Term Project Presentation CEE6440 GIS in Water Resources Seungbin Hong

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Drainage Basin System
Advertisements

Modelling the rainfall-runoff process
5. Final Remarks Information and the GIS package developed will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of implemented watershed management practices in.
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
Methodology for Evaluating Hydrologic Model Parameters in an Urban Setting: Case Study Using Transferred HSPF Parameters in Midlothian and Tinley Creek.
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: List the essential data needed for water resource modeling Identify sources of water resources.
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
Dr. R.P.Pandey Scientist F. NIH- Nodal Agency Misconception: A DSS takes decisions ---(No)
Hypothesis-Testing Model-Complexity. Hypothesis Testing …..
Flow Estimation in the Wood River Sub-Basin. Study Motivation To estimate an historical record at the mouth of the Wood River. –Enables comparison of.
Watershed Management Water Budget, Hydrograph Analysis
AWRA Water Resources Conference Jacksonville, FL, November Modeling of Watershed Systems Lauren Hay Steve Markstrom Steve Regan.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
These notes are provided to help you pay attention IN class. If I notice poor attendance, fewer notes will begin to appear on these pages 1.
Application of GIS and Terrain Analysis to Watershed Model Calibration for the CHIA Project Sam Lamont Robert Eli Jerald Fletcher.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
GeoResources Institute AN RPC EVALUATION OF THE WATERSHED MODELING PROGRAM HSPF TO NASA EXISTING DATA, SIMULATED FUTURE DATA STREAMS, AND MODEL (LIS) DATA.
The Drainage Basin System
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2011.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.
Introduction to the TOPMODEL
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
DIRECT RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH FOR UNGAUGED BASINS USING A CELL BASED MODEL P. B. Hunukumbura & S. B. Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering, University of.
Automatic Calibration of HSPF model with NEXRAD rainfall data for DMIP Jae Ryu Hydrologist, National Drought Mitigation Center University of Nebraska Lincoln,
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
1 WaterWare description Data management, Objects Monitoring, time series Hydro-meteorological data, forecasts Rainfall-runoff: RRM, floods Irrigation water.
Introduction. The Hanford Site.
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
Simulation of stream flow using WetSpa Model
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Utah State University GIS in Water Resources CEE 6440 Term Project
Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Klamath ADR Hydrology Report
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
National Hydro Data Programs
Distributed modelling
Estimation of Runoff & nonpoint source pollution using GIS techniques
PROCESS-BASED, DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS
Modeling tools Training Module
CBS TECO 2016-Guangzhou,China November 21-22,2016
Calibration.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Following the Lower Colorado River with the guidance of BASINS 3.0
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Parallel Computation of River Basin Hydrologic Response Using DHM
Using GIS to Aid in TMDL Modeling
DHSVM Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model
Hydrologic Information System
Hydrology CIVL341.
Computer Modeling Vadose Zone Models Groundwater Flow Model
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of BASINS/HSPF Runoff Predictions from Craypan Agricultural Watershed Term Project Presentation CEE6440 GIS in Water Resources Seungbin Hong 12/03/2002

BASINS BASINS is a multipurpose environmental analysis system for use by regional, state, and local agencies in performing watershed and water-quality based studies. Integrates GIS ARC View Extensive Database for the entire US Water Quality Models Tools

Components of BASINS Nationally derived databases with Data Extraction tools and Project Builders Assessment Tools (TARGET, ASSESS, and Data Mining) that address large and small-scale characterization needs BASINS Utilities including watershed Delineation, import, Landuse reclassification, DEM reclassification Watershed Characterization Reports Non-Point Source Model (NPSM) and Water Quality Model (QUAL2E) Target – used to perform broad-based water quality and/or point source loading data evaluations on the entire extracted project area. Assess tool - allows users to perform water quality and point source discharge assessment on an individual watershed or a group of watersheds. Data Mining - builds dynamic links between the map interface and related data tables to allow users to retrieve and visualize (1) water quality stations and parameter data, (2) permitted facility locations and pollutant loading discharge data, and (3) bacteria stations and corresponding parameter values. Land Use Reclassification – used to group detailed land use classes, based on their code and descriptions, into broad categories. This tool can modify the existing land use theme(s) or create new themes with different classifications to reflect alternative scenarios. BASINS 2.0 provides users the capability to generate six different types of watershed characterization reports; 1) Point Source Inventory Report 2) Water Quality Summary Report 3) Toxic Air Emission Report 4) Landuse Distribution Report 5) State Soil Characteristics Report 6) Watershed Topographic Report

Non Point Source Model NPSM (HSPF v11) HSPF is a very complex model. However, it is structurally modular permitting the user to isolate and focus on elements of interest while bypassing other modules and their activities. The model considers a basin or watershed comprising of 2 segments: Land Segment – pervious and Impervious Water body (Streams, lakes, reservoirs) HSPF Modules PERLAND – the module that simulates pervious land segment IMPLAND – the module that simulates impervious land segment RCHRES – the module that routes runoff through reservoir while simulating instream processes NPSM – Non Point Source Model HSPF – Hydrologic Simulation Program - FORTRAN

Hydrology in NPSM Hydrologic Components: Rainfall or Snow Interception Depression Storage Evapotranspiration Infiltration Surface Storage Runoff Interflow Groundwater Flow

Objectives Run BASIN/HSPF modeling program and evaluate runoff predictions using BASINS default parameters Evaluate the sensitivity of key hydrologic parameters Calibrate the model Evaluate the calibrated model

Site Description- Craypan Watershed in Missouri Located within Monroe and Shelby County in North Central Missouri Encompasses 111 sq.mi. (71,204 acres) A tributary of the North Fork of the Salt River, which empties into Mark Twain Lake . The watershed encompasses 111 sq.mi. (71,204 acres) and is a tributary of the North Fork of the Salt River, which empties into Mark Twain Lake just upstream of the intake for the Clarence Cannon Wholesale Water Commission (CCWWC) which provides over 2.3 million gallons per day of drinking water to a 12 county area.

Soil, Landuse, and Topograph

Delineation of the Sub-watershed Crooked Creek based on the RF1 and RF3 reach networks

Parameters and Default value for simulation Data Group Symbol Definition Default Value Minimum Maximum PWAT- PARM2 LZSN Lower zone nominal storage 14.10 0.01 100.0 INFILT Index to the infiltration capacity of the soil 0.16 0.0001 LSUR Length of the assumed overland flow plane 300 1.0 None SLSUR Slope 0.035 0.0000001 10.0 AGWRC Basic groundwater recession rate if KVARY is 0 and there is no inflow to groundwater 0.98 0.001 0.999 PARM3 DEEPFR Fraction of groundwater inflow which will enter deep (inactive) groundwater and be lost 0.10 0.0 BASETP Fraction of potential E-T which can be satisfied from baseflow (groundwater outflow) 0.02 PARM4 UZSN Upper zone nominal storage 1.1280 NSUR Manning’s n for the assumed overland flow plane INTFW Interflow inflow parameter 0.75 IRC Interflow recession parameter 0.5 1.0E-30 LZETP Lower zone E-T parameter. It is an index to the density of deep-rooted vegetation

Steps for performing within the NPSM interface

Steps for performing within the NPSM interface

Runoff by Default values on the simulation The default parameters are largely divided into three categories: Water Balance, Groundwater, and Surface Runoff. Categories Parameters Water Balance LZSN, LZETP, INFILT, DEEPFR Groundwater INFILT, AGWRC, DEEPFR, BASETP Surface Runoff UZSN, INTFLW, IRC, LUSR, NSUR, SLSUR (Unit; mm) PERO* SURO* Base Flow* Measured Value 287.59 244.45 43.14 Predicted Value 298.64 32.14 266.49 Difference % -4% 87% -518% * PERO ; Total outflow SURO ; Surface outflow Base flow ; IFWO (Interflow) + AGWO (Groundwater flow)

Calibration, Sensitivity, & The Best Result on Simulation by the revised Parameter Default Revised Default LZSN INFILT LSUR SLSUR AGWRC DEEPFR BASETP UZSN NSUR INTFW IRC LZETP 14.10 0.16 300 0.035 0.98 0.10 0.02 1.1280 0.75 0.5 0.1 18.5 0.009 0.96 0.08 1.25 0.01 0.65 PERO SURO Base Flow 298.64 32.143 266.50 287.20 243.58 43.62 Sensitive Parameters LZSN, DEEPFR, BASETP, USZN Insensitive Parameters LZETP, IRC PERO SURO Base Flow Measured Value 287.59 244.45 43.14 Revised Value 287.20 243.58 43.62 Difference % 0.14% 0.36% -1.11%

Future Work According to “Crooked Creek Watershed Project”, an atrazine, sediment, and nutrient loading are concerning in this watershed. In the future, when simulating this model, we should consider important environmental parameters.