Module 7 Do No Harm INTERNATIONAL PROTOCOL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Areas of Research Specific issues. Clinical Trials Phase I First use in humans of an experimental drug or treatment In a small group of healthy volunteers.
Advertisements

Good Medical Practice Evidence to use for Appraisal Good Medical Practice 2006.
Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 3 The Ethical Principles that Guide Researchers.
Information Sharing 1. Overview Inquiries into sexual violence incidents are extremely sensitive. Collecting and sharing information on GBV can be dangerous,
An introduction to Child Protection and Safeguarding
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. THE TITLE “INTRODUCTION”
Code of Ethics – Discussion Question
The principles used by AUTEC in granting ethical approval for research.
1 Critical issue module 6 Separated children in emergency settings.
Mediation in the application of the 1980 Convention Regional Conference on the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
Gender-based Violence (GBV) prevention and response in humanitarian settings TYPHOON HAIYAN / YOLANDA.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 7-1 Chapter 7: Audit Planning and Documentation.
TRAINING COURSE. Course Objectives 1.Know how to handle a suspected case 2.Know how to care for a recognized trafficked person referred to you Session.
SESSION SIX YOU ARE NOT ALONE SERVICES WHICH ARE AVAILABLE TO HELP.
Consent & Vulnerable Adults Aim: To provide an opportunity for Primary Care Staff to explore issues related to consent & vulnerable adults.
An Introduction to the Privacy Act Privacy Act 1993 Promotes and protects individual privacy Is concerned with the privacy of information about people.
Reporting and Referral Procedures Section 5 Page 19 1.
5-6-1 Unit 6: Ethical considerations After completing this unit, you should be able to: Understand the basic ethical principles of working with.
TRAINING COURSE. Course Objectives 1.Know how to handle a suspected case 2.Know how to care for a recognized trafficked person referred to you Session.
Unit 4 Seminar. Key Terms  Confidentiality  Privileged communication  Privacy.
Week 12. Lecture 2. Health Law & the EU Cross-border healthcare: patients’ rights.
Research ethics.
Child Safe Standards How effective is your leadership team in promoting a child safe culture in your organisation? 2 June 2016.
Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2015 Module 6 – Testimony INTERNATIONAL PROTOCOL,
Module 3 - Preliminary Considerations Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2015 INTERNATIONAL.
Module 4 – Key Planning Topics Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2015 INTERNATIONAL.
Ethics and Educational Research. The aims of the session  To consider the ethical values that inform educational research  To reflect on our own values.
ETHICAL ISSUES IN HEALTH AND NURSING PRACTICE CODE OF ETHICS, STANDARDS OF CONDUCT, PERFORMANCE AND ETHICS FOR NURSES AND MIDWIVES.
Introduction – Using the International Protocol Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations.
Working Together for the Benefit of Children and Young People
The added Value of the Istanbul Convention: Prevention, Protection and Support to victims of violence Hilary Fisher Expert consultant, former member of.
Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy TENTH EDITION
Claude JANIZZI Chairman of the Lanzarote Committee
TRIPLE JEOPARDY: Protecting
Medical/Legal and Ethical Issues
Substance Addiction(Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 2017 Processes
Kids' legal rights in medical care, your obligations and risk minimisation 27 April 2017.
Patricia M. Alt, Ph.D. Dept. of Health Science Towson University
#StandByMe Supporting Survivors
Sexting case study Every case is unique, taking risk factors into consideration to aid decision making. No clear definite answers but safeguarding the.
Chapter 2 Ethical and Legal Issues
TRIPLE JEOPARDY: Protecting
TRIPLE JEOPARDY: Protecting
Hi Everyone, Welcome to the Webinar! Developing HNOs/HRPs
TRIPLE JEOPARDY: Protecting
Community Level Data Capture for MDSR
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Purposes of the Convention
Consent, throughout the Early Help Journey
Legal Advocacy Learning Module: Volunteer Training Level 3.
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION (GDPR)
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CONDUCT OF HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH
International Protocol
Informed Consent to Treatment
PRESENTATION AT 49TH WASH IN EMERGENCY WORKING GROUP MEETING
Module 9 Planning INTERNATIONAL PROTOCOL
Gem Complete Health Services
Safeguarding.
Management of Allegations Against Adults who work with Children Linda Evans (Head of Quality Assurance for Safeguarding) and Majella O’Hagan (Local Authority.
Child Sexual Exploitation - 7 Minute Briefing
TYPHOON HAIYAN / YOLANDA
Consent, throughout the Early Help Journey
Evidence to use for Appraisal Good Medical Practice 2006
“Seven-minute Staff Meeting”
Toronto Child & Youth Advocacy Centre (CYAC)
Ethical, Professional and Legal Issues in Groups
Presentation transcript:

Module 7 Do No Harm INTERNATIONAL PROTOCOL PART IV – DOCUMENTATION IN PRACTICE: PREPARATION PAGES 84-103 Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

Session objectives Recognise the fundamental importance of the Do No Harm principle and a survivor-centred approach to documentation Explain what informed consent means and when and how to obtain it Identify categories of measures to prevent, mitigate or respond to potential harm Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

What does it mean to Do No Harm? International Protocol, page 85 The key ethical principle of Do No Harm should guide any CARSV documentation process – it is a minimum requirement Do No Harm means: thinking carefully about all possible negative impacts of documentation on victims/witnesses, the wider community and documentation team; being prepared for the harm those impacts may cause; and making every possible effort to prevent, minimise or respond to potential harm, or dropping documentation or aspect of it if harm cannot be prevented or appropriately minimised. Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

Who causes harm to CARSV survivors? Please refer to the table on page 87 of the International Protocol, Chapter 7, for examples of types of harm and who causes it. Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

respect survivors’ autonomy? What does it mean to respect survivors’ autonomy? Do No Harm requires adopting a survivor-centred approach and supporting survivors’ autonomy by prioritising their needs/ requests Survivors’ decisions may sometimes appear to result from family/cultural pressures and not to be in their best interest Fully inform survivors, discuss all risks/benefits of participation & support them in accessing services to ensure they make the best possible decisions for themselves - you may not agree with their decisions but their wishes should be respected Respecting survivors’ autonomy means recognising their right and ability to make independent decisions and take action based on their own personal values and beliefs © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

What does it mean to Do No Harm? Informed consent Mitigating harm Do No Harm Some risks are inherent to CARSV documentation and cannot be avoided – a full disclosure of all possible risks to victims/witnesses is therefore critical Respecting the principle of Do No Harm does not necessarily mean that CARSV documentation should not be pursued - victims may be vulnerable but they can be empowered by telling their story and pursuing accountability – that’s their decision Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

© Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018 Informed consent – what it means? Informed consent means that CARSV victims/witnesses have the ultimate authority to decide if and how they wish to participate in the documentation process Legal and ethical obligation to obtain informed consent derived from the principle of autonomy It requires victims/witnesses to give voluntary consent on the basis of full disclosure and understanding of all stages and aspects of the documentation process Permission of a legally authorised representative may be sought for individuals incapable of giving informed consent (e.g. young age, disability or mental illness) – children with sufficient maturity may be required to provide informed assent Fundamentals of informed consent, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 2 © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

Informed consent – what it means? Informed consent is a process and involves STAGES Witnesses to consent to be interviewed and have their information recorded be photographed and/or examined be referred to support services/have information shared with third parties ASPECTS Witnesses to fully understand purpose of documentation & intended use of information meaning and limits of confidentiality risks and benefits of participation © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

© Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018 Informed consent – what negates it? Consent is not informed or voluntary: if obtained based on lies, deceit or partial disclosure of potential risks or other information - whether malicious or not; when despite full disclosure, the witness did not fully understand the facts (e.g. limited capacity, language issues, bad communication, etc.); or in situations of coercion or inducement (e.g. threats to withdraw assistance or to provide support in return for information). Information obtained without securing informed consent may not be admissible in court or before other mechanisms © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

© Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018 Informed consent – top tips Ensure victims/witnesses feel comfortable enough to refuse and clearly explain that they have a choice Offer them opportunities to ask questions and share concerns Take time to explain all relevant factors and give them enough time to make a decision - allow them to change their mind Fully explain purpose of documentation and all possible uses of information, including possible obligations to disclose (e.g. children) Explain benefits & risks of participation and limitations of services provided Obtain explicit consent for specific activities (e.g. using tape recorder, doing a physical examination, taking pictures of injuries, referring the victim, etc.) © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. How to mitigate harm? Those documenting CARSV have an ethical professional responsibility to put in place measures to prevent, mitigate or respond to potential harm caused by themselves and institutional/social actors as well Mitigating measures Threat and risk assessments Coordination Confidentiality Referrals of victims/witnesses Mitigating harm, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 3 © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

threat and risk assessments B. Mitigating harm – threat and risk assessments International Protocol, pages 92-93 Module 8 – Safety and Security and Module 9 - Planning Annex 2 – Conducting Threat and Risk Assessments During the planning phase, it is your responsibility to conduct careful and thorough threat and risk assessments for those with whom you will interact, your own team and your information Threat and risk assessments should be carried out repeatedly throughout the documentation process Threats, risks and vulnerabilities, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 4 Assessing risks means identifying potential threats, assessing what is the risk or likelihood that the threat will materialise and its impact, and putting in place measures to counter identified potential risks Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

threat and risk assessments B. Mitigating harm – threat and risk assessments Risk assessments require that you consider not only potential threats to individuals but also the security of infrastructure, equipment and information and its impacts on staffing, approaching and interviewing victims/witnesses and information security No piece of evidence or professional ambition should take priority over the safety, privacy or personal wishes of victims/witnesses Threats, risks and vulnerabilities, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 4 IF YOUR ANALYSIS INDICATES THAT THE RISKS ARE TOO SEVERE OR CANNOT BE MITIGATED, YOU SHOULD NOT PURSUE THAT WITNESS OR INFORMATION Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

threat and risk assessments B. Mitigating harm – threat and risk assessments To conduct a threat and risk assessment follow these steps: What are the threats? Who/what is threatened? Who/what has made the threat? STEP 1 List the threats How likely is it that the threat will become a reality? How severe would the impact be? STEP 2 Assess the risk What measures can be put in place to reduce or counter those risks on individuals, infrastructure or information STEP 3 Mitigate or manage the risk Threats, risks and vulnerabilities, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 4 Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm – coordination International Protocol, pages 93-94 Module 8 – Safety and Security and Module 9 – Planning Module 15 - Trauma All too often, response to humanitarian crisis and other situations involving CARSV is characterised by poor coordination between multiple agencies and organisations with different mandates and competing agendas Some CARSV is not documented at all and some is the subject of multiple inquiries – this can happen if jurisdictions overlap or in regions where sexual violence is particularly notorious or prevalent Mitigating harm, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 3 Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm – coordination International Protocol, pages 93-94 Module 8 – Safety and Security and Module 9 – Planning Module 15 - Trauma If multiple inquiries are not coordinated, it can cause harm to affected individuals, reduce the quality of information collected and hamper the work of organisations on the ground Consequences of a failure to properly coordinate inquiries include: Mitigating harm, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 3 Multiple accounts – trauma risk Possible conflicting factual statements Increased risk to community Assessment fatigue/ cynicism Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

Coordination B. Mitigating harm – coordination Security procedures of others Respect for mandate & facilities of others Information sharing and confidentiality Existing coordination mechanisms Awareness of & working with existing data Contact with relevant organisations Knowledge of threats or false information National monitoring/ reporting obligations Coordination International Protocol, pages 93-94 Module 8 – Safety and Security and Module 9 – Planning Module 15 - Trauma Key issues for efficient coordination with other inquiries and referral services include: © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm -confidentiality International Protocol, pages 95-97 Module 8 – Safety and Security Module 13 – Storing and Handling Information Confidentiality is an ethical obligation and operational necessity requiring that information about victims/witnesses be collected, used, shared and stored in a confidential manner by those documenting CARSV Confidentiality measures put in place may cover the identity of the victim/witness, information collected, referrals made, protective measures taken and/or the existence of the documentation process itself Both your facilities and procedures should be designed to ensure confidentiality Mitigating harm, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 3 © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm -confidentiality International Protocol pages 95-97 Module 8 – Safety and Security Module 13 – Storing and Handling Information Confidentiality can be understood differently by different people, and you should be able to clarify with specificity what do you mean by confidentiality and ensure that you and the victim/witness have a shared understanding, in particular about: how the information will be stored; who will have access to it; under what circumstances you will return to the witness to seek their specific consent to share the information; whether only the identifying information will be kept confidential or also the content of the information; and any possible mandatory reporting obligations (e.g. children). Mitigating harm, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 3 © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm – confidentiality To operate according to confidentiality principles you should: Develop confidentiality procedures and policies and ensure that team members know what information to collect, where and how to store it and who can access it Ensure that team members do not discuss case details with anyone outside of the documentation team Put in place information protection measures (e.g. use of pseudonyms, coding system, etc.) for all identifying information on the victim/witness, referrals made and protective measures taken Fully and clearly explain to victims/witnesses the conditions and limits of confidentiality and ensure that they give their informed consent to how their information is used Agree with victims/witnesses how they would like you to approach and contact them © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm – confidentiality Confidentiality has limits and can only be guaranteed to the best of your abilities - you should never promise total anonymity or respect for confidentiality Besides unintended breaches, CARSV information may be subject to mandatory disclosure to criminal justice authorities Your team must be aware of the limits of confidentiality and legal consequences of refusing to testify or hand over information Official requests for information, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 5 Peer experience – limits of confidentiality, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 6 DO NOT TAKE TESTIMONY OF VICTIMS/WITNESSES OR OTHER IDENTIFYING DETAILS if there is a high risk of subpoenas or court appearance orders and you are concerned about the safety and security of victims/witnesses should information about them become public © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm – referrals International Protocol pages 98-103 Module 8 – Safety and Security and Module 9 - Planning Referrals means the process of referring victims/witnesses to vetted/ appropriate organisations who can provide them with medical, psychological, legal, social/protection or other types of support During the planning phase, you should identify suitable formal and informal options to refer male, female and child victims/witnesses for assistance and support and put procedures in place Mitigating harm, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 3 Referral terms, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 7 Referrals for victims/witnesses should not be dependent on their participation in the documentation process Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm – types of referrals MEDICAL Hospitals, health centres and clinics - Treatment for life-threatening complications, care of wounds, STIs, HIV, emergency contraception - Psychiatric services PSYCHOLOGICAL Counselling services, community centres and victim support groups - Emotional support, counselling and family mediation - Livelihood assistance - Skills training LEGAL Legal clinics, victim support groups - Legal education on victims/witnesses’ rights - Advice and legal representation PROTECTION Organisations, centres and victim support groups - Safe shelters, transport assistance, witness relocation programme MULTI-SECTORAL MODEL Referral terms, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 7 © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm – referrals Ensure that referrals are not interpreted or perceived as an exchange of goods or services for testimony When formal services are not available or accessible, you should identify what suitable informal systems are available When dealing with children, always consider informal family and community support systems – also note that some countries have mandatory reporting laws When dealing with male victims, you may need to rely on informal support systems, self-help networks or build the capacity of local service providers as services for male survivors of sexual violence are often non-existent or untailored Widespread lack of support services for men and boys, International Protocol Chapter 7, Box 10 Training Materials on the International Protocol © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018

B. Mitigating harm – referrals To develop your own referral pathways follow these steps: E.g. sexual assault referral centres, NGOs, hotlines, faith leaders, self-help networks, etc. STEP 1 Map existing services Are services adequate? Are they too far? Will the referral put the victim at further risk? STEP 2 Assess their suitability, safety and accessibility Put in place SOP/MOU to facilitate efficient, confidential and safe referrals/agree points of entry STEP 3 Develop or adopt referral pathways Who will you refer, why, for what kind of services, how will victims access services and when STEP 4 Implement internal SOP Explain what the options are and the limits of assistance – not dependent on participation Does the victim/witness consent to that service? STEP 5 Communicate clearly with victims/witnesses © Institute for International Criminal Investigations 2018