Ambulance Response Programme (ARP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transforming Services Media briefing Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust.
Advertisements

Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group An introduction.
Transforming health and social care in East Sussex East Sussex Better Together.
NAME – Council of Governors. What is swasft? We provide emergency, urgent and unscheduled care We are a Foundation Trust (March 2011) – aliened Acquired.
Trevor Single Chief Executive Officer Telecare Services Association United Kingdom.
Transforming Community Services Commissioning Information for Community Services Stakeholder Workshop 14 October 2009 Coleen Milligan – Project Manager.
Our Plans for 2015/16 We want to make sure that people in our area are able to live long and healthy lives, both now and in the future, and our plans set.
Introduction to SECAmb Paul Sutton Chief Executive.
Remote Practitioners Association Inverness 11 th November 2010 Shirley Rogers Stephanie Phillips Paul Gowens.
Berkshire West 10 Frail and Older People Pathway Redesign Programme
Connected Health View from Scotland Prof George Crooks OBE Dublin November 2014.
Healthy Liverpool. Five areas of transformation “Not just physical activity, other factors have to be considered, loneliness, deprivation, housing conditions,
A clinically led programme: 5 hospitals 5 Clinical Commissioning Groups 2 PCT Clusters Aim: Improve health services and ensure they have a long term future.
Paul Sutton, Chief Executive Reviewing 2014/15 and looking forwards.
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide Annual Quality Framework Quality & Safety improvement Reporting.
Our five year plan to improve local health and care services.
Urgent & Emergency Care Review IMAS Urgent & Emergency Care Event 4 July 2013.
West Yorkshire Sustainability and Transformation Plan An overview September 2016.
Health and Wellbeing VCS Forum
New Care Models: Learning from the care homes vanguards
Highly Preliminary Building a sustainable health and care system for the people of Sussex and East Surrey.
East Midlands Ambulance Service
Governing Body 24 January 2017
Sustainability and Transformation Partnership
Paramedic Dispatch and Medical Response
Our five year plan to improve local health and care services
Operational Plan 2017/18 and 2018/19
Children and Families Bill SEND provision: how we work together
South West London Landscape
Commissioning for children
Better Care Fund (previously known as Integration Transformation Fund)
Workforce Priorities in the Nottinghamshire STP
Digital Technology Overview
North East London (NEL): Mental Health Crisis Care
Older peoples services
Integrating Clinical Pharmacy into a wider health economy
Annual General Meeting
Ambulance Response Programme
Somerset Together David Slack, Managing Director
1000 Lives Plus Update Andrew Cooper Monday 5 September 2011
Enfield Patient Participation Groups
Contribution to closing the financial gap:
Frimley Health and Care Integrated Care System
Specialised Commissioning Improving specialised services for severe intestinal failure adult patients What will this mean for you?
Let’s plan Health and Care in Hereford
Technology Enabled Care and Support in Devon
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw Shadow Integrated Care System
A Summary of our Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (STP)
CQC: The new approach to inspection
Sutton CCG and LB Sutton have come together to develop and deliver a joint strategy
Patient Forum Pack September 2018
National Ambulance Service (NAS) Martin Dunne Director NAS
Ambulance Response Programme
Integrated Care System (ICS) Berkshire West
Berkshire West ICS Strategic Priorities
Operational Plan 2017/18 and 2018/19
Social prescribing in County Durham
CCG Merger Proposal Consultation Event St Peter’s in the City, Derby
Moving Forward Together Programme Overview
What will it mean for me and my family?
How will the NHS Long Term Plan work in our community?
Monthly Performance Report
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw Shadow Integrated Care System
Leadership and Safety Culture Across a Complex System
NWAS Presentation to Greater Manchester Health Scrutiny Committee
The Comprehensive Model for Personalised Care
Unplanned Care Workstream Emerging plans for 2019/20 CCF, July 2018
Our Team – Emergency Care Intensive Support Team
Clare Lewis Deputy Chief Nursing Officer Community
Patient Forum Pack May 2019 This report refers to May 2019 (M2) data unless otherwise stated All data is based on LONDON Clinical Commissioning Groups.
Presentation transcript:

Ambulance Response Programme (ARP) Yvonne Ormston, Chief Executive, NEAS The Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE) 13th November 2017 Association of Air Ambulances Conference

National picture 2016/17 10 English NHS Ambulance Services 999 calls increased by 21% since 13/14 11.2 million 999 calls Includes 1.46 million transfers 111 > 999 Led to 6.9 million face-to-face attendances 52% conveyed to ED 38% treated at home & discharged or referred 10% telephone advice and/or referral 700,000 hours lost waiting to transfer care in ED

The Emergency / Urgent Picture: complex remit for ambulance services 10% Life threatening Advances in cardiac care, stroke, major trauma, cardiac arrest Alternative destinations – Trauma Centres, PPCIs, Stroke Units Acute service reconfigurations - maternity, paediatrics, surgery Clinical vs Response time performance measures (AQIs) 90% Urgent care Mix of acute/chronic, LTCs, complex and multiple health issues Increasing care closer to home Alternative destinations - UCCs Ambulance clinicians working alongside community, primary care, social care, mental health in MDTs Advanced and specialist paramedic roles (MSc) - expanded clinical decision making, advanced clinical assessment, diagnostic & treatment skills Public health promotion/prevention role - MECC Plus, maintain Resilience for major incidents & mass casualties - working with other emergency services and specialist response agencies (JESIP)

Challenges growing demand and tightening finances complex commissioning arrangements ageing population, with rising numbers of frail people living independently at home increasing numbers of people living with one or more long term conditions extended job-cycle times social care services under severe pressure increasing delays in transfer of care into ED and out of hospital too few paramedics across country – attractive to other sectors gaps in technology to support care remotely, at scene, at home or whilst travelling new arrangements for health and care, with the emergence of Accountable Care Systems ensuring the ambulance service has ‘a seat at the table’

Demand vs Performance

Handover delays at ED Hours ‘lost at ED’ directly increase pressure on resourcing and responding In 2016/17, 700,000 hours were lost, the equivalent of 80 years of ambulance time, or 560,000 patients* * Based on average job cycle time of 75mins

Introduction NHS England announced its recommendations for changes to the ambulance service operating model and associated standards, developed through the Ambulance Response Programme (ARP). The redesigned system for ambulance services in England will focus on ensuring patients get rapid life-saving, life-changing treatment for conditions such as cardiac arrest, stroke and heart attack, rather than simply sending ambulances to “stop the clock”. Currently, as many as one in four patients who needs hospital treatment, more than a million people each year, undergo a “hidden wait” beyond the current 8 minute target because the vehicle dispatched cannot transport them there.

Evaluation An evaluation has been undertaken by the Sheffield School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR). The results highlighted have been impressive and once ARP is adopted nationally, it should: Improve early recognition of life-threatening conditions, particularly cardiac arrest. Based on figures from London Ambulance Service, they predict up to 250 additional lives could be saved in England every year. Improve waiting times; as many as 750,000 patients every year will receive an immediate ambulance response, rather than joining a queue. Reduce the differences in response time between patients living in rural areas, and those living in towns and cities. ARP evaluation has been the largest of its kind in the world, and has included 14 million 999 calls with no patient safety or adverse incidents attributed to the programme.

New System Under the new system ambulance call handlers will change the way they assess cases and have slightly more time to decide the most appropriate clinical response. At the same time, changes to the early call handling process mean that cardiac arrest patients will be identified quicker than ever before – with evidence in London showing this will save more lives each year. Ending the out-dated 8 minute target will free up more vehicles and staff to respond to emergencies. Under the existing standards three or even four vehicles may be sent to the same 999 call in attempt to meet the target, meaning that across the country one in four ambulances are stood down before reaching their destination. These changes mean that more than half a million calls annually that would currently go into a queue will get an immediate response.

New System For patients with a serious condition such as heart attack or stroke, Dispatchers will send the most appropriate response to deliver treatment to the patient at scene and then transport them rapidly to the right specialist centre. A new set of clinical indicators will be introduced that will put improving outcomes central to demonstrating the impact that ambulances can have when the right resource is sent to patients in a timely manner, ensuring that patients are taken to the hospital offering the most appropriate emergency treatment that they need. We expect to see steady gains in patient outcome, including mortality, as a result. The changes also introduce a mandatory response standard for all patients who dial 999. Currently, half of all ambulance calls (around five million a year) are classed as “green” and not covered by a national response time standard. Response times for these patients, who are often frail and elderly, have risen by up to 100% in some ambulance services during the past two years, with some patients waiting over 8 hours.

New System The ARP changes have been strongly endorsed by expert organisations such as the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, the Stroke Association, and the College of Paramedics.

Ambulance Response Programme Principles What does the patient need? The right vehicle The right skills The right place for care (Home, Trauma, A&E, stroke centre, UCC….) The right time What does AS need? Less on scene time for RRVs Fewer stand-downs and diverts Less multi-vehicle deployments on CAT 2,3&4

New categories CATEGORY 1 - LIFE-THREATENING Time critical life-threatening event needing immediate intervention and/or resuscitation e.g. cardiac or respiratory arrest; airway obstruction; ineffective breathing; unconscious with abnormal or noisy breathing; hanging. CATEGORY 2 - EMERGENCY Potentially serious conditions (ABCD problem) that may require rapid assessment, urgent on-scene intervention and/or urgent transport. CATEGORY 3 – URGENT Urgent problem (not immediately life-threatening) that needs treatment to relieve suffering (e.g. pain control) and transport or assessment and management at scene with referral where needed within a clinically appropriate timeframe. CATEGORY 4 – NON-URGENT Problems that are not urgent but need assessment (face to face or telephone) and possibly transport within a clinically appropriate timeframe. TYPE S – SPECIALIST RESPONSE (HART) Incidents requiring specialist response i.e. CBRNe, hazardous materials; specialist rescue; mass casualty

Categories National Standard How long does the ambulance service have to make a decision? What stops the clock? Category 1 (8% of demand) 7 minutes mean response time                 15 minutes 90th centile response time The earliest of: •The problem is identified •An ambulance response is dispatched •30 seconds from the call being connected The first ambulance service-dispatched emergency responder arrives at the scene of the incident   (There is an additional Category 1 transport standard to ensure that these patients also receive early ambulance transportation) Category 2 (48% of demand) 18 minutes mean response time 40 minutes 90th centile response time •240 seconds from the call being connected If a patient is transported by an emergency vehicle, only the arrival of the transporting vehicle stops the clock. If the patient does not need transport the first ambulance service-dispatched emergency responder arrives at the scene of the incident Category 3 (34% of demand) 120 minutes 90th centile response time Category 4 (10% of demand) 180 minutes 90th centile response time Category 4T: If a patient is transported by an emergency vehicle, only the arrival of the transporting vehicle stops the clock.

Range of benefits from new model: Allows resources to be focussed on improving response for Cat1 Cat 1 patients identified quicker due to Creates potential to improve cardiac survival Greater efficiency in deployment of vehicles, releasing resources Effective targeting of right resource, first time Improvements in getting patients to definitive care in specialist units, eg stroke and STEMI More patients managed appropriately through H&T or S&T without need for conveyance to hospital Reduces stress on resources and better able to absorb peaks in demand Greater transparency about whole system / ambulance performance

ARP Roll Out

Points To Note ARP provides a focused approach to ensuring that the right response is delivered to patients the first time. As such the targets and reporting cannot be compared with historical performance. The classification of incidents (the ‘code-sets’) may be subject to further change as ARP is embedded. A period of grace has been granted to make the necessary changes to its reporting systems, which includes reporting to NHS England. High level reporting to Lead Commissioners is expected from October onwards. Lead Commissioners are having weekly discussions with NHS England on the implementation of ARP.

See & Treat Mobile Healthcare

Workforce priorities Lack of paramedics in some areas of the country Develop and retain more Specialist & Advanced level paramedics – increase provision of S&T / H&T Greater integration across sectors – multi-professional workforce / rotational models Diversity – especially Board level and to reflect the communities we serve Health & Wellbeing – MECC principles also apply to staff Mental health support & suicide prevention System leadership

Technology & Innovation in Healthcare Delivery Connectivity on the move ePRF Dynamic access to and integration with Summary Care Records, Care Plans, End of Life plans Clinical decision support – e.g. Pathfinder Telecare – monitoring pendant alarms etc Telehealth – virtual consultations Remote clinical support Online 111 advice Medicines management Connecting staff to back office functions – briefings, HR services etc eLearning Video conferencing

Transforming the Ambulance Service – what is needed? Joint Ambulance Improvement Programme – NHSI & NHSE Collaborative commissioning framework Developing & retaining the right skill mix & capacity across ambulance workforce, moving to multi-professional workforce Enhance & develop new models of care / response Less focus on targets – more on patient / system outcomes More direct referral pathways within the community and smoother integration across providers Changing NHS culture – building trust across professions and sharing responsibility for change Interoperable technology and timely data sharing Improved patient safety, outcomes & experience and happier, healthier workforce and more sustainable systems & services

THANK YOU - ANY QUESTIONS ?