To view animation on PC: hit F5

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marathon August [?], 490 BC Strategic Context After the failures of an expedition in 492 BC and diplomacy the following year, Darius of Persia invades.
Advertisements

Kosovo June 20, 1389 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire is growing steadily at the expense of neighbouring powers in the Balkans where Murad I wishes.
Cowpens January 17, 1781 Strategic Context The overall strategic situation of the American Revolutionary War is already decidedly in the American favour.
Leuthen December 5, 1757 Strategic Context The Seven Years’ War begins! Backed only by Britain after attacking Saxony, Prussia finds itself surrounded.
Grunwald July 15, 1410 Strategic Context Founded in 1190 in Acre, the Teutonic Knights are unable to expand against the Saracens, and eventually accept.
Pydna June 22, 168 BC Strategic Context Following the death of Philip V of Macedon in 179 BC, Perseus of Macedon hopes to renew his father’s ambition of.
Adrianople August 9, 378 Strategic Context The Visigoths and Ostrigoths conspire to assassinate Roman Emperor Valens but fail; the Romans consequently.
Maling 342 BC Strategic Context Of the Seven Warring States in China, Wei finds itself particularly vulnerable following its defeat at the Battle of Kuei-ling.
Fornovo July 6, 1495 Strategic Context In February 1495, Charles VIII of France is able to conquer Naples with the help of Milan, following a long march.
Ayacucho December 9, 1824 Strategic Context Stakes
Blenheim August 13, 1704 Strategic Context England, as part of its commitment to the Grand Alliance with Holland, Austria and Prussia, sends then-Earl.
Raphia June 22, 217 BC Strategic Context Antiochus III the Great inherits the Seleucid throne in 223 BC and undertakes a quest to restore the lands lost.
Torvioll June 29, 1444 Strategic Context The Ottoman Empire recovers from its decade-long civil war in 1415, and subsequently seeks to reestablish control.
Bannockburn June 24, 1314 Strategic Context Edward I of England defeats William Wallace at the Battle of Falkirk in 1298, crushing the Scottish uprising.
Thymbra [?], 546 BC Strategic Context In 559 BC, Cyrus deposes Astyages of Media and begins to consolidate his new Persian state, which he accomplishes.
Ankara July 28, 1402 Strategic Context The clash between the Timurid and Ottoman Empires is somewhat inevitable in the early 1400s. Tamerlane’s Tatars.
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade attack the Roman Empire.
Yarmuk August 15-20, 636 Strategic Context Beginning in 622, Emperor Heraclius revitalizes the Byzantine Empire and conquers the Fertile Crescent of modern.
Lake Trasimene June 24, 217 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca negates Roman control of the seas by leading the Carthaginians through Spain.
Varna November 10, 1444 Strategic Context Vladislav III, the King of Poland and Hungary, encourages his general, John Hunyadi, to chase the Ottomans out.
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context In 218 BC, Hannibal Barca leads a Carthaginian army from Spain across the Alps to invade the Roman Empire. Despite.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The khan’s authority falls.
Kulikovo September 8, 1380 Strategic Context The Mongol-Tatar Golden Horde is deteriorating due to internal and external power struggles. The Khan’s authority.
THE BATTLE OF GAUGAMELA 331 B.C. By Alexandra Bowers-Mason and Christina Main From Putaruru College.
Cowpens January 17, 1781 Strategic Context Britain’s American colonies revolt in 1775, provoking a large military response from Britain. The overall strategic.
Catalaunian Plains June 20, 451 Strategic Context After four years of peace, Attila leads his Huns against the Western Roman Empire, sacking Trier and.
Catalaunian Plains June 20, 451 Strategic Context After four years of peace, Attilla leads his Huns against the Western Roman Empire, sacking Trier and.
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Ad Decimum September 13, 533 Strategic Context Stakes No Image
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Varna November 10, 1444 Strategic Context Stakes
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Ilipa [?], 206 BC Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
Gaugamela October 1, 331 BC Strategic Context Stakes
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Alexander vs. the Persians – Round 1
The Trebia December [?], 218 BC
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
To view animation on PC: hit F5
Daras [?], 530 Strategic Context Stakes
Strasbourg August [?], 357 Strategic Context Stakes No Image Available
Zama October 19, 202 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Ruspina January 4, 46 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Breitenfeld September 17, 1631
Ipsus [?], 301 BC Strategic Context Stakes
Alexander vs. the Persians – Round 1
Presentation transcript:

To view animation on PC: hit F5 Raphia June 22, 217 BC Strategic Context Antiochus III the Great inherits the Seleucid throne in 223 BC and undertakes a quest to restore the lands lost in previous years. In 219 BC he turns against Egypt, under rule of Ptolemy IV, to ignite the Fourth Syrian War. Antiochus reduces fortress after fortress for two years while Ptolemy rebuilds the decaying army of his empire. Ptolemy is desperate enough to recruit native Egyptians, unused in combat for almost a century due to their rising nationalistic ambitions. With this uncertain force, Ptolemy gives battle to Antiochus at Raphia, near the famed Gaza. To view animation on PC: hit F5 To view animation on Mac: hit ⌘ + enter Stakes + A Seleucid victory would expose the Egyptian empire to further conquest and eventual collapse. + An Egyptian victory would check the Seleucid advance and reestablish a defensive line in Syria. By Jonathan Webb, 2009

Raphia, 217 BC Strength Seleucids Well Egyptians Well Antiochus III the Great Ptolemy IV 55,000 infantry 68,000 infantry 7,000 peltasts 2,000 peltasts 6,000 cavalry 5,000 cavalry 102 war elephants 73 war elephants By Jonathan Webb, 2009

Mediterranean c. 218 BC

The battlefield consists of a flat, arid plain with no obstacles or features. However, flanking the battlefield off-map are low sand dunes and drifting sands. Seleucids (Antiochus) Egyptians (Ptolemy)

(Antiochus III the Great) The presence of Ptolemy to his already superior infantry is invaluable; he leads his two infantry phalanxes forward to defeat the outmatched Seleucid infantry phalanx outright. The Seleucid infantry rout from the battlefield before Antiochus can return from his cavalry pursuit. The Egyptian and Seleucid left wings are both defeated by superior right wings and driven back. However, Antiochus continues to personally pursue the routed Egyptian left wing while Ptolemy extricates himself from the situation to take command of his infantry phalanx, boosting its morale. Antiochus surges forward with the rest of his right wing to take advantage of the Egyptian left wing’s disorder, driving it backwards. Ptolemy’s right wing also surges forward in accordance with his orders in the event of collapse on the left wing. The inferior Egyptian war elephant force does not charge until the cavalry and infantry – carefully evading the Seleucid war elephants – drive the Seleucid left wing back. Antiochus opens the battle with an attack by his war elephants on his right wing. The more numerous Seleucid war elephants defeat their Egyptian counterparts, which then retreat and disrupt the infantry and cavalry formations of Ptolemy’s left wing. Antiochus and Ptolemy deploy their armies in a standard formation: infantry at the center, cavalry on the wings, and war elephants on both wings ahead of the main line accompanied by peltasts. Both commanders strengthen their right wings, Antiochus’ with cavalry and Ptolemy’s with infantry. Antiochus plans to use his superior cavalry and war elephants to win the battle on the wings. Ptolemy plans to use his superior infantry phalanx to win the battle at the center. Antiochus and Ptolemy position themselves on opposing wings to begin the battle. Seleucids (Antiochus) Symbol guide Seleucids Egyptians Phalanx Phalanx Infantry Infantry Peltasts Peltasts Cavalry Cavalry War elephants War elephants Egyptians (Ptolemy IV) 68,000 infantry 2,000 peltasts 5,000 cavalry 102 war elephants Seleucids (Antiochus III the Great) 55,000 infantry 7,000 peltasts 6,000 cavalry 73 war elephants Egyptians (Ptolemy)

Raphia, 217 BC Casualties & Aftermath Seleucids: Egyptians: 14,300 or 19% 2,200 or 3% The battle checked Antiochus’ advance into Egyptian territory but Ptolemy was unable to fully exploit the victory. He was fully aware that his empire was weakening, not becoming stronger, and opted to use the victory to reestablish the defensive line in Syria, forcing Antiochus to look elsewhere for conquest. By Jonathan Webb, 2009

The Art of Battle: Animated Battle Maps http://www.theartofbattle.com By Jonathan Webb, 2009