Tx EVM for MCS-10 in ah Date: Authors: Nov 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
256-QAM TX EVM and RX Sensitivity
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1367r0 Submission Nov 2013 Mingguang Xu, et. Al.Slide 1 Tx EVM for MCS-10 in ah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0309r1 Submission March 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 1MHz Waveform in Wider BW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0489r1 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0597r0 Submission May 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Editorial Change on SIG Field Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE ah Corrections to TGah Channel Model Date: Slide 1InterDigital Communications March 2015 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1326r0 Extend Submission Panasonic Nov 2012 PSDU Size For Receiver Sensitivity Power Level Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /1279r0 Submission Nov 09, 2010 Slide 1 Minho Cheong, ETRI Segment Parser for 160MHz Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0553-r1 Submission April 2011 James Wang, et al, Mediatek COST231 Walfish Ikegame Model for for 11ah Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0385r0 Submission March 2006 A. Kapur, et al, Broadcom CorporationSlide 1 EVM Specification Issues for TGn Notice: This document has.
Doc.: IEEE /1125r1 Submission Sept 2013 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 HEW Outdoor Channel Model Discussions Date: Authors: Name AffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Submission doc: IEEE /0807r0 July 2010 R. Kudo et al., NTT Slide 1 PHY Abstraction for MU-MIMO Date: Authors: Name AffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0645 Submission May 2012 Open-Loop Link Margin Index for Fast Link Adaptation Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell,
Doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Submission Jan 2013 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Receiver Sensitivity Levels Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1484r4 Submission January 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0363r2 Submission Pilot Value Definitions May 2012 Yongho Seok (LG Electronics), Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell)Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0216r1 Submission February 2012 James Wang et al, MediaTekSlide 1 Comment Resolution Receiver Parameters Date: Authors:
WUR Link Budget Analysis
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
11ah Interframe Spacing Values
WUR Link Budget Analysis Follow-up: Data Rates and SIG Bits Protection
Non-Uniform HOM Constellations for 11ay Single Carrier
Signaling and Capabilities for Non-Uniform Constellation
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
Spectrum Mask in IEEE802.11p Date: Authors: March 2008
WUR Legacy Preamble Design
1MHz SIG Field Discussions
Rate 7/8 LDPC Code for 11ay Date: Authors:
Month Year Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0135r0
China S1G Spectrum Performance Analysis
Spectrum Mask in IEEE802.11p Date: Authors: March 2008
VHT Packet Duration Signaling
LDPC for 1024QAM Date: Authors: July 2016
HEW Outdoor Channel Model Discussions
Outdoor Channel Model Simulation Follow-up
Motions for 2007/09 Date: Authors: September 2007
Non-orthogonal Multiple Channel Access in Wi-Fi
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Proposed US Channelization for IEEE ah
HEW Outdoor Channel Model Discussions
160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: Authors: September 2010
Detailed Responses to “Reasons and Cures” Comments on MCS Set
11ac Explicit Sounding and Feedback
Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values
‘On’ Symbol Generation
256 QAM Mapping Date: Authors: Month Year
Single User MCS Proposal
Phase Rotations for 1MHz DUP Mode
Straw Polls and Motions on 256 QAM and BW: Optional-Mandatory Features
Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g
On TX EVM Date: Authors: September 2017 Month Year
Proposed Resolution to CID2114
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
256 QAM Mapping Date: Authors: Month Year
PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models
1MHz Dup Mode Date: Authors: Nov 2012 Month Year
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be
Transmit OOB emission Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be
Performance Analysis of Outer RS Coding Scheme
NGV PHY Performance Results
Motion on Manchester Coding
80 MHz Channelization Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Month Year doc.: IEEE y18/r0 March 2018
Presentation transcript:

Tx EVM for MCS-10 in 802.11ah Date: 2013-11-10 Authors: Nov 2013 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Nov 2013 Tx EVM for MCS-10 in 802.11ah Date: 2013-11-10 Authors: Mingguang Xu, et. Al. John Doe, Some Company

Nov 2013 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Mingguang Xu, et. Al. John Doe, Some Company

Nov 2013 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Mingguang Xu, et. Al. John Doe, Some Company

CID 2004 for 11ah D1.0 Nov 2013 Hongyuan Zhang 336.23 24.3.17.4.3 Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Nov 2013 CID 2004 for 11ah D1.0 Hongyuan Zhang 336.23 24.3.17.4.3 TBD needs to be filled up will bring proposal Revised, propose TxEVM to be -4dB for MCS10 as indicated by submission 1367r1 Mingguang Xu, et. Al. John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Nov 2013 Introduction: Tx EVM To ensure that the TX signal quality does not significantly limit the overall link performance. Tx EVM requirement for MCS-10 is currently not specified in [1]. The slopes of PER curves are consistent between different MCS’s. No fading, 1x1, 1 MHz, 256 bytes/packet, no impairments. Mingguang Xu, et. Al. John Doe, Some Company

“Criterions” for Setting Tx EVM Requirement Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Nov 2013 “Criterions” for Setting Tx EVM Requirement Impact of Tx EVM to PER should be more or less consistent between MCS’s. “Delta” between Tx EVM requirement and Rx sensitivity requirement should be similar for all MCS’s. Performance degradation due to Tx constellation error at the EVM requirement point should be relatively small (e.g., <2 dB). There is no significant incremental performance improvement on PER beyond the Tx EVM requirement point. Mingguang Xu, et. Al. John Doe, Some Company

Tx EVM Requirement for 11ah Nov 2013 Tx EVM Requirement for 11ah Previously increased ~6 dB for every 4x in QAM order. Propose -4 dB for BPSK ½ rep2 (MCS-10). A B A+B MCS bits/subcarrier Tx EVM (in dB) SNR for 10% PER (in dB) Difference, “Delta” BPSK ½ rep2 0.25 -4 -2.4 -6.4 BPSK ½ 0.5 -5 0.0 -5.0 QPSK ½ 1 -10 3.0 -7.0 QPSK ¾ 1.5 -13 6.0 16QAM ½ 2 -16 8.3 -7.7 16QAM ¾ 3 -19 12.4 -6.6 64QAM +2/3 4 -22 16.7 -5.3 64QAM ¾ 4.5 -25 18.1 -6.9 64QAM +5/6 5 -27 18.7 -8.3 256QAM ¾ 6 -30 23.5 -6.5 256QAM+5/6 6.7 -32 24.0 -8.0 6 5.4 6 5.3 Avg. -6.5 6 5.7 5 5.4 Mingguang Xu, et. Al.

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Nov 2013 PER v.s. Tx EVM The loss@EVM=-4 dB w.r.t. no constellation error is about 1.2 dB. Starting from EVM=-4 dB, the PER performance improvement of each 0.5 dB increment on Tx EVM is marginal (<0.2 dB). Mingguang Xu, et. Al. John Doe, Some Company

Nov 2013 Conclusions We studied the Tx EVM requirement for MCS-10 in 802.11ah, and suggested to specify it to be -4 dB. Mingguang Xu, et. Al.

Editorial Instruction Nov 2013 Editorial Instruction TGah Editor: In Table 24-30 on Page 336, in the second row, please fill up the “TBD” with “-4”. Mingguang Xu, et. Al.

Nov 2013 Straw Poll Do you support to specify the Tx EVM requirement for MCS-10 in 802.11ah to be -4 dB as the editor’s instruction in Slide 10? Yes No Abstain Mingguang Xu, et. Al.

Motion Move to accept the resolution of CID 2004 as below. Nov 2013 Motion Move to accept the resolution of CID 2004 as below. TGah Editor: in Table 24-30 on Page 336, in the second row, please replace the “TBD” with “-4”. Hongyuan Zhang 336.23 24.3.17.4.3 TBD needs to be filled up will bring proposal Revised, propose TxEVM to be -4dB for MCS10 as indicated by submission 1367r1 Mingguang Xu, et. Al.

Appendix (1) MCS-0: the specified requirement is -5 dB. Nov 2013 Appendix (1) MCS-0: the specified requirement is -5 dB. The loss w.r.t. no constellation error is about 1.6 dB, and the marginal gain beyond EVM=-5 dB is less than 0.2 dB. Mingguang Xu, et. Al.

Appendix (2) MCS-1: the specified requirement is -10 dB. Nov 2013 Appendix (2) MCS-1: the specified requirement is -10 dB. The loss w.r.t. no constellation error is about 1.0 dB, and the marginal gain beyond EVM=-10dB is less than 0.2 dB. Mingguang Xu, et. Al.

References Nov 2013 [1] IEEE P802.11ah™/D1.0, October 2013. Mingguang Xu, et. Al.