REMUNERATING DISTRIBUTION IN SPAIN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Tariffs Gender Module #5 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social Equality.
Advertisements

1 Conservation Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests Presentation to the: Florida Public Service Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency Initiatives November.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Natural monopoly: public or private?
Cross-Border Infrastructure: A Toolkit Tariff and Rate Setting Session on Regulation & Accountability Max Bradford Castalia The views expressed here are.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Market Definition in the Telecoms Industry Prof. Jordi Gual IESE Business School Barcelona-Madrid Brussels, 16 September 2002.
Trade Rules in Services: Issues and Problems Carsten Fink, The World Bank EU-LDC Network Annual Conference Trade and Poverty Reduction Rotterdam, 30 and.
Energy regulation and quality of service Eric Groom FEU, World Bank 4 th Poverty Reduction Strategy Forum Athens, June
A4 Privatization and regulation David Begg, Stanley Fischer and Rudiger Dornbusch, Economics, 6th Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2000 Power Point presentation by.
EStorage First Annual Workshop Arnhem, NL 30, Oct Olivier Teller.
RATE OF RETURN REGULATION. Why we regulate?  Public Interest Theory  Monopoly power & abuses  Improved regulator procedures, greater accountability.
RPI-X: Forecasting costs Regulation and Competition John Cubbin.
Pricing and Sales Promotion A Wrap Up MAR 331. Pricing and Sales Promotion A Wrap Up Marketing and Pricing –Price/Value Relationships –Role of the Distribution.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Chapter 18 Natural monopoly: public or private? David Begg, Stanley Fischer and Rudiger Dornbusch, Economics, 9th Edition,
Ranci Highways Nov.261 Highways: Cost and Regulation in Europe Università degli studi di Bergamo November 26 th -27 th, 2004 Applying a Price Cap: RAB.
Monopoly vs Perfect Competition. Allocative efficiency Society can maximize its net benefit by allocating just enough resources to produce the quantity.
IGCSE®/O Level Economics
Amount and cost of losses June 11 th Florence School of Regulation Jose Luis Mata.
Chapter 27: Natural Monopolies: (De)Regulation? Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 13e.
Definition of an Externality
Are Monopolies Desirable?
Chapter 6: Perfect and Imperfect Competition. Section A Perfect Competition Consumers look for best price Consumers look for best price For profit, firms.
BSc Economics and related programmes
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.13-1 Natural Monopolies And Regulation.
BSc Economics and related programmes Economics of Competition and Regulation EC 3015 Week 8: Price Cap Regulation.
Lecture 20 Monopoly. Market structure Market structures: u A monopolized market - a single seller. u Monopoly affects the price (has market power) u Takes.
First edition Global Economic Issues and Policies PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Copyright © 2004 South-Western/Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
BRITO Portugal Session 4 – Block 1 Barcelona May EDP Distribuição Energia, S.A. Internalisation of Environmental Benefits Concerning Dispersed.
UPDATES ON THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN LITHUANIA Aistija Zubaviciute National Control Commission for Prices and Energy 3 April 2007, Riga.
Incorporating Quality of Service into Incentive-based Regulation Juan Rivier Florence School of Regulation Workshop Improving.
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION, RENEWABLE ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY. IMPACT ON POWER QUALITY AND NETWORK PLANNING “Inauguration of the 6th Framework Programme”
Increasing integration of variable RES-E: Policy and regulatory measures for T&D networks Luis Olmos Pontificia Comillas University Madrid / Spain
“ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS OF REDUCED LOSS TRANSFORMERS: Experiences in Spain" 14 th May 2003 J.Frau Spain Session 5 – Block 1.2.
Monopoly: Price Searcher Monopoly defined –One firm –Unique product, no close substitutes –Barriers to entry.
1 Märt Ots Energy Market Inspectorate 4 th Baltic Electricity Market Mini-Forum Riga Latest developments in Estonia.
Kazakhstan Electric Association KEA Established in 1998 Unites 21 participants and 12 observers Among participants 9 distribution companies 3 vertically.
Electricity Power Market: Competitive and Non-competitive Markets Ito Diejomaoh.
LOW INFLATION. DEFINITION  A SUSTAINED GENERAL RISE IN PRICES.
Price Regulation of Natural Monopolies. “Natural” Monopoly Average total cost Output/hr 产出 / 小时 Price/unit 0 Industry characterized by declining ATC.
State Regulation in the Natural Monopoly Sphere Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Regulation of Natural Monopolies ALMATY – 2006.
... Absolute monopoly: One seller The firm is the industry Firm’s demand is also the market demand.
Draft 2015 electricity distribution price-path reset Briefing for financial market analysts 4 July 2014 Sue Begg Commerce Commission.
1. 2 Residential Solar Valuation Project SPI 2012: Solar Energy's Positive Impacts on the Electric System Karl R. Rábago Rábago Energy LLC.
Summary of Learning Objectives
James L. Plummer, President, Climate Economics Foundation
Introduction to Economic Regulation
THE ARGENTINE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK VIS-À-VIS THE CURRENT POLITICAL CRISIS AND ITS SOCIOECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES.
Regulatory ‘Do’s’ and ‘Don’ts’ for DSOs to serve consumers’ interests Garrett Blaney co-chair, CEER Distribution Systems Working Group CEER Annual Conference.
15 Monopoly.
Lecture 19 Monopoly.
10b - ARE BUSINESSES EFFICIENT? Monopolies in the Long Run
ارائه خدمات سلامت: آيا انتخاب و سازماندهي خدمات سلامت مناسب است؟
Cired Alpha Session 6 Special Report Question 3
Lecture 19 Monopoly.
Distributed Solar Generation: Value and Pricing
Rate-of-Return Regulation
Engineering Economic Decisions
Economies of scale up output Q'
Lecture 20 Monopoly.
10b - ARE BUSINESSES EFFICIENT? Monopoly in the Long Run
Inflation and The Consumer Price Index
Lucía Quesada – UW Madison ABCDE, Amsterdam May
Business Organizations and Competition
Lecture 20 Monopoly.
Lecture 19 Monopoly.
Lecture 20 Monopoly.
Transmission Pricing & Regional Electric Markets
Lecture 19 Monopoly.
Lecture 19 Monopoly.
Lecture 20 Monopoly.
Presentation transcript:

REMUNERATING DISTRIBUTION IN SPAIN Jordi Dolader, Luis Maqueda, Antonio Candela CIRED 2003 - Barcelona

REGULATORY POINT OF VIEW(I) NATURAL MONOPOLY ECONOMIES OF SCALE COST SUBADITIVITY NETWORK ECONOMIES A BIG PROBLEM : CROSS SUBSIDIES

REGULATORY POINT OF VIEW(II) PROFIT OPORTUNITY PRICES CUT DOWN CUSTOMERS FIRMS AVOID ABUSE OF NATURAL MONOPOLY DISTORSION IN THE ACTIVITY REGULATORY COSTS BENEFITS COSTS SAVINGS FROM THE EFFICIENCY MEASURES REGULATORY COSTS

INCENTIVE REGULATION Decouples profits from firm´s costs Remuneration procedurement fixed for the rate period Incentives to reduce and control its costs QoS problems, ratched effect

GENERAL SCHEME

REGULATORY ACCOUNTS

REFERENCE NETWORK MODEL Basis Results Location and characterisation of demand Facilities Minimizing trinomial (Investment, Operation cost and Losses) WORKING UNDER DIFFERENT SUPPOSALS Catalogue of instalments Subject to QoS requirements Facilities in different Scenarios

ANALYSIS PROCEDUREMENT

UPDATING REMUNERATION (I) Losses reduction incentives Efficiency factor Quality of service Firm Year Recognised costs for increased activity Adjusting factor from forecasted values to real ones Remuneration Forecasted increase in the Retail Price Index

UPDATING REMUNERATION (II) Recognised costs for increased activity Increasing activity costs will be remunerated considering activity costs inductors Incentives for better quality of services The incentives/penalties that will be received by each firm, is calculated with this phormula:

UPDATING REMUNERATION (III) Incentives for losses cut down Incentives and penalties that will be given to each firm for their losses reduction, will be calculated with this phormula: Updating forecasted parameters in the past with real ones