Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Advertisements

Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
1 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE Classified Staff Performance Evaluation To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate.
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
Evaluations: Administrative & Classified Employees
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WORKSHOP The Performance Evaluation Process Mark Clements Human Resources The Performance Evaluation Process Mark Clements Human.
Performance Management Review FAQs
KCTCS PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCESS RESULTS OF KCTCS EMPLOYEE PPE SURVEY (Overall 317 faculty and 614 staff responded, a total of 931) Only 6% of.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
WSU Training for Supervisors September 2014 Position Descriptions, Expectations, and Annual Reviews.
Performance Appraisal in the Public Sector
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Georgia Teacher Evaluation Program Orientation
Competency Assessment and Pay Determination N.C. Office of State Personnel Career-Banding Project Team.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Evaluating School Counselors SY13-14
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 School Counseling Office, SSS Gail Smith, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams,
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS ENHANCING COMMUNICATIONS & WORKING RELATIONSHIPS Texas A&M University, Human Resources DIVISION OF FINANCE.
CCSD Performance Evaluation Systems
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY11-12
Performance Management for IT Leaders
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Library Media Specialist Evaluator Training August 2010 Library Media Education Dept, C&I Andy Spinks, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley,
DMS Leadership Team Meeting September 23, :00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Manager’s Process Overview
EVALUATIONS EVALUATIONS ARE REGULATED AND REQUIRED BY KDE (KAR’S AND KRS’S)
Evaluating School Counselors SY11-12 School Counseling Program, SSS Gail Smith, Ed. S., Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley, PHR, Director.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Evaluating Central Office Employees Evaluator Training for Clerical Evaluations July 2008.
Faculty Orientation for Certified Evaluation SY13-14
School Social Workers’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 School Social Workers Office, SSS Paulette Herbert, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office,
Utah State University Extension Civil Rights Compliance Self-Assessment Tool Dr Dallas L. Holmes Institutional Research 2005 National Diversity Conference.
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY10-11 Guidance Services Office, SSS Gail Smith, Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley,
School Counselors’ Evaluation System Orientation SY15-16 Gail M. Smith, Supervisor School Counseling Office, Teaching and Learning Support and Specialized.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Evaluating School Counselors August 2010 School Counseling Program, SSS Gail Smith, Ed. S., Supervisor Evaluation Systems Office, HR Jan Holley, PHR,
Office of Human and Resources 2014/2015 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS & GUIDELINES.
HUMAN RESOURCES Teach Cobb! It’s Better at the Top! Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation Evaluator Training SY
2014 – 2015 EVALUATION PERIOD KCTCS ePerformance Training.
December 13,  Current policy  Required employees to complete Individual Development Plans (IDPs) for Milestone and Exemplary Merit increases.
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation Evaluator Training SY.
WSU Training for Supervisors September 2016 Position Descriptions, Expectations, and Annual Reviews.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Doreen Griffeth, Director.
Performance Management
ARTICLE 10 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE
TOPS TRAINING.
WSU Training for Developing Leaders
Performance Review Tool Updates College of Engineering
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
WSU Training for Developing Leaders
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
WSU Training for Developing Leaders
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Performance Management System
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Employee Performance Management System
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Performance Management Training
Annual Development Plan (ADP) Development 25th April 2018
Overview of Academic Staff Title Change Process
WSU Training for Supervisors
Presentation transcript:

Classified Employee Performance Evaluation Orientation Evaluator Training 2018-19 SY Updated Sept. 20, 2016 by Maria Schmidt, Evaluation Specialist

Classified Employees Evaluation Process Classified employees are evaluated in 3 Performance Categories: each category contains Performance Descriptors describing expected behaviors within the category (see job-specific evaluation forms) Job Competencies Workplace Qualities Human Relations

Performance Category: 1. Job Competencies The 1st descriptor is the supervisor’s assessment of the employee’s performance on his/her essential duties (job description) Although the items on the job description are not specifically rated, the importance of an employee’s performance on the essential duties of the job cannot be overstated If an employee receives a Needs Improvement (NI) on this single descriptor, he/she will not receive an overall Meets Expectations (ME) rating for this Performance Category

Performance Category: 2. Workplace Qualities Has 6 Performance Descriptors The Descriptors address desirable behaviors in the workplace as related to an employee’s department and/or his/her specific position, such as “self-motivated”

Performance Category: 3. Human Relations Has six Performance Descriptors The Descriptors address desirable traits related to professional interpersonal skills, such as “teamwork”

Rating Performance Descriptors Each descriptor is assigned 1 of 3 individual ratings based on an employee’s performance Meets Expectations (ME) Needs Improvement (NI) Not Applicable (N/A)

What do the Performance Descriptor Ratings mean? Simply put… Meets Expectations (ME) means that the employee consistently accomplishes assigned tasks and demonstrates specific competencies needed for the responsibilities at or above the expectations of the supervisor. Needs Improvement (NI) means that the employee inconsistently accomplishes assigned tasks or fails to demonstrate specific competency for the responsibility.

What do the Performance Descriptor Ratings mean? Not Applicable (N/A) means the descriptor does not apply to that employee. N/A is equal to Meets Expectations (ME). The evaluator determines if a descriptor is N/A. Unsatisfactory means that the employee consistently fails to accomplish assigned tasks and/or fails to demonstrate specific competencies needed for the responsibilities of the position (Overall Annual Rating, only).

How is an overall rating for each category determined? Each Performance Category is given an Overall Category Rating based on the number of individual descriptors within the category & the rating received on each one: Job Competencies: 6 of 8 ME = Overall ME Workplace Qualities: 4 of 6 ME = Overall ME Human Relations: 4 of 6 ME = Overall ME Remember: N/A = ME

How is the overall Annual Rating determined? The Annual Overall Rating is assigned based on the overall ratings earned on the 3 Performance Categories Meets Expectations ME in all 3 Overall Ratings Needs Improvement NI in 1 Overall Rating Unsatisfactory NI in 2 or 3 Overall Ratings

No Surprises! No employee should receive an Annual Overall Unsatisfactory Rating unless he/she has been informed in writing of specific performance concerns during the year.

Recognizing the Best! Administrative evaluators are strongly encouraged to acknowledge exceptional performance with specific written commentary in Section VI of the evaluation document.

When are Annual Evaluation Conferences held? Paraprofessionals must have their annual conferences complete by May 15th, 2019. Other classified employees must have their annual conferences before June 21st, 2019.

Appealing an Annual Rating If an employee wishes to appeal his/her evaluation results, he/she must: complete an evaluation appeal form (found on PASS), submit it to the evaluator within 10 business days of the receipt of the original evaluation report, along with any evidence and/or documentation The evaluator must respond to the appeal within 20 school days of receipt of the appeal

Appealing an Annual Rating If the rating is upheld by the evaluator, the employee may submit an appeal to the evaluator’s supervisor within 10 days of receipt of the evaluator’s response The evaluator’s supervisor must respond to the appeal within 20 days of receipt of the appeal If the evaluator’s supervisor upholds the rating, the appeal process is exhausted

Unsatisfactory Annual Ratings for Paraprofessionals As Paraprofessionals are certified by the PSC, per GA law and PSC regulation, an annual Unsatisfactory Rating earned by a paraprofessional must be recorded on the PSC’s UNSAT statewide database. If a paraprofessional has 2 Unsatisfactory Ratings on the database, and has not demonstrated successful remediation (improvement), the paraprofessional’s certification will not be renewed by the PSC.

Unsatisfactory Annual Ratings In accordance with Administrative Rule GBA-R, any employee earning an overall UNSAT annual rating will have his/her salary/step frozen. When an employee has earned a Satisfactory Annual Rating in a subsequent year, his/her salary/step is unfrozen. Human Resources receives the originals of all classified evaluations for filing in employees’ personnel files.

Remediation Plan Directions are on PASS! As needed, and at a Supervisor’s discretion, a Remediation Plan may be created to support professional growth and development at any time during the year. A Remediation Plan may also result from an employee receiving a rating of Needs Improvement or Unsatisfactory.

Cheryl Davis Director of Evaluations 678-581-6750 Office of Evaluations