SEISMIC DATA GATHERING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
Advertisements

Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic Reflection Processing Illustrations The Stacking Chart and Normal Moveout Creating a seismic reflection section or profile requires merging the.
Velocity Analysis Introduction to Seismic ImagingERTH 4470/5470 Yilmaz, ch
Accommodation space, Coluvial wedge. Even in this image, throw is hard to interpret however, there is still geologic insight to be gained. Surface expression.
Reflection Seismic Processing
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Introduction to GeoProbe
Processing: zero-offset gathers
Stacked sections are zero offset sections
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
SOES6004 Data acquisition and geometry
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Loading of the data/conversion Demultiplexing Editing Geometry Amplitude correction Frequency filter Deconvolution Velocity analysis NMO/DMO-Correction.
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Basic Seismic Processing INPUT FILTER CMP Gather NMO STACK MIGRATE DISPLAY GEOM VEL ANAL STATICS MUTE.
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
GG 450 April 16, 2008 Seismic Reflection 1.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
1 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. VSP modeling, velocity analysis, and imaging in complex structures Yue Du With Mark Willis, Robert Stewart May.
The ray parameter and the travel-time curves P flat and P radial are the slopes of the travel time curves T-versus-X and T-versus- , respectively. While.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 18 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Wed 20 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Reflection Data Processing Step.
Last week’s problems a) Mass excess = 1/2πG × Area under curve 1/2πG = × in kgs 2 m -3 Area under curve = -1.8 ×10-6 x 100 m 2 s -2 So Mass.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Seismic reflections. Seismic waves will be reflected at “discontinuities” in elastic properties A new ray emerges, heading back to the surface Energy.
Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell Migration In a Nutshell D.S. Macpherson.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Introduction to Seismology
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
T 2 = T X 2 /V 2. It is a hyperbola with apex at X = 0 and T 0 = 2H/V. – –V and H are the layer velocity and thickness. T 2 -X 2 plot is a straight.
Reflection seismograms
Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging References: J.M. Reynolds, An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics, John Wiley & Sons,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 Vertical Seismic Profiling– Nov 2, 2015
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 10 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Seismic Reflection Travel-Time Cont’d Dix Equations for multiple layers:
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology Field measurements and mapping Terminology on folds and folds Stereographic projections From maps to cross-sections.
Geology 490M 3D Seismic Workshop tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV Demo, Wave.
Stacked sections are zero offset sections
Lithospheric Layering
I. Basic Techniques in Structural Geology
Single fold vs. Multi-fold CMP seismic profiling
Reflection velocity analysis
Reflection Seismic Method
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II
Marine Reflection Seismology - Geometry
Coincident Source receiver Concepts
From Raw Data to an Image
Making CMP’s From chapter 16 “Elements of 3D Seismology” by Chris Liner.
High Resolution Velocity Analysis for Resource Plays
Common MidPoint (CMP) Records and Stacking
3D Seismic Processing Eric Verschuur AES 1530.
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
The nice looking seismic sections you’re used to seeing in text books are compiled from field data which is collected in the form of shot records. The.
Normal Incidence (coincident source-receiver) Ray-Tracing
Presentation transcript:

SEISMIC DATA GATHERING

GEOPHONE STRUCTURE

GEOPHONE TYPES & FREQUENCY

SOURCE TRUCKS

3D-SEISMIC COVERAGE

CDP & FOLD STACK

MARINE SEISMIC CABLE LAYOUT

MULTIPLE RAYPATH

ATTENUATION TECHNIQES

SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING

PROCESSING FLOWCHART

OBJECTIVE OF PROCESSING REAL EARTH EARTH PROPERTIES PULSE SEISMIC TRACE PROCESSING MODEL EARTH

EFFECT OF STACKING ON NOISE SIGNAL PLUS RANDOM AT SIX-DETECTOR ARRAY NOISE SIGNAL SIGNAL + NOISE SIGNAL + NOISE EACH RECEIVER SUMMED OUTPUT

POST-STACK PROCESSING RESIDUAL STATICS DISPLAY ENHANCEMENT MIGRATION ATTRIBUTE ANALYSIS INVERSION TIME-DEPTH CONVERSION

SUMMARY OF SEISMIC PROCESSING DATA ARE GATHERED AND CMP-ORDERED GATHERS ARE FORMED VELOCITY ANALYSIS IS PERFORMED ON SELECTED GATHERS THE GATHERS ARE MOVEOUT CORRECTED, STACKED, AND PLOTTED STACKING MAY BE FOLLOWED BY ADDITIONAL PROCESSING

FACTORS AFFECTING AMPLITUDE

VELOCITY ANALYSIS NORMAL MOVEOUT (NMO) X = TX - T0 TX T0 IMAGE POINT WHERE T0 = ZERO OFFSET TIME

NMO-ISOTROPIC LAYER X A C Z B WHERE THEREFORE D IMAGE POINT

ASSUMED RAYPATH FOR VNMO CALCULATION MULTI-LAYER CASE ASSUMED RAYPATH FOR VNMO CALCULATION X TX,1 Z V1 T0,1 T0,2 TX,2 ACTUAL RAYPATH FOR LAYER 1: FOR LAYER 2: VNMO = NORMAL MOVEMEOUT VELOCITY

FOR EACH TRACE T AND X VALUES ARE DETERMINED HOW IS VNMO DETERMINED? FOR EACH TRACE T AND X VALUES ARE DETERMINED

VELOCITY ANALYSIS Y=b+mX T2 - X2 PLOT X2 OFFSET2 t2 HYPERPOLA PLOTS AS A STRAIGHT LINE ON T2 - X2 GRAPH Y=b+mX WHERE

VMNO CORRECTION KNOWING THE VNMO, T AND OFFSET, THE TIME CORRECTION NECESSARY TO SHIFT EACH TRACE CAN BE CALCULATED

INTERVAL VELOCITY DETERMINATION FROM SEISMIC FROM VELOCITY ANALYSIS, WE KNOW VNMO1,T0,1 VNMO2, T0,2 SUBTITUTING THESE VALUES INTO THE DIX EQUATION

MIGRATION EFFECTS FLAT HORIZONS REMAIN UNCHANGED IF THERE ARE NO VELOCITY ANOMALIES ABOVE DIPPING HORIZONS BECOME STEEPER, SHALOWER, AND MOVE LATERALLY UPDIP SYNCLINES BECOME BROADER, WITH ANY BOW TIES ELIMINATED ANTICLINES BECOME NARRWER DIFRACTIONS COLLPSE TO POINTS

RAY PATH MIGRATION t x WHERE  = TRUE DIP OF REFLECTOR REFLECTION REFLECTOR x t WHERE  = TRUE DIP OF REFLECTOR = APPERENT DIP OF REFLECTOR V= VELOCITY

WHY MIGRATE? TIME DEPTH DEPTH MODEL ARRIVAL TIMES IF BEDS ARE DIPPING, APPERENT POSITION OF EVENTS ON A STACKED SECTION DIFFERS FROM THEIR TRUE POSITION DEPTH MODEL ARRIVAL TIMES 7 KFT/SEC TIME DEPTH 9 KFT/SEC 11 KFT/SEC

ASSUMPTION UNDERLYING MIGRATION ALL EVENTS ARE PRIMARIES- NO NOISE, NO MULTIPLES, NO SHEAR WAVES ALL EVENTS COME FROM THE PLANE VERTICALLY BENEATH THE SEISMIC LINE- NO SIDEWIPE VELOCITY ARE KNOWN EVERY WHERE

MIGRATION MOVES DIPPING HORIZONS

FOCUSING EFFECT OF A SHARP SYNCLINE

DEFOCUSING EFFECT OF AN ANTICLINE

FOCUSING EFFECT OF A SYNCLINE

3-D MIGRATION ELIMINATES ASSUMPTION OF 2--D MIGRATION THAT ALL DATA COMES FROM WITHIN PLANE OF SECTION REQUIRES 3-D DATA COLLECTION TO INSURE CLOSELY SPACED TRACES IN BOTH X, Y DIRECTIONS MOVES ENERGY IN BOTH INLINE AND CROSSLINE DIRECTIONS INLINES AND CROSSLINES TIE AFTER 3-D MIGRATION MAP MIGRATION IS AN ALTERNAIVE FOR COARSE GRID OF 2-D LINES

TIME VS. DEPTH SECTIONS