NPQH Final Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

Managing SEN: Monitoring and Evaluation – Gathering Evidence: Making Judgements Day 1.
Head of Learning: Job description
Performance management guidance
Performance management guidance. Performance management Part C: Appraisers An introduction to the revised Performance Management Regulations January 2011.
BA Year 2 SBT Briefing for Class Mentors Wednesday, 29 th April 2015 Ben Wye Year 2 Cohort Leader - Crewe Tel Archana Hinduja.
Week 2 Standards and evidence Building your professional persona and portfolio.
Assessing Pupils’ Progress (APP) in English Workshop: Introducing APP February
The Ofsted ITE Inspection Framework 2014 A summary.
National Vocational Qualifications in the United Kingdom Author:Richard Leach Venue: Turku, Finland Date:14 th September 2007.
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Qualifications Update: Mathematics Qualifications Update: Mathematics.
The National professional Qualification for Headship Merseyside September 2009.
Lesson observations: evaluating the quality of teaching and learning.
Action research projects This sequence may help you when planning your case study What does the data identify about this target group? What will.
Edita Trečiokienė Grundtvig 3: Grants to Participate in Adult Education Training Activities The Quality of Training Activities applied for and possible.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
PESB Standards Standard 2: Accountability and Program Improvement.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
PGCE Evaluation of Assessment Methods. Why do we assess? Diagnosis: establish entry behaviour, diagnose learning needs/difficulties. Diagnosis: establish.
New Assessment Routines: Update for Parents
Parent update meeting July 2016.
Professional Recognition and Development (PRD) Scheme
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Using evidence to review and moderate students’ progress against the Teachers’ Standards Explain that students should have provided their TP files and.
NCFE Level 1 Certificate in Health and Fitness (601/4662/X)
Southampton City Council School School Improvement Service
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Accounting: Graded Unit 2 F8KF 35
Sign Off Mentor Preparation
Assessment brief Post graduate route.
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Involving the uninvolved
Developing a Vision for Change
B.A. 4 Placement Overview (Placement 1) 4th October 2016
Our Vision Our vision is to be recognised nationally and internationally as a leader in qualification, assessment and verification.
Tips for tenderers Liz Frizi: Head of Procurement
SQA for parents Session
Victoria Morris LIZ JONES
Primary pgce mentor training
NPQonline - Final Assessment
Headteacher Briefing 18th September 2013
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Mentor training Wednesday 13th February 2013.
Vicki Stokes School of Education 02/10/17
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
Final Assessment.
Practice of Teaching Part 1
school self-evaluation and improvement toolkit
Practice of Teaching Part 1
Welcome to our Assessment and Reporting Meeting
Professional development
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Primary PE and Sport Premium
MTSA programme School Direct.
New Standard for Employer Responsiveness
Assessing Pupil Progress in Science (APP) Department CPD session Spring 2009 Slide 0.1.
Holistic Assessments.
York St John University Primary Mentor Training Spring 2019
The National Professional Qualification (NPQ) An overview
An overview of course assessment
Statutory induction briefing
Does not confer “professional” status
Statutory induction briefing for supply agencies
University of Brighton
Making it meaningful A continuous cycle to ensure improved outcomes and impact of careers encounters.
Students can fail professionally if they:
Presentation transcript:

NPQH Final Assessment

Aims of the assessment process To enable you to write and submit an account of your project/s which demonstrates your ability to act with credibility as a headteacher, demonstrating how you achieved the two tasks.

Final Assessment information NPQH assessment description and tasks overview NPQH Final Assessment Guidance Submission Form for both task 1 and 2 General submission advice Task 2 submission advice How to book your submission window All these documents are available on the Inspiring Leaders portal – NPQH/Assessment

Starting with the end in mind Final Assessment: Process and Requirements See NPQH Assessment description document Two tasks – in school and placement Draw upon research and examples that relate to the nature of your project Include evidence of your learning Include required supporting documents

Task 1 Lead change programme at whole-school level, lasting at least 2 terms, to improve pupil progress and attainment. Present the plan to the Governing board prior to implementation and gather their feedback. Submit a written account of the project to the provider for assessment, which aims to evidence the criteria indicated. This should cover the design, implementation and evaluation of the programme. Submit supporting documents/material as evidence where indicated below. Supporting evidence must be concise and directly related to the candidate’s project and corresponding assessment criterion. Not exceed a total word count of 4,000, excluding supporting documents or annexes

Task 2 – See Task 2 guidance Undertake a placement in a contrasting school (for example, by performance, pupil profile, geography etc.), lasting at least 9 working days. Research the placement school’s current and/or projected resource and capability challenges, and design an action plan to address these. Present the plan to the placement school’s governing board and gather their feedback. Submit a written account of the project to the provider for assessment, which aims to evidence the criteria indicated Submit supporting documents/material as evidence where indicated below. Supporting evidence must be concise and directly related to the candidate’s project and corresponding assessment criterion. Not exceed a total word count of 2,500, excluding supporting documents or annexes

NPQH TCE (Teaching and curriculum excellence) Ref : NPQH FA submission form Key question: How have you led teaching so that pupil progress and attainment rise across the school, taking account of groups of pupils with particular needs and teacher workload?

NPQH TCE (Teaching and curriculum excellence) Questions to aid assessment Has this participant: Analysed research into and examples of the leadership of teaching domestically? Analysed research into and examples of the leadership of teaching internationally? Provided evidence of the need for change? Carried out a project which has improved pupil progress or attainment across the school? Ensured the needs of all pupils, including those groups with particular needs are met? Checked that plans for change do not increase teacher workload?

Can I include other documents? NPQH this includes: Pupil performance data Sponsor comments Presentation recording and feedback Communications/ stakeholder engagement strategy Curriculum-led budget You may also attach other documents as appendices. Whilst these are of unlimited length, if they are too long your assessor may not have time to consider them properly.

What does my sponsor have to write? For NPQH your sponsor will need to write comments on one of the assessment criteria. Example: 3.3.2 Adapts or tailors their leadership style to lead effectively in different situations.

Presentation recording and feedback Ref: Handbook Final Assessment Guidance For NPQH task 1 you will need to upload an audio file: Present the plan to the Governing board prior to implementation, and gather their feedback.

How do I meet the standard? Ref: General submission advice You must provide enough evidence based on your project and your wider leadership, to demonstrate your competency at the level you are working at.

Starting with the end in mind Ref: How to book your submission window Final Assessment: Submitting Book a submission slot with Inspiring Leaders within 3 months of starting the programme Submit your tasks to Inspiring Leaders Tasks are assessed by an external organisation experienced qualified assessors used nationally to ensure consistency

The Assessment process Technical corrections Quality Assurance Best Fit Recording concerns Exceptional Circumstances Pass or Fail?

Any questions…?