National Grantee Orientation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

WIA Performance and Common Measures Where are we now? by Anthony L. Joseph, Ph.D. Program Manager Workforce Development & Training Division, NYSDOL.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data Bigger Picture Updated 5/22/14.
Data Validation Documentation for Enrollments. Learning Objectives As a result of this training you will be able to: Describe the data validation process.
SCSEP New Regulation - Additional Indicator on Volunteerism Presentation by Peggy Stadler.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Reporting and Data Validation Updates Presenters: Wes Day Barbara Strother Greg Wilson ETA’s.
SSAI Sponsor Transition Webinar t We will start in 5 minutes. t Please dial in by following the instructions (to see those instructions again click the.
SSAI Recertification for PY 2012 t We will start in 5 minutes. t Please dial in by following the instructions (to see those instructions again click the.
Review of Data Validation Results for PY 2004 We’ve come a long way, baby!
Data Validation (DV) What is DV? Who conducts DV Why conduct DV? How is DV done? When is DV? Common Fails Suggestions Expectations.
FORTIFYING HIGH PERFORMANCE : IMPROVING REPORTING AND DATA COLLECTION OF POSITIVE EXITS PRESENTERS: RIAN HOWARD POSTELL CARTER DONNA SATTERTHWAITE FORTIFYING.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
AEBG Webinar September 25, Agenda for Today MOE & Consortia allocations update Governance Questions Adult Education Block Grant Reporting Toolkit.
Senior Service America’s SPARQ Transition Overview Module August 15, 2012.
Performance Reporting Under WIA Title 1B Candice Graham-Young ETA Performance Accountability Team.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda May 19, 2011 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA WIA Youth under the Recovery Act Guidance for Implementing and Reporting on DOL Youth Recovery.
Participants will have a knowledge and understanding of priority of service in DOL funded programs.
Managing Average Project Duration and Individual Participant Duration SCSEP Business Meeting November 18, 2010 – 2:00 p.m. Presented by: Bennett Pudlin,
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Common Measures. When did common measures become effective? Common measures became effective for W-P on 7/1/05.
Youth CareerConnect (YCC) Participant Tracking System (PTS) Orientation and Training: Module #4—User-Defined Fields and Data Export Presented by: Evan.
Program Management 4. INDIAN AND NATIVE AMERICAN (INA) EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PROGRAM UNDER SECTION 166 OF THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) An Orientation.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Performance Goal Negotiation for SCSEP Grantees February 28, 2011.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 Presented by: Division.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 3, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration H-1B Grants Performance Reporting Tutorial #1: Performance Reporting.
The Minority Report Annual Analysis of SCSEP Service to Minorities September 29, 2009 at 3:00pm E.S.T.
1 Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training (TAACCCT) Grant Program FPO Training October 21, 2011.
H-1B Grants Technical Assistance Tutorial #4: Resolving Common Errors
WIOA Section 166 – Indian and Native American Program
THURSDAY TARGETED TRAINING: Reporting Regulations and Requirements
Webinar Date: February 5, 2015; 3:00 p.m.
Using Data to Manage Your YCC Program
WIOA Performance Workgroup
The Application of Common Measures
Presented by Sarah Martinez and Patricia Meyertholen June 2, 2016
September DEI Project Lead Bi-Monthly Administrative Web Conference
CareerSource Chipola Performance Overview
Adult Education and Literacy Measureable Skills Gains Targets for PY’16-’17 Carrie Tupa Adult Education and Literacy Texas Workforce Commission
WIOA Annual Performance Report
Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP)
Stakeholder Consultation
We will start in 5 minutes.
The Final Transition To Boldly Go Where No Transfers Have Gone Before
Senior Community Service Employment Program SCSEP
2016 Transition and Transfer activities
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
Sarah Martinez Patricia Meyertholen June 23, 2016
2.6: Data System Business Process Maps
FY19/FY20 Detroit Collective Impact Funding
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
PE Determiner Portal Registration and Log on Workshop
Connecting TANF to Career Pathways with HPOG
You’re In the Right Place
H-1B America’s Promise Grantee Convening Day 1: November 14, 2017
H-1B Grants Performance Reporting Guidance
Understanding FSS Reporting Requirements and Composite Scores
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
JOHN BURTON FOUNDATION
FY18 Water Use Data and Research Program Q & A Session
December 13, 2018 SCSEP Service Delivery Model and Performance I Take Care of the Customers.
BCS Template Presentation February 22, 2018
Congratulations! One of your employers was selected for a survey
Download Slides at OVERVIEW
SCSEP Service Delivery Model and PERFORMANCE II: OJE and ATSS
Senior Service America, Inc.
Monitoring & Managing Your WIF Grant
NFJP Performance and Reporting Webinar
Presentation transcript:

National Grantee Orientation Promoting self-sufficiency and employment opportunities for older adults Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) National Grantee Orientation Employment and Training Administration

SCSEP Grantees Create a virtual name tag… #

Michi McNeace U.S. Department of Labor National SCSEP Team

Introduction to SCSEP Performance and Data Management Systems SPARQ Overview QPRs Performance Measures for PY 2016 and 2017 Next Steps

Bennett Pudlin Terry Cram U.S. Department of Labor National SCSEP Team

What Do You Know About the SCSEP Performance System? It won at Daytona last year It keeps your staff motivated Something related to the Common Core Curriculum? The performance measures and related data collected by SCSEP

OVERVIEW OF SCSEP PERFORMANCE SYSTEM

What is the SCSEP Performance System Core and additional performance measures mandated by Congress Customer satisfaction surveys Minority Report Data collection system mandated by the regulations and grant agreements Data validation InfoSPACE

Core Measures Three measures of service to participants Service level Community service Most-in-need Three employment outcome measures Entered employment Retention at 6 months Average earnings

Additional Measures Retention at 1 year Customer satisfaction of participants, host agencies, and employers Entered volunteer work

Negotiating Goals for Core Measures Goals for core measures negotiated in spring for following program year Proposed goals use each grantee’s own baseline performance through Q3 with continuous improvement increment and various adjustments Consequences of bad data or small denominators Negotiations must be based on data Goals published; right to comment on process Right to seek adjustment during the year

Evaluation of Grantee Performance Performance evaluated after close of the program year around September 30 Report on actual performance and percent of goal achieved on each goal Calculation of aggregate percent of performance achieved on all 6 measures Corrective action plan for grantees not achieving 80% of goal in the aggregate Sanctions for state grantees failing three consecutive years and national grantees failing four consecutive years TA provided for not doing well on individual measures Results published and reported to Congress

Resources Title V of Older Americans Act, Section 513 SCSEP Final Rule, Subpart G, Sections 641.700-641.750; Section 641.140 (definitions) SCSEP Web page and Older Worker Community of Practice for annual grantee goals and evaluation of grantee performance and various presentations on the performance measures

Customer Satisfaction Surveys Participant and host agency surveys conducted annually by mail house, usually in fall; grantees inform participants and host agencies to that surveys are coming and that it is important to complete them Employer surveys conducted continuously by sub-grantees with qualified employers only. Management report lists all qualified employers and when they need to receive the survey

Resources Title V of Older Americans Act, Section 513 SCSEP Final Rule, Section 641.700(c)(2) Older Worker COP for copies of survey reports and the Employer Survey Kit Pending Employer Surveys management report

What Is the Minority Report? A report presented by less than half of the members of a committee The 2002 movie with Tom Cruise Annual report of SCSEP service to minorities

Minority Report Annual report of SCSEP service to minorities required by Congress Two components: participation and outcomes Participation compares enrollment in SCSEP of each minority group against its proportion in the population. Based on weighted Census data for each county in a state served by a grantee Outcomes compares employment outcomes in SPARQ achieved by each minority group against the outcomes of non-minorities Grantees must address any disparities in their annual grant application narrative

Resources Title V of Older Americans Act, Section 516 Annual Planning Guidance TEGL (#28- 12), Attachment B (Program Narrative) Older Worker COP for latest Minority Report and a recorded Webinar on the how to use the Minority Report

What Is SPARQ? Yes, my son just bought a pair Speed, power, agility, reaction, and quickness The SCSEP data collection and reporting system It precedes a flame A very nasty disease

sCSEP Performance and results QPR System (SPARQ)

Data Collection and Reporting System SPARQ is the online system for entering data and reporting on measures Web Data Collection System: (WDCS) Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) Management reports Various utilities and functions InfoSPACE provides ability to analyze the data at a record level over time

SPARQ All grantees and sub-grantees have access Security rules strictly enforced Functions: Data collection QPRs Management reports Searching for participants and organizations Transferring participants or moving them from one sub- grantee to another Extending durational limit of participants Data validation Managing users Data extracts

Access and Security

Data Collection All grantees are required to use the Web Data Collection System (WDCS) to enter required data on participants Grant assurances require timely and accurate data entry Grantees should establish data standards in their sub-grant agreements Contains required fields and values and optional fields Numerous edits protect data quality Specified values Screen rejects Enrollment Data Quality Problems (EDQP) Data Quality Report (DQR)

Data Collection (WDCS)

Data Collection (WDCS)

Data Collection (WDCS)

SPARQ Home Page

QPRs

Management Reports

Management Reports

Searches

Transfers and Moves Extending Durational Limit

Data Validation

Managing Users Data Extracts

InfoSPACE Uses SPARQ data but maintained by DOL Data Warehouse team Advanced query and analysis functions using de- identified record level data Provides analysis of all active participants and of core measures by participant characteristics and services Currently available to grantee administrators only Will be made incrementally available to sub- grantee administrators

Resources SCSEP Final Rule, Section 641.879(b)-(h) Annual Planning Guidance TEGL (#28-12), Attachment C (Grant Assurances) OMB-approved hard copy data collection forms Data Collection Handbook Ask the Experts Forum SPARQ tutorials, specifications, other resources SPARQ online Help

Data Validation Conducted annually after close of program year; grantees have 6 months to complete Random sample of records based on size of grantee; not valid at sub-grantee level Independent grantee evaluation of whether data in SPARQ comply with program rules; validator checks against underlying documentation in case file Two separate samples: eligibility and performance Worksheets and reports in SPARQ Grantees should use to identify need for sub- grantee training and oversight

Resources 2016 FOA for national grantees Annual grant assurance for all grantees TEGL 3-03 October 16, 2007, Data Validation Guidance Data Validation Handbook SPARQ Data Validation samples, work sheets, and reports

Do You Understand Your QPR? Well, yes I do! Some of it Too many numbers No way!

Quarterly Progress Report (QPR)

How Program Elements Relate to Performance Measures The measures required by Congress support the two main goals of the program and relate to critical program elements Simplified flow chart on next slide identifies major program activity clusters and the performance measures that relate to them The measures are also related to each other; increased performance on one measure will enhance performance on another measure

SL MiN MiN CS, CSS SL CS EE, Ret, AE, CSS EE, Ret, AE EE, Ret, AE, Vol, CSS

QPR The QPR is designed to report performance on each of the performance measures in Sections E and F. The QPR also contains critically important information in the other sections: Section B shows customer flow and placement activity Section C reports on community service performed Section D presents participant demographics and characteristics In trainings and TA sessions, we look at relevant QPR fields to explore each performance measure in depth The next slides show you which QPR elements are related to which measures.

CS, SL SL, MIN SL, MIN SL, MIN CS, SL CS, SL, MIN EE EE AE EE, ER, AE CS = community service (E1) EE = entered employment (E2) ER = employment retention (E3) AE = average earnings (E4) SL = service level (E5) MIN = most-in-need (E6)

MIN priority of service MIN waiver factor

Final QPRs Final QPRs are produced roughly 30 days after the quarter closes and are the official reports of activity for that quarter The final QPR for the program year is produced on September 30 of the following program year The extra time after the close of the calendar quarter allows grantees to clean up their data and to complete undone follow- ups A final QPR is frozen and never changes. New and changed data will be reflected in subsequent QPRs for that program year in the fields for Year to Date (YTD) and Last 4 Quarters (L4Q) Final QPRs at any level (nationwide, grantee, sub-grantee, and national grantee by state) are public records and are available to all SPARQ users

QPR Review The QPR Review reflects the current quarter’s data until the quarter is closed Once the quarter is closed and the final QPR for the quarter is produced, the QPR Review will show the Final QPR values for that quarter Because the data in the QPR Review are preliminary and will always change, this function is only accessible by users with appropriate permissions

Generating the QPR The QPR must be generated to present the latest data in SPARQ The system automatically generates all QPRs each weekend so users will see the latest data reflected when they come to work on Monday morning Sub-grantee and grantee users can generate the QPR at any time if they want to see the effect of changes they have made to their data

Resources Data Collection Handbook Ask the Experts Forum QPR Handbook

No – this is the first time I’ve heard of them Do You Know What Your Performance Goals Are? I think so Of course I do! A 10-minute mile No – this is the first time I’ve heard of them

Performance measures for py 2016 and py 2017

Performance Measures in PY 2016 Current national grantees negotiated their performance goals for PY 2106 last spring. Can seek adjustment of those goals until September 30, 2017 if newly awarded territory produces a significant change in circumstances New national grantees are assigned the average of the national grantees’ goals as targets for PY 2016. They too can seek adjustments if warranted FOA, Section VI(C)(2)(c)(2)

Performance Measures in PY 2017 OAA amendments make modest changes in the SCSEP performance measures: 3 common measures slightly redefined and recalculated, but still use data we currently collect 3 SCSEP participation measures unchanged Additional measures eliminated but one new core measure for effectiveness in serving our three customer groups Amendments require DOL to put in place the new performance measures no later than December 31, 2017. We think this means that they will be finalized by then and used in the spring 2018 goal setting. If so, they will first be officially reported in PY 2018, starting July 1, 2018

NEXT STEPS If you need assistance with the SCSEP performance measures or other aspects of the SCSEP performance system, contact Michi at mcneace.meche@dol.gov, with a copy to your FPO If your staff needs training or support in using SPARQ, contact HELP@SCSEP-help.com If there is general interest, we will schedule additional trainings on the performance measures and how to use the tools in SPARQ to manage your performance

I need Performance Training I’ll take both Do You Need Technical Assistance and/or Training? I need SPARQ TA I need Performance TA I need TA on both I need SPARQ Training I need Performance Training I’ll take both