Abusayeed Saifullah*, Mahbubur Rahman*, Dali Ismail,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
$ Network Support for Wireless Connectivity in the TV Bands Victor Bahl Ranveer Chandra Thomas Moscibroda Srihari Narlanka Yunnan Wu Yuan.
Advertisements

VSMC MIMO: A Spectral Efficient Scheme for Cooperative Relay in Cognitive Radio Networks 1.
Networking with Wi-Fi like Connectivity Victor Bahl, Ranveer Chandra, Thomas Moscibroda, Microsoft Research Rohan Murty*, Matt Welsh Harvard University.
Fine-grained Channel Access in Wireless LAN SIGCOMM 2010 Kun Tan, Ji Fang, Yuanyang Zhang,Shouyuan Chen, Lixin Shi, Jiansong Zhang, Yongguang Zhang.
Medium Access Control in Wireless Sensor Networks.
Comp 361, Spring 20056:Basic Wireless 1 Chapter 6: Basic Wireless (last updated 02/05/05) r A quick intro to CDMA r Basic
Aida BotonjićTieto1 LTE Aida Botonjić. Aida BotonjićTieto2 Why LTE? Applications: Interactive gaming DVD quality video Data download/upload Targets: High.
System Design for Cognitive Radio Communications
Wireless and going mobile Browsing via low energy photons.
CDMA X RTT Overview. Global 3G Evolution.
6: Wireless and Mobile Networks6-1 Chapter 6: Wireless and Mobile Networks Background: r # wireless (mobile) phone subscribers now exceeds # wired phone.
5-1 Data Link Layer r What is Data Link Layer? r Wireless Networks m Wi-Fi (Wireless LAN) r Comparison with Ethernet.
1 Wireless and Mobile Networks EECS 489 Computer Networks Z. Morley Mao Monday March 12, 2007 Acknowledgement:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA)
System parameters and performance CDMA-2000, W-CDMA (UMTS), GSM 900, WLAN a, WLAN b, Bluetooth. By Øystein Taskjelle.
6: Wireless and Mobile Networks6-1 Chapter 6 Wireless and Mobile Networks Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach Featuring the Internet, 3 rd edition.
SMACK: Smart ACKnowledgment Scheme for Broadcast Messages in Wireless Networks Aveek Dutta, Dola Saha, Dirk Grunwald, Douglas Sicker, University of Colorado.
MAC Protocols In Sensor Networks.  MAC allows multiple users to share a common channel.  Conflict-free protocols ensure successful transmission. Channel.
Network and Systems Laboratory nslab.ee.ntu.edu.tw Branislav Kusy, Christian Richter, Wen Hu, Mikhail Afanasyev, Raja Jurdak, Michael Brunig, David Abbott,
A Multi-Channel CSMA MAC Protocol with Receiver Based Channel Selection for Multihop Wireless Networks Nitin Jain, Samir R. Das Department of Electrical.
SEA-MAC: A Simple Energy Aware MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring Applications By: Miguel A. Erazo and Yi Qian International.
1 Quick Review on Data Link Layer – Part 2 Jonathan C.L. Liu, Ph.D. Department of Computer, Information Science and Engineering (CISE), University of Florida.
CRMA: Collision Resistant Multiple Access Lili Qiu University of Texas at Austin Joint work with Tianji Li, Mi Kyung Han, Apurv Bhartia, Eric Rozner, Yin.
Adapting Channel Widths to Improve Application Performance Ranveer Chandra Microsoft Research Collaborators: Victor Bahl, Ratul Mahajan, Thomas Moscibroda,
Data and Computer Communications Tenth Edition by William Stallings Data and Computer Communications, Tenth Edition by William Stallings, (c) Pearson Education.
Discovering Sensor Networks: Applications in Structural Health Monitoring Summary Lecture Wireless Communications.
Experimental Evaluation of Co-existent LTE-U and Wi-Fi on ORBIT Problem DefinitionExperimental Procedure Results Observation WINLAB Conclusion Samuel
 First generation systems utilized frequency axis to separate users into different channels  Second generation systems added time axis to increase number.
Bluetooth 4.0: Low Energy.
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
5G MOBILE TECHNOLOGY TECHNICAL SEMINAR
244-6: Higher Generation Wireless Techniques and Networks
Cellular Networks Wireless Transmission Cellular Concept
4G-WIRELESS NETWORKS PREPARED BY: PARTH LATHIGARA(07BEC037)
WiMAX 1EEE Protocol Stack
The Medium Access Control Sublayer
Wireless Networks.
Shamir Stein Ackerman Elad Lifshitz Timor Israeli
Multi-channel, multi-radio wireless networks
Long Term Evolution (LTE)
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
CS 457 – Lecture 7 Wireless Networks
An Overview of ax Greg Kamer – Consulting Systems Engineer.
Greg Kamer – Consulting Systems Engineer
MIMO-OFDM Wireless Communications with MATLAB®
Street Light Monitoring System
Long-Range Low-power Radio (LoRa)
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
Presented by Mohamad Haidar, Ph.D. May 13, 2009 Moncton, NB, Canada
28 October, 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Beacon-based Multi-Channel MAC for.
doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 January 2018
Connecting Things Data must travel from devices which are immersed in the urban environment toward information sinks, and vice versa. Cellular Mobile.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Intended IG Objectives] Date Submitted:
Multi-channel, multi-radio
Is the MAC sufficient for wireless high speed mesh LANs?
Introductory TGah Proposal
Submission Title: IEEE Standards for Low Power Wide Area Networks
Introductory TGah Proposal
Multi-block OFDM for TVWS Operation
Reducing Channel Access Delay
Greg Kamer – Principal Systems Engineer
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Multi-block OFDM for TVWS Operation
D2D Technology for HEW Date: Authors: January 2010
Performance aspects of Multi-link operations
Reducing Channel Access Delay
Performance aspects of Multi-link operations
Physical Layer (2).
Presentation transcript:

Enabling Reliable, Asynchronous, and Bidirectional Communication in SNOW Abusayeed Saifullah*, Mahbubur Rahman*, Dali Ismail, Chenyang Lu, Jie Liu, Ranveer Chandra *co-primary author Wayne State University Washington University in St Louis Microsoft Research

Low-Power Wide-Area Network (LPWAN) Overcomes scalability and range limits of traditional wireless sensor networks. A key technology driving the Internet of Things (IoT). LoRa SigFox nWave RPMA NB-IoT EC-GSM-IoT LTE Cat M1 5G

SNOW (Sensor Net. over White Space) LPWAN by exploiting the TV white spaces. White Space: unused TV channels between 54-698MHz. SNOW 1.0 [SenSys ’16, Best Paper Nominee] Long range  nodes directly Tx to the base station (BS). The BS accesses cloud for white space database. Spectrum split into narrow orthogonal subcarriers. Each node transmits on a subcarrier. Multi-Rx at the BS using a single antenna-radio.

Decoding for Multi-Rx at BS Aggregate OFDM signal in time domain Orthogonal signals from sensor nodes on orthogonal subcarriers.

SNOW 2.0 Uplink: Multi-Rx with single-antenna radio (SNOW 1.0). Downlink: Multi-Tx with single-antenna radio Send different data to different nodes using a single Tx Bidirectional: concurrent uplink and downlink comm. Fully Asynchronous Reliability ACK for each Tx

SNOW 2.0 Dual-Radio Design Simultaneous Tx/Rx at BS is enabled by using two radios. One radio is dedicated for Tx, the other for Rx. BS uses wide white space spectrum Each node uses one half-duplex narrowband radio

PHY Design Using D-OFDM D-OFDM: Distributed OFDM Tx on narrow OFDM subcarriers  energy and spectrum efficiency Individual subcarrier modulation: BPSK Uplink Each node independently encodes and transmits. BS runs decoder based on global FFT to decode asynchronous Tx. Downlink: needs an inverse implementation. Different from MIMO radio that rely on multiple antennas Single antenna is important for low frequency band (54-698MHz).

Downlink Communication BS encodes different data on different subcarriers. Different from traditional broadcast. Performs IFFT. Makes a single transmission. From the received OFDM signal, a node independently decodes data from signal component on its subcarrier. Can encode anytime on a subcarrier Distributed decoding

MAC Protocol White space spectrum split into orthogonal subcarriers. Each node is assigned a subcarrier. When number of nodes> subcarriers, a subcarrier is shared. Location-aware subcarrier allocation Attempt to assign different subcarriers to hidden terminals. Also ensure a subcarrier is not overly congested. Tx using a lightweight CSMA/CA protocol (like TinyOS) Static interval random backoff Try to assign different subcarriers to u and w. u w

MAC Protocol: Handling ACK D-OFDM allows us to encode data anytime on any subcarrier  allows ACK of asynchronous Tx. Rx radio keeps receiving while Tx radio keeps sending. When there is nothing to transmit, Tx radio can sleep. CSMA/CA helps avoid interference on ACK. ACK for u will be sensed by v. u v

Other Features Peer to peer communication Handling dynamics Spectrum dynamics through backup subcarrier Subcarrier swap Load balancing Node join/leave SNOW can exploit fragmented white space spectrum. Fragmented white space spectrum Signal strength (dBm) Frequency (MHz)

Implementation Implemented in GNU Radio Experiment with USRP device Connected to laptop or Raspberry pi All the packets (up to # of subcarriers) are decoded within 0.1ms  comparable to a single packet decoding time scalability.

Design Parameters Key design parameters Default settings Bit rate: target bit rate at least 50kbps. Packet size Subcarrier bandwidth Bit spreading factor Default settings Tx power: 0dBm Subcarrier bandwidth: 400kHz BS bandwidth: 6MHz Packet size: 40bytes Bit spreading factor: 8 Determined based on target bit rate, Shannon-Hartley Theorem, Nyquist Theorem, and experiment.

Urban Deployment Deployment in Detroit, Michigan

Distance vs. Tx Power 400kHz bandwidth Approx. 8km at 0dBm

Reliability Uplink Downlink 400kHz 0 dBm bandwidth SNOW is reliable in both directions

Max Achievable Throughput Throughput increases linearly with the number of subcarriers due to parallel receptions at BS.

Indoor Deployment Lower frequency propagates well through obstacles. Deployment in CS building in Wayne State University

Rural Deployment (Rolla, Missouri) Throughput increases linearly with the number of subcarriers due to parallel receptions at BS.

Benefits of SNOW over Other LPWANs Limited infrastructure NB-IoT, 5G, LTE Cat M1, EC-GSM-IoT need infrastructure. Bidirectional Most non-cellular LPWANs are primarily uplink only. Scalability increases with the spectrum availability due to high parallelism. LoRa, SigFox achieve scalability assuming very low traffic. Abundant spectrum Spectrum availability in the US counties

Comparison with LoRa (QualNet Simulation) Setup Used a LoRa gateway with 8 parallel demodulation paths. An equal spectrum given to LoRa and SNOW. Energy consumption and latency are quite steady in SNOW As parallelism in SNOW is much higher.

Conclusion SNOW is an LPWAN over the TV white spaces. Can be exploited by the future IoT and CPS. Can help shape and evolve IEEE 802.15.4m standard. Potential advantages over existing LPWANs. SNOW achieves scalability, robustness, energy efficiency Asynchronous, parallel Tx and parallel Rx Reliable, bidirectional Simple design using single antenna radio Future work Coexistence Mobility Security.