Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADVISING STUDENTS: WHAT DO THEY REALLY WANT? Marymount Innovations October 2009.
Advertisements

Austin Community College Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Executive Summary.
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2013 November 27th, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
SATISFACTION AND SELF-PERCEPTIONS: HOW ARE THE RELATED? STEVE GRAUNKE INDIANA UNIVERSITY-PURDUE UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS.
OMS Questionnaire Changes for Version 3
Entering Student Surveys (UG & Grad) and Non-Enrolling Survey (UG): Fall 2011 November 1, 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Planning.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
New Business Overall Satisfaction Ratings Rating Scale = Extremely Satisfied 6 = Very Satisfied 5 = Satisfied 4 = Neither Satisf. nor Dissatisfied.
Real Estate Agent Response Times versus Client Expectations Room for improvement is clearly indicated. Market Enhancement Group, Inc. MEG-Research.com.
Period 5 Survey Findings English 10 A. Parents  1 of 6 did attend the Prep, that 1 stated the Prep HAS changed since they attended  Satisfaction with.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Campus Climate: Embedded in Strategic Plan Core Theme Three: Building Community – Create a diverse, inclusive, and safe environment accessible to all Objective.
Alumni Survey Summer 2015 Undergraduate and Graduate.
Enrolling Student Surveys: Fall 2009 November 10, 2009.
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (long version) Institutional Research and Planning.
Entering Student Surveys: Fall 2010 Perry Deess, Ph.D. Institutional Research and Planning November 17, 2010.
1 ANOVA: ANalysis Of VAriances Shyh-Kang Jeng Department of Electrical Engineering/ Graduate Institute of Communication/ Graduate Institute of Networking.
THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME AUSTRALIA 82% Graduate Employment Rate That’s what we deliver at Notre Dame.
Undergraduate&Graduate – Entering Students Survey Fall 2016
National Survey of Student Engagement Noel-Levitz Satisfaction Surveys
Capital Community College 2014 Graduate Survey
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
Community Survey Report
Faculty Diversity & Work Life Survey Review
Fall 2015 Faculty Satisfaction Survey
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
Membership Satisfaction Survey
ELI 2012 Annual Meeting February 15, 2012 Austin, Texas
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey
NSSE Data Conversations
Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city
2017 Community Survey Town of Snowmass Village, CO
Employer-Intern Survey 2016
Institutional Research and Planning
Institutional Effectiveness: Trends for Planning
administered at MMCC six times:
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2017
Demographic and Outcome Trends for Planning
2003 Student Satisfaction Survey
The 2015 COACHE Survey YORK COLLEGE Faculty Satisfaction
One Step Away Initiative
Montana University System Staff Association (MUSSA) Board of Regents meeting May 25, 2017 John.
Managing Motor Fleet Safety Programs: Training for the Safety Director
Katie Sherron Economics
Student Satisfaction Spring 2007 (Short version)
Student Satisfaction Spring 2009
Enrollment Update BOT March 2018.
Employer Survey 2018 Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Report to the Board of Trustees November 2018
Entering Student Surveys (Undergraduate & Graduate) Fall 2018
OFFICE OF RESIDENTIAL LIFE RESULTS OVERVIEW
Student Satisfaction: Undergraduate Spring 2010
Student Satisfaction Spring 2006 (Short version)
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Student Student Evaluations of Fall 2010 Career Fair.
Academic Development Survey By School Spring 2007
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Undergraduate Survey Data
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
Institutional Research and Planning
Student Satisfaction Learning Community Spring 2011
Student Experience Survey 2016 Preliminary Analysis
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2012
2009 Student Opinion Survey Results
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2018 Undergraduate Trends
The NJIT Student Experience
Student Satisfaction Survey Spring 2019 Undergraduate Trends
Institutional Research and Planning
Presentation transcript:

Student Satisfaction Spring 2009 Short Version Institutional Research and Planning

Undergraduate Student Sample (n = 1535) 31.4 % response rate

If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT If you could start over again, would you go to NJIT? Undergraduate Students Comparison

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Comparison with 2008 Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Undergraduate Student Satisfaction Overall Satisfaction Trend Importance Scale: 5 – Very important, 4 – Important, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Somewhat important, 1 – Little or no importance Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Overall Undergraduate Satisfaction With NJIT Seven Year Comparison Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied

Personal security and safety on campus Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

General condition of buildings and grounds Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

Relevance of coursework to career development Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

Feeling of community on campus Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

Overall quality of instruction Undergraduate Students Three Year Trend

Student Satisfaction By Undergraduate/Graduate Undergraduate Response Rate: 31.4% Graduate Response Rate: 36.5% Satisfaction Scale: 5 – Very satisfied, 4 – Satisfied, 3 – Neutral, 2 – Dissatisfied, 1 – Very dissatisfied