Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.
MS4 Stormwater Permit Program and Great Bay. Brief Overview – EPA’s Stormwater Management Program Clean Water Act – NPDES Stormwater amendments.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
URBAN STORMWATER: A PERFECT STORM FOR CHANGE Jon M. Capacasa Director, Water Protection Division EPA Region III.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Chesapeake bay program: Funding & Bay TMDL Midpoint Assessment
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Chesapeake bay program
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
MACo Winter Conference
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Funding from the Local Perspective
Local Planning Process…
Watershed Implementation Plan
Funding Sources and Resources
City of Forest Lake MS4 Program
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
Funding from the Local Perspective
Funding from the Local Perspective
Understanding the State’s Accounting for Growth Policy
Federal Facilities and the District’s Phase III WIP
Local Partners Engagement and Communication Strategy
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Funding at Record Levels
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
Funding from the Local Perspective
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Approach to Setting Local Planning Goals
Agriculture WIP Phase III Development Update
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Maryland’s Draft Phase III WIP for the Chesapeake Bay
Presentation transcript:

Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems Greg Busch gregory.busch@maryland.gov

Maryland 2017 Nitrogen Contributions to Bay Presentation topics Where are we now? Where are we going? What is your role? Phase III WIP process overview Maryland 2017 Nitrogen Contributions to Bay 1. Wastewater 2. Stormwater 3. Septic Systems 2

Wastewater … where we are today Million Pounds of Nitrogen to the Bay 1980s & 90s Industrial re-tooling, treatment and closures Phosphorus controls 2000s Wastewater upgrades with Bay Restoration Fund (BRF) Enhanced Nutrient Removal By 2017 $970M in BRF Wastewater Treatment Plant Fund Over 95% of capacity will be upgraded 20% of Maryland’s nitrogen load in 2017 WIP2 3

Wastewater … where we are today Million Pounds of Phosphorus to the Bay 1980s & 90s Industrial re-tooling, treatment and closures Phosphorus controls 2000s Wastewater upgrades with Bay Restoration Fund (BRF) Enhanced Nutrient Removal By 2017 $970M in BRF Wastewater Treatment Plant Fund Over 95% of capacity will be upgraded 13% of Maryland’s phosphorus load in 2017 WIP2 4

Wastewater … Phase III WIP Participating in the Phase III WIP Local WIP Inventory Performance incentives Water Quality Trading Program Clean Water Commerce Act BRF O&M Grants for Performance Capital improvements Minor Municipal Upgrades Sewer Projects & Septic Connections Consider new technologies Treatment Water reuse Key Planning Documents Wastewater Permits County WIPs and Milestone Plans Bay Restoration Fund Annual Report County Water and Sewer Plans 5

Stormwater treatment Untreated runoff Treated runoff 6

Stormwater … where we are today Million Pounds of Nitrogen to the Bay 1980s Early stormwater controls: dry ponds, wet ponds, etc. 2000s 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual Issued 2007 Stormwater Management Act Now MS4 retrofits of pre-2000 development 17% of Maryland’s nitrogen load in 2017 WIP2 7

Stormwater … where we are today Million Pounds of Phosphorus to the Bay 1980s Early stormwater controls: dry ponds, wet ponds, etc. 2000s 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual Issued 2007 Stormwater Management Act Now MS4 retrofits of pre-2000 development 21% of Maryland’s phosphorus load in 2017 WIP2 8

Stormwater on new development & redevelopment Stormwater Management Environmental Site Design Conservation Forest conservation Critical area protection Wetland protection “woods in good condition” 9

Stormwater on existing development MS4s: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permits Restoration requirements Retrofit untreated acres Impervious Acre Equivalents Bay Restoration Phase I MS4s Population over 100K Permits Issued 2013-14 Annual restoration budgets exceed $300M Phase II MS4s Issued 2018 10

Stormwater … Phase III WIP Participating in the Phase III WIP Local WIP Inventory MS4 Restoration Requirement Restoration plans Impervious acre retrofits Bay restoration Non-MS4s Water Quality Trading Program Grant programs Plans for projects with nutrient benefits Watershed Restoration Specialists Key Planning Documents MS4 Restoration Plans MS4 Financial Assurance Plans County WIPs and Milestone Plans Annual reporting of BMP implementation Emphasize benefits beyond nutrients 11

Septics … where we are today Million Pounds of Nitrogen to the Bay Management actions Connections Upgrades Pumpouts Bay Restoration Fund $122M in septic Grants awarded Three Rs Regulatory reform Retool inspection and enforcement efforts Rethink septics vs. sewers 6% of Maryland’s nitrogen load in 2017 WIP2 12

Septics … looking to 2025 420,000 systems 6% of Maryland’s nitrogen Minimal phosphorus Focus on benefits to public health Drinking water Shellfish harvesting Concentrated problem areas Septic Stewardship Plans Target use of state funds Address county-specific water quality concerns 13

Septics … Phase III WIP Participating in the Phase III WIP Local WIP Inventory Capital improvements using BRF Septic Upgrades Septic Connections Credit through permits MS4 restoration credit Wastewater capacity Septic Stewardship Plans Complete in 2021 Key Planning Documents County WIPs and Milestone Plans NPDES permits County Water and Sewer Plans 14

2017 Midpoint Assessment Phase II WIP 60% toward our 2025 goal by 2017 Phosphorus and sediment met this with room to spare Nitrogen is there as well, but is not accounted for in the 2017 modeling 15

EPA Phase III WIP Expectations Implementation commitments from 2018 to 2025 to meet WIP Planning Targets Developed at a scale finer than the basin Identify: Specific funding and financing Cost-share & technical assistance Voluntary actions & incentives Policy, legislative & regulatory actions Engagement of local, regional and federal partners Account for climate change, Conowingo infill and growth 16

Bay Cabinet: Maryland’s Bay Restoration Framework 2016 Historical and Projected Chesapeake Bay Spending Report Use wastewater growth allocations wisely … preserve future options for local growth build capacity back into the system. Mitigate the future impact of growth … 6. Plan for 2025 and beyond 17

Compiling our Phase III WIP Local WIP Inventories Current practices Proposed practices by 2025 For each sector For each county MDE to work directly with local practitioners MDE to compile: At a county level For the entire state 18

Phase III WIP Schedule Since 2010 WIP engagement Summer 2018 Establish sector suballocations Fall 2018 Develop Local WIP Inventories Work with local practitioners Individually and through existing workgroups Comprehensive inventory of planned projects Improve inventory of current projects Winter 2018/19 Compile statewide WIP Combine local WIP inventories Assess whether plan meets WIP targets Establish local WIP goals March 2019 Draft WIP for Public Review Address stakeholder comments June 2019 Final Phase III WIP 2019 to 2025 Refine Phase III WIP 2-year milestones 19

Conclusions Water quality in the bay is improving … but our job is not getting easier Focus on capacity for 2025 and beyond Emphasize benefits beyond nutrient reductions Outreach to practitioners and stakeholders: Ongoing since Phase I WIP Through spring 2019 for WIP development To continue through 2025 implementation and milestones To develop Local WIP Inventories To ensure that Maryland’s WIP is comprehensive 20