Reclassification and Delisting A Growth Industry (and the focus of our next workshop?) Congress envisioned an accurate list.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
Advertisements

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species IUCN Red List Categories.
The Role of Citizens in Endangered Species Monitoring Rori Paloski Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Status of implementation of the Ronald Vargas and Ines Beernaerts Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Samarkand, Uzbekistan - 10 September.
Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1.
Protected Areas. National Parks Provincial Parks Nature Conservancy Not counted: Game Sanctuaries Biosphere Reserves.
Section 18 Final Rule Overview Presentation originally given by EPA at Emergency Exemption Process Revisions Workshop, revised by Laura Quakenbush.
Developing Biodiversity Indicators Measuring Conservation Impact at Global and Project Scales Valerie Kapos.
Endangered Species Act Overview
NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Donna Wieting Director Office of Protected Resources MAFAC September 24, 2014 Silver Spring, MD.
Threatened and Endangered Wildlife Species AGR 381 Unit H-1 William Hanel.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Slide 1 Our Mission: “Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for.
404 Species Mega-petitioned from Center of Biological Diversity: Where are we now? Presented by: Channing St. Aubin US Fish and Wildlife Service Panama.
This project is funded by the European Union ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATION FOR THE BLACK SEA GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, RUSSIA and UKRAINE Euroconsult This project.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
November 12, 2014 St. Louis, Missouri OPTN Strategic Planning Feedback Board of Directors.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced or distributed without authorization. ASSET Safety Management.
The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List Criteria are used to determine extinction risk and set numerical thresholds for qualification for three globally.
UNDERSTANDING THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT. What is the ESA? Federal Law : 1973 (USA), 1976 (Canada) protecting wildlife & plants Conserve & recover species.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 By Tristan Armstrong.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
111 Synthesis of Questionnaires. Thematic concentration  Most of the new member states support the suggested principle while maintaining the element.
Monitoring for Conservation Planning and Management Elizabeth Kennedy Conservation International 5-8 June 2007 Intervention Monitoring Exchange, Wang Lang.
Solutions on the Horizon: Integrated Planning in the 21 st Century Trisha White Defenders of Wildlife.
What is the essence of the Platform? Protection can be achieved through a variety of regulatory and incentive based tools and both should be used. At.
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988
Species at Risk Lesson 6.
Monday, December 8 th, Write A if you agree with a statement, write D if you disagree with the statement and correct the statement StatementAgree.
The Endangered Species Act of 1973 Daniel Eidelson Period 3.
Global Symposium Round Table Session – 23 rd June, 2006 Status & trends in Madagascar’s biodiversity Zo Lalaina Rakotobe Conservation International.
Improving the Recovery Process 4 Derrickson’s ideas 4 Carroll et al.’s ideas 4 Novel approaches from Clark et al.’s book –is the theory applicable to reality?
Measuring Conservation Outcomes for Biodiversity: Name Date Location An overview on monitoring the status of biodiversity and the Outcome Monitoring Program.
URPC Budget Update January 29, CA Governor’s Budget Reflects ongoing economic recovery o Projects economy will continue to grow in 2016 and 2017.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans021-1 Unit 21 Endangered Species Endangered Species Act of 1973.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Fish and Game Commission Meeting December 12, 2012 Randy Botta South Coast Region/Wildlife Program Bighorn Sheep in the Peninsular Mountains Photo by J.
Pp Conserving Biodiversity The modern science of conservation biology seeks to understand and protect biodiversity. Part of this task includes.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
Strategic Planning for State Energy Workforce Consortia Day 2.
Measuring Conservation Outcomes for Biodiversity: Elizabeth T. Kennedy 22 January 2004 Key biodiversity areas concept development meeting An overview on.
EBTJV Performance Evaluation Measure 1: Fish Habitat Conservation Projects implemented during Federal FY EBTJV Performance score:
Grizzly Bears and the Species at Risk Act
When to stop managing or surveying cryptic threatened species
Final ESA Listing Determination for Nassau Grouper
Creating Government Efficiency
Endangered Species Act Listing Program
Section 16.5 Conservation.
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
One Perspective on an effort to improve the implementation of the Endangered Species Act David Bernhardt.
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Peer eXchange & Learning
Species at Risk (SAR) Legislation & Program Renewal Project
Sustainable development manages resources for present and future generations.
The Endangered Species Act 1973 ,1982,1985,1988
WRAP Regional Haze Grant Status, Technical Project Priorities, & Proposed Technical Analysis Forum Tom Moore WRAP Technical Coordinator Attribution.
SNA Work Plan and Budget Revision 2015 (additional activities)
The IUCN Red List.
Endangered Species.
Project WECC-0100 Update Load Modeling Task Force
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
OBJECTIVES: Define recovery and explain how it fits within the other provisions of the Act. Describe the historical development of recovery. Compare and.
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
NDPHS Work Plan for 2012 NDPHS 8th Partnership Annual Conference
The State of Nature in the EU
4. IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
4. IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

Reclassification and Delisting A Growth Industry (and the focus of our next workshop?) Congress envisioned an accurate list

Practical Reasons Reduce regulatory burden Allocation of resources ($) Remove regulation by delisting Target regulation through 4(d) rule Allocation of resources ($) Acknowledge partners Show our progress Credibility See previous slides notes

Envisioned by Congress 4(c)(1) – revise list from time to time 4(c)(2) – 5-year reviews 4(b)(3)(B)(iii) – expeditious progress adding & removing from List Congress envisioned an accurate list

Regulatory Basis for Delisting Recovery Recovered = no longer meet the definition of threatened or endangered Recovery criterion are guidance Extinction Original data “in error” E.g., changes in taxonomy Picture - Passenger Pigeon Martha, thought to be the world's last passenger pigeon, died on September 1, 1914 Downlist Arrest ongoing severe decline Push extinction horizon beyond near-term, into foreseeable future Remember T is still in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future Recovery Recovery = no longer T or E. Data error is usually reserved for taxonomic changes – finding more is usually considered the result of a recovery action and usually falls into the recovery category. Uplisting Requires listing dollars. Practice says we should spend listing dollars on listing new species, rather than uplisting which provides minimal tangible benefits, so rarely done (rarely floats to the top – grizzly bear uplistings have been warranted but precluded for over 20 years).

Regulatory Basis for Delisting Recovery Recovered = no longer meet the definition of threatened or endangered Recovery criterion are guidance Extinction Original data “in error” E.g., changes in taxonomy Picture - Passenger Pigeon Martha, thought to be the world's last passenger pigeon, died on September 1, 1914 Downlist Arrest ongoing severe decline Push extinction horizon beyond near-term, into foreseeable future Remember T is still in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future Recovery Recovery = no longer T or E. Data error is usually reserved for taxonomic changes – finding more is usually considered the result of a recovery action and usually falls into the recovery category. Uplisting Requires listing dollars. Practice says we should spend listing dollars on listing new species, rather than uplisting which provides minimal tangible benefits, so rarely done (rarely floats to the top – grizzly bear uplistings have been warranted but precluded for over 20 years).

Regulatory Basis for Delisting Recovery Recovered = no longer meet the definition of threatened or endangered Recovery criterion are guidance Extinction Original data “in error” E.g., changes in taxonomy Picture - Passenger Pigeon Martha, thought to be the world's last passenger pigeon, died on September 1, 1914 Downlist Arrest ongoing severe decline Push extinction horizon beyond near-term, into foreseeable future Remember T is still in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future Recovery Recovery = no longer T or E. Data error is usually reserved for taxonomic changes – finding more is usually considered the result of a recovery action and usually falls into the recovery category. Uplisting Requires listing dollars. Practice says we should spend listing dollars on listing new species, rather than uplisting which provides minimal tangible benefits, so rarely done (rarely floats to the top – grizzly bear uplistings have been warranted but precluded for over 20 years).

Regulatory Basis for Delisting Recovery Recovered = no longer meet the definition of threatened or endangered Recovery criterion are guidance Extinction Original data “in error” E.g., changes in taxonomy Picture - Passenger Pigeon Martha, thought to be the world's last passenger pigeon, died on September 1, 1914 Downlist Arrest ongoing severe decline Push extinction horizon beyond near-term, into foreseeable future Remember T is still in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future Recovery Recovery = no longer T or E. Data error is usually reserved for taxonomic changes – finding more is usually considered the result of a recovery action and usually falls into the recovery category. Uplisting Requires listing dollars. Practice says we should spend listing dollars on listing new species, rather than uplisting which provides minimal tangible benefits, so rarely done (rarely floats to the top – grizzly bear uplistings have been warranted but precluded for over 20 years).

Delisted Species 1978-2017

Status of 5-year Reviews Number of listed species (all US, domestic) = 1586 Number of these species with 5-year reviews = 1155 Number of species without 5-year reviews: Nationally = 423 Southwest Region (R2) = 63 Mountain-Prairie Region (R6) = 15 Completed 5-year reviews:     No change in status Delisting due to error Delisting due to extinction Delisting due to recovery Delisting Total Downlist to T Revision of listed entity Uplist to E Total Downlistand Delist National 1077 3 9 12 24 35 6 13 59 R2 89 1 4 2 R6 38

Questions: How do we better focus on downlisting and delisting National work plan (5-year reviews & potential rulemaking) What percentage of the recovery budget should go towards: On the ground recovery action (including funding to Partnerships) 5-year reviews Rulemaking How do we prioritize rulemakings Delisting vs. downlisting Extinct vs. recovery or error Partner investment & regulatory burden How do we prioritize 5-year reviews Species without 5-year reviews vs. redos Picture - Passenger Pigeon Martha, thought to be the world's last passenger pigeon, died on September 1, 1914 Downlist Arrest ongoing severe decline Push extinction horizon beyond near-term, into foreseeable future Remember T is still in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future Recovery Recovery = no longer T or E. Data error is usually reserved for taxonomic changes – finding more is usually considered the result of a recovery action and usually falls into the recovery category. Uplisting Requires listing dollars. Practice says we should spend listing dollars on listing new species, rather than uplisting which provides minimal tangible benefits, so rarely done (rarely floats to the top – grizzly bear uplistings have been warranted but precluded for over 20 years).

Potential State Role: Coordination on National work plan Get Bill to plan another work shop Collaborate on: New Science (e.g., taxonomy, distribution, abundance and trends) Implement Conservation Actions Post Delisting Management: Regulatory protection Conservation Strategies Post delisting Monitoring: Picture - Passenger Pigeon Martha, thought to be the world's last passenger pigeon, died on September 1, 1914 Downlist Arrest ongoing severe decline Push extinction horizon beyond near-term, into foreseeable future Remember T is still in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future Recovery Recovery = no longer T or E. Data error is usually reserved for taxonomic changes – finding more is usually considered the result of a recovery action and usually falls into the recovery category. Uplisting Requires listing dollars. Practice says we should spend listing dollars on listing new species, rather than uplisting which provides minimal tangible benefits, so rarely done (rarely floats to the top – grizzly bear uplistings have been warranted but precluded for over 20 years).

Thoughts? Picture - Passenger Pigeon Martha, thought to be the world's last passenger pigeon, died on September 1, 1914 Downlist Arrest ongoing severe decline Push extinction horizon beyond near-term, into foreseeable future Remember T is still in danger of extinction within the foreseeable future Recovery Recovery = no longer T or E. Data error is usually reserved for taxonomic changes – finding more is usually considered the result of a recovery action and usually falls into the recovery category. Uplisting Requires listing dollars. Practice says we should spend listing dollars on listing new species, rather than uplisting which provides minimal tangible benefits, so rarely done (rarely floats to the top – grizzly bear uplistings have been warranted but precluded for over 20 years).