South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Feeder Student Data File Instructions for Filtering & Usage Guidelines.
Testing Overview 2012, 2013, 2014 Presenter – Guyla Ness.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
LCAP Butte County Office of Education. STATE FUNDING $ per ADA Revenue Limit $ Categorical Programs $ K-3 CSR $
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
2015 RESULTS: SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT CONSORTIUM (SBAC) SFUSD Board Presentation September 29, 2015.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
 Marcie L. Gray, Testing Coordinator Courtney M. King, Principal PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Data.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Accountability Scorecards Top to Bottom Ranking February 2016.
TACOMA PUBLIC SCHOOLS- RESEACH AND EVALUATION Webinar for Tacoma Principals May 7, 2014 (Thank you to the State Board of Education for some of the slides.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Student Population Trends (Percent of K-12, September Unaudited Enrollment, Public Schools) 1.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Illinois.
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Bennett County School District
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
Michigan School Report Card Update
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
Texas State Accountability
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
A-F Accountability and Special Education
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Every Student Succeeds Act
How Closely Do South Dakota’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of South Dakota’s general.
How Closely Do North Dakota’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of North Dakota’s general.
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Director of ESEA Programs
How Closely Do North Dakota’s RN Graduates Reflect the State’s Diversity? This chart compares the racial and ethnic composition of North Dakota’s general.
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013

What is the School Performance Index Based Upon? Elementary/Middle School Student Achievement Academic Growth Attendance Effective Teachers and Principals School Climate High School Student Achievement High School Completion College and Career Readiness (based on ACT scores) Effective Teachers and Principals School Climate

Student Achievement Percent proficient and advanced in reading and math in grades 3-8, 11 on state assessment Calculation includes: Gap Group score – Ethnicity: Black or African American, Native American Indian or Alaskan, Hispanic/Latino – Students with Disabilities – Economically Disadvantaged – English Language Learners Non-Gap Group score – Ethnicity: White/Caucasian, Asian, Native Hawaiian-Pacific Islander, 2 or More Races

Formula for Student Achievement Step 1: Divide the maximum allowable index points in half to allow equal weight for reading and math. Step 2: Calculate the # of students that fall into the Gap Group and Non-Gap Group. Step 3: Calculate the % of students that fall into the Gap Group and Non-Gap Group by dividing each by the total number of students. Step 4: Take the overall possible points (column 1) times the % of students (column 3) in each group to get the weighted points for each group. Step 5: Calculate the % Proficient/Advanced for each group. Step 6: Calculate the score for each group by multiplying the % Proficient/Advanced (column 5) times the weighted points for each group (column 4). Step 7: The sum of these represents total points for Student Achievement category

Academic Growth Model that uses indicators to evaluate student academic achievement over time and determines whether that progress is reasonable or appropriate

SD-STARS South Dakota Student Teacher Accountability Reporting System System will warehouse all pertinent scores of students across South Dakota Secure reporting Dakota STEP Roster Reports Report Cards Will house scoring results for the up-coming Smarter Balance testing

Piedmont Valley Elementary

Sturgis Elementary

Whitewood Elementary

Sturgis Williams Middle School

Sturgis Brown High School

Annual Data Retreat Will be done at each school site in the fall Data provided to site with suggestions for analysis and goal-setting Provided – Roster reports – Standards Reports – Graphs with data on all sub-groups, 2-year analysis on students that were at each site for full- academic school year

Standards Reports Include Information about Common Core Standards in Math and Reading

Testing This Spring Smarter Balance online for grades 3-8, 11 Extended window for testing Science in grades 5, 8, and 11 will be done paper/pencil Analysis and reporting of results will take longer and the district will not have information until late fall Results will be based on common core standards so uncertain how student achievement will be working into the School Progress Index

Other Testing Measures WriteToLearn – students in grades 5, 7 & 10 must submit 2 writing samples (essays) for year Accreditation testing – Done three times a year in math and reading – Based on common core math and reading test items – Use South Dakota Assessment Portal