Proposal for Distribution Group Studies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Larsen Consulting Solutions, Interconnection Activity around the U.S. IREC Interconnection Workshop Wichita, Kansas October 1, 2003 Chris Larsen.
Advertisements

GEORGIA POWERS SMALL POWER PRODUCERS FUNDAMENTALS.
Revised Draft1 Distributed Generation Interconnections - Group Study Process Option: Voluntary Rolling Window Presented to Massachusetts Distributed.
Project Definition of Bulk Electric System & Bulk Electric System Rules of Procedure Development Presenter: Peter Heidrich, FRCC – BES Drafting.
1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.
California Interconnection 101 An Update on Reform: What’s Happening and Why it is Important March 16, 2011 Sky C. Stanfield
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
Does owning a solar array make you a utility?...and other questions A presentation to the Kentucky Environmental Quality Commission Andrew Melnykovych.
Confidential Draft 2012 PG&E Wholesale Distribution Tariff (WDT) Generator Interconnection Procedures (GIP) Changes Electric Generation Interconnection.
Topics to Cover Interconnection Process Overview
SCE Grid Interconnection Workshop
© 2001 Utility Management Consulting, Inc. All Rights Reserved Distributed Resources Interconnection Policies: A Report to EEI Members Presentation of.
Small Generation Interconnection Standards - IOU Dennis Reed Westar Energy Topeka, KS September 26, 2007.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform Stakeholder Meeting February 19, 2009.
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
California Independent System Operator Joint Agency Energy Action Plan Meeting Generation Interconnection Queuing & Streamlining Dennis Peters, Lead Interconnection.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform 2 nd Stakeholder Meeting May 5, 2009.
March 30, 2012 Wholesale Generation Interconnection Process Photovoltaic Program Power Purchase Agreements Request for Offers.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 2 7 th May 2008 Substitution Example.
Madrid 15 th June 2009 OS Agreement to Reserve Capacity 10 th IG meeting.
Gas Regional Initiative North West Region - Draft Framework Guidelines Capacity Allocation Mechanisms BNetzA/CRE Pre-Comitology Meeting Bonn – 26 May 2011.
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
August 24, 2007 ERCOT Regional Planning Group Meeting CREZ Transmission Optimization Study Warren Lasher System Assessment.
Generator Interconnection Studies & Agreements Charles Hendrix.
Contestability Working Group Consultation Report and Recommendations NIE Networks / SONI Joint Presentation 26 January 2016.
QC9 Application Process SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SM Welcome to Queue Cluster 9 Monday, April 4, 2016.
Community Environmental Council Data Access and “Click and Claim” Interconnection.
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
Presentation Title SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Regulatory Affairs Net Load Peak ELCC Draft Results / Work.
Transitional offtake arrangements – Ofgem Initial Proposals on transitional incentives 6 October 2005.
GC0104 – Demand Connection Code (DCC)
Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)
PLWG Review 6.9 and the Interconnection process
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update
BPA Formal Comments Overview to NAESB OS
Voluntary Contributions
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
QBS: The Process Selecting a Design Firm
CEO Report Thomas F. Schrader ERCOT Board of Directors May 17, 2005
Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017
KORRR INFORMAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
Interconnection Practice, Policies, Procedures ComEd Illinois
DOL Fiduciary Duty and the Important Business Implications
HSCN Supplier Workshop – 16 June 2016
Update on European Network Codes
IID Generating Facility Interconnection Process
Internal control - the IA perspective
平成30年11月 doc.: IEEE /424r1 March 2007 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Delay.
Presenter: Peter Heidrich, FRCC – BES Drafting Team Chair
Network Contracting with Generators (incl
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Back-up flexibility for this winter Slow R3 non-reserved power
©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
General recommendations
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Construction Contract Administration
Assigned to the WEQ OASIS and WEQ OASIS/BPS Subcommittees
Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Results informal break out session SCG meeting
Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Energy Project
Water Directors meeting Spa, 2-3 December 2010
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
MA DG Collaborative – Year 1
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Presentation transcript:

Southern California Edison Proposal Distribution Group Study Process Workshop June 6, 2012

Proposal for Distribution Group Studies General SCE proposes a Distribution Group Study (DGS) process that will be flexible enough to allow group study when several transmission independent projects are submitted in the same electrical area at around the same time This is a draft proposal and is subject to change Applicability All projects that pass transmission system independence (screen Q) and fail distribution system independence (screen R) The DGS process is designed for projects that are not transmission interdependent, but are interacting with other queued projects on the distribution system (e.g. a project undergoing an ISP). The DGS is mandatory for projects that pass Screen Q and fail screen R, unless Applicant withdraws A single developer with multiple applications in one area submitted at the same time may request that the projects be studied in a DGS (i.e. waive screen R) If the developer did not request a group study for its projects, the first project in the bunch would, potentially, pass Screen R and be studied under ISP and the remaining would fail Screen R and be studied as a DGS when the first project is complete. A developer’s request to study multiple projects in a DGS does not create an exclusive distribution group i.e. other projects may be placed in the same group

Study Process Study Process The study itself will follow the Rule 21 ISP with an System Impact Study, results meeting, financial security posting and Facilities Study (if required) The Rule 21 timelines for the studies and for applicant responses will apply. However, if the volume of studies reaches a certain level and/or the number of applicants in a particular group study reaches a certain level, additional time will be required to complete studies and prepare interconnection agreements. There may be limits on how many applicants can be studied in one DSG. Generator response will be considered complete when all generators in the group have completed the required step For example, the Facilities Study (if required) cannot begin until all generators in the group have posted their financial security or withdrawn. A Facilities Study cannot be waived unless all generators (and the Distribution Provider) agree to waive it. The Distribution Group study will begin when any current study is complete or when there is sufficient information about the impact of earlier-queued projects See examples of how a distribution group forms and studies begin on next page

Example - Multiple Generators Connecting to Different Circuits

Example - Multiple Generators Connecting to Same Circuit

Cost Allocation Cost Sharing Costs will be allocated to the group similar to cost allocation in the cluster study process Upgrade costs will be allocated on a per MW basis to all generators triggering each specific upgrade, for upgrades triggered by a single generator, cost will be allocated 100% to that generator Short circuit related upgrades will be allocated based on the short circuit duty contribution of each generating facility When any generator in the group drops out, the costs will allocated to the remaining generators Restudies will be done (at Applicant’s cost) any time there is a change in circumstances that may result in a change to the upgrades required to interconnect a generator (e.g. generators from the distribution group drop out, an earlier-queued gen drops out, a planned upgrade is cancelled or delayed). Impact on ISP ISP remains unchanged and applies to generators that pass Screen Q and R.

WDAT and Electrical Area Interaction with WDAT WDAT generators that apply while a Rule 21 distribution group study is ongoing will fail the ISP independence test under the current tariff and will need to reapply or be studied under the cluster WDAT generators that qualify for an ISP will be studied accordingly. Any Rule 21 generators that come while a WDAT study in a given electrical area is in progress, will be put into a distribution group study which will begin when the current study is complete or when there is sufficient information about the impact of earlier-queued projects SCE reserves the right to modify its WDAT to include a distribution group study, but makes no commitment to do so Definition of Electrical Area Requires Flexibility Projects that fail Screen R will be placed into groups based on the electrical area of the point of interconnection An electrical area will in some cases be the circuit and in other cases be the substation, but in any event, will be determined by engineering judgment. Questions?