Categorization of bike sharing systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T HE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS IN THE ICT PROMOTION DEVELOPMENT.
Advertisements

Institute for Mobility Research A Research Establishment of 1 Institute for Mobility Research | The Future of Mobility Meeting at JRC Ispra.
Public Transport’s Contribution to Sustainable Development.
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
EMTA General Meeting, Budapest April Governance issue s in case of the Budapest Transport Association (BKSZ) Dr. DENKE, Zsolt managing director.
INNER CITY INVESTMENT SUMMIT TRANSPORT, INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Presenter: L N Mangcu SED: Transport and Roads Department.
University of Minho School of Engineering Centre Algoritmi Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de Engenharia - 24 a 27 de Outubro de 2011.
Increasing the Quality of Public Transport in Prague Prague Integrated Transport.
Automatic loading of inputs for Real Time Evacuation Scenario Simulations: evaluation using mesoscopic models Josep M. Aymamí 15th TRB National Transportation.
Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics, 21 st session Geneva, 9-10 September 2008 Supply chain challenges for transport.
Environmental Management and Sustainable Mobility of Health Care Companies in Emilia-Romagna Region Environmental Management and Sustainable Mobility.
15 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Tuesday, May 19 th, 2015 – Atlantic City, NJ Integrating Travel Demand Models & SHRP2 C11 Tools:
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Computers in Urban Planning Computational aids – implementation of mathematical models, statistical analyses Data handling & intelligent maps – GIS (Geographic.
ECOMM 2014 HOW MM POLICY HAS BEEN INTEGRATED IN SUMP IN ILE-DE-France REGION Région Ile-de-France Direction des Transports Nathalie GRANES.
Transit Oriented Development in the city region; a dream? Reindert Augustijn Team manager traffic and transport Stadsregio Arnhem Nijmegen.
Indicator pilot project – 2011 Central Hungary Operational Program.
DEMOCRITOS DEveloping the MObility CRedits Integrated platform enabling travellers TO improve urban transport Sustainability Grant agreement no
Public Transportation Excellence Index
Measuring rail accessibility using Open Data Elena Navajas-Cawood.
B A N C O C E N T R A L D E C H I L E 1 Chilean experience regarding Trade in Services compilation and current developments Balance of Payments and External.
Janos MONIGL director of TRANSMAN Ltd 1968 TU Dresden – M.Sc.traffic engineer 1974 TU Budapest – M.Sc.engineer economist 1976 Hungarian Academy of Science.
Transportation Nudges: Experiments in Improving Urban Mobility Boston University Marcel Meeuwissen – City of Enschede.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
ELECTRIC CAR INTEGRATION IN VILNIUS Gintare Zorskaite 1, Vita Duminyte 2, Grazvydas-Mykolas Paliulis 3 Vilnius Gediminas technical university, Saulėtekio.
Athens, Conference Hall, Ministry of Infrastructure, Transport and Networks, 5&6 November 2015 ALTERNATIVE-COLLECTIVE PATTERNS OF OWNERSHIP AND USE OF.
UNESCO INSTITUTE for STATISTICS Indicators for the Periodic Reporting Working group on the simplification of the Periodic Reporting questionnaire
Organizzato da: Global Mobility Integration for Global Transit Schemes Bertrand Moritz Head of Product Management – VIX Technology.
Region Parkstad Limburg Assessment Results Marcel Bus & Ricardo Poppeliers Ancona, 7 March 2013.
Preconditions for the introduction of free public transport in Tallinn Dago Antov Tallinn University of Technology Professor on transport planning 1 Tasuta.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Public transport quality elements – What really matters for users? By Dimitrios Papaioannou and Luis Miguel Martinez Presentation for the 20 th ECOMM in.
Market Research: A tool for generating ideas
Konstantinos Alexopoulos Transport Division UNECE
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
The research on usage parameters of wooden buildings
Calculating the benefits of Transit in North Carolina
Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: Monitoring & Evaluation
Pasi Piela NTTS Conference, Brussels 14 March 2016
Andres Harjo Transport Department City of Tallinn
What is el Observatorio de la bicicleta pública en España (Observatory of bike-sharing in Spain) Independent information platform for the critical evaluation.
Emilija Manic, PhD, Associate Professor The Faculty of Economics
Lecturer: Andrzej Bujak Summer School 2015 Wroclaw School of Banking
Bike Sharing Systems. EFFECTIVENESS, IMPACT AND ASSESMENT
A High Shift to Cycling Scenario How a large-scale increase in cycling would affect emissions, expenditures, and mobility Title slide, you can place a.
Shaping the CREATE ‘Guidelines’ Workshop preparation
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Empirical analysis of Chinese airport network as a complex weighted network Methodology Section Presented by Di Li.
Internet of Things workshop
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Introduction and Applications
MEASURING INDIVIDUALS’ TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR BY USE OF A GPS-BASED SMARTPHONE APPLICATION IN DAR ES SALAAM CITY 37th Annual Southern African Transport Conference.
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Assessing Passenger Requirements along the D2D Air Travel Chain
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
A Call for city data on cycling
Community Analysis for Strategic Planning
Passenger Mobility Statistics 10 April 2014
Bus services and contracts in London
The InnovaSUMP project:
Paolo Bolsi DG MOVE - Unit A3 Economic Analysis and Impact Assessment
TESTING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION GA 3113 lecture 1
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
SATC 2017 Influence Factors for Passenger Train Use
Tuesday, 07 May 2019 Steer Davies Gleave Upper Ground
Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl
Innovation in Railways NTA Ireland
An Analytical Modeling Tool for Active Transportation Strategy Evaluation Presented by: Jinghua Xu, Ph.D., PE May 16, 2017.
LTP Finance Working Group Workshop
INTERNET-BASED APPLICATION FOR RURAL ELECTRIFICATION STATUS AND PLANS VISUALISATION IN BURKINA FASO GEONET©
Presentation transcript:

Categorization of bike sharing systems A case study from Budapest Authors: Tamás MÁTRAI, PhD Student János TÓTH (PhD), Head of Department

Motivations People lives in urban area will grow from 3,3 to 6,4 billion until 2050. In several of her presentation Robin Chase quoted Stanford professor Banny Banerjee : "You can’t solve exponential problems with linear solutions.„ Sharing economy can be this non-linear solution. Unfortunately, there is no comprehensive, worldwide comparative evaluation of the PBS systems. The data about the systems are not available in every cases.

Understanding PBS

Generations of Public Bike Sharing First generation- Free systems (1965) e.g.: White bikes - Amsterdam Regular bikes with diferentiating colour Free access (Anonim) Free usage No fix stations Second generation- Coin based systems (1995) e.g.: Bycyklen - Coppenhagen Custom bikes Access with coin (Anonim) Fix stations Third generation- ICT based systems (1998) e.g.: Vélos á la Carte, Rennes Custom bikes Access with user card (User identification - registration required) Free (usually in the first 30 minutes) Fix station Fourth generation systems - Complex, integrated systems (2005) e.g.: Mol-Bubi, Budapest Access with mobile device (User identification - registration required) Real time information provision Large scale integration with different systems

Components of the Framework Database 50-100 PBS systems ~100 parameters Categorization Clustering SWOT Benchmark Multi-Criteria Assessment Absolute scale Impact assessment Transport modelling Economic Analysis System dynamics

Database Business model Socio-demographic background Fare system type of the owner type of the operator main source of incomes Business model annual subscription fee daily subscription fee usage fee integration with other services Fare system number of annual users number of trips, revenue Impact and usage statistics main goal other goals Goals city size population climate topography Socio-demographic background length of PT network modal share of different modes length of dedicated cycling infrastructure number of daily trips Transport system details service area size number of docks number of bikes capital costs annual operating expenditure Base data of the PBS system

Categorization Main categorization criteria City based PBS system size based Business model based Accessibility based There is no need for all of the parameters in clustering. Our assumption is that 90% of the systems could be classified into one of the 5 clusters. Based on the database Determining grouping criteria Cluster analysis SWOT for all categories Development of a self-assessment tool

Data about the Budapest system Budapest in general Mol BUBI Population: 1 750 000 inhabitants Budapest downtown area 15 km2 Land area: 525 km2 98 docking station (2116 stands) Road network length: 4 500 km 1200 bicycles Car trips per day: ~1 600 000 ~3 670 000 € total cost PT system length: 3 300 km Support in operation: MOL Hungary PT passenger trips per day: 2 220 000 2000 trips / day DCI length: 288 km Cycling trips per day: ~150 000

Mol Bubi in pictures

SWOT for Mol Bubi favorable geographical location Strengths favorable geographical location dense dock stations network intelligent bicycle distribution On-board unit on the bikes Weaknesses Robust and heavy bikes Long-term access with personel registration only Opprtunities growing share of cycling growing tourism climate change incomplete bicycle network dangerous cycling on some roads effects of politics Threats

Benchmark tool Based on the database Assessment all systems in the database Development of a self-assessment tool Determination of the scale for each criterion Transfers the qualitative criteria (objective) Description of the qualitative criteria (subjective) Assignment weights for the criteria Based on the user surveys Based on the operator surveys Selection of the benchmark criteria Important for the users Important for the operators Based on the database

Impact assessment Evaluation of social impacts System dynamics Impact on cycling Impact on dedicated cycling infrastructure Impact on transport culture Calculating Economic Benefits Travel Time reliability Travel time reduction Health benefit Transport modelling Impact on congestion Mode choice Route choice

Summary This paper illustrates the interim status of a PhD research. The collection of data is the main task. Parallel with this, an elaboration of guidelines is in progress. This tool could be use on a different level. The methodology with a detailed list of parameters could be a planning aid and a shortlist of the properties could give a simply comparison of different systems for non-professional users. The principle now is clear but the detailed elaboration is still under progress, it will be finished in this year.

Thank you for your Attention! Tamás MÁTRAI PhD Student, BME tamas.matrai@mail.bme.hu +36-20-260-6171 +36-1-463-3742