Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (April 2002)
Advertisements

Essential Role of ERK Dimers in the Activation of Cytoplasmic but Not Nuclear Substrates by ERK-Scaffold Complexes  Berta Casar, Adán Pinto, Piero Crespo 
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Modulation of K-Ras-Dependent Lung Tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21
Shitao Li, Lingyan Wang, Michael A. Berman, Ye Zhang, Martin E. Dorf 
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Yu-Hsin Chiu, Jennifer Y. Lee, Lewis C. Cantley  Molecular Cell 
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Nithya Raman, Elisabeth Weir, Stefan Müller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
TNF-Induced Activation of the Nox1 NADPH Oxidase and Its Role in the Induction of Necrotic Cell Death  You-Sun Kim, Michael J. Morgan, Swati Choksi, Zheng-gang.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
C-Jun Downregulation by HDAC3-Dependent Transcriptional Repression Promotes Osmotic Stress-Induced Cell Apoptosis  Yan Xia, Ji Wang, Ta-Jen Liu, W.K.
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Lizhong Xu, Veronica Lubkov, Laura J. Taylor, Dafna Bar-Sagi 
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
C-Raf Inhibits MAPK Activation and Transformation by B-RafV600E
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Centrosome-Associated NDR Kinase Regulates Centrosome Duplication
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Akihiko Yokoyama, Michael L. Cleary  Cancer Cell 
Activation of a Signaling Cascade by Cytoskeleton Stretch
Shipra Das, Olga Anczuków, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
The Tumor Suppressor PP2A Aβ Regulates the RalA GTPase
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Yuki Okuda-Shimizu, Linda M. Hendershot  Molecular Cell 
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 45-56 (July 2011) SHP2 Tyrosine Phosphatase Converts Parafibromin/Cdc73 from a Tumor Suppressor to an Oncogenic Driver  Atsushi Takahashi, Ryouhei Tsutsumi, Ippei Kikuchi, Chikashi Obuse, Yasuhiro Saito, Azadeh Seidi, Robert Karisch, Minerva Fernandez, Taewoo Cho, Naomi Ohnishi, Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen, Matthew Meyerson, Benjamin G. Neel, Masanori Hatakeyama  Molecular Cell  Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 45-56 (July 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.014 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2011 43, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Interaction of the PAF Complex with Substrate-Trapping SHP2 (A) NIH 3T3 cells were transiently transfected with the indicated vectors. Total cell lysates prepared were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Myc antibody and the immunoprecipitates (IPs) were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. FAK, a known SHP2 substrate, was used as a control. ST, substrate-trapping SHP2; ST/T507K, substrate-trapping SHP2-T507K; pY, phosphotyrosine. (B) lacC9 cells with or without induction of SHP2-specific shRNA by IPTG treatment were subjected to immunostaining (top) or immunoblotting (bottom) with the indicated antibodies. Nuclei were visualized by DAPI staining. Scale bar represents 20 μm. (C–E) AGS (C and D) or lacC9 cells with or without induction of SHP2-shRNA (E) were transiently transfected with the indicated vectors. Total cell lysates (TCLs) prepared were immunoprecipitated with the respective antibodies and the IPs were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. PF, parafibromin. (F) AGS (top) or HEK293A (bottom) cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-parafibromin (PF) antibody or control IgG and the IPs were immunoblotted with an anti-PF antibody or anti-phosphotyrosine (pY) antibody. (G) Ptpn11fl/KO mice-derived MEFs expressing tamoxifen (4-OHT)-inducible Cre-ER were treated with or without 4-OHT. TCLs prepared were immunoprecipitated with an anti-PF antibody. The IPs were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Tyrosine Dephosphorylation of Parafibromin by SHP2 (A) AGS cells were transiently transfected with the indicated parafibromin (PF) vector or control empty vector. Total cell lysates (TCLs) prepared were immunoprecipitated with the respective antibodies and the immunoprecipitates (IPs) were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. (B and C) AGS cells were cotransfected with SHP2-ST-Myc (B) or SHP2-ST/T507K-Myc (C) vector and Flag-parafibromin (wild-type or Y290/293/315F) vector. TCLs prepared were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Myc (B) or anti-Flag (C) antibody, and the IPs were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. (D) AGS cells were triple-transfected with Flag-parafibromin (PF), c-Abl, and SHP2-Myc vectors. TCLs prepared were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Flag antibody, and the IPs were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. (E) AGS cells were cotransfected with Myc-tagged SHP2 (wild-type, T507K, D61G, or E76K) and Flag-parafibromin (PF) vectors. TCLs prepared were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Flag antibody and the immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Values indicate levels of parafibromin tyrosine phosphorylation relative to that in the absence of ectopic SHP2 expression. See also Figure S2. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Regulation of Parafibromin/β-Catenin Interaction by SHP2 (A–C) HEK293A (A) or AGS (B) cells were transiently transfected with the indicated vectors. The lacC9 cells (C) were induced to express SHP2-shRNA by IPTG treatment. Total cell lysates (TCLs) were immunoprecipitated with the respective antibodies and the immunoprecipitates (IPs) were immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies. Error bars indicate + standard deviation (SD); n = 3, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (A). Values indicate relative amounts of β-catenin that bound to parafibromin (PF) (B and C). See also Figure S3. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effect of β-Catenin or SUV39H1 on Parafibromin Function (A–D) AGS cells were transiently transfected with luciferase reporters together with the indicated expression vector and were subjected to the dual luciferase reporter assay. β-catenin S33Y is a degradation-resistant β-catenin mutant. The levels of transfected proteins are shown (representative images from triplicate experiments). In (B), AGS cells were cotransfected with Paf1-specific shRNA and wild-type parafibromin vector. Error bars represent ± SD; n = 3, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (E) AGS cells transfected with the parafibromin (PF) vector were immunoblotted with the respective antibodies. Values indicate amounts of c-Myc or cyclin D1 relative to Actin. (F and G) AGS cells transfected with the c-myc reporter together with the indicated vectors were subjected to the dual luciferase assay. Error bars indicate mean ± SD; n = 3 (F), n = 6 (G), ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (H and I) HEK293T cells were transfected with the indicated vectors. Total cell lysates (TCLs) were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Flag (H and I) or anti-Myc (H) antibody, and the immunoprecipitates (IPs) were immunoblotted with the respective antibodies. See also Figure S4. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Nuclear Accumulation of β-Catenin by Parafibromin or SHP2 (A) AGS cells transfected with the Flag-parafibromin (PF) vectors were immunostained with respective antibodies. The signal intensity of β-catenin was quantified. Error bars indicate ± SD; n = 10, Scale bar represents 20 μm. (B) AGS cells transfected with the PF vectors were subjected to immunoblotting with respective antibodies. (C) AGS cells transfected with the SHP2-Myc vectors were immunostained with respective antibodies. The signal intensity of β-catenin was quantified. Error bars indicate ± SD; n = 10, Scale bar represents 20 μm. (D) AGS cells transfected with the parafibromin-shRNA and SHP2-T507K-Myc vectors were immunostained with an anti-parafibromin antibody (top left) or anti-Myc plus anti-β-catenin antibodies (bottom left) or were subjected to immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies (top right). The signal intensity of β-catenin was quantified (bottom right). Error bars indicate ± SD, n = 10, scale bars represent 20 μm. (E) Anti-β-catenin or anti-c-Myc immunostaining of myeloid cells infiltrating enlarged spleens of Ptpn11D61G/+ mice. Spleens from littermate mice were used as a control. Scale bars represent 20 μm. See also Figure S5. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 RAS Signal-Dependent Translocalization of SHP2 (A) AGS cells, either proliferating (left) or confluent (middle), were immunostained with an anti-SHP2 antibody (green). The confluent cells were re-seeded at a reduced cell density and stained with an anti-SHP2 antibody (right). Scale bar represents 20 μm. (B and C) Confluent HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with K-RASV12 vector (B) or SOS1-M269R-Flag vector (C). Transfected cells were then stained with anti-SHP2 antibody (green) and anti-RAS or anti-Flag antibody (red). Scale bar represents 20 μm. Box and whisker plots on the right show the ratio of the fluorescence intensity of the nuclear SHP2 to that of the cytoplasmic SHP2. Boundaries of the box: 25th and 75th percentiles, A line within the box: median; whiskers: 10th and 90th percentiles; filled circles: outliers. n = 34, Student's t test. (D) Nuclear extracts prepared from proliferating or confluent AGS cells were immunoprecipitated with an anti-parafibromin (PF) antibody. The immunoprecipitates (IPs) were immunoblotted with an anti-phosphotyrosine (pY) or anti-parafibromin antibody. Molecular Cell 2011 43, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.014) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions