receiver is in central area, the transmit power is 𝑷 𝒄 When the receiver is in edge area, the transmit power is 𝑷 𝒆 Hongyan Li, et al. (Xidian)

December 2017 Simulation Comparison between current WLAN, TPC and TPC + channel allocation. Our method can increase the throughput by 47.28% compared to current WLAN. Parameter Value Num of STA Each AP has 10 central users and 10 edge users Num of AP 3 CCA sensitivity level [dBm] -62 MCS Selection MCS2 Bandwidth 160MHz RTS/CTS OFF Hongyan Li, et al. (Xidian)

December 2017 Conclusion In this presentations, we introduce a method called TPC combined with channel allocation to improve the network’s performance in dense scenario. Performance of TPC and TPC combined with channel allocation has been compared. Hongyan Li, et al. (Xidian)

Simulation Setup details December 2017 Simulation Setup details Parameter Value Node (AP x 1, STA x 20) x 3 (Half of STAs are central STA, and others are edge STA) Traffic Model UDP (Full Buffer) Access Category [EDCA, AC_BE with default parameters] [CWmin = 15, CWmax = 1023, AIFSn=2 ] MCS Selection MCS2 Packet Length (byte) 63000 ACK Rate 6.0Mbps RTS/CTS OFF CCA level [dBm] -62 AP number of antennas 1 STA number of antennas Bandwidth 160MHz Tx gain Rx gain Hongyan Li, et al. (Xidian)