Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning – Reasoning that uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Chapter 2 Geometric Reasoning

Advertisements

2-4 Rules of Logic What is deductive reasoning?

Targets Use the Law of Detachment. Use the Law of Syllogism. Lesson 2-3: Deductive Reasoning TARGETS.

Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning. Ohio Content Standards.

Chapter 2-4 & 2-5 Reasoning and Proofs. Lesson 5 MI/Vocab postulate axiom theorem proof paragraph proof informal proof Identify and use basic postulates.

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.

Splash Screen. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–3) Then/Now New Vocabulary Example 1: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Key Concept: Law of.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning Goal: You will use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.

Write the following in biconditional form. p: The sun is out. q: It is day time. The sun is out iff it is day time.

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning Use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.

Applying Deductive Reasoning Section 2.3. Essential Question How do you construct a logical argument?

Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.

Chapter 2 Lesson 3 Objective: To use the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism.

 ESSENTIAL QUESTION  How can you use reasoning to solve problems?  Scholars will  Use the Law of Syllogism  Use the Law of Detachment UNIT 01 – LESSON.

Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning- uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions Law of Detachment: If p.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.

Do Now. Law of Syllogism ◦ We can draw a conclusion when we are given two true conditional statements. ◦ The conclusion of one statement is the hypothesis.

Over Lesson 2–3 5-Minute Check 1 A.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x = 4 B.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x  4 C.Hypothesis: x = 4 Conclusion:

Welcome to Interactive Chalkboard Glencoe Geometry Interactive Chalkboard Copyright © by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Developed by FSCreations, Inc.,

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the process of reasoning logically from given statements to a conclusion.

Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Example 4-2b 1. PROM Use the Law of Syllogism to determine whether a valid conclusion can be reached from the following set of statements. (b) The Peddler.

Difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.

Section 2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Definition: Conjecture an unproven statement that is based on observations or given information.

Geometry 2-3 Law of Syllogism The Law of Syllogism allows you to draw conclusions from two conditional statements. Law of Syllogism If p  q and q  r.

Splash Screen. Over Lesson 2–3 5-Minute Check 1 A.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x = 4 B.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x  4 C.Hypothesis:

Deductive Reasoning LESSON 2–4. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–3) TEKS Then/Now New Vocabulary Example 1: Real-World Example: Inductive.

Chapter 2, Section 1 Conditional Statements. Conditional Statement Also know as an “If-then” statement. If it’s Monday, then I will go to school. Hypothesis:

Deductive Reasoning BOMLA LacyMath Geometry Pre-AP.

Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.

Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3

1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If

Deductive Reasoning, Postulates, and Proofs

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.

2.2 Continued: Deductive Reasoning

Reasoning Proof and Chapter 2 If ….., then what?

LESSON 2–4 Deductive Reasoning.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.

Do Now: Name each point , line, and line segment, or ray

02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning

2.4 Deductive Reasoning.

Warmup Definition: Perpendicular Lines—

2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:

Chapter 4 – Scale Factors and Similarity Key Terms

LESSON 2–4 Deductive Reasoning.

1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If

1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the conditional below and determine the truth value for each. “If the measure of an angle is less.

EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment

Math Humor Q: How is a geometry classroom like the United Nations?

Concept 8 Inductive Reasoning.

Lesson 2 – 4 Deductive Reasoning

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Welcome to Interactive Chalkboard

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning: Using facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment: A form.

2-4 Deductive Reasoning Vocab:

EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Consider the following TRUE conditional statement…

Presentation transcript:

Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning – Reasoning that uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment – A form of deductive reasoning that is used to draw conclusions from true conditional statements. If the conditional “if p, then q” is true and p is true, then q must be true.

The following is a true conditional The following is a true conditional. Determine whether each conclusion is valid based on the given information. Explain your reasoning. If a polygon is a convex quadrilateral, then the sum of the interior angles is 360. a. Given: Conclusion: If you connect X, N, and O with segments, the figure will be a convex quadrilateral. b. Given: ABCD is a convex quadrilateral. Conclusion: The sum of the interior angles of ABCD is 360. Answer: not valid Answer: valid Example 4-1c

Deductive Reasoning Law of Syllogism – A law of logic that is similar to the Transitive Property of Equality. If the conditionals “if p, then q” and “if q, then r” are true, then “if p, then r” must also be true.

Use the Law of Syllogism to determine whether a valid conclusion can be reached from each set of statements. a. (1) If you ride a bus, then you attend school. (2) If you ride a bus, then you go to work. b. (1) If your alarm clock goes off in the morning, then you will get out of bed. (2) You will eat breakfast, if you get out of bed. Answer: invalid Answer: valid Example 4-2c

(2) Janine always buys Jill popcorn at the movies. Determine whether statement (3) follows from statements (1) and (2) by the Law of Detachment of the Law of Syllogism. If it does, state which law was used. If it does not, write invalid. a. (1) If a children’s movie is playing on Saturday, Janine will take her little sister Jill to the movie. (3) If a children’s movie is playing on Saturday, Jill will get popcorn. (2) Janine always buys Jill popcorn at the movies. Answer: Law of Syllogism Example 4-3e

(3) The sum of the interior angles of polygon GHI is 180. b. (1) If a polygon is a triangle, then the sum of the interior angles is 180. (3) The sum of the interior angles of polygon GHI is 180. (2) Polygon GHI is a triangle. Answer: Law of Detachment Example 4-3f