William Lou Supervisor: Prof. Georg Hoffstaetter

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4GLS Cavity considerations for BBU Emma Wooldridge Accelerator Science and Technology Centre.
Advertisements

Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
SPEAR3 short pulse development J. Safranek for the SSRL accelerator physics group* Outline: Timing mode fill patterns Short bunches –Low alpha Bunch length.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
Ivan Bazarov, New Tool for Beam Break-up Simulations, SRF mtg, 9 April CHESS / LEPP New tool for beam break-up analysis y z y x EB injected beam.
Ivan Bazarov, New Tool for Longitudinal BBU Simulations, SRF mtg, 7 October CHESS / LEPP New tool for longitudinal BBU simulations injected beam.
X-ray optics in the BMAD beam dynamics computer code Joel Brock, Georg Hoffstaetter, Dave Sagan, and Karthik Narayan.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Beam tolerance to RF faults & consequences on RF specifications Frédéric Bouly MAX 1 st Design Review WP1 - Task 1.2 Bruxelles, Belgium Monday, 12 th November.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui IHEP , Beijing Sep 17 th, 08IMAC.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Ivan Bazarov, Single HOM two-pass analysis, SRF mtg, 4 June CHESS / LEPP Single HOM, two-pass analysis Motivation: explain the plot produced by.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
1 Simulation for power overhead and cavity field estimation Shin Michizono (KEK) Performance (rf power and max. cavity MV/m 24 cav. operation.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Jean-Luc Biarrotte, SPL HOM Workshop, CERN, June 25-26, A few longitudinal BBU simulations (in the SPL case) J-Luc Biarrotte CNRS, IPN Orsay.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Argonne National Laboratory is managed by The University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy Effects of Impedance in Short Pulse Generation Using.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
TAC Synchrotron Radiation Project Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University Science Faculty Physics Department.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
RF measurements during floating MD in Week 40 3 rd of October 2012 LIU-SPS BD WG 25/10/2012 Participants: T. Argyropoulos, H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, J. Esteban.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
Crab Cavity Study with GDFIDL Narong Chanlek and Roger Jones 20/12/06.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Damping intense wake-fields in the main Linacs and PETS structures of the CLIC Linear Collider Vasim Khan: 1 st year PhD Student Supervisor: Dr. Roger.
MEW Meeting 05/06/14 Aaron Farricker 1. Effect Of HOMs Near Machine lines HOMs on or near machine lines get resonantly excited. Modes in real cavities.
ILKYOUNG SHIN University of Connecticut April 9, 2013
USPAS 2005 Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs1 CHESS / LEPP USPAS Course on Recirculated and Energy Recovered Linacs I. V. Bazarov Cornell University.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
WG2: Beam Dynamics, Optics and Instrumentation – Summary
Beam Commissioning Adam Bartnik.
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Higher Order Modes and Beam Dynamics at ESS
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
HOM power in FCC-ee cavities
Developments on Proposed
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Linear and Nonlinear Lattice Correction Via Betatron Phase
Transverse Beam Jitter Propagation in Multi-bunch Operation at ATF2
Objectives for experimental proposal (from Francois):
FCC-ee: coupling impedances and collective effects
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
The SPS 800 MHz RF system E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF
Optimization of Elliptical SRF Cavities where
ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
Changsheng Song Visit on Saturday 4 July
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
William Lou Supervisor: Prof. Georg Hoffstaetter
Statistical Comparison to ERL-06-01
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
Longitudinal Focusing & The Gamma Transition
Presentation transcript:

William Lou Supervisor: Prof. Georg Hoffstaetter BBU simulation William Lou Supervisor: Prof. Georg Hoffstaetter

Outline BBU overview Design current of CBETA Bmad simulation 2) 1-pass results statistics Results with additional phase-advances Results with x-y coupling 4-pass results (similar to 1-pass)

Beam breakup Instability (BBU) Higher Order Modes (HOM) in the cavities give undesired kick. Off-orbit bunch returns to the cavities and excite more HOMs… BBU limits the maximum achievable current in an ERL threshold current decreases with # recirculation turns.

Design current of CBETA Design current (mA) KPP UPP 1-pass 1 40 4-pass -

BBU simulation on Bmad Given a complete lattice with multi-pass cavities and HOMs assigned… Starts with a test current… tracks off-orbit bunches through lattice computes bunch-HOM momentum exchanges determines stability of all HOM voltages Attempts different test currents to pin down

Simulated HOM data for one MLC cavity Cavity construction error: ± 125 μm, 250 μm… 400 unique cavities provided per error case. The “10 worst dipole HOMs” (large figure of merit) provided per cavity.

HOM assignment: random (10 dipole/cavity) CBETA 1-pass Cavity shape error: 125 μm HOM assignment: random (10 dipole/cavity) All results above KPP (1mA) 20 out of 500 below UPP (40mA)

Two cases: Vary the optics in Bmad Introduce either T matrix at the end of LINAC 1st pass

CBETA 1-pass v.s additional phase advances (decoupled optics) Min = 140 mA Max = 611 mA nominal = 342 mA The valley location depends on which cavity has the most dominant HOM results can improve significantly

with different HOM assignments… 1-pass decoupled with different HOM assignments… Valley location Min = 175 mA Max = 640 mA Nominal = 218 mA Min = 165 mA Max = 595 mA Nominal = 248 mA

CBETA 1-pass with x-y coupling Min = 140 mA Max = 520 mA nominal = 342 mA Nominal ( no coupling ) = 342mA (0,0) at 277mA results can improve significantly

with different HOM assignments… 1-pass coupled with different HOM assignments… Min = 136 mA Max = 436 mA Nominal = 218 mA Min = 166 mA Max = 678 mA Nominal = 248 mA

HOM assignment: random (10 dipole/cavity) CBETA 4-pass Cavity shape error: 125 μm HOM assignment: random (10 dipole/cavity) Before: 70 out of 300 All results above 10 mA 32 out of 500 below UPP (40mA)

HOM assignment: random (10 dipole/cavity) CBETA 4-pass Cavity shape error: 250 μm HOM assignment: random (10 dipole/cavity) Before: 33 out of 300 All results above 10mA 23 out of 500 below UPP (40mA)

CBETA 4-pass v.s additional phase advances (decoupled optics) Min = 61 mA Max = 193 mA Nominal = 69 mA Location of the valley depends on which cavity has the most dominant HOM. results can improve

with different HOM assignments… 4-pass decoupled with different HOM assignments… Min = 37 mA Max = 176 mA Nominal = 38 mA Min = 39 mA Max = 205 mA Nominal = 49 mA

CBETA 4-pass with x-y coupling Min = 89 mA Max = 131 mA Nominal = 69 mA Nominal = 69mA (0,0) = 99mA Location of results can improve

with different HOM assignments… 4-pass coupled with different HOM assignments… Min = 47 mA Max = 100 mA Nominal = 38 mA Min = 57 mA Max = 107 mA Nominal = 49 mA

1-pass ~ 200 mA to 400 mA 4-pass ~150 mA ~ 60 mA Potential improvement on Ith from the current design (mA) Additional phase advances (decoupled optics) x-y coupling 1-pass ~ 200 mA to 400 mA 4-pass ~150 mA ~ 60 mA

Summary For 1-pass, all simulated are above the UPP (40mA) For 4-pass, 93% simulated are above the UPP (40mA) For 4-pass, introducing additional phase advances allows greater improvement in than x-y coupling

Acknowledgment References Special thanks to: Prof. Georg Hoffstaetter Christopher Mayes Nick Valles David Sagan References BBU papers by Georg and Ivan Bmad manual Nick Valles’s dissertation

THE END

Find the critical which gives the maximum real eigenvalue of M Helper Slide #1 General analytic formula for BBU Find the critical which gives the maximum real eigenvalue of M The corresponding is

RFC cavity HOMs from Nick Valles Helper Slide #2 RFC cavity HOMs from Nick Valles

Potential ways to improve : 1) Change bunch frequency Helper Slide #3 Aim for better Potential ways to improve : 1) Change bunch frequency 2) Vary phase advance 3) x-y coupling of beam optics

Does vary with bunch frequency? Helper Slide #4 Does vary with bunch frequency? fb / (1.3 GHz) 4-pass (mA) 1 40.0 1/2 48.8 1/4 49.5 1/8 46.0 1/16 45.8