Mark P Chisholm September 5, 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation title – Presenter/ref. - - p.1 AREVA / CVCC National Career Pathways Network Conference Stephanie Hart Program Manager October 18, 2012.
Advertisements

A Guide to Analyzing PrOF Instructional Data Packets CRC Research Office 2009.
The Non-Tenure-Track Academic Workforce Myths, Facts, Resources © 2015 by The Modern Language Association of America All rights reserved. Rosemary G. Feal.
SB 70 Webinar June 7 th, SB 70 Webinar - June 7 th, 2012 § Educational Level. For purposes of determining a grant recipient’s total program.
Tracking Our Students with National Student Clearinghouse StudentTracker Data Presented by: Sandy Naumann Jennifer Li Kent McShan TAIR 30 th Annual Conference.
How College Shapes LivesFor detailed data, see: trends.collegeboard.org. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, 2013, Tables 222, 306, and.
THECB 1/2008 Report on Closing the Gaps Success Progress January 24, 2008.
Curricular Practical Training. What is Curricular Practical Training ? Curricular Practical Training (CPT) is an employment opportunity, in the United.
The Pathway to Success Enhance the Co- Curricular Experience & the Value of Participation Goal 2 – Initiative 5.
Student Affairs Learning Collaborative Mission Related Outcomes at Santa Clara University Santa Clara University Campus Visit November 21, 2008.
NRS E VALUATION L EARNING C OMMUNITY P ROJECT : I OWA A DULT L ITERACY P OST S ECONDARY T RANSITIONS Amy Vybiral, Consultant January 16, 2013.
Completers and Wage Progression: Joining Wage Data and Student Records Patrick Perry, Vice Chancellor California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office.
1 Regional Research Institute Oregon Supported Employment Center of Excellence 2011 Regional Research Institute for Human Services.
Fall 2011 Assembly State of the College Address Dr. MaryLou Apple, President.
Aggregated Core Indicator Data TOPs Code 12 – Performance Of All Voc Ed & Special Populations Students.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Challenges using IPEDS for examining the Early Childhood teacher preparation pipeline Abstract The purpose.
24/36 Hour Rule L E G I S L A T I V E S E R V I C E S R U L E S E D U C A T I O N.
Low-income Adults in Profile: Low-income Adults in Profile: Improving Lives Through Higher Education Bryan Cook ACE Center for Policy Analysis.
L ONGITUDINAL D ATA AND H IGHER E DUCATION A CCOUNTABILITY Tom Schenk Jr., Consultant.
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Palomar College Presentation to Palomar College Board of Trustees March 11, 2008.
October 13, 2015 Understanding TAACCCT Performance Metrics.
Performance Reporting Nuances Kristen Milstead, Ph.D. Workforce Analyst Department of Labor, ETA.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: March 6, 2014 Presented by: ETA/OWI Division of.
The University of Texas at Brownsville and Texas Southmost College “Student Employment Initiative” The UTB/TSC Student Employment Initiative is part of.
Capital Community College 2014 Graduate Survey
Post-School Education and training-uptake in labour market trends.
Don McCorquodale, Chair Commission on Workforce Development
AUB Alumni Survey Report 2016
Community College of Baltimore County
Having a Degree is important
North Carolina Community College IIPS 2007 Summer Conference
Community and Technical Colleges 2009 Fall Enrollments
Biotechnology Program Review Presentation April 18, 2012
Training Module 3: USDOL Annual Programmatic Reporting Connecticut Advanced Manufacturing Initiative (CAMI) September 14, 2015 Michelle Hall, CAMI Project.
Objectives How reliable are the student success measures that are reported to the Board of Trustees? How accurate is the underlying student record data.
Community for Excellence Assessment Results
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Post-School Education and training-uptake in labour market trends.
KEY INDICATORS OF THE LABOUR MARKET - KILM
How High Schools Explain Students’ Initial Colleges and Majors
Statewide College Workforce Report
Shoumi Mustafa September 27, 2017
Shoumi Mustafa November 20, 2017
Lifting the Lid on Completion Rates
Shoumi Mustafa October 16, 2017
Sonoma County Junior College District
AASFAA Financial Aid Legislative Update
AASFAA Financial Aid Legislative Update
Unemployment Insurance and Reemployment among Older Workers
Strong Workforce Program Incentive Funding Overview
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
AACRAO Transfer Conference July, 2013 Afet Dundar, PhD
NCAA Eligibility Center Workshop Stanislaus State Nov
Student Success Data.
DQI Atlanta, June 21, 2006 Jim Halloran
Access Center Assessment Report
2008 ARCC Report Findings February 2, 2009
2009 ARCC Report Findings October 5, 2009
MACRAO Conference 2018 Using Transfer Grades to Improve Operations
Maryland’s Workforce Development Growth
Performance Update St. Philip’s College.
Student Success Metrics
Student Success Metrics
CUNY ASAP National Replication Institute April 15th, 2019
IPEDS Outcome Measures and the VFA
Beyond Graduate Survey 2015 Summary Analysis
Workforce Preparation and Employment Outcomes
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
GDS – What Does It Tell Us? Presented by Planning & Research
Presentation transcript:

Mark P Chisholm September 5, 2018 SUN PATH Participant Outcomes Compared to Similar Students in NM Institutions Mark P Chisholm September 5, 2018

Final selection of students used in the analysis: This study looked at SUN PATH participants from the first four semesters of the project: fall ‘15, spring ‘16, summer ‘16, and fall ’16 Students were tracked through spring 2017 and employment outcomes were tracked through the third quarter of 2017 Student data from all two-year colleges in the state, who had similar degree program codes as the SUN PATH students, were pulled to serve as a Comparison Group Final selection of students used in the analysis: SUN PATH Participants – 1,821 Comparison Group – 17,996 The source of the data was the Department of Workforce Solutions (DWS) database and institutional files reported by institutions to the Higher Education Department. All analysis records were anonymized to protect individual student data. Note that when students sign up to be part of the SUN PATH program they are often continuing students at the institution – the comparison group is distributed similarly.

Overall, SUN PATH students are much more likely to have completed a certificate or degree through spring 2017 than the comparison group. However, the full set of study students encompasses four different starting semesters, so some of these students only had two semesters of data to track while others had five semesters – this issue is addressed in the next chart.

Because of the four initial starting semesters, the chart on the next slide looks at completion rates for students after two semesters (the semester they first enrolled and the following semester). All four cohorts were tracked for two semesters. One of the major goals of SUN PATH was to help students complete quickly, with a focus on shorter certificates that could lead to employment in Allied Health fields. The previous chart shows that a far higher percentage of SUN PATH participants complete a less-than-one-year certificate than the comparison group (25.6% compared to 1.6%) within two semesters, and that a majority of the completers complete in their first semester. Overall, after two semesters, 34.7% of the SUN PATH participants have completed a program after two semesters. The next chart looks at only the fall 2015 cohort, to track the percentage of completers after five semesters (through spring 2017)

This chart looks at only the fall 2015 cohort, to track the percentage of completers after five semesters (through spring 2017) Over half of the SUN PATH participants had completed a certificate or a degree after five semesters (52.1%), compared to 15.2% for the Comparison group (note, these are not they same as typically reported graduation rates – these represent only a sample of each institution’s enrollment, and each cohort is comprised of continuing students, transfer students, as well as first-time students.) There was a larger completion percentage at all award levels, but the largest difference was with the less-than-one-year certificates. The other main goal of SUN PATH was to help participants get jobs after graduation.

This chart focuses both on non-incumbent workers (those participants who were not employed in the quarter prior to enrollment) and on incumbent workers (those who were previously employed) Employment after graduation was measured by matching to DWS unemployment insurance (UI) files in the first full quarter after graduation, for example, graduates in spring 2017 were matched to UI files for the third quarter of 2017. The chart shows a large benefit for non-incumbent workers, with 46.2% employed after completion compared to 31.5% for the Comparison group. This advantage occurred for all certificate and degree levels. However, for incumbent workers, there wasn’t much difference in subsequent employment of SUN PATH participants versus the Comparison group, and in one case the Comparison group was slightly higher – basically, if employed before, still employed afterwards. The next chart looks at average salaries before and after the program.

This chart shows that the SUN PATH participants experienced, on average, a higher increase in salary than the Comparison group (the salary is the average quarterly salary pulled from the DWS UI database). This salary increase wasn’t consistent across all award levels, the 1-2 year certificate students in SUN PATH had a salary increase, but it was smaller than for the Comparison Group, while the increase for Associate Degree recipients was much higher. Overall, the SUN PATH participants had a $962 increase compared to $712 for the Comparison group.

Conclusions The charts in this presentation provide a very high-level summary of how SUN PATH participants fared comparted to a large group of similar students at similar institutions: SUN PATH students completed a certificate or degree at a 34% higher rate, when compared to similar non-participants SUN PATH participants who were unemployed at enrollment, became employed after program completion at a 14% higher rate when compared to similar non-participants The average overall gain in salary for SUN PATH students was almost $1000 per quarter compared to $700 for non-participants