Evaluation Research and Meta-analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Childhood exposure to domestic violence predicts relationship violence: A meta-analysis Markus Kemmelmeier and Kerry Kleyman.
Advertisements

A Comparison of Early Versus Late Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically III Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and.
Statistical Analysis and Data Interpretation What is significant for the athlete, the statistician and team doctor? important Will Hopkins
Meta-analysis: summarising data for two arm trials and other simple outcome studies Steff Lewis statistician.
EVAL 6970: Meta-Analysis Vote Counting, The Sign Test, Power, Publication Bias, and Outliers Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn Spring 2011.
Significance and effect sizes What is the problem with just using p-levels to determine whether one variable has an effect on another? Don’t EVER just.
15 de Abril de A Meta-Analysis is a review in which bias has been reduced by the systematic identification, appraisal, synthesis and statistical.
Heterogeneity in Hedges. Fixed Effects Borenstein et al., 2009, pp
1 of 27 PSYC 4310/6310 Advanced Experimental Methods and Statistics © 2013, Michael Kalsher Michael J. Kalsher Department of Cognitive Science Adv. Experimental.
Overview of Meta-Analytic Data Analysis
Statistics for clinical research An introductory course.
POSTER TEMPLATES BY: Introduction Results Discussion References Study Objective(s) Methods (Continued) Specify the objective(s)
Program Evaluation. Program evaluation Methodological techniques of the social sciences social policy public welfare administration.
Data Analysis in Systematic Reviews-Meta Analysis.
The Campbell Collaborationwww.campbellcollaboration.org C2 Training: May 9 – 10, 2011 Introduction to meta-analysis.
Effect Size Calculation for Meta-Analysis Robert M. Bernard Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance Concordia University February 24, 2010 February.
RevMan for Registrars Paul Glue, Psychological Medicine What is EBM? What is EBM? Different approaches/tools Different approaches/tools Systematic reviews.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS FOR THE MATHEMATICALLY-CHALLENGED Associate Professor Phua Kai Lit School of Medicine & Health Sciences Monash University (Sunway.
META-ANALYSIS, RESEARCH SYNTHESES AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
WINKS 7 Tutorial 3 Analyzing Summary Data (Using Student’s t-test) Permission granted for use for instruction and for personal use. ©
Course: Research in Biomedicine and Health III Seminar 5: Critical assessment of evidence.
Is a meta-analysis right for me? Jaime Peters June 2014.
How to Conduct a Meta-Analysis Arindam Basu MD MPH About the Author Required Browsing.
Meta-analysis Overview
I-squared Conceptually, I-squared is the proportion of total variation due to ‘true’ differences between studies. Proportion of total variance due to.
FIGURE 3. FOREST PLOT AFTER CONTROLLING FOR NETWORK INCONSISTENCY
Analyzing Small Group Research DR. Joann Keyton
Lecture #8 Thursday, September 15, 2016 Textbook: Section 4.4
ANOVA: Analysis of Variation
Inferential Statistics
Evaluation Research and Meta-analysis
BIOSTATISTICS Qualitative variable (Categorical) DESCRIPTIVE
Lecture #24 Thursday, November 10, 2016 Textbook: 13.1 through 13.6
Do Adoptees Have Lower Self Esteem?
Brady Et Al., "sequential compression device compliance in postoperative obstetrics and gynecology patients", obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 125, no.
Data Sciences Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University
H676 Week 3 – Effect Sizes Additional week for coding?
UOG Journal Club: October 2016
ANOVA: Analysis of Variation
NURS3030H NURSING RESEARCH IN PRACTICE MODULE 7 ‘Systematic Reviews’’
Meta-analysis: Conceptual and Methodological Introduction
Power Analysis and Meta-analysis
The binomial applied: absolute and relative risks, chi-square
Journal Club Notes.
Testing for moderators
#696 Implants with Sinus Augmentation-The Merit of Bone Grafting? A Systematic Review Karim M. Fawzy El-Sayed1, 2 Dagmar E. Slot3 Shaimaa Nasr1 Samah Bahaa1.
Statistics.
Heterogeneity and sources of bias
Lecture 4: Meta-analysis
H676 Meta-Analysis Brian Flay WEEK 1 Fall 2016 Thursdays 4-6:50
Meta Analysis/Systematic Review Poster Template
Georgi Iskrov, MBA, MPH, PhD Department of Social Medicine
SA3202 Statistical Methods for Social Sciences
کارگاه کشوری آموزش نقد و داوری مقالات علمی‌
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Stat 217 – Day 28 Review Stat 217.
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis
Criticisms of Meta-Analysis
قياس المتغيرات في المنهج الكمي
Gerald Dyer, Jr., MPH October 20, 2016
Narrative Reviews Limitations: Subjectivity inherent:
Systematic review or meta-analysis
McLeod 2007.
Statistics II: An Overview of Statistics
EAST GRADE course 2019 Introduction to Meta-Analysis
Fleminger.
InferentIal StatIstIcs
Georgi Iskrov, MBA, MPH, PhD Department of Social Medicine
Meta-analysis, systematic reviews and research syntheses
Correlations and practicals
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Research and Meta-analysis

Significance and effect sizes What is the problem with just using p-levels to determine whether one variable has an effect on another? Be careful with comparisons--sample results: For boys, r (87) = .31, p = .03 For girls, r (98) = .24, p = .14 How does sample size affect effect size? Significance? Why are effect sizes important? What is the difference between statistical, practical, and clinical significance?

What should you report? 2 group comparison—treatment vs. control on anxiety symptoms 3 group comparison—positive prime vs. negative prime vs. no prime on number of problems solved 2 continuous variables—relationship between neuroticism and goal directedness 3 continuous variables—anxiety as a function of self-esteem and authoritarian parenting 2 categorical variables—relationship between answers to 2 multiple choice questions

Narrative vs. quantitative reviews When was the first meta-analysis? When was the term first used? What are the advantages of quantitative reviews? What are problems with them?

Steps to meta-analysis

1. Define your variables/question 1 df contrasts What is a contrast?

2. Decide on inclusion criteria What factors do you want to consider here?

3. Collect studies systematically Where do you find studies? File drawer problem

4. Check for publication bias Rosenthal’s fail-safe N # studies needed at p < .05= (K/2.706) (K(mean Z squared) = 2.706) Z = Z for that level of p K = number of studies in meta-analysis Funnel plot (Egger’s test) Rank correlation test for pub bias

Fig. 3. Funnel plots of 11 (subsets of) meta-analyses from 2011 and Greenwald, Poehlman, Uhlman, and Banaij (2009). Marjan Bakker et al. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2012;7:543-554 Copyright © by Association for Psychological Science

What can you do if publication bias is a problem? Trim and fill Sensitivity analysis Weight studies PET-PEESE (Figure 1; Elk et al., 2015) Bayesian approaches P-curve analysis (Figure 1; Simmons 7 Simonsohn, 2017) www.p-curve.com (detour: power pose response)

5. Calculate effect sizes If there is more than 1 effect per study, what do you do? What does the sign mean on an effect size? What are small, medium, and large effects? How can you convert from one to another? r or d? http://www.soph.uab.edu/Statgenetics/People/MBeasley/Courses/EffectSizeConversion.pdf

Families of effect sizes—d family 2 group comparisons (difference between the means) Table 1; Lakens, 2013 Cohen’s d (with various subscripts) Hedge’s g Glass’s d or delta Within vs. between-participants designs

Families of effect sizes—R family Continuous or multi-group (proportion of variability) Table 2; Lakens, 2013 η2 ηp2 ηG2 ω2 and its parts r, fisher’s z, R2, adjusted R2 difference between η2 and R2 family

Other effect sizes Nonparametric effect sizes Nonnormal data: convert z to r or d Categorical data: Rho Cramer’s V Goodman-Kruskal’s Lambda How can you increase your effect sizes? https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863/full

CIs How can you calculate confidence intervals around your effect sizes? http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2014/06/calculating-confidence-intervals-for.html https://thenewstatistics.com/itns/esci/ http://www.cem.org/effect-size-calculator

Interpretation of effect sizes Recommended for at least most important findings Benchmarks? SD units Practical or clinical significance and compare to lit PS or common language effect size U Binomial effect size display Relative risk Odds ratio Risk difference

6. Combine effect sizes When should you do fixed vs. random effects? Should you weight effect sizes, and if so, on what? How can you deal with dependent effect sizes? Hunter and Schmidt method vs. Hedges et al. method

7. Calculate confidence intervals Credibility intervals vs. confidence intervals

8. Look at heterogeneity of effect sizes Chi-square test I2 (measure based on Chi-square) Cochran’s Q Standard deviations of effect sizes Stem and leaf plot Box plot Forest plot

Forest plot

9. Look for moderators What are common moderators you might test? How do you compare moderators?

“little ‘m’ meta-analysis” Comparing and combining effect sizes on a smaller level—when might you want to do this? How would you do it? Average within-cell r’s with fisher z transforms To compare independent r’s: Z = z1-z2/sqrt ((1/n-3) + (1/n-3)) To combine independent r’s: z = z1+z2/2

Write-up Inclusion criteria, search, what effect size Which m-a tech and why Stem and leaf plots of effect sizes (and maybe mods) Forest plots Stats on variability of effect sizes, estimate of pop effect size and confidence intervals Publication bias analyses

Evaluation Research

Terms Evolutionary epistemology Evidence-based practice Systems thinking Dynamical systems approaches Evaluation research

Issues with evaluation research What questions are asked? What methods are used? What unique issues emerge?

Types of evaluation Formative Summative Needs assessment Evaluability assessment Structured conceptualization Implementation evaluation Process evaluation Summative Outcome evaluation Impact evaluation Cost-benefit analysis Secondary analysis Meta-analysis

Methods used for different ?s What is the scope of the problem? How big is the problem? How should we deliver the program? How well did we deliver it? What type of evaluation can we do? Was the program effective? What parts of the program work? Should we continue the program?

Evidence based medicine (Sackett et al.) Convert problem into question Find evidence Evaluate validity, impact, applicability Integrate patient experience and clinical judgment Review evaluation

What does the book author Mean by an “evaluation culture”? Is it a good thing?

Coming up Quantitative article review due today Next week: Presentations for proposal Formal presentations—dress nice, stand up No more than 12 minutes I’ll take notes and send to you Go through your FINAL plan for your study—background, method, expected results, and discussion We might go a little over class time