Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Laying a Foundation for First Year Assessment Nazareth College of Rochester, Marywood University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Best Practices: Monitoring Academic Progress and Improving Student Retention Brian Willison, Academic Dean Carolyn Kent, Life Management Director Herzing.
Catherine Andersen Advisor/Institute Fellow JNGI Associate Provost and Chief Enrollment and Marketing Office Gallaudet University, Washington,
ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Security Education and Awareness Workshop January 15-16, 2004 Baltimore, MD.
Achieving the Dream Report. Second year of Achieving the Dream implementation has begun Second year grant approval July Lumina reaction to first year.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Focusing on Two-Year Colleges Randy L. Swing, Ph.D. Kathleen M. Morley, Ph.D. Policy Center on the.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year (4-year institutions) Salisbury University Project Description of Review Process of First College.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Defining and Measuring Excellence in the Beginning College Experience Betsy O. Barefoot & John N.
Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year An Aspirational and Measurement Model for Private Colleges Franklin Pierce College, NH Kathleen.
Ivy Tech and the HLC Assessment Academy Learning College Conference February 26-27, 2009.
The Pennsylvania State University Service Learning- Engaged Scholarship Task Force Sponsored by Interim Provost Vice President, Student Affairs Vice President,
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
SEM Planning Model.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
History, Status and Challenges as of August 2010 Outcomes, Assessment and Accreditation.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
A Team-Based Assessment Model Annual Conference on First-Year Assessment October 12-14, 2008 San Antonio, Texas John N. Gardner Executive Director, Policy.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
The Personal Development Plan (PDP)
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Student Services Program Review Plan. Overview Develop/Review Mission, Purpose, Vision and Values Create Strategic Academic Development Plan (5 year plan)
Augustana’s Five Year Goals To Create a Campus Climate that Fosters Student Learning through Effective Assessment To Articulate Learning Objectives for.
Update on Institutional Reaccreditation and the Foundations of Excellence Fall Faculty In-Service August 19,
The Institutional Effectiveness Plan An Excellent Way to Convey Evidence of Assessment Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Marywood University NEAIR – 33 rd Annual.
Implementing Change: A Holistic Approach to Developmental Education Sue Cain, Director Transition and University Services Eastern Kentucky University.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Where Innovation Is Tradition Students as Scholars : QEP Update Fall 2010 Kimberly K. Eby Bethany M. Usher QEP Planning Committee.
“If a student has never experienced high levels of engagement in high school, how can we assume that all of a sudden they will be highly engaged in college?”
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Developing a Distance Learning and Online Strategy: A Case Study of a Small, Private University using the Hedgehog Approach.
1 Overview of Issues and Activities of the Planning Committee of Council Presented to University Council October 19, 2006.
Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) 101 Del Mar College January 8, 2007 Loraine Phillips, Ph.D. Interim Assessment Director Texas A&M University.
Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Improving the First Year of College: Foundations for Excellence Scott E. Evenbeck IUPUI FACULTY.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
Overview of the Self Study Presented to NAQAAE Review Team November 7 th, 2010 November 7 th, 2010.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Our Story: Our Story: The Story of One Student Affairs Division’s Quest to Improve Assessment Don Whalen, Coordinator of Assessment, Department of Residence.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Undergraduate Advising in the College Academic Support from Orientation to Graduation April 2006.
Program Services Coordinator Transfer Center Hiring Justification Soraya Sohrabi.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Steering Ships: Institutional Efforts to Serve Students in Developmental Education League for Innovation in the Community College Innovations 2012 Conference.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Report of Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE) Goals, Timelines and Requirements Catherine F. Andersen Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
A Team-Based Assessment Model Annual Conference on First-Year Assessment October 12-14, 2008 San Antonio, Texas John N. Gardner Executive Director, Policy.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
South Seattle Community College BUDGET HEARING FY June 5, 2013.
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Development of Key Performance Indicators: Lebanese Case Study
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Georgia State University Dual Enrollment Task Force:
Presentation transcript:

Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Laying a Foundation for First Year Assessment Nazareth College of Rochester, Marywood University

Mary Louise Gerek, M.B.A. Institutional Research Analyst Nazareth College of Rochester Rochester, New York Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Associate Director of Institutional Research Marywood University Scranton, Pennsylvania

Overview Foundations of Excellence project Foundations of Excellence project Tools to build buy-in Tools to build buy-in Institutional assessment efforts Institutional assessment efforts Recommendations for change Recommendations for change Long-term impact Long-term impact

Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year National Grant-Funded Project To Develop Standards of To Develop Standards of Excellence Excellence To Develop Certification Process To Develop Certification Process Sponsored by the Policy Center for the First Year of College

Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Lumina Foundation for Education & The Atlantic Philanthropies AASCU AASCU Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning Pennsylvania State University – Pennsylvania State University – Center for the Study of Higher Education Center for the Study of Higher Education Council of Independent Colleges Council of Independent Colleges NCHEMS NCHEMS National Resource Center for The National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students First-Year Experience and Students in Transition in Transition

Foundations of Excellence TM in the First College Year Dimensions

Foundations of Excellence M in the First College Year Dimensions of Excellence AASCU Institutions CIC Institutions

PhilosophyOrganizationCommitmentTransitions All Students Educated Person ImprovementEngagementDiversityFaculty Life Purpose © 2003 Policy Center Foundations of Excellence TM Foundations of Excellence TM CIC Foundational Dimensions

Foundations of Excellence M in the First College Year Nazareth College Rochester, New York

Project Organization Structure Taskforce with 15 members Taskforce with 15 members Steering Committee with 4 members Steering Committee with 4 members Twice-Monthly Meetings Twice-Monthly MeetingsChallenges First faculty/staff integrated assessment project First faculty/staff integrated assessment project Considerable time commitment Considerable time commitment Not accepting a response without evidence Not accepting a response without evidence Tracking documents/information Tracking documents/information Foundations Task Force Nazareth College

First Steps Current Practice Inventory Current Practice Inventory Collect evidence from all over campus Collect evidence from all over campus Compile sources of evidence for future reference Compile sources of evidence for future reference Foundations Task Force Nazareth College

Current Practice Inventory Inventory current policies and structures supporting the first-year Inventory current policies and structures supporting the first-year Identify distinct subgroups of the first-year students relevant to your campus Identify distinct subgroups of the first-year students relevant to your campus Inventory existing first-year assessments Inventory existing first-year assessments Foundations Task Force Nazareth College

Inventory of Policies and Structures Structures: –First-year seminars –Advising centers –New student orientation Policies –Admissions requirements –Mandatory advising –Registration rules The Task Force was charged to identify major structures and policies that, by design or circumstance, uniquely impact first-year students. Foundations Task Force Nazareth College

Inventory of Policies and Structures Created Policy and Structure documentation forms and distributed to all offices within the campus with first-year student contact Requested any supporting documents Additionally, requested any documents that provided any information for first-year students Suggested reference: A Data Audit and Analysis Toolkit to Support Assessment of the First College Year: Technical Manual, Karen Paulson. Foundations Task Force Nazareth College

Document Management Developed MS Access database to manage documents Identified sources and contacts for follow-up by Task Force Created links within the database to documents or web locations Identified the Dimension where the document was cited as evidence for the response Compiled reports with complete document lists Utilized the same ideas in preparation of the Middle States Self Study Foundations Task Force Nazareth College

Current Status Spring 2005 – Restructured Task Force began the development of a Philosophy Statement for the First Year at Nazareth Statement unanimously approved by faculty – Fall 2005 Statement unanimously approved by faculty – Fall 2005 Discussions of the first-year philosophy parallel discussions in Curriculum Committee about reevaluating our core curriculum Discussions of the first-year philosophy parallel discussions in Curriculum Committee about reevaluating our core curriculum Significant use of the Task Force findings in the Middle States Self Study Significant use of the Task Force findings in the Middle States Self Study Foundations Task Force Nazareth College

Foundations of Excellence M in the First College Year Marywood University Scranton, Pennsylvania

Project Organization Structure Taskforce with 22 members Taskforce with 22 members Subcommittee for each Dimension Subcommittee for each Dimension Twice-Monthly Meetings Twice-Monthly MeetingsChallenges Systematic assessment in flux Systematic assessment in flux Considerable time commitment Considerable time commitment Linking evidence to responses Linking evidence to responses First Year Assessment Marywood University

First Year Assessment Marywood University

Collect baseline data Measure first-year outcomes Use assessment to confirm or improve practice Contribute to the national knowledge base Continue the commitment MU Foundations Institutions conduct assessment….to achieve ongoing first-year improvement. First Year Assessment Marywood University

Collect baseline data Admissions intake data Academic assessment and registrar recommendations Disabilities needs College Student Inventory (CSI) to assess academic and social motivation, coping skills, and desire for support services CIRP Freshman Survey benchmarks Performance Indicator 11.1 …data to place students in appropriate courses…provide academic support, personal support. First Year Assessment Marywood University

Measure first-year outcomes Performance Indicator 11.2 …measurement of cognitive development, personal development. First Year Assessment Marywood University

Use assessment findings Marywoods Teagle Grant has been used to strengthen key first-year initiatives in academics, advising, and retention, and allowed for three consecutive years of the NSSE Ongoing evaluation of Orientation programs results in annual review, change, and improvement A strong, established cycle of annual surveys translates into continuous assessment of the first year Performance Indicator 11.3 …assessment findings used to confirm or improve first-year practice. First Year Assessment Marywood University

Continue the commitment Continued funding for baseline surveys, outcomes assessment Personnel for academic advising, retention, counseling Commitment to scholarship on first-year practice First-year line items in the institutional budget Performance Indicator 11.5 …continuing allocation of resources, both human and financial, to assessment first-year practice First Year Assessment Marywood University

Long-Term Impact First-year package of programs Targeted retention efforts Targeted retention efforts Direct assessment is bolstered Direct assessment is bolstered More activity is linked to P.I.s More activity is linked to P.I.s Faculty advisor model continues Faculty advisor model continues Liberal arts dean is accountable Liberal arts dean is accountable Sharper insight into students, self Sharper insight into students, self First Year Assessment Marywood University

Enrollment Management Admissions+ registrar retention advising disabilities diversity

Retention Rates First Year Assessment Marywood University

Contact Information Nazareth College of Rochester Mary Louise Gerek Institutional Research Analyst Institutional Research Analyst Marywood University, PA Ellen M. Boylan, Ph.D. Associate Director of IR Associate Director of IR