Agenda 3:00 Introductions and ZOOM Webinar reminders 3:05 LEA Determinations: Compliance Matrix 3:55 General Information and Reminders Future Calls The monthly call topics will be on the special education website under the “Monthly TA Call” tab Please submit topics or questions for future calls on our website Calls will be held on the last Thursday of each month from 3:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. (a reminder email will be sent monthly) Webinar Reminders If you have questions during the webinar, please ask them by clicking on the question button. If you are experiencing any technical difficulties, please let us know by clicking on the chat button. You can see and hear us, but we are not able to see or hear you.

Last month we went over the Results Elements of the LEA APR Determination. We showed you how they elements were grouped into three priority areas: College Career Readiness, Academic Growth, and Achievement. The fourth priority area is Compliance. The compliance elements have not changed; however the scoring has been changed to match the scoring of the results elements, as recommended by the work group. For the Past few years the scoring was based on a scale of 2, 1, 0; this year the scoring will based on a 5 point scale: 4 , 3, 2, 1, 0 All compliance elements are weighted the same and will make up 75% of the total LEA APR Determination. Now let us look at the scoring of the Compliance Elements

Compliance Elements: Disproportionality Priority Area IV: Compliance   Score 4 Score 3 Score 2 Score 1 Score 0 None 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years Policies/Procedures Indicators 4B: Discipline There is no significant difference suspected within the LEA. The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 1 year. The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 2 year. The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 3 or more years. Inappropriate policies, procedures, and practices resulted in the significant difference in discipline. Indicators 9: Disproportionality Identification There is no disproportionate representation suspected within the LEA. Inappropriate policies, procedures, and practices resulted in the disproportionate representation in identification. For the three disproportionality indicators the scoring is based on the number of consecutive years an LEA has had to complete the self-assessment. If in the year of the APR data you were not flagged for Disproportionality Then the score is 4, one year = 3; two consecutive years = 2; three or more years = 1; and If the review of the self-assessment resulted in the identification of inappropriate policies, procedures, and practices then the score is zero Indicators 10: Disproportionality in a Specific Disability There is no disproportionate representation suspected within the LEA. The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 1 year. The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 2 year. The LEA has been required to complete the self-assessment for 3 or more years. Inappropriate policies, procedures, and practices resulted in the disproportionate representation in a specific disability.

Compliance Elements: Implementation of IDEA Priority Area IV: Compliance   Score 4 Score 3 Score 2 Score 1 Score 0   100- 95% 89-94.99% 79 – 88.99% 69 – 78.99% 0 – 68.99% Indicators 11: Child Find –Timely Evaluation The LEA meets or exceeds the State target. The LEA is .01% to 6.00% below the State target. The LEA is 6.01% to 16.00% below the State target. The LEA is 16.01% to 26.00% below the State target. The LEA more than 26.00% below the State target. Indicator 12: Part C to Part B Transition Indicator 13: Secondary The three compliance elements which focus on the implementation of IDEA are Indicator 11: Timely Evaluation, Indicator 12: Part C to B Transition, and Indicator 13, secondary transition. By law the requirement is 100% compliant; however, if you are 95% or above then we consider you in substantial compliance and will receive the full 4 points. These targets never change they will always be 100% with a substantial compliance of 95% or above. The percentages listed under each score will remain the same and will not change each year unlike many of the results elements.

Compliance Elements: Timely and Accurate Priority Area IV: Compliance   Score 4 Score 3 Score 2 Score 1 Score 0 State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Reporting The LEA reported all requested data/ documents within timelines and all were accurate. 1 Component was Late and/or Not Accurate 2 Components were Late and/or Not Accurate 3 or more Components were Late and/or Failed to Report one or more required data sets/documents. Timely and Accurate Reporting means the LEA has submitted required data sets and documents on time and the information is accurate. Besides the Cycle data, this includes required documentation/activities for all sections of ADE Special Education Unit by due dates. Cycle 4 Data, includes MySped Resource Review Cycle 7 Data, includes MySped Resource Review Monitoring - correction of non-compliance Required corrective actions for State Complaints and Due Process Hearings 1% Assessment documents APR Response Table Disproportionality Self-Assessment and/or Success Gap Rubric Fiscal Other as deemed necessary In the area of Timely & Accurate Reporting the scoring is based on the number of data sets/documents not reported on time and the data/documents are accurate. The elements that make up timely/accurate Cycle 4 Data, includes MySped Resource Review Cycle 7 Data, includes MySped Resource Review Monitoring - correction of non-compliance Required corrective actions for State Complaints and Due Process Hearings 1% Assessment documents APR Response Table Disproportionality Self-Assessment and/or Success Gap Rubric Fiscal Other as deemed necessary

Compliance Elements: General Supervision Priority Area IV: Compliance   Score 4 Score 2 Score 0   None 2 Years 3 or more Years Long-standing Noncompliance No outstanding noncompliance or special conditions imposed on Part B grant.   Has non-compliance from the past 2 years and has not demonstrated correction and/or has a special condition imposed on Part B grant. Has noncompliance from 3 or more years-ago and has not demonstrated correction and/or has had special condition imposed on Part B grant for more than 3 years. In the area of general supervision we are looking at long-standing noncompliance. The is means the LEA has not corrected findings of noncompliance and it has been ongoing for 2 or more years. In addition, a score lower than 4 can be issued if there are special conditions imposed on your Part B grant award. Now we have covered all the elements of Compliance. Let us talk about what the final scoring will look like in establishing your Results Driven Accountability score for your determination.

LEA DETERMINATION DEFINED Meets Requirements: An LEA’s 2018 Determination is Meets Requirements if the RDA rate is at least 80%, unless the ADE-SEU has imposed Special Conditions on the LEA’s last three (FFYs 2015, 2016, and 2017) IDEA Part B grant awards, and those Special Conditions are in effect at the time of the 2018 determination. Needs Assistance: An LEA’s 2018 Determination is Needs Assistance if the RDA rate is at least 60% but less than 80%. A LEA would also be in Needs Assistance if its Compliance Score is 80% or above, but the ADE-SEU has imposed Special Conditions on the LEA’s last three (FFYs 2015, 2016, and 2017) IDEA Part B grant awards, and those Special Conditions are in effect at the time of the 2018 determination. Needs Intervention: An LEA’s 2018 Determination is Needs Intervention if the RDA rate is less than 60%. Needs Substantial Intervention: The ADE-SEU did not make a determination of Needs Substantial Intervention for any LEA in 2018. There are 4 determination categories. Based on your overall Results Driven Accountability Rate or other special conditions; you will receive one of the following determinations Meets Requirements: An LEA’s 2018 Determination is Meets Requirements if the RDA rate is at least 80%, Needs Assistance: An LEA’s 2018 Determination is Needs Assistance if the RDA rate is at least 60% but less than 80%. Needs Intervention: An LEA’s 2018 Determination is Needs Intervention if the RDA rate is less than 60%. Needs Substantial Intervention: The ADE-SEU did not make a determination of Needs Substantial Intervention for any LEA in 2018.

OVERALL DETERMINATION Once the Results percent is calculated and the Compliance percent is calculated the overall determination score can be calculated For example: If an LEAs Results percentage is 68 their Results determination is NEEDS ASSISTANCE If the LEAs Compliance percentage is 88 their Compliance determination is MEETS REQUIREMENTS Results: 68% * 25% = 17% Compliance: 88% * 75% = 66% 17% + 66% = 83% RDA rate resulting in a determination of MEETS REQUIREMENTS Once the Results percent is calculated and the Compliance percent is calculated the overall determination score can be calculated For example: If an LEAs Results percentage is 68 their Results determination is NEEDS ASSISTANCE If the LEAs Compliance percentage is 88 their Compliance determination is MEETS REQUIREMENTS Remember from last month, results is only counting 25% toward the overall determination Results: 68% * 25% = 17% Compliance is comprising 75% of the determination Compliance: 88% * 75% = 66% 17% + 66% = 83% So the RDA rate of 83% results in a determination of MEETS REQUIREMENT

Updates

SPECIAL EDUCATION ADMINISTRATORS’ ACADEMY 2018 SPECIAL EDUCATION ADMINISTRATORS’ ACADEMY SEPTEMBER 13 & 14, 2018 HOT SPRINGS CONVENTION CENTER HOT SPRINGS, ARKANSAS

Recorded webinar

2018-2019 Special Education Course (Assessment) Codes For next year ONLY, grades 3-11 will take DLM literacy and math. Grades 3-10 will take DLM science. After next year, DLM will be administered in grades 3-10 for literacy, math, and science. There are no changes in course codes for students who take ACT Aspire. Tinyurl.com/18-19sped Look at pages three and four.

DLM Training: Instruction, Not Just Assessment Commissioner’s Memo LS-18-060

Science of Reading Requirements Commissioner’s Memo LF-18-090

Alternate Pathway to Graduation

Questions? Next Call: May 31, 2018