Double Chooz: Collaboration, Experimental concept, Detector, Physics Prospect, Status & Schedule, Summary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
26/01/05A. Geiser, Discussion on T2K 1 Participation in T2K neutrino program? benefits, options, and opportunities nIntroduction nOutline of current questions.
Advertisements

1 Probing CP violation in neutrino oscillations with neutrino telescopes Kfir Blum, Yosef Nir, Eli Waxman arXiv: [hep-ph]
Neutrino mixing angle θ 13 In a SUSY SO(10) GUT Xiangdong Ji Peking University University of Maryland.
Amand Faessler, München, 24. November Double Beta Decay and Physics beyond the Standard Model Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix.
Neutrino physics using Nuclear Reactors J. Magnin Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas Rio de Janeiro - Brazil.
1 3+2 Neutrino Phenomenology and Studies at MiniBooNE PHENO 2007 Symposium May 7-9, 2007 U. Wisconsin, Madison Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University.
Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
Amand Faessler, GERDA, 11. November Double Beta Decay and Neutrino Masses Amand Faessler Tuebingen Accuracy of the Nuclear Matrix Elements. It determines.
Heeger theta13, May A Neutrino Project at Diablo Canyon.
Stokstad, Heeger NSD, May 1, 2003 Reactor Neutrino Measurement of  13 Measuring the Last Undetermined Neutrino Mixing Angle  13 Searching for Subdominant.
Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics: Understanding Neutrino Oscillations 2-3 neutrino detectors with variable baseline 1500 ft nuclear reactor Determining.
Status of Neutrino Science Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003.
Lorentz Violation and an Experimental Limit Ben Rybolt 12/10/2012.
April-June )Oscillations: 2)Kinematics in weak decays: 3) 0 double beta decay: ?
Neutrino Mass and Mixing David Sinclair Carleton University PIC2004.
Measuring CP violating phase from long baseline neutrino experiments Naotoshi Okamura (YITP, Kyoto Univ.) ICFP2005 Oct. 07, NCU.
3 Neutrino Oscillation and Off-axis Experiments David Barnhill UCLA May 30, 2003.
CP-phase dependence of neutrino oscillation probability in matter 梅 (ume) 田 (da) 義 (yoshi) 章 (aki) with Lin Guey-Lin ( 林 貴林 ) National Chiao-Tung University.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 6 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
INDIA-BASED NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (INO) STATUS REPORT Naba K Mondal Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India NUFACT Scoping Study Meeting at.
APS Neutrino Study: Reactor Working Group Beyond   Gabriela Barenboim.
Toyota National College of Technology A.Takamura Collaboration with K.Kimura and T.Yoshikawa GLoBES 2007 Measuring the Leptonic CP Phase in Oscillations.
LBL neutrinos; looking forward to the future Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande and Sudbury Neutrino Observatory R. D. McKeown California Institute of Technology January 17, 2004 IHEP Beijing.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Precision measurement of mixing angles and CP Hisakazu Minakata PUC-Rio.
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University Model independent analysis of New Physics interactions and implications for long baseline experiments INTERNATIONAL.
November 2008 Maury Goodman ANL1 Planned reactor and beam experiments on neutrino oscillations The search for  13 A review for experts Maury Goodman Argonne.
Karsten M. Heeger US Reactor  13 Meeting, March 15, 2004 Comparison of Reactor Sites and  13 Experiments Karsten Heeger LBNL.
Prospects in Neutrino Physics Prospects in Neutrino Physics J. Bernabeu U. Valencia and IFIC December 2007 December 2007.
Monday, Feb. 19, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #7 Monday, Feb. 19, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Experiments 2.Long.
FJPPL Suekane1 Nu_2-WP2: R&D of detectors for future high statistics, high precision experiment (R&D for reactor anti-neutrino experiments) F.Suekane,
Karsten Heeger, LBNL TAUP03, September 7, 2003 Reactor Neutrino Measurement of  13 Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Physics Colloquium-28 November 2001 “The Neutrino Oscillation Industry”Maury Goodman, Argonne National Lab Outline  Neutrino History   Oscillations.
Prospects in Neutrino Physics Prospects in Neutrino Physics J. Bernabeu U. Valencia, IFIC and CERN Pontecorvo School September 2007.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Neutrinos September PDG advisory committee Maury Goodman for The neutrino group.
NEUTRINOS: PAST PRESENT FUTURE Heidi Frank Merritt Fest
Neutrino Oscillations at Homestake from Chlorine to the Megadetector Ancient Origins of the Question ~1860 Darwin publishes “On The Origin of Species”-
Gianluigi Fogli 24 th Rencontres de Blois, Chateau Royal de Blois, May 28, th Rencontres de Blois Particle Physics and Cosmology May 27 – June.
General motivation S. Geer, K. Long Charge: (July collaboration meeting) Neutrinos and our lives (PR motivation) Neutrino oscillation and the role of NuFact.
Future Reactor Neutrino Physics Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “International Workshop on RENO-50, June 13-14, 2013”
Karsten Heeger, LBNL INPAC, October 3, 2003 Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
NUFACT’06 Summary of working group 1 Neutrino Oscillations Experiments Mark Messier Indiana University August 30, 2006.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman HEPAP July 24, 2003 Bethesda Reactor Detector 1Detector 2 d2d2 d1d1.
Θ 13 and CP-Violation in the Lepton Sector SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris.
1 Luca Stanco, INFN-Padova (for the OPERA collaboration) Search for sterile neutrinos at Long-BL The present scenario and the “sterile” issue at 1 eV mass.
Michel Gonin – Ecole Polytechnique – France : SUPER NOVA SN1987A Super-Kamiokande Introduction neutrino oscillations mixing matrices Introduction.
Kam-Biu Luk 28 Nov, 2003 Neutrino at Daya Bay Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Water Cherenkov detector - brief status report - Kenji Kaneyuki Research Center for Cosmic Neutrinos, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo.
Future neutrino oscillation experiments J.J. Gómez-Cadenas U. Valencia/KEK Original results presented in this talk based on work done in collaboration.
October 14th, 2006LONU-LENS, Virginia Tech Solar Luminosity by Neutrinos Solar Luminosity by Neutrinos Carlos Pena Garay IFIC, Valencia ~
NWG Presentation Heeger, Freedman, Kadel, Luk LBNL, April 11, 2003 Reactor Neutrino Measurement of  13 Searching for Subdominant Oscillations in e  ,
1 A.Zalewska, Epiphany 2006 Introduction Agnieszka Zalewska Epiphany Conference on Neutrinos and Dark Matter, Epiphany Conference on Neutrinos.
The Double Chooz reactor neutrino experiment
NEUTRINO OSCILLATION MEASUREMENTS WITH REACTORS
Neutrino Oscillations and T2K
Flavor Mixing of quarks.
Neutrinos and the Evolution
Overview of the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO)
The Neutrino Oscillation Industry
Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments
Neutrinos in the Standard Model and Beyond
The Neutrino Oscillation Industry
Some Comments to the Neutrinoless Double Beta-Decay
Presentation transcript:

Double Chooz: Collaboration, Experimental concept, Detector, Physics Prospect, Status & Schedule, Summary

Small 13 leptonic CP phase Neutrino oscillations atmospheric solar Reactor Super-K+K2K+MINOS P( ) Solar+KAMLAND P( e x ) CHOOZ sin 2 (2 13 hep-ph/ e,, ( e,, ) T = U ( 1, 2, 3 ) T :U =MNS Matrix (2 mass differences, 3 angles,1complex phase) 6 parameters can be accessible from neutrino oscillation. Remains

Reactor neutrino experiment L=1.05km D=300mwe CHOOZ reactor experiment e e ( disappearance experiment) P th = 4.5 GW th, L = km, M = 5 t overburden: 300 mwe Chooz B reactor 2 cores sin =0.1 E=4MeV Measure very small deficit e

e Detection CHOOZ hep-ex/ v1 Chooz data Gd doped liquid scintillator E=1~8MeVE=8MeV ~30 s e+e+ n sin 2 (2 13 )=0.04 sin 2 (2 13 )=0.1 sin 2 (2 13 )=0.2 (0.511MeV) E ~8MeV 30μs Prompt signal Delayed signal E e = E MeV + O(E e /m n ) Gd

The next quest for 13 Chooz Result sin 2 2 m 2 =2.5x10 -3 eV 2 CHOOZ : R osc = 1.01 ± 2.8% (stat) ± 2.7% (syst) World best constraint No effect from Small Matter effect AcceleratorReactor Complementary

Double Chooz Detecctor Design/ Physics Prospects How to improve CHOOZ result? CHOOZ Result :sin 2 (2 13 )<0.2 R osc = 1.01 ± 2.8% (stat) ± 2.7% (syst)

Double Chooz Experiment Far Near ~1.05km ~ 0.4km Ardennes, France CHOOZ B Reactor Power = 4.27GW th x 2 Far Site Overhaul CHOOZ Exp. Hall 300 m.w.e 70 /day ©2009 Google Near Site 115 m.w.e 500 /day

Double Chooz Collaboration ~150 people 35 institutes, 8 countries Japan Tohoku U Tokyo Metropolitan U Niigata U Tokyo Institute of Tech. Kobe U Tohoku Gakuin U Hiroshima Inst. of Tech. France Saclay APC (collège de France) Subatech Nantes IPHC Strasbourg Germany Max planck Heidelberg Munich TU Hamburg U Tubingen U Aachen U Spain CIEMAT Madrid England Sussex Univ Russia Kurchatov inst Sc. Acad. Brasil CBPF UNICAMP Very Experienced members: Chooz, Bugey, KamLAND, Super-Kamiokande, SNO, Borexino USA Livermore nat lab Argonne Columbia Univ Chicago Univ Kansas U Notre Dame U Tennesse U Alabama U Drexel U Illinois Inst tech MIT

Double Chooz: 2 phases Timeline Construction Far Design Data Taking (Phase 1) Cstr. Near Data Taking (Phase 2) 2013 We are here now! Identical detectors cancel systematics on. Neutrino flux/Reactor power Acceptance, Cross section and etc.. Improve statistics Large target volume Longer stable operation Improve systematics Better detector design Low BG PMT/material Buffer oil/Gamma catcher Improved Cosmic-Veto detectors Phase 1:Far Detector OnlyPhase 2:Far + Near Detector Better understand of Background and Energy scale is important for the further reduction of systematic errors CHOOZ Result :sin 2 (2 13 )<0.2 R osc (=Observe/Expect)= 1.01 ± 2.8% (stat) ± 2.7% (syst)

Electronics & DAQ CEA-DSM-IRFU (thechnical coordination) Outer Veto: plastic scintillator strips (400 mm) -Target: 10,3 m 3 scintillator doped with 4.5g/l of Gd compound in an acrylic vessel (8 mm) -Catcher : 22,3 m 3 scintillator in an acrylic vessel (12 mm) Buffer: 110 m 3 of mineral oil in a stainless steel vessel (3 mm) viewed by 390 PMTs Inner Veto: 90m 3 of scintillator in a steel vessel equipped with 78 PMTs Veto Vessel (10mm) & Steel Shielding Detector Design New 4-region large detector concept

Muon Inner-VETO : LS PMT support structure: steel tank, optical insulation target/veto The detector design 7 m Shielding : steel 17 cm: >7 7 m -catcher : Extra-volume for -interaction 80% dodecane + 20% PXE + PPO + Bis-MSB -target : Volume for -interaction 80% dodecane + 20% PXE + PPO + Bis-MSB + 0.1% Gd n e p Gd ~ 8 MeV 511 keV e+e+ Non-scintillating buffer : Mineral Oil Isolate PMTs from target area Muon Outer-VETO : Scintillators Panels Acrylic vessels «hardware» definition of fiducial volume Improved background reduction

How much can we R = %(stat) 2.7%(syst) CHOOZ-far : 50,000/3 y CHOOZ-near: ~2.5x10 5 /3 y 2700Event rate 3-5 yearsFew monthsData taking period 0.5%2.8%Statistical error H/m H/m 3 Target composition 10.2 m m 3 Target volume Double-ChoozCHOOZ – Statistical error – Luminosity incerase L = t x P(GW) x Np Large detection volume & Long stable operation are necessary

Gd doped scintillator Solvent: 20% PXE – 80% Dodecane Gd loading: being 0.1% Gd loading of Gd-BDK (Beta Diketonate) Long term Stability promising LY ~7000 ph/MeV: 6 g/l PPO + 50 mg/l Bis-MSB Attenuation length: 5-10 m meters at 420 nm Radiopurity U: g/g - Th: g/g - K: g/g UV-VIS-IR scintillator transmission -All liquids are on site. MPI-K product and purify scintillators Gd(dpm) 3 for 2 years

e + Energy Systematic on Analysis/Selection n e p Gd e+e+ 1.5% syst. err. (Efficiency ~70% ) 2 layer design (no fiducial cut) Low BG PMT/Material Improve Veto detector Reduce # of cuts in Goal Double Chooz: Efficiency is INSENSITIVE to the energy scale error In total, 0.2~0.3% syst. err.: Better Energy calibration (depends on position) realize further reduction Neutron Energy t

Backgrounds Estimated with CHOOZ OFF data & Simulation ( represent CHOOZ data well) Spallation fast neutron μ capture Recoil p n capture on Gd Gd Recoil p n from capture μ μ N bkg = ~1.6 evts/day (Far) 2% of signal 0.7% syst err. =10~20evts/day (Near) 0.5% 0.2% syst err. Fast neutrons Gd ~ 8 MeV proton recoils μ ( 9 Li, 8 He) β-n γ PM + rocks + neutron-like event Correlated Accidentals Due to the different overburden, BG is not fully canceled. Better understand of BG reduces sys. errors. (To be measured within a few tens of percent If we can take ~a few weeks reactor OFF data.) Positron Energy spectrum

How much can we improve? Systematic error CHOOZDobule Chooz Reactor Cross section1.9%- Number of protons0.8%0.2% Detection efficiency1.5%0.5% Reactor power0.7%- Energy per fission0.6%- Total systematic error R = %(stat) 2.7%(syst) – Systematic errors – Double Chooz Goal in Phase 2 (Far+Near) Thanks to improved detector design and 2 detectors concept

Achievable sensitivity of sin 2 2θ 13 5 times better than current limit (5 year measurement) Achievable sensitivity of sin 2 2θ 13 (90%CL) m 2 atm = 2.5x10 -3 eV 2 (20% uncertainty by MINOS) CHOOZ: sin 2 2θ 13 < Far/Near ratio e + spectrum Spectrum Analysis is necessary for confidence

Status of construction/ Schedule in the future MaterialStatus of installation Steel shield Complete Inner veto tank Complete Inner veto PMT (8 78PMTs) Complete Buffer tank Complete Buffer tank PMT(10 390PMTs) Complete Gamma catcher and Target vessels Complete Close Lids Complete Electronics/DAQ installationOn going Liquid fillingSoon Far detector construction

Far site construction Lab cleaning Installation Veto and Veto-PMTsInstallation Buffertank February 2009 Overhaul CHOOZ Exp. Hall

PMT installation 400High performance low background 10" PMTs(Oil proof) (HAMAMATSU R7081MOD-ASSY) May 2009 Test Assembly Final test at Exp. site Installation to detector

PMT installation report July 2009 Buffer PMT complete

Acrylic vessel installation Acrylic vessels in lab Gamma Catcher installation Gamma Catcher transport Sept 2009 Acrylic vessels in buffer tank Oct 2009

Current status Construction Far Data Taking (Phase 1) In parallel, start filling of Liquid Scintillator to Acrylic Vessels, Buffer and Inner Veto. DAQ/Electronics installation will start in the Next week! DAQ/Electronics: Deadtime less Splitter(Installed), PMT HV supplies Trigger electronics 500MHz FADC, DAQ PCs Run control PCs Dec 2009 Lid closed Start Data taking!!!

Soon.. Construction Far Data Taking (Phase 1) Outer veto : Panels of strips of coextruded plastic scintillator with wavelength shifting fiber. Calibration: - Target fish-line & articulated arm - -catcher and buffer guide tubes - Embedded LEDs (Installed) Cstr. Near Data Taking (Phase 2) Data taking start. Then…. Improve data quality and reduce systematic errors.

Status of the Near site Tunnel (155 m), 12% slope Site engineering study completed Start excavation 2010 Site will be ready 2011 Neutrino fluxes: 2.5 x10 5 events in 3 years Depth: 120 m.w.e. ( flux: ~ 3-4 /m -2 s -1 ) Laboratory Open ramp (85 m), 14% slope Liquid storage 456m 160m 340m

Summary for Double Chooz The Double Chooz experiment –Double Chooz will be the first of a new generation of reactor neutrino experiments. It is the one of the best experimental concept to measure 13 The status of DoubleChooz Experiment –Detector Construction are close to the final stages. Installation of DAQ/Electronics starts in the next week. Filling of Liquid Scintillator follows. –We should observe the neutrino from reactor in this year! –Construction of the near site/detector will be started soon. Prospects for the future –First data taking expected to start in 2010 with far detector only sin 2 (2 13 ) < 0.06 in 1.5 year –From year 2011~, take data with the both near and far detectors sin 2 (2 13 ) < 0.03 in 3 years