Mail Prep & Entry Pre-MTAC Webinar

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Move Update & Compliance Fundamentals M & W Printers and United States Postal Service.
Advertisements

® Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
Global Systems Management Surface Visibility Presented by USPS at July 10 Packages Subgroup Meeting.
Change to CASS/MASS Change to CASS/MASS ZIP + 4 ®Process Jan Caldwell Manager, Address Management Mailers Technical Advisory Committee May 2006 George.
Seamless Acceptance Pritha Mehra, USPS Manager, Marketing Technology & Channel Management.
Mailers+4 The #1 Mailing Software in the Industry.
Understanding & Using the USPS DSMS System The Benefits, Requirements Added Value of the Drop Ship Management System.
® ACS PROCESSING IMPROVEMENTS IN CFS AND DELIVERY OPERATIONS May 26, 2011.
Module 9 Leaving the Office. Objectives  Recognize forms and equipment carried on the route  Properly process hot case mail  Apply automated mail procedures.
Stump The Experts With Your Uncodable – Undeliverable-As-Addressed Mail National Postal Forum April 11 – 14, 2010 Jim Wilson, Manager Address Management,
Addressing, Automation & Presort Lloyd M. Moss. Agenda Overview of how Addressing, Automation and Presort earn postal discounts Addressing Requirements:
Price Change Effective April 26, 2015 Northeast Area Mailing Industry Focus Group Meeting February 25,
PROJECT ARROW Project Arrow Office PERFORMANCE MONITORING 3.
Postal Automated Redirection System (PARS) John Keegan Manager, Automation Equipment Engineering Mailers´ Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) November.
Mail Entry and Payment Technology MTAC Pritha Mehra VP Mail Entry & Payment Technology February 17, 2011.
Total Address Quality. Total Address Quality 2 OSV At A Glance OSV produces over 500 Million envelopes every year! OSV processes over 4 Million addresses.
Mail Entry & Payment Technology Agenda  Benefits of IMpb  IMpb Requirements Unique Barcode Shipping Services File (SSF)  Postal Wizard Enhancements.
Shipping 101 Shipping Best Practices Southern Tier Postal Customer Council.
Mail Services Survey 121 Completed Survey, Thank You Satisfaction levels ranged from 72-1/2 % up to 91.7% Awareness & usage of service were lower In the.
Parcel Endorsement Options and Shipper Paid Forwarding 8/05/08.
Background on USPS mail forwarding operations Overview of PARS
1 New Move Update Standards Keeping Track of Your Customers Malaki Gravely Business Mail Entry Unit US Postal Service Baltimore PCC March 24, 2011 Baltimore,
Overview of Scanning Presented by Tom Day Senior VP, Intelligent Mail & Address Quality Friday, February 20, 2009 Webinar #14.
Outgoing Mail  Outgoing campus mail should be bundled and prepared to be given to a Mailing Services employee by 9:00 a.m. Monday through.
Service Measurement – SPMS PO Box Up Time Measurement at Delivery Units Presented by: Kathy Ainsworth Vice President, Retail Operations and Jordan Small.
The ROI of Address Quality Charles Hunt Address Management USPS ® Chris Lien Executive Vice President BCC Software Inc A Böwe Bell + Howell Company.
February, 2008 Intelligent Mail® Readiness. 2 Agenda Intelligent Mail® Readiness  Full Service Project Schedule  Intelligent Mail® Releases  Mailer.
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION November 5, FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION Issue #81 MTAC November 5, 2003.
FAST for Periodicals MTAC Workgroup 95 Washington, D.C. November 8, 2007.
Network Rationalization Mail Moves, Labeling Lists and Mail Direction File Industry Webinar July 1, 2013 To listen to a recording of this presentation.
Day Weighted Resident Rosters New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services AND July-August 2010.
Address Quality It is more important than anything else!
® Flats Update Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS Krista Finazzo Manager, Operational Requirements MTAC – November 2010.
® MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement USPS Service Measurement Capability July 31, 2007.
Addressing, Automation & Presort Lloyd M. Moss Senior Product Manager Pitney Bowes Group 1 Software.
Corporate Automation Plan PHASE 2 February 4, 2004Washington D.C.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process October 6, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
Mailing Services Price Change Effective April 17, 2011 January Mailing Services Price Change GBPCC L & L Andrée Kater Manager, Business Mail.
Intelligent Mail February Vision Provide end-to-end visibility and a seamless process for mail acceptance and delivery, using standardized intelligent.
® MTAC 143 September 11, ® Agenda  Release 38, Known Issues Impacting Reports  Release 38, MicroStrategy Report Updates  Questions 2.
1 Gary Reblin and Jan Caldwell Intelligent Mail & Address Quality Intelligent MAIL ™ in the U. S. Postal Service MTAC February 5, 2004.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process November 15, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
® Customer Supplier Agreements Presented by Pritha Mehra Vice President, Business Mail Entry Friday, October 17, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
® Flats Symposium 2008 Bill Galligan Senior Vice President, Operations USPS National Postal Forum ® National Postal Forum 2008.
MTAC Workgroup #87 - Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process August 3, 2006.
“In-Home Delivery” Instructions for Standard Mail MTAC Presentation February 05, 2003.
Address Change Service (ACS)™ – A Primer. ACS™ debut  In the mid-1980s, Address Change Service (ACS) was developed to provide an enhancement to the manual.
1 November, 2008 Intelligent Mail® Readiness. 2 Agenda Intelligent Mail® Readiness  Full Service Project Schedule/Infrastructure  Recap Full Service.
MTAC Work Group 136 Kick-Off Expanding and Enhancing ACS™ Data June 7, 2010.
MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement Standard Mail Measurement July 30, 2007 Std Subgroup Meeting.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process TBD MTAC Workgroup 138.
® Webinar #10 Commercial First-Class Mail and Standard Mail Measurement Presented by Tom Day Senior Vice President, Intelligent Mail and Address Quality.
Changes By Class of Mail
1 MTAC May 26, 2011 Washington D.C. Kelly Sigmon Vice-President, Engineering USPS Operations Plan for Flats & Technology Update.
ENTER To view the PS Form 3546 tutorial slide show, press the F5 key or click on Slide Show at the top of this window. In the dropdown window, click View.
Military Postal Service Agency FOUO 1 DoD Mail Acceptance & Delivery Solutions.
Simplifying the Commercial Mailing Experience Heather Dyer Program Manager Major Mailer Support HQ.
What Are Bad Addresses – Xactly? 1 What are “Bad” Addresses & What Do You Do With Them – Xactly? National Postal Forum Anaheim, CA May 18 th – 21 th, 2007.
Campus Mail Services HOW TO USE THE CMS PACKAGE TRACKING SYSTEM UI Business Mail Only (no student mail is tracked on this system) TRACK A PACKAGE FLAG.
Express Mail Offers: Overnight delivery to most locations Money back guarantee Receives expedited handling from acceptance to delivery Express Mail label.
® Managing Function 4 AM Operations WSS/ WSH Don Marbrey Ken Capps June 2011.
PARS MAIL PREPARATION. PARS DEFINITIONS CFS Computerized Forwarding System CIOSS Combined Input Output Sub System CIF Carrier Identified Forwards RTS.
Colleges & Universities Delivery Partners Program
… January 14 – 16, 2014 Wanda Senne NAAD Meeting, February 28, 2014
Online Student Orientation
Seamless Acceptance Pritha Mehra, USPS Manager, Marketing Technology & Channel Management.
CBMS Transformation Address Tip Sheet
JUNE 2010 CALENDAR PROJECT PLANNING 1 Month MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY
Contact
Presentation transcript:

Mail Prep & Entry Pre-MTAC Webinar February 15, 2018

Agenda Delivery Operations FAST Update Question/Answer Period Closing

Delivery Operations August 23, 2017

Undeliverable as Addressed and Return to Sender Process Reasons for UAA and RTS There are 25 reasons in the DMM for returning mail to the sender (DMM 507.1.4.1) Most common reasons are Addressing issues Missing or incorrect components Addressee (name) issues Does not reside at address Most obscure Violation of Postal False Representation and Lottery Law Percent of total packages returned UAA .03%

Mail piece is identified as UAA by USPS employee Undeliverable as Addressed and Return to Sender Process UAA Process Mail piece is identified as UAA by USPS employee Employee endorses the mail piece with reason for the return Some pieces are all endorsed individually Deceased, Refused, No Mail Receptacle, others For some return categories only the top piece of a group of like pieces are endorsed and bundled Attempted Not Known, No Such Number, Insufficient Address, others Employee provides mail to a specialized clerk who groups mail from multiple employees by reason for return Uses specialized divider cards that contain each endorsement Mail is sent to a centralized processing facility for Postal Automated Redirect System (PARS) processing Automated equipment reads the separator card, applies a label with the return reason and a barcode with the return address for all following pieces until the next card is detected Mail is then processed with other outbound mail Parcels are endorsed similarly but may also receive a scan from the carrier The specialized clerk will make a more specific scan with the reason for the return Manually prepares the package for return or forwarding and place with other outbound parcels Undeliverable as Addressed

Scanned UAA and Delivered to Same Address Weighted Undeliverable as Addressed and Delivered Scanned UAA and Delivered to Same Address Week 16 FY18 SATURDAY 10.1% SUNDAY 3.2% MONDAY 15.4% TUESDAY 22.3% WEDNESDAY 17.1% THURSDAY 16.7% FRIDAY 15.2% Unfamiliar carriers sometimes cannot find an address in complex urban environments, or the customer does not have a house number so they return the piece to the post office and to obtain instructions for delivery City Carrier 53.4% Rural Carrier 28.6% Clerk 10.3% Small errors in the address will cause a carrier unfamiliar with the route to return a piece to the post office to allow a carrier experienced on the route to correct the error rather then return the package

Mobile Delivery Device Menu Redesign Reducing Scanning Errors Simplify and Consolidate Categorize into five broad selections Delivered Attempted Return to Sender or Forward Ancillary Other Allow carrier to select specific reason for returns Improve login process to ensure Correct carrier information Correct route information Mobile Delivery Device Menu Redesign

Training Initiatives Finalizing clerk, carrier training video for UAA Addresses several key mailer concerns Mail returned in error Mail returned with wrong endorsement Barcode obliteration

3M – Missent, Missort and Missequence 3M Errors 3M errors occur in automated mail processing Root causes: Delivery looks for recurrent errors / Feedback process to mail processing Mail Processing has some early warning tools for Delivery Letter & Flat Delivery Point Sequencing Machine jams Machine stops Double feeds Bad barcodes Glare

USPS ingests package data Dynamic Routing Delivery controls & decides level/scope of routing needed Groups of ZIP Codes Fixed Groups of Routes Sections of Routes Delivery unit submits selected areas and/or packages for routing USPS software routes packages Delivery unit receives “routing complete” message Distribution clerks scan packages AAU and receives dynamic route number and delivery order (sequence number) Carrier receives sequence and directions via the Mobile Delivery Device Audio and on-screen Paper back-up available USPS ingests package data

Summary Summary USPS shares your concerns with errant Undeliverable As Addressed returns Letters, Flats, Parcels Working to improve via education, technology, scanning USPS has expanded dynamic routing from Sunday only to all days of the week True dynamic, Static dynamic, volume based dynamic, street density level dynamic Working to include fixed scheduled points (time of day)with unscheduled points Collection points, package delivery, custom delivery, USPS relays Improve the customer experience and improve efficiencies

FAST August 23, 2017

Master Draft 1 6:00 AM FAST Help Desk The following charts relate to calls and emails from mailers to the FAST Helpdesk over Dec 2017 - Jan 2018 3,906 Emails 7,766 Calls Master Draft 1

FAST Help Desk Dec 2017 – Jan 2018 Emails Calls Help Desk Hours Call Count % Business Hours (Mon-Fri, 7AM-7PM CT) 7,291 93.9% On Call Hours (7PM-7AM CT & wknds) 475 6.1% Total 7,766 100.0%

FAST Help Desk – FAST Issues

FAST Help Desk – Unloads Unload Issues, Dec 2017 – Jan 2018

Planned Improvements Verify facility profiles nationally, including names, email addresses, phone numbers, hours of operation, drop ship hours, etc. [Feb 2018] Notify managers/employees of FAST issues [Feb 2018] Develop internal drop shipment dashboard [April 2018] Provide employee training/communications on common FAST issues [ongoing]

Questions