Options for TDR in Puyallup

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of North Liberty North Liberty Area Development Corporation University of Iowa Community Credit Union Economic Development Partnership Project October.
Advertisements

Purpose of TDR Market Analysis To determine whether and where there is demand for development over and above whats permitted by baseline zoning How that.
Washington State Department of Commerce Transfer of Development Rights: A Regional Approach June 2012.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Local Food Puts it All Together. Local Food Action Initiative Promote local and regional food sustainability and security. Advance Seattle's goals of.
Western Adaptation Alliance Regional Leadership Academy Enhancing the Resilience of Sustainable Food Systems through Adaptive Water Management in the American.
AIRPORT AREA INFRASTRUCTURE TIF DISTRICT: Public Hearing Presentation Oct 21, 2013.
Farmland Preservation is essential to our Polk County lifestyle.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Seattle Station Area Planning Milestones & Events Transit-Oriented Development Program Information & Schedule Station Area Atlas Station Area Recommendations.
Transfer of Development Rights
Transfer of Development Rights & Possibilities for Coastal Communities Steven Bruder, NJ State TDR Bank Monmouth University: Urban Coast Institute November.
Bolton Economic Development Committee Why? 1.Master Plan, Sustainable Village Center Study (UMass study) refer to economic development. 2.Proactive approach.
Palm Coast City Council STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN 2012.
Land Use Sustainable Development Environmental Justice.
Container Port Element City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services January 17, 2014.
Advancing Sustainability at the Local Level Alison Van Gorp and Jeremy Eckert Cascade Land Conservancy.
Where the Home Is Matters Planning for Healthy and Equitable Communities Julie West, MPH Jim Krieger, MD, MPH Public Health – Seattle & King County May.
CITY OF TACOMA CTR PILOT CTR Board WSDOT Headquarters May 30, 2014.
West Oakland Specific Plan Equity Strategies. Potential impacts of new development and investment on existing West Oakland community New development &
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Introduction to Transfer of Development Rights Presentation for: Skagit County – TDR Stakeholder Committee June 19, 2012.
Urban Renewal Feasibility Study Tashman Johnson LLC, Urban Land Economics, Elaine Howard Consulting LLC, SERA Architects.
The Office of Sustainability develops and advocates for programs, policies and actions by government, citizens, businesses, and institutions that improve.
CPA-14-08: Transfer of Development Rights Large Scale Text Amendment Adoption Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 23, 2008.
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) June, 2007 Kirby Date, Countryside Program Coordinator.
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Skagit Regional TDR Project AN INTRODUCTION TO TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
MENU OF TOOL TOPICS (Choose 4 out of the 11 listed)
TRANSFERRING DENSITY AND DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OVERVIEW Creating an effective TDR Program Creating an effective TDR Program Steps.
Project NSTL Kara Clay Joshua Rucker. Purpose To revitalize North Saint Louis City and bring prosperity O Jobs O Sustainability O Long lasting Business.
Local Housing Policy Initiatives & Engagement Housing WA Conference, October 6, 2015 Kelly Rider, Policy Director Kayla Schott-Bresler, Policy Manager.
Dan Stonington Cascade Land Conservancy December 2nd, 2009 The Cascade Agenda.
Brownfields Redevelopment Financing for Small Cities, Rural Communities And Tribes October 27-29, 2003 Sharon Kophs Washington State Department of Community,
An Introduction to the concepts and the connections URBAN FORESTRY & GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE Bill Hubbard Southern Regional Extension Forester.
THE REAL ESTATE INSTITUTE OF ZIMBABWE ANNUAL WINTER SCHOOL (JULY 2015) (JULY 2015)
Waterfront and Marinship Steering Committee Form Based Zoning A Petaluma Experience 05 March 2009.
COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING July 29, 2015 Summit County 2015 Climate Action Plan.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
Land Use North Street Plan Downtown & Waterfront Plan Natural Environmen t Open Space Protection Plan Built Environmen t Transportatio n System Economic.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
World Bank and Habitat III
Evaluating and Improving Tax Incentives Lessons Learned
Hart’s Mill Ecovillage and Farm
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Update
Ocean/Envir 260 The Cascade Agenda (and related issues) Lecture #20:
Streamlining Integrated Infrastructure Implementation: Workshop Report
Creating an Effective Density Bonus in Durham
40R Smart Growth & Starter Home Zoning Districts
Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program:
CES Locality working and enabling communities
Inefficiencies in Land Markets
Presented at the AFN National Housing and Infrastructure Forum
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
Welcome!.
Transfer of development rights
MENU OF TOOL TOPICS (Choose 4 out of the 11 listed)
NHA Mission & Vision Statements
MENU OF TOOL TOPICS (Choose 4 out of the 11 listed)
Farmland Preservation Program
Capital Improvement Plans
Menu of Tool Topics (Choose 4 out of the 11 listed)
Framework Webinar September 7, 2016 NOTES FOR TODAY’S WEBINAR
Minnesota NAHRO Redevelopment Resource Tools September 26, 2003
An Overview of Farmland Protection Tools under The Agricultural Development and Farmland Preservation Enabling Act Theodore A. (Ted) Feitshans Department.
Land Use 101: The Comprehensive Plan
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
COMMUNITIES A PARTNER TO 2020 Levy Request County Board Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Options for TDR in Puyallup Presentation for: Options for TDR in Puyallup Puyallup City Council February 13, 2018

Overview Objectives TDR recap Policy questions for council input Infrastructure financing opportunities

growth In 2016 Pierce was the fastest growing county in the United States. The county gained 11,785 new residents. Growth remains strong as economic vitality of region flourishes.

New Map1 Tacoma Puget Sound Puyallup River What will this growth look like?

New Map3 Tacoma Puget Sound Puyallup River Future land use in Puyallup River valley if farming areas are built out to suburban densities. Is this the kind of community we want? If not, then let’s explore options for achieving a more sustainable vision for growth and keeping our working lands working to support our communities.

Tacoma Puget Sound Puyallup River Conserved Prime Farmland May 2014 TDR Brownbag

= TDR and Zoning Development rights Potential for residential development Can be traded = 10 Development Rights 100-acre farm 1 house per 10 acres

TDR overview Real estate tool Gives landowners choices Market-based solutions Real estate tool Gives landowners choices Can sell the development potential from property to a developer who can achieve higher density in an area where it’s desired 100% voluntary, market- based, respects private property rights

Ingredients for success Clear conservation priorities (supply) Market for growth (demand) Policy linking TDR to growth Incentives Business model

Sending areas In-city + Conservation benefits for community + Can allow farming to continue on designated ag land Credits tend to be expensive Dilutes conservation potential Doesn’t give the city access to funding through the regional infrastructure financing program Higher administrative complexity Policy questions Sending areas Receiving areas Incentives Administration

Sending areas County + Conservation benefits for community (protection of farms that supply farmers markets/grocery stores/restaurants; lands of ecological importance) + Flood control benefits = County preference is for ILA Conservation is “out there” (outside of city) Doesn’t give the city access to funding through the regional infrastructure financing program Policy questions Sending areas Receiving areas Incentives Administration

Sending areas Regional + City can access new revenue for infrastructure + City has discretion to prioritize conservation = County preference is for ILA = City can choose alternative to ILA Conservation is “out there” (outside of city) Complex tool (but help is available) Policy questions Sending areas Receiving areas Incentives Administration

Receiving areas Downtown Regional Growth Center Was focus of 2011-2012 TDR project work South Hill Regional Growth Center Growth potential Any area seeking upzone Zoning changes from R-5 to 4:1, e.g. Other commercial areas (e.g. River Road) Policy questions Sending areas Receiving areas Incentives Administration

Incentives Additional density Units Building height / FAR / additional square footage Setback reductions Cost savings Parking requirement relaxation Property tax exemptions Policy questions Sending areas Receiving areas Incentives Administration

Administration Continuum of involvement: City-run program Light touch (County program) – City process permits, in coordination with county TDR program Hands on/staff intensive (In-City program) – recruit participants, provide market info, connect buyers and sellers, operate a TDR bank Public-private partnership City retains permitting role Partner leads marketing, outreach, deal-making Can be cost effective depending on scale of program Policy questions Sending areas Receiving areas Incentives Administration

Regional TDR Cities need infrastructure to support growth Public improvements are expensive

LCLIP TDR TIF + = LCLIP Land Conservation and Local Infrastructure Program Financial incentive for cities to use TDR Forterra designed LCLIP to give cities access to new revenue to support growth

LCLIP Time Increment Base Assessed Value Incremental Assessed Value $ LCLIP start LCLIP end (25 years later) City retains a portion of county’s share of property tax revenue on new construction City commits to accepting TDR credits Puyallup: 73 to 364 credits Program runs up to 25 years

LCLIP City retains a portion of county’s share of property tax revenue on new construction City commits to accepting TDR credits Puyallup: 73 to 364 credits Program runs up to 25 years

LCLIP City Tax Revenue Growth without LCLIP New Property Tax Revenues Counties retain at least 25% of new revenues Cities can retain up to 75% of new county property tax revenues accruing from new development in a defined area City Tax Revenue Growth with LCLIP City Tax Revenue Growth without LCLIP City can spend revenue on public improvements. Infrastructure can include parks, transportation, streetscapes, utilities, security, maintenance. Works with LIFT

LCLIP Adopted: Seattle In the process: Tacoma Tukwila Shoreline Bothell Mountlake Terrace

LCLIP Feasibility study: How much revenue? How many credits? Where to use it? When to start? What are the risks?

questions Contact: Nick Bratton nbratton@forterra.org 206-905-6941 Morgan Shook shook@econw.com 206-388-0082