Transportation Funding Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.
Advertisements

1 Measure M Investment Plan Update. 2 Measure M: A Contract With the Voters Approved by 55 percent of voters in November 1990 after two failures One-half.
Iowa State Association of Counties 2013 Fall School of Instruction November 14, 2013 Stu Anderson Iowa Department of Transportation.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Ballot Financing Alameda County Presented by Tess Lengyel, Deputy Director Center for Transportation Excellence June 22, 2011.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Funding the Future of Our Transportation Infrastructure Juva Barber Executive Director.
Juva Barber Executive Director. What is KBT? Kentuckians for Better Transportation educates and advocates for all modes of transportation to promote a.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison, WI - Mexico City June.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Module Funding Sources, Requirements, and Opportunities Identify, access, and share funding to support road safety initiatives.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis Transportation Funding Updated March 10, 2014.
Pasco County “Budget 101” OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET.
Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
BUDGET PROCESS & REVENUE & EXPENSE INFORMATION For FISCAL YEAR 2011.
NORTH & SOUTH FULTON TRANSPORTATION VOTE November 8, 2016.
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017
John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer
League of California Cities Sacramento Valley Division “Transportation Funding through Grants” California Consulting, LLC Tove Beatty, Project Manager.
The California Gas Tax Swap Learning from a Failed Experiment
The Roads Most Traveled: California’s Transportation Funding Needs
Senate Committee on Transportation, Technology and Legislative Affairs
State & Federal Transportation Funding Trends 2017
State Funding Strategies
Transportation Funding Deal Explained
Fund Accounting Overview
Minnesota’s Municipal Transportation System
TOWN OF BOURNE FINANCIAL REVIEW
Regional Roads Committee
Winning Dedicated Funding for California Transit
NOTE: To change images on this slide, select a picture and delete it. Then click the Insert Picture icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. Highways.
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Transportation Funding
Finance and Governance Infrastructure Challenges in North Carolina
FY 2017 Recommended Capital Plan
SB1: Road Repair & Accountability Act of 2017 “Local Perspective”
Moving Away From The Gas Tax
November 3rd, 2017 Autumn 2017 CalACT Conference
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
SB 1 Funding Overview and Regional Impacts
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City, Kansas
SB 1 and Capital Program Update
Transportation Finance Legislation and Ballot Measures
County State Aid Needs.
This is a side to visualize how we got into this transportation funding problem (most folks have probably seen this and know the numbers) We only spend.
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Finance and Fiscal Policies
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Joint Committee Meeting: Highway and Finance & Budget
STIP Development OTO Board Meeting
February 2017 New Starts Financial Plan
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
Comprehensive and Dependable Transportation Plan
Highways GOVT 2306, Module 12 NOTE:
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
MoDOT: Year In Review Ed Hassinger Deputy Director/Chief Engineer.
Budget office overview
Funding Agricultural Replacement Measures for Emission Reductions (FARMER) Program CARB Board Hearing: March 22-23, 2018.
Transportation Planning and Funding Overview
Presentation transcript:

Transportation Funding Update 2018 Public Works Officers Institute CEAC Spring Conference

Topics 2017 Transportation Funding Package Highlights SB 1 Repeal Efforts Frequently Asked Questions Economic Study Homework Assignment!

SB 1 & ACA 5/Prop 69 Transportation funding package – SB 1 and ACA 5 (Prop 69) – signed into law April 2017 SB 1 – The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 Approximately $5 billion/year in new revenue – no sunset Prop 69 – extends constitutional protections to SB 1 revenues not already protected Prop 69 will go to voters for approval June 2018

What taxes were part of the deal? 12-cent gas excise tax increase Reset price-based excise tax at 17.3-cents 20-cent diesel excise tax increase 4% diesel sales tax increase $25-$175 annual “transportation improvement fee” based on vehicle value $100 annual zero emissions vehicle fee CPI adjustments on excise taxes/fees

Accountability & Transparency Cities/counties submit annual list of planned projects and list of expenditures to CTC FY 2018-19 Project List due May 1, 2018 FY 2017-18 Expenditure Report due October 1, 2018 Office of Inspector General to conduct audits and investigations of transportation programs Additional CTC oversight of the development and management of SHOPP program CTC oversight, development and administration of competitive grant programs

How will revenues be phased-in? New fuel taxes effective November 2017 First payment to cities, counties and state Jan. 30 The  value-based transportation improvement fee effective January 2018 The price-based excise tax will be reset July 1, 2019 (maybe) One more adjustment regular adjustment scheduled for July 1, 2018 Zero emissions vehicles will begin to pay an additional registration fee for road maintenance in 2020

Where does the funding go? $1.5 billion for state highways $1.5 billion for local roads $750 million for transit operations and capital $400 million for state bridges $300 million for goods movement/freight projects $250 million for the new “Solutions for Congested Corridors” program $200 million for state-local partnership $100 million for the Active Transportation grants $25 million for Freeway Service Patrol $25 million for local planning grants $7 million for UC and CSU Transportation Research

Statewide Project & Funding Information Rebuilding California Search by lead agency, type of project California Transportation Commission Guidelines for SB 1 programs, oversight activities California State Association of Counties and League of California Cities Annual revenue projections, local agency outreach tool kit

SB 1 Under Fire Effort to repeal SB 1 Strong opposition campaign Collecting signatures, raising money November 2018 General Election Strong opposition campaign Coalition to Protect Local Transportation Investments https://fixcaroads.com/join-our-coalition/

Education & Outreach Educate, don’t advocate (on public dime) Know the facts – what SB 1 does and does not do. What does SB 1 mean for your community? What benefits, direct and indirect, will community receive? What would happen to your community’s infrastructure if SB 1 is repealed? Promote project list adoption, project milestones, project expenditure reports. Use traditional and social media outlets.

Frequently Asked Questions Do SB 1 funds go into the state’s General Fund? What guarantees are there that the money will be used to fund transportation improvement projects? Revenues go directly into transportation accounts and are constitutionally protected. All transportation revenues that were loaned in prior decades to the General Fund will have be repaid under SB 1 by 2020.

Frequently Asked Questions, Cont. Why can’t California just dedicate existing General Fund revenues to fix transportation? Why not repurpose High Speed Rail (HSR) bonds? SB 1 follows the user-pay model. If the State were to use General Fund revenue, it would have to come from other important programs like healthcare and public safety. In order to repurpose the HSR bond for roads, it would require a vote of the people. The bond was for $10 billion in one time money. It wouldn’t come close to solving the state’s long-term transportation funding problem.

Frequently Asked Questions, Cont. Are SB 1 funds being used for non-transportation purposes, such as off-highway trails and boating infrastructure? A percentage of the existing gas tax revenue related to fuel sales from boats, agricultural equipment, and other off-highway vehicles (quads, dirt bikes) has always gone toward supporting infrastructure related to these economic and recreational activities. The percent of gas tax revenues collected from these sources is two-percent (2%).

Frequently Asked Questions, Cont. Will SB 1 fund the high-speed rail project? No funds raised from SB 1 will be used to fund high-speed rail. California’s state-maintained transportation infrastructure will receive roughly half of SB 1 revenue: $26 billion. The other half will go to local roads, transit agencies and an expansion of the state’s growing network of pedestrian and cycle routes.

Economic Study

Economic Study, Cont. Translates to an average of 68,203 jobs each year. An annual savings of nearly $300 per household in California (derived from “total user benefits”). Will support the repair, repaving & reconstruction on over 84,000 lames miles on nearly 19,000 miles of roadways. With improved conditions, drivers will see an average of $818 million per year on operating costs.

Economic Study, Cont. Better roads also mean safer roads. Adding up to an average of $8 million per year in additional safety benefits. Enables the replacement of an additional 556 state and local bridges in the first five years. Sales and output by business in all sectors will increase by $11 billion each year. Workers will earn an average of $3.3 billion in wages per year.

Traditional Media Opportunities

Get Social

A picture is worth 1,000 words…

Get Social + Pictures

Get Social + Pictures, Cont.

Road Signs

Homework Assignment! Projects, projects, projects! Promote those projects. Get involved in the effort to protect state and local transportation investments. Guidance for public agencies and campaign activities: Institute for Local Government: http://www.ca-ilg.org/sites/main/files/file- attachments/ballot_measure_activities_2018.pdf. Talk to People, influential or “otherwise”.