Utah’s APCD as a Stand-alone Opioid Monitoring Tool

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Barbara Rudolph, PhD, MSSW NAHDO Consultant. To enhance the value of statewide APCDs by cataloging measures and reporting practices To develop and disseminate.
Advertisements

1 Proprietary and Confidential 1 Identification of Potentially Avoidable Emergency Department Visits Using Claims Data APHA Session : Advances in.
Department of Vermont Health Access Vermont Blueprint for Health: Using APCD to Evaluate Health Care Reform Pat Jones, MS Blueprint Assistant Director.
VIRGINIA PRESCRIPTION MONITORING PROGRAM C.A.R.E Presentation February 27, 2015 Ralph Orr Director, Virginia Prescription Monitoring Program.
Pharmacy Department Overview & Prescription Regulations
Prescription Opioid Use and Opioid-Related Overdose Death — TN, 2009–2010 Jane A.G. Baumblatt, MD Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epidemic Intelligence.
Adoption of Health Information Technology among U.S. Ambulatory and Long-term Care Providers by Esther Hing, M.P.H., and Anita Bercovitz, Ph.D National.
Technology Council of Maryland Health IT Forum “Big Data” and the Real World.
Public Employees Benefits Board April 23, PEBB Procurement Bid Alternatives.
Monthly APCD User Workgroup Webinar May 27 th, 2014.
An Overview of NCQA’s Relative Resource Use Measures.
1 Proprietary and Confidential 1 Geographic Variation in the Rates of Chiropractic Manipulation Treatment in Northern New England APHA Session :
The Prescription Behavior Surveillance System: Applications of De-identified PDMP Data in Public Health Surveillance Rx Abuse Summit April 23, 2014 Peter.
Snapshot of IMS LifeLink Claims Database 10% Random Sample
Overview of the National Health Care Survey Thomas McLemore Division of Health Care Statistics October 10, 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES.
Accessing Aggregated Population Health Data from Select Tools of the NCHS A presentation at the Knowledge 4 Equity Conference James M. Craver November.
Medicare Claims Dashboard Application Overview. THE CHALLENGE The challenge being put forth is to develop an online dashboard for researchers or other.
July 31, 2009Prepared by the Maine Health Information Center Overview of All Payer Claims Data Suanne Singer, Senior Consultant Maine Health Information.
Available Types of National Drug Use Data DSARM Advisory Committee Meeting Silver Spring, Maryland May 18, 2005 Judy Staffa, PhD, RPh, Epidemiology Team.
Maine Prescription Monitoring Program Using the PMP to Improve Patient Care John Lipovsky, MPPM, AREM, PMM Prescription Monitoring Program Coordinator.
Providing Health Care Information for Floridians.
John Lipovsky, MPPM, AREM, PMM
Copyright © 2011, 2006 by Saunders an imprint of Elsevier Inc. UNDERSTANDING HOSPITAL BILLING AND CODING CHAPTER 3 Hospital Organizational Structure and.
Government Agencies. World Health Organization  Sponsored by United Nations  Investigates serious diseases & health issues across the world.
Maine Prescription Monitoring Program Using the PMP to Improve Patient Care John Lipovsky, MPPM, AREM, PMM Prescription Monitoring Program Coordinator.
Maine Prescription Monitoring Program Using the PMP to Improve Patient Care John Lipovsky, MPPM, AREM, PMM Prescription Monitoring Program Coordinator.
Maine Prescription Monitoring Program Using the PMP to Improve Patient Care John Lipovsky, MPPM, AREM, PMM Prescription Monitoring Program Coordinator.
Achieving Better Care by Monitoring All Prescriptions (ABC-MAP) Act 191 of 2014 Pennsylvania's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) May 17, 2016.
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Quality Measurement A Changing Landscape
Comparison of Opioid Prescribing Guidelines Violations by Clinical Speciality Chia-Chen Teng1,2, Christy Porusnik3, Erin Johnson4, Robert Rolfs3, Jonathan.
Treatment of Pain on Opioid Prescribing in Utah, 2002–2009
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
The Many Careers of Pharmacy
Effectiveness of Care Measures
Comparing abuse of extended-release versus immediate-release opioid analgesics adjusted for number of prescriptions and morphine-equivalent dose Stephen.
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Brain Injury and Opioid Epidemic
An Overview of the ePDMP
ROOM project Addressing the Opioid Epidemic in the U.P.
Health Home Program Services
Prescribing Opioids in Vermont
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Controlled Substance Monitoring & Legislative updates
PRESCRIPTION MONITORING PROGRAMS
What Are the Differences? (Part 1)
Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System
Life & Health Insurance Chapter 12
Medicare Supplement or Medicare Advantage
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
Available Types of National Drug Use Data
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
Selected Components of the Health Care Delivery System
Treasurers’ Meeting November 10,2016.
Life & Health Insurance
Medicare Supplement Protection
Statewide Health Home Initiatives
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
2019 Medicare Part D Rule Opioid-related Provisions
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program
Healthcare Pricing Transparency
Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Megan Eguchi, MPh Sana karam, md, phd
Data Sources ADH: Other AR Data: National: Vital Statistics PDMP
Situation analysis in Kyrgyzstan
PMP Advisory Committee
All Payer Claims Database Creation PCC Certification Phase: Initiation
Presentation transcript:

Utah’s APCD as a Stand-alone Opioid Monitoring Tool Office of Health Care Statistics Utah Department of Health

Introduction Sterling Petersen, Analytics Lead Office of Health Care Statistics Utah Department of Health sterlingpetersen@utah.gov

Office of Health Care Statistics (OHCS) Housed within the Center for Health Data and Informatics (CHDI) at the Utah Department of Health (UDOH) Collects, analyzes, and disseminates data Healthcare Facility Discharge Data Inpatient (1992–Current) ED (1996–Current) Ambulatory Surgery (1996–Current) APCD (2013–Current) HEDIS CAHPS

All Payer Claims Database (APCD) Submitted on a monthly basis, processed bi-annually 2013–Current Anticipate moving to quarterly processing 2019Q1 About 40 data streams Covers approximately 75% of the commercial market Medicaid About 2/3 of Medicare Advantage/Part C market Unknown portion of the Medicare Part D market

Controlled Substance Database (CSD) Utah’s prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) Maintained by the Division of Occupational and Professional Licensing (DOPL) at Utah Department of Commerce Collects dispensing information on Schedule II–V drugs Retail pharmacies Institutional pharmacies Outpatient hospital pharmacies In-state/Out-of-state mail order pharmacies

All Payer Claims Database (APCD) Data Release Policies All Payer Claims Database (APCD) Datasets available for internal and external researchers after approval “Limited Use” “Research” Controlled Substance Database (CSD) Datasets available for internal researchers at the Utah Department of Commerce and the Utah Department of Health after approval Narrow access provision for external partners

APCD as a Stand-alone Opioid Monitoring Tool? Coverage APCD Most commercial, Medicaid, some Medicare CSD All commercial, Medicaid, Medicare, cash-pay

APCD as a Stand-alone Opioid Monitoring Tool? Data Quality APCD Continuous quality monitoring by internal and external personnel Feedback from external data users Linked person-centric database CSD Enhanced quality monitoring in early stages of development No built-in longitudinal person identifier

APCD as a Standalone Opioid Monitoring Tool? Measurement Results - CY2017 Pharmacy Quality Alliance’s Opioid-Related Measures Concurrent Use of Opioids and Benzodiazepines (COB) Use of Opioids at High Dosage in Persons Without Cancer (OHD) (NQF #2940) Use of Opioids from Multiple Providers in Persons Without Cancer (OMP) (NQF #2950) Use of Opioids at High Dosage and from Multiple Providers in Persons Without Cancer (OHDMP) (NQF #2951)

Concurrent Use of Opioids and Benzodiazepines (COB) The percentage of individuals 18 years and older with concurrent use of prescription opioids and benzodiazepines APCD 22,682 / 110,889 ≈ 20.5% CSD 38,421 / 203,040 ≈ 18.9% Cancer and hospice exclusion omitted

Use of Opioids at High Dosage in Persons Without Cancer (OHD) The proportion of individuals from the denominator receiving prescriptions for opioids with a daily dosage greater than 120 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for 90 consecutive days or longer APCD 5,788 / 105,424 ≈ 5.5% CSD 10,304 / 192,763 ≈ 5.3% Cancer and hospice exclusion omitted

Use of Opioids from Multiple Providers in Persons Without Cancer (OMP) The proportion of individuals from the denominator receiving prescriptions for opioids from four (4) or more prescribers AND four (4) or more pharmacies APCD 2,856 / 105,424 ≈ 2.7% CSD 4,652 / 192,763 ≈ 2.4% Cancer and hospice exclusion omitted

Cancer and hospice exclusion omitted Use of Opioids at High Dosage and from Multiple Providers in Persons Without Cancer (OHDMP) The proportion of individuals from the denominator receiving prescriptions for opioids with a daily dosage greater than 120 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for 90 consecutive days or longer AND who received opioid prescriptions from four (4) or more prescribers AND four (4) or more pharmacies APCD 203 / 105,424 ≈ 0.2% CSD 382 / 192,763 ≈ 0.2% Cancer and hospice exclusion omitted

Basic Diagnostics (APCD | CSD) Age Group Female Male Unknown 18-24 64.9% | 62.1% 35.1% | 37.6% 0.0% | 0.3% 25-34 63.7% | 59.0% 36.3% | 40.6% 0.0% | 0.4% 35-44 59.0% | 56.0% 41.0% | 43.6% 0.0% | 0.5% 45-54 58.5% | 56.2% 41.4% | 43.3% 55-64 56.4% | 53.8% 43.5% | 45.6% 65+ 62.9% | 59.4% 37.1% | 39.9% 0.0% | 0.7% Total 60.1% | 57.1% 39.9% | 42.4%

Basic Diagnostics (APCD | CSD) Age Group Gender Average Total Days Supply Max Total Days Supply Average Unique Days of Service Max Unique Days of Service 18-24 Female 75.8 | 76.6 1527 | 1412 6 | 6 72 | 73 Male 77.9 | 77.0 834 | 803 5 | 5 26 | 47 25-34 128.6 | 126.8 1298 | 1272 7 | 7 81 | 85 137.0 | 136.7 1095 | 1256 61 | 61 35-44 164.6 | 162.1 1065 | 1532 8 | 8 72 | 93 170.3 | 167.3 1118 | 1069 64 | 77 45-54 180.9 | 174.9 1074 | 1109 65 | 67 178.6 | 176.3 1467 | 3114 142 | 354 55-64 182.9 | 173.9 1213 | 1345 59 | 70 181.7 | 177.9 1367 | 1578 59 | 67 65+ 164.2 | 147.1 1039 | 1019 7 | 6 66 | 72 159.9 | 151.2 1332 | 1384 70 | 73

Basic Diagnostics (APCD | CSD)

Results by Age Groups (ApCD | CSD) COB OHD OMP Age Group APCD CSD 18-24 7.7% 8.0% 1.1% 1.3% 6.7% 4.9% 25-34 16.9% 15.8% 4.2% 4.5% 5.9% 35-44 21.9% 20.5% 6.9% 7.1% 4.6% 45-54 24.0% 22.3% 7.6% 2.9% 2.7% 55-64 23.6% 21.6% 7.3% 2.2% 1.8% 65+ 17.4% 16.1% 3.0% 2.8% 1.0% 0.8% Total 21.0% 19.7% 6.3% 6.5% 3.2%

Conclusion and Looking Forward Utah’s APCD and CSD yield comparable results for basic measures We only examined CY2017 due to constraints with the CSD. A multi-year investigation might be useful Utah’s APCD might be an appropriate alternative to the CSD for some opioid-related analyses