Water Quality Trading – Point Source for Non-point Source Sediments: Piasa Creek Watershed Project Illinois-American Water Company & Great Rivers Land.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Little Canyon Creek Subwatershed Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project Sponsored by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Reduction Presenter: Keith Noble, Saginaw Bay District Office.
Agricultural Engineer Water Quality Specialist
Stream Corridors Christine Hall Natural Resources Conservation Service North Jersey RC&D Slides 1-12.
Stormwater Regulations and Programs Law Permits Watershed Programs Information available at
Phosphorus As A Stressor Alexandra Arntsen, Alison Foster, Scott Ritter April 2011.
7:00 pmWelcome and introductions 7:05pmHLWD planning overview Plan update process 7:25 pmStakeholder involvement Watershed problems 7:40 pmPublic comment.
Sustainable Landscapes Using Waste Sustainably Michael D. Pavelek II Greater Lebanon Refuse Authority.
Cameron County Conservation District. Chapter 102 Rules and Regulations  Erosion is natural, so what’s the deal?  Accelerated Erosion is not natural.
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
Proposed Stormwater Regulations Public Forum Richland County Government September 2009.
CHAPTER 102 Plain English Guide to the Erosion and Sediment Control (E&S) Regulations Fulton County Conservation District 216 N. Second Street, Suite 15.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
1 United Water Delaware “Cut the Crypto” Watershed Control Plan 1 Nancy Trushell, P.E. Director of Engineering United Water Delaware.
Indiana 6217 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program – What it is, and What it Means!
Expedited Projects + Innovative Teamwork = Measurable Improvements to the Health of Lake Okeechobee and the St. Lucie and Caloosahatchee Estuaries.
Env 247 Overview of Stormwater Management March 1, 2011.
Anatomy of Iowa Floods: Preparing for the Future “How urban and rural Iowans can work together to reduce flood impacts.” James Martin, Division of Soil.
Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRIT) Eastgate Shopping Center Chapel Hill, NC September 9, 2008.
Northeast Corridor Greenway Acquisition – Mitigation Feasibility Study Results City Council Workshop June 24, 2014.
Watershed Forestry Initiative Ellen Kohler Attorney & Policy Specialist Funded in part by Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Urban.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
Illinois American Water “Green Initiatives” Karla Olson Teasley President Illinois American Water.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) Permit.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
WATER REVIEW 1.WORLD-WIDE, WHAT ARE THE TWO MAIN PROBLEMS THAT EXIST WITH WATER? 2.WHAT IS THE MAIN WATER POLLUTION PROBLEM IN THE TRIAD?
Golf Course Water Resources Best Management Practices TOOLBOX  Project Overview  Your Role in the Project April 2009.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Source Water Protection Plans A case study of the Ross Barnett Reservoir in Central MS.
May 5, 2015 Water Resources Meeting Heather Gutherless Jefferson County Planning & Zoning
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Nonpoint Source Management Plan: Issues and Opportunities Greg Anderson Nonpoint Source Coordinator MO DNR.
CleanWaterManagementTrustFund Clean Water Management Trust Fund Need For program History of CWMTF Eligible projects Examples of Projects Across State Questions.
CHAPEL HILL HIGH SCHOOL ISLAND PROJECT Water: The Essential Ingredient & Thoughts for Sustainability ©Town of Chapel Hill Stormwater Management Division.
Sylvia Heaton, Aquatic Biologist Water Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Applications of Pesticides to Surface Waters of the State.
Improving Lives, Communities and the Environment Through Natural Resources Conservation.
Clayton County Watershed Projects Update Turkey River Watershed Alliance January 31, 2013.
La Moine River Ecosystem Partnership: Organizing for Success Dan Moorehouse & Jeff Boeckler.
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
The Clean Water Act © Dr. B. C. Paul (Jan. 2000).
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Urban Water Research Todd Rasmussen Associate Professor of Hydrology The University of Georgia, Athens and Pending Director, Urban Water Research Institute.
Protecting our Watershed. What is a watershed? A watershed is an area of land that drains into a body of water: –Stream –River –Lake (Let’s take a look!)Let’s.
Lee County Water Resource Initiative: Community Sustainability Committee June 16, 2010 Kurt Harclerode Operations Manager Lee County Natural Resources.
CENTRAL MUSCATATUCK WATERSHED. BMPs Cost-Shared by Central Muscatatuck Watershed Project.
An Overview of our Community’s Stormwater Management Program
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,
1 United Water Delaware “Cut the Crypto” Watershed Control Plan 1 Nancy Trushell, P.E. Director of Engineering United Water Delaware.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Stormwater Management William Taylor New Hampshire Wastewater Control Association June 13, 2013.
Solving Water Pollution Problems in the Wakulla Springshed The City of Tallahassee’s Efforts to Reduce Stormwater Pollution Hydrogeology Workshop May 12-13,
Working to Improve Water Quality What can we do to help improve the Chesapeake Bay? David O’Brien NOAA Fisheries Service Gloucester Point, VA.
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Agricultural Soil and Water Conservation Stewardship
Water pollution Chapter 11.
Integrating Wetlands and Watershed Management: Lessons from the U.S.
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
Protecting our Watershed
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Watershed Management Plan Citizens Advisory Committee April 18, 2011
Strategies to Reduce P Loading and Sedimentation on Forestry Operations in Vermont First few slides will provide some background information on what we.
Freshwater Pollution Unit 5: Water February 27, 2009 Sanders.
Waterway Investment prioritisation
SHOAL CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN Stakeholder Meeting: August 15, 2019
SHOAL CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Trading – Point Source for Non-point Source Sediments: Piasa Creek Watershed Project Illinois-American Water Company & Great Rivers Land Trust

Legend of the Piasa Bird

Location of Alton IL

Great River Road Scenic Highway

Old Alton Water Treatment Facility

Wet Alton Water Treatment Facility

New Alton Water Treatment Facility

The Challenge Old facility –Site specific exemption –Non-standard NPDES permit –Direct discharge allowed –Exempt from TSS and total iron effluent standards New facility –Old regulatory relief does not apply –Must apply for/justify new relief

The Regulators IL Pollution Control Board (IPCB) –Writes environmental law –Arbitrates contested issues IL EPA –Administers/enforces environmental law –Writes/issues NPDES permit –Cannot write a permit that IL law does not allow for

The Stakeholders Owner, Illinois-American Water Company Regulators, IEPA, IPCB Local Interest Groups (economic, aesthetic) Environmental groups (local, state, national) Customers

The Study (SSIS) Site Specific Impact Study ENSR environmental engineers Consider all regulatory tests (BPJ,BPT, BCT) Compare residual management control technologies Two Alternatives –Lagoons, dewatering, landfilling –Direct discharge

The comparison Lagoon & Landfill –$7.4 million capital costs, $0.42 million annual O&M –Avg 4 trucks/day on Scenic Route 3 –8,800 yd 3 /yr of landfill space –Local Opposition Direct Discharge –No water quality impacts –No landfill depletion –No aesthetic impacts on area –No cost –No brainer (?)

The Impacts SSIS findings: –TSS impact insignificant –91% of solids originate from river –Metals nil (note reliance on PAS) –No harm to aquatic life –No unnatural buildup –Mussel survey no problems IEPA – nope!

The Solution Partnership with Great Rivers Land Trust (GRLT) –Piasa Creek Watershed Plan –Sustainable reduction in overall sediment loading to the Mississippi River –IL-AWC contribution of $4.15 million over 10-year period –Minimum 2:1 reduction (6600 ton/year) Regulatory Approval –IEPA, IPCB –Adjusted Standard AS 99-6 written into IL law –Terms of AS 99-6 and contract w/GRLT written into special conditions of NPDES permit

Great Rivers Land Trust Local Non-Profit Organization Primary Mission: –Preservation of scenic and ecologically valuable land along the Alton Lake Heritage Corridor, 20,000 acres –Land preservation efforts accomplished through easements and land acquisitions –Goal: 5,000 to 10,000 acres protected in next 10 years

Piasa Creek Watershed Plan Primary Objective: –To enhance and restore the natural non-point source pollutant mitigation functions of the watershed

Piasa Creek Watershed

Watershed Major Problem Areas Planning and Regulation Sewage Stormwater Runoff and Erosion –Uncontrolled urbanization –Sediment –Road salts, fertilizers, pesticides –Septic tank effluent –Other pollutants

Meeting the Objective Land acquisition and conservation easements Grassed waterways Filter strips Storm water detention basins Terraces Grade control structures Stream bank stabilization Educational programs (communities, schools, landowners)

Project Timeline Year 1 (2001): Update 1995 plan, identify potential sediment reduction sites, contact landowners. Years 2-5: Install sediment control structures. Year 6: IEPA review. Years 6-10: Installation of sediment control structures continues. Achieve 2:1 suspended solids reduction.

Project Metrics Goal 6600 tons/year sediment reduction Use accepted sediment control practices Sediment savings estimated in partnership with SWCD Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation Resource inventory worksheets for each project Projected year-end 2003: 2613 tons/year

Streambank Erosion

Streambank Stabilization

Storm water basins

Erosion control

Boy Scout Lake

The Benefits Avoid capital and O&M $ for lagooning, landfilling Rate impact on customer reduced No sludge hauling trucks along the Great River Road Save landfill space Reduced net sediment load to the river Precedent/model for other creative beneficial partnerships

Questions? Brent Gregory, Director Water Quality Illinois-American Water Company