FCIM and School Improvement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
Advertisements

Instructional Decision Making
The 8-Step Continuous Improvement Model
Blended Learning Rubric BMS Faculty Meeting – September 10.
2 Collaboratively creates a roadmap for teaching, re-teaching, and assessing targeted benchmarks during the academic school year. Places focused instruction.
Instructional Decision Making
RTI: Questions and Answers June, Response to Intervention (RTI) What is it? a problem-solving systema problem-solving system a way to monitor progressa.
Bureau of School Improvement. It is Possible! It happened here: The Florida Story... Closing The Achievement Gap No Excuses.
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Elementary Science Bellringers
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Response to Intervention – Progress Monitoring December 10, :00 am Our session will start momentarily. While you are waiting, please do the following:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
Data Team Training February 4, 7, 10, 2014 Principals’ Meeting February 6, 2014.
Winston-Salem / Forsyth County Schools Revised Unit Maps Grades 3-5.
Carol Stewart Kennesaw State University. Purpose  To conduct a comprehensive needs assessment of the school that addresses academic areas of math and.
Standards-Based Education
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
BENCHMARK #3 “ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE RIGHT WORK” PLC YEAR 2 DAY 2 INQUIRY CYCLE.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
APS SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS August, District Goal By June 2015, APS district and schools will cut the achievement gap in one-half for all students.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
PLC Year 2 Day 2 Inquiry Cycle
Welcome PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS WHILE WAITING FOR THE CLASS TO BEGIN: Rate your knowledge of the MTSS process using the colored dot. Rate.
Assessment That Transforms Teaching
Assessment That Transforms Teaching
Problem Solving Process.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
Data Review Team Time Winter 2014.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
TAIS Overview for Districts
Comprehensive Planning
Data Review Team Time Spring 2014.
Purposeful Literacy Leadership for Administrators: Start a Movement
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Deep dive on learning progressions + Critiquing lesson methods
INCLUDE Strategy A plan for accommodating
IEP Workshop Kathryn Everest YRDSB SEAC Representative – AO – YRC
Teaching with Instructional Software
Response to Intervention (RtI) What is a Teacher’s Role?
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
GAM OVERVIEW August 2018 The new IASC Gender with Age Marker was launched in June, and is now a mandatory part of the Humanitarian Program Cycle for all.
CHAPTER 12: Assessing Reading Achievement
Building Independent Learners
Diane Curry, Teacher Consultant Mary Sue Weis, Teacher Consultant
Title I Schoolwide Programs
Specialist Workshop II Data Driven Decision Making
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
Student Progress Inspiring Learning.
CLASS Keys™ Strands and Elements
What are the CDTs? (Classroom Diagnostic Tools)
Multiple Ways to Track Progress
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Presentation transcript:

FCIM and School Improvement 2013-14 [Recommend having this as a poster up in the training room and refer to when presenting.] The Plan-Do-Check-Act process was developed by Dr. Walter Shewhart and later incorporated into the work of E. W. Deming. Dr. Deming credits Shewhart with teaching him that there are two ways of doing things: the old way and the new way. It requires planning, implementation, assessment of success and revision. It is often referred to as the PDCA cycle.

8-Step Overview: Components Identify Instructional (Learning) Goals (Plan) Develop Timelines, Identify Strategies (Plan) Deliver Instructional Focus Lessons (Do) Conduct Assessments (Study) Account for Skill Maintenance (Study) Monitor Effectiveness (Study) Deliver Tutorials and Enrichment (Act) Adjust Strategies (Act) Here are the components listed in the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle in a format easier to read. We will be covering each of these components in our training today and tomorrow. Data-driven Focused instruction Identifies instructional needs Identifies struggling students Provides re-teaching for mastery Monitors student learning The strengths of the FCIM model are: The use of data in making decisions and pedagogical choices rather than subjective opinions, hunches, traditional ways of teaching and testing students, or relying on the status quo to raise student achievement Because objective decisions are reached on data, teacher subjectivity is eliminated With careful and thorough data analysis, specific subjects and grade levels and student subgroups are identified Constant monitoring of student progress along with deeper mining of test data result in the ability to identify individual students who need more help in targeted benchmarks, clusters and strands. What to re-teach and who needs it are made apparent from the data analysis and tracking of student learning.

Problem-Solving Focus Based on the targets set for your school in each required Area, engage in a problem-solving process using the following questions. Goals shall specifically address any subgroup not meeting its AMO targets for 2012-2013. The special needs of subgroups not addressed in the AMO report (e.g., migrant, homeless, neglected and delinquent) shall also be considered during this process. Operational data such as climate surveys and classroom walkthroughs may also be used as available and relevant. Step 1: Identify goal(s) to help you achieve your targets. (Select one or more Areas each goal addresses.) Step 2: Brainstorm which resources are available to support the goal and barriers that could prevent achieving the goal; prioritize barriers.

Step 3: Choose some barriers to address, based on alterable elements of curriculum, instruction, environment, and organizational systems (e.g., those which have the most impact on the goal if removed or are immediately actionable). Step 4: Brainstorm and prioritize strategies that could be used to eliminate or reduce each targeted barrier. Step 5: Identify action steps (including who, what, where, when) that will need to be taken to implement the identified strategies.

Step 6: Determine how strategies will be monitored for fidelity of implementation (including who, what, where, when). Step 7: Determine how strategies will be monitored for effectiveness (including who, what, where, when). Step 8: Determine how progress towards each goal will be monitored (including who, what, where, when).