Citizen Review Panels Home Visiting Symposium

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
One Science = Early Childhood Pathway for Healthy Child Development Sentinel Outcomes ALL CHILDREN ARE BORN HEALTHY measured by: rate of infant mortality.
Advertisements

Benchmark: Improved Maternal and Newborn Health Construct: Prenatal care Parental use of alcohol, tobacco, or illicit drugs Preconception care Inter-birth.
Successfully Implementing Evidence-Based Programs for Children and Families in North Carolina A Presentation for the Family Impact Seminar Michelle Hughes,
LeddyView Graph # 1 OUTLINE Background - RIte Care Rhode Island’s Title XXI Plans RIte Care Benefit Package Experience Impact on Health Care Access, Utilization,
A Report to the Community: Invest in Children’s Impact to Date Rob Fischer, Ph.D. Claudia Coulton, Ph.D.
Family Nurse Partnership BLACKPOOL. FAMILY NURSE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMME A structured, intensive home visiting programme A preventative programme Benefits.
How Northern Ireland Can Get Lasting Returns on Preschool Investment: A Tale of Two Studies Larry Schweinhart, Ph.D. President, HighScope Educational Research.
The Achievement Gap: Lessons from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study – Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) Tamara Halle, Nicole Forry, Elizabeth Hair & Kate Perper.
DECISION SUPPORT RESEARCH TEAM “Providing expertise to improve health & wellbeing of families” Retention in a Study of Prenatal Care: Implications of attrition.
Family Nurse Partnership
Welcome to the 1 st Annual Summer Early Childhood Public Policy Institute!
Medway FNP Annual Report Safeguarding vulnerable children Challenge How to protect and improve the outcomes for children whose parents have had.
that keep families strong
Collaboration and data in a County Initiative : Cuyahoga County – Invest in Children Claudia Coulton & Rob Fischer, Ph.D. Center on Urban Poverty & Community.
Strengthening Families at Brighter Beginnings PROGRAM OVERVIEW 2012.
ADCANP/CTF Program Evaluation: RFP Training April 6 – 9, 2010 M. Felicia Woerner, MA Debra Nelson-Gardell, Ph.D., LCSW The University of Alabama School.
Coming Together for Young Children and Families.  What we know  Where we have been  Where we are today  Where we need to go.
Strengthening Families Protective Factors Hays Kansas Kansas State Coordinators’ Meeting Nancy Keel, MS Ed, P-3 National Trainer Executive Director Kansas.
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
The Link Between Thriving Children and Economic Security: Creating Equity in Early Childhood for Our Common Good.
Healthy Families America Overview. Healthy Families America Developed in 1992 by Prevent Child Abuse America Evidence-based home visiting model 400 Affiliated.
CDA Child Development Associate. What Is a CDA? Child Development Associate – Demonstrated the ability to meet the specific needs of children, work with.
Parents as Teachers and Idaho Home Visiting. Home Visitation  SCPHD has pursued a home visitation program for 4 years  Grant received starting 1/1/15.
GEORGE L. ASKEW, MD, FAAP OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AMERICAN.
Integrated Approach towards Investing in Children
Family Advocates Home Visiting Program. Mission Strengthen families and communities so they can be safe, healthy and thriving. We do this by providing.
Effects of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program on Children with Chronic Health Conditions Amy J. Davidoff, Ph.D. Genevieve Kenney, Ph.D. Lisa.
Enrollment and Retention in Voluntary Home Visiting Programs Deborah Daro.
 Preventive programme for 1 st time teenage parents through pregnancy until child is aged 2 years  Structured, intensive home visiting programme delivered.
Psychological Service Using a Relational Approach (Video Interaction Guidance: ViG and Video Enhanced Reflective Practice: VERP) to Improve Attunement,
22 - Understand children's and young person development (man)
WELCOME! Jean Bell, Coordinator & Facilitator June Smith, Facilitator.
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Tulsa Implementation and Evaluation of CDC’s Legacy for Children™ Model Lara Robinson,
Welcome Baby [Insert Organization Name] PROVIDER INFORMATION PRESENTATION INSERT DATE I PRESENTER.
Portland State University
Virginia Department of Health Staysi Blunt, Evaluator
What is a Children’s Services Council (CSC)?
Older Americans Act Nutrition Performance Outcome Report
Working Together to Ensure Healthier Families
Texas Pediatric Society Electronic Poster Contest
Technology Solutions for Early Childhood Symposium
Chapter 6 Using Frequency Counts to Look at Emotional Development
Introduction to the PICCOLO Observation Tool
Of Note A HEALTHY START Birth Weight
Department of Early Childhood Education
Curriculum & Programming for Kindergarten
TITLE IV-E WAIVER SITE VISIT
Informing policy, Improving programs
American Public Health Association
What IS a Collaborative?
Promoting equity through early childhood development: strategies and systems to reach the vulnerable Sara Poehlman, Senior Director Early Childhood Care.
Overview of Maternal and Child Health Program
Measure Description Standard Frequency of Measurement
Module 3 Child Development
Prenatal & Perinatal Care & Pediatrics A Good Fit with the New Payment Systems VBP, P4P, Integrated MMC Elie Ward, MSW Director of Policy & Advocacy NYS.
Project 3B: Reproductive, Maternal and Child Health – Logic Model 2018
Benefits of Home Visitation
Using Relationships of Support to Nurture the Language of Emotions
Ready Families in Ready Communities
ECED 263 Foundations of Early Childhood Education
Attachment Behaviors:
Women’s Health Care and Education Coalition
Monitoring Children’s Progress
”Supporting Parents Right from the Start”
ASN Coordinator’s Meeting
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
ECED 263 Foundations of Early Childhood Education
Quality Early Childhood Care and Development:
Adverse Childhood experiences (ACE)
Supporting Families Together Association
Presentation transcript:

Citizen Review Panels Home Visiting Symposium October 11, 2018 Kristen Kirkland, Ph.D. NYS Office of Children & Family Services Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Performance Analytics

Supporting Families Right from the Start: Findings from the Healthy Families New York Randomized Controlled Trial

Improved Birth Outcomes Reduction in low birth weight deliveries among women who enrolled before the 31st week of pregnancy (5% vs. 10%) Particularly effective in reducing LBW for black (3% vs. 10%) and Hispanic mothers (5% vs. 9%) Improved Birth Outcomes

Increased Access to Care More target children with health insurance at Y1 (94% vs. 90%) More mothers with primary care provider at Y2 (85% vs. 76%) More mothers with health insurance at Y2 (87% vs. 82%) Fewer target children did NOT receive medical care when needed at Y2 (1% vs. 5%) Increased Access to Care Target Child health insurance coverage remained high across waves (93% vs. 91% at Y2, 93% vs. 94% at Y7).

Prevented Child Abuse and Neglect Mothers engaged in 30% fewer acts of psychological aggression at Y1 Mothers engaged in 31% fewer acts of minor physical aggression at Y1 Mothers engaged in 75%-88% fewer acts of serious physical abuse at Y1, Y2, Y7 Fewer target children reported mothers engaged in minor physical aggression at Y7 (71% vs. 77%) Prevented Child Abuse and Neglect (Self-report) Acts of very serious physical abuse Year 1 (88% reduction: .01 vs. .08) Acts of serious physical abuse Year 2 (75% reduction: .01 vs. .04) Acts of serious physical abuse Year 7 (80% reduction: .03 vs. .15) Acts of Minor Physical Aggression Year 1 (31% reduction: 2.40 vs. 3.46) Acts of Psychological Aggression Year 1 (30% reduction: 3.34 vs. 4.74) Harsh Parenting in the Past week Year 1 (1.21 vs. 1.81) TC report of maternal minor physical aggression (9% reduction: 70.79% vs. 77.23%)

Prevented Child Abuse and Neglect 50% reduction in subsequent confirmed child protective services reports after 7 years for mothers with a confirmed report prior to program entry 49% reduction in the rate at which children of young, first time moms who enrolled early in pregnancy were confirmed as victims in child protective services reports between ages 5 and 7 Prevented Child Abuse and Neglect (Administrative) Average Kempe Score for full sample: 42.4 (25 or less: 13.9%, 30 to 50: 63.6%, over 50: 22.5%) Average Kempe Score for mothers with a confirmed CPS report prior to program entry: 51.49 Average Kempe Score for young, first time mothers who enrolled early in pregnancy: 44.39 Compared to their counterparts in the control group, HFNY mothers in the RRO subgroup had markedly lower rates of involvement—from random assignment to Age 7—in confirmed CPS reports for any type of abuse or neglect (41.5% vs. 60.4%); in confirmed reports involving physical abuse (3.3% vs. 13.4%); and in preventive, protective, and placement services (38.0% vs. 60.0%). Program impacts on confirmed CPS reports began to emerge for the HPO subgroup around Age 5, or at time of entry into school. From Age 5 to 7, the target children of HFNY mothers in the HPO subgroup were less likely to be named as confirmed victims in CPS reports than were their counterparts in the control group (9.9% versus 19.3%).

Promoted Positive Parenting Practices Mothers endorsed more appropriate limit setting strategies at Y2 More mothers observed using strategies that stimulated child’s cognitive skills and were sensitive to child's needs and affective cues at Y3 More mothers used non-violent discipline strategies and used them more often at Y7 Promoted Positive Parenting Practices Limit Setting Strategies: mean 32.26 vs. 31.62 Non-violent discipline: 49.27 vs. 45.27, 100% vs. 98.6% Cognitive Stimulation and Sensitive Structuring: Puzzle: 96.5% vs. 92.8% Delay: 17.2& vs. 10.6% Cleanup: 85.3% vs. 78.3%

Promoted School Success Less likely to repeat 1st grade (4% vs. 7%) More likely to score above grade level in 1st grade on three specific behaviors that promote learning (13% vs. 8%) Lower receipt of special education services at Y7 (17% vs. 12%) Greater participation in gifted programs by Y7 (5% vs. 2%) Promoted School Success BTPL: works or plays cooperatively with others, follows oral directions or classroom rules, completes home or class work on time

By Y7 HFNY returned $3 for every dollar invested for moms who had prior CPS histories $1,000 to serve a family during pregnancy is totally recovered before a child’s birth due to reductions in LBW Additional savings accrue from reductions in grade retention and special education services Saved Money Moms with prior CPS histories has fewer subsequent pregnancies by Year 2 Cost to care for LBW babies is very high Reductions in grade retention explained at least in part by Y2 limit setting $0.20 per dollar invested for HPO $0.16 per dollar invested for Whole sample

Increasing Protective Factors in Other OCFS-funded Home Visiting Programs Trust Fund and Public Private Partnerships funded Home Visiting Programs (9/1/16-8/31/18) Pre-Post Protective Factors Instrument Data Collected via Community-based Prevention Programs Data Management System (N=249, 4 programs)

Protective Factors Instrument Improvements in PFI Subscale/Item Scores from Pretest to Post-test: Protective Factors Instrument Family Functioning: 5% Social Support: 5% Concrete Support: 5% Nurturing & Attachment: 7% Knowledge of Parenting & Child Development Items: 7%-14%

Protective Factors Instrument I know how to help my child learn (10%) I understand why my child behaves the way he/she does (13%) I know what behaviors and abilities are normal for my child’s current developmental stage (13%) I know how to obtain information on what to expect of my child as he/she grows and matures (13%) I know where I can get information about parenting and taking care of children (10%) I praise my child when he/she behaves well (7%) I discipline my child without losing control (7%) I read to or with my child (13%) My child has a routine for daily activities (14%) I help my child figure out a task when he/she is having trouble (10%) I provide activities for my child that will help him/her develop new skills (13%) Protective Factors Instrument KPCD Items

Questions? Kristen Kirkland, Ph.D. kristen.kirkland@ocfs.ny.gov (518) 473-8833 Questions?