Justin Weisser, MPH; Nathan Crawford, MPH; Mimi Luther, BA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Russell A. Duke.  Idaho is 49 th in the nation for vaccine preventable disease coverage at only 54.24%.  Surveys indicate a need to educate local health.
Advertisements

Which factors make a difference when identifying pockets of under-immunization? Gayle Moxness Hennepin County Community Health Department Minneapolis,
Registries as tools for provider quality assurance and clinic assessment Diana Bartlett National Immunization Program Immunization Registry Support Branch.
IMPROVING IMMUNIZATION RATES. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Enhance understanding of benefits of a recall system for adolescent immunizations and well checks. Increase.
Using the NCIR as a Clinical Tool January 11, 2012 Mary Stanley, RN Clinical Nurse Consultant.
Kim Salisbury-Keith, MBA Rhode Island Department of Health October 2003 Provider Based Assessment of Data Quality The AFIX Model CDC 4th Immunization Registry.
What to do before you have a Registry?: Provider Preparation Presentation to 2002 National Immunization Registry Conference October 28-30, 2002 Philadelphia.
Pediatric Asthma Hospitalizations: Impact of Managed Care in the Patterns of Outpatient Healthcare Utilization Capriles, JA., Rodríguez, MH., Rios, R.,
Reasons for Incomplete Follow Up for HPV Vaccination in Females Attending an Urban Public Immunization Clinic Fiona G. Kouyoumdjian, 1 MD, MPH, CCFP, Anne.
Evaluation of the 2004 pneumococcal conjugate vaccine shortage utilizing data from the Michigan Childhood Immunization Registry Norma Allred, PhD, John.
Improving Reporting and IIS-Based Coverage by Conducting VFC Accountability Through an IIS: The New York City Experience Michael Andreas Hansen, MPH, Melissa.
Children’s Outcomes Research Program The Children’s Hospital Aurora, CO Children’s Outcomes Research Program The Children’s Hospital Aurora, CO Colorado.
Arizona Immunization Program Office AFIX and ASIIS “A Great Partnership” Andie Denious, MS. RN Immunization Services Manager Jennifer Ralston Roll, BA.
Donna Rickert, M.A., Dr.P.H. Abigail Shefer, M.D. National Immunization Program Immunization Services Division Health Services Research and Evaluation.
A Healthier Tomorrow Begins Today National Immunization Conference 2004.
Using Best Practice Recommendations to Improve Data Quality Assurance in an IIS. Nichole D. Lambrecht, MSc; Mike McPherson; Sue Bowden, Kristin Shore,
RECIN Intervention- Working Collaboratively to Raise Immunization Rates.
Common Threads: Immunization and Well Child Completion Rates Jeff Neccuzi, Director Division of Immunization Services Bureau for Public Health May 17,
Angel Rivera, MD (Puerto Rico Immunization Program)
Southeast Michigan PARTNERS PROJECT
Age at First Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination in Children with Autism and School-Matched Control Subjects William W. Thompson, PhD Presented at the.
Utilizing a statewide immunization information system and GIS mapping software to determine pockets of need Tammy LeBeau South Dakota Immunization Registry.
Quality Assurance Project – 2007
The Medical Home and Rural Childhood Immunization Delivery in Family Medicine STFM Practice Improvement Conference 7 November 2009 L.J. Fagnan, MD Oregon.
BACKGROUND New Jersey Immunization Information
Dua K. Siam, MSN, APRN, FNP-c
Diana Bartlett Immunization Registry Support Branch
Enrique Ramirez1, Julie Morita1
Epidemiology Section APHA Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2007
Virginia’s Stay on Track Daycare Initiative
VFC Site Visit Questionnaire and AFIX as Tools for Quality Assessment
Are US Children In Compliance with Vaccination Recommendations?
Amy Groom, MPH IHS Immunization Program Manager/CDC Field Assignee
Integrating Registries and AFIX for Data Quality
Immunization Registry and Provider-Reported Vaccination Histories: Assessing Missing Vaccinations Linda Piccinino (Abt Associates), Meena Khare (CDC),
Evidence-Based Strategies to Increase Adult Vaccination Rates Recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services Megan C. Lindley, MPH.
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Bureau of Immunization
What’s going on out there
Paul Melinkovich, MD Toni Lyles, RN
Childhood Immunization Rates
Increasing Capacity to Provide Immunization Services
Improving Immunization Rates in Clatsop County:
ACIP Recommended Vaccines for Adults – By Age
RJ Jacobs AS Meyerhoff Capitol Outcomes Research, Inc.
Registry Impact on Program Operations
FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH RECEIPT OF HEPATITIS B VACCINE AMONG HIGH RISK ADULTS NATIONAL HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY, 2000 Nidhi Jain MD MPH The topic of my.
California Automated Immunization Registry CASA Audit Process San Luis Obispo County Public Health Clinics Karen Turner, Regional Registry Coordinator,
Saving Vaccine and Costs With Immunization Registries
Immunize LA Kids Coalition
Coverage Rates in Texas
The Coalition Training Institute At The Center for Pediatric Research
Evaluation Plan to Determine Effectiveness of Promoting Timely Infant Immunizations, Philadelphia, PA Philadelphia Department of Public Health Andrew.
Natalie Darling, M.P.H. Kate Shaw, M.S. Lawrence Barker, Ph.D
Strategies for Private Provider Participation in Registries
NIC 2008 Presented by: Rebecca Coyle Idaho Immunization Program
Merced County Immunization Program Immunization Rates Best Practices
Using the Registry to Conduct WinCASA Assessments: Lessons Learned
Using Ohio’s Impact SIIS Data in Assessing Immunization Rates
Contact: Anuradha Bhatt, MPH
Evaluation of an Intervention to Improve Immunization Up-to-Date Rates Among Children Attending WIC in South Los Angeles Working together for healthy.
Immunization Assessments: More Than a Single Visit
“THIS WILL TAKE JUST A MINUTE OF YOUR TIME”
Evaluation of the San Diego County Baby Track Program
Evaluating National Influenza Vaccination Week (NIVW)
Immunization Status of Colorado Kindergartners
Karen Wooten, MA Elizabeth Luman, MS Lawrence Barker, PhD
The Texas Child Care Immunization Assessment Survey
National Immunization Conference 2005 March 22, 2005 ~ Washington D.C.
Auditing Techniques for Ensuring Quality Data in a Registry
Comparing School Immunization Exemptions to Registry Records
Presentation transcript:

Justin Weisser, MPH; Nathan Crawford, MPH; Mimi Luther, BA An Exploration: - Using Oregon’s AFIX Data - Evaluating 4th DTaP Administration Justin Weisser, MPH; Nathan Crawford, MPH; Mimi Luther, BA

Background: Importance of the 4th DTaP Shot in 4:3:1:3:3 Series Completion Many have theorized that completion of the 4:3:1:3:3 series by 24 months of age is often contingent on the receipt of the 4th shot in the DTaP series. In the past five years of AFIX assessments in Oregon, absence of a 4th DTaP was the most common reason children were found not to be up-to-date with the full 4:3:1:3:3 series.

Study Data Data were taken from 74 AFIX Assessments conducted by Oregon’s VFC/AFIX program in ‘06 Clinics varied by type, size and geographic location Kids assessed from varied SES backgrounds and insurance coverage

Study Data (Con’t) Only kids who had a 4th DTaP were included Only kids at least 24 months old at time of assessment were included A total of 9,316 kids were assessed in this study ALERT Registry source of data

What Is ALERT? Oregon’s Award-Winning Registry! “data warehouse” model public-private partnership voluntary private participation Population-based registry with strong provider participation 100% of public clinics 87% of private clinics

ALERT Registry ALERT contains approximately 95% of kids resident in Oregon between the ages of 0-36 months who have had two or more shots. ALERT registry data are used by the AFIX program to assess individual kid’s immunization status for clinic assessments.

Study Methods Data were received from ALERT and entered into CASA v2.6 at the time of clinic assessment Later, data were exported from CASA as individual clinic data files Individual files were grouped into a single database Merged database was de-duplicated Data were imported into SPSS v14.0 Chi-square test showed an association between the timing of DTaP administration and up-to-date status at 24 months of age

Analysis Results Did receive by 14 months, and UTD: 88% Received after 14 months, and UTD: 81% p <.000  OR= 1.7 95% CI 1.5-2.1

Conclusions Initial results seem to indicate that giving the 4th DTaP before 14 months greatly increases chances of being up-to-date by 2 years of age If correct spacing allows, co-administration of all vaccines due at the 12 months visit.

Limitations & Strengths Shots not evaluated with valid-spacing criteria Participating clinics were self-selected Reasons for early immunization not investigated Very well-populated registry Oregon AFIX data: Oregon specific, timely, relevant, inexpensive (no chart pulls!)

Future Directions Further explore data to find influencing factors (clinic size, practice type, etc…) including valid spacing methodology Design and implement a study to compare practices which switch to a “early 4th DTaP shot” set of standing orders vs. practices which continue with the standard ACIP schedule

Mimi Luther Oregon Public Health Division, Immunization Program 800 NE Oregon, #370 Portland OR 97232 971-673-0296 Lydia.M.Luther@state.or.us