Bench trials A view from the bench

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dennis I. Wilenchik Wilenchik & Bartness, P.C North Third Street Phoenix, Arizona (602) (T) (602) (F)
Advertisements

In-House Mock Trial Seminar
Nuts and Bolts of a Closing Argument NITA Presentation for Juvenile Defenders September 18, 2011 By Michael Washington.
EFFECTIVE TRIAL ADVOCACY: THE PRINCIPLES DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS MID-YEAR CONFERENCE JULY 11, 2014 PROFESSOR STEPHEN A. SALTZBURG.
R OLES & R ESPONSIBILITIES From Speaking With A Purpose: Jo Thornton & Jessica Pegis.
AKA: The Last Words AAKA: Parting Gift Closing Arguments.
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
Introduction to Law Introduction to Advocacy and Developing Legal Arguments.
Closing Argument Initial and Rebuttal Nancy C. Jacobs Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney 91 st Judicial Circuit Switzerland County.
Eric J. Bengtson, Esq. Civil defense attorney (No criminal stuff!) Davis & Young, APLC.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
DIRECT EXAM. WHY AM I CALLING THIS WITNESS? ELEMENTS? EXHIBITS? CREDIBILITY? MORAL STRENGTH?
Presented by Nicole Longwell Prepared by Jonathon Horton Nicole Longwell.
Parts with Explanations
The Case Police vs. Jack Jones
Trial advocacy workshop
MBA Mock Trial Program. What is a Mock Trial?  Trial before a real judge (or lawyer)  Held in real courtroom (State Court)  Examination of witnesses.
Simplified Rules of Evidence How to Behave in the Courtroom.
Section B, Part V: Examination of Witnesses. Credibility –Most of the information upon which the jurors/judge will decide your case will come from examination.
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics Presentation by Jim and Josh McGuire Permission granted for any education use in connection with MBA Mock Trial.
Closing Arguments Saving the Best for Last. Purpose of Closing Arguments This is your one chance to be an advocate. This is your one chance to be an advocate.
Questioning Witnesses Miss Getsch Crime and Justice.
Trial. Trial: broken down  Pre-Trial hearings: Judge makes decisions on various motions  Opening statement: attorneys tell the story of the case. No.
English 9H Ms. Bugasch November 4, 2013 “D” Day Goals 1. Evidence Submittal and Approval 2. Students will be able to: -Understand the purpose of cross-examination.
Presentation by Jim and Josh McGuire Permission granted for any education use in connection with MBA Mock Trial Program November 18, 2002 Pirated and modified.
How To Prepare A Team For Mock Trial Presenters: Jean Wentz and Lourdes Morales.
DO NOW: REVIEW CASE Aim: How do we write an opening statement? HI MS. BASER!!!!!!!!!!!
Tell the story better than the other side.. Opening Statements  This is like the introductory paragraph and thesis statement of an essay  This lays.
1 Agenda for 11th Class Admin –Handouts Slides German Advantage –Name plates Summary Judgment in a Civil Action JMOL New Trial Introduction to Appeals.
English 9H Ms. Bugasch October 29, 2013 “F” Day Goals 1.To review opening statements 2. To understand direct questioning 3. Understand how to formulate.
ANATOMY OF A TRIAL Opening Statements -1 st : Plaintiff -2 nd : Defendant Examinations -1 st : Plaintiff Witnesses -2 nd : Defendant Witnesses Closing.
Aim: How is creating a persuasive story instrumental to resolving factual disputes at trial? Do Now: What is the function of a trial? Answer: Resolve Factual.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
Do now: To the best of your knowledge, what do you think is the purpose of the direct examination.
Trial Procedure. Theory of a case  Attorneys must present a logical argument demonstrating what really happened to the jury  This is prepared prior.
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program.
CIVIL TRIAL FROM START TO FINISH: A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO TRYING A CIVIL CASE IN ARIZONA Richard K. Mahrle Dennis I. Wilenchik.
CHAPTER 7: Emond Montgomery Publications 1 Direct Examination of Witnesses.
+ Trial Basics Information you need for the trial!
Mock Trials in the Classroom Ruth Kagan Glebe Collegiate Institute Ottawa, Ontario.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
 By Michael Johnson.  How does a judge/jury decide a case? o Factual content o Legal requirements o Just result.
Academic debate Lecturer: Lutsenko Olena
IOWA MOCK TRIAL 101: Middle School Mock Trial Basics
ENSURING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN A NEUTRAL COURT
PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF A MOCK TRIAL
Agenda for 11th Class Admin Handouts Slides German Advantage
Barrister’s Council – Trial Advocacy Division
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Persuasive Speaking Structures and Appeals
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Opening Statements & Closing Arguments
Chapter Sixteen Rules of Evidence  .
By: The Mock Trial Class of 4B
Criminal Trial Components
OPENING STATEMENTS 2007 Street Law Mock Trial.
““Pause awhile, And let my counsel sway you in this case.”
TRIAL.
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program
OPENING STATEMENTS Mock Trial.
Presentation for Judges
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program
What is Mock Trial? Steps in what we do…...
Direct Examinations.
OPENING STATEMENTS 2007 Street Law Mock Trial.
OPENING STATEMENTS Mock Trial.
Courtroom to Classroom:
Communicating Your Ideas
MBA Mock Trial Program Mock Trial Basics
Business Law Final Exam
Presentation transcript:

Bench trials A view from . . . the bench Hon. Michael D. Vhay, Massachusetts Land Court January 18, 2018

Today’s agenda Planning for Bench Trials, Start to Finish (or, the Finish is the Start) Presenting the Case Persuasively: Direct Examination and Exhibits Making the Case: Pre-Trial Briefs, Opening Statements and Closing Arguments Questions and Comments Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Some initial considerations Trials – even bench trials – are serious matters. When trying a real-estate case, trial-advocacy skills are as important as knowledge of real-estate law. Good lawyers appreciate their limitations, and get help. Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Planning for a bench trial

Famous bench trials Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Stern & Salzburg, trying cases to win Rules Jury Trial Bench Trial Personal advocacy  Central theme Case bigger than facts Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Stern & Salzburg, trying cases to win Laws Jury Trial Bench Trial Primacy  Recency Vividness Frequency Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

essentials of trial advocacy Reduce the case to a simple story Match the story to the law (the theory of the case) Develop the theme of the case Work backwards from the desired result Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

The finish is the start Remedy Closing Case in Chief Cross-Examination Re-evaluation Opening Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

“pre-trial” trial advocacy Develop a theory and a theme from the outset Determine which issues aren’t (or shouldn’t be) disputed Advance the theme in all filings (frequency) Lay the foundation for an excellent trial relationship Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

“advice for going to trial” Be prepared Be orderly Be brief Be polite Be congenial Be civil Be deferential Avoid smugness Be mindful of body language Accept defeat graciously Cecil C. Kuhne III, Convincing the Judge: Practical Advice for Litigators, 89-90 (ABA Publishing 2008) Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Persuasive content Direct examination

Aims of direct examination Introducing undisputed facts (maybe) Enhance the chances that the judge will decide disputed facts in your client’s favor Lay foundation for disputed exhibits Demonstrate that your client’s witnesses are credible Hold the judge’s attention Steven Lubet, Modern Trial Advocacy 15-17 (Nat’l Inst. for Trial Advocacy 1993) Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Planning a direct examination Content is the driver (see Aims of Direct Examination) Corollary: Exclude Clutter The Unprovable The Implausible The Impeachable Door-openers Lubet, Modern Trial Advocacy at 20-23. Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Organizing a direct examination Start strong, end strong Organize by topics (“Sub-Directs”), then by chronology Start and end Sub-Directs strong Get to the point Give separate attention to important details Don’t interrupt action Unify circumstantial evidence Affirmation before refutation Be selective in raising defensive points End with a clincher Lubet, Modern Trial Advocacy at 24-33. Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Presenting a direct examination Engage the witness Use short, open questions DO NOT LEAD Use directive and transitional questions (followed by short, open ones) “Re-Initiate Primacy” Use incremental questions Repeat important points (with sensitivity) Use visual aids (and rehearse) Lubet, Modern Trial Advocacy at 33-43. Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Persuasive content exhibits

Real and demonstrative exhibits advantages disadvantages Clear Concrete Understandable Reliable Few things speak for themselves The “Safe Side” Problem “Publication? We don’t need no stinking publication!” Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Using exhibits persuasively Be selective Eye the design Know the courtroom Use in demonstrations Use in cross-examination Use in opening and closing Draw attention to important provisions Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Making the case

Pre-trial brief: the closing at the opening Assume it’s your only shot One Theory, One Theme Be brief Advocate credibly Confine Findings of Fact to facts Preview subsidiary facts Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

OPENING STATEMENT Don’t forfeit Expect it to be short One Theory, One Theme Order the facts as (you hope) the judge will Interweave specific names, testimony, and exhibits Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Closing argument Understand, before trial: Timing Expected length One Theory, One Theme Start strong, end strong Organize facts as a judge would analyze them Be specific Weave in circumstantial evidence Marshal “incredibility” facts Respond to (or anticipate) arguments that: Undercut Theory and Theme Derail the proposed analysis Real Estate Bar Association January 18, 2018

Questions & comments