Need to Knowledge Model: A framework for achieving market Innovations through sponsored R&D Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
Advertisements

KT for TT – Ensuring Technology- based R&D matters to Stakeholders
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Principal Patent Analyst
Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone University at Buffalo/
TTO Role in University / Corporate Partnership
How to Translate Knowledge in Three States: Discovery, Invention, Innovation Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
Innovation in Universal Design “Universal integration of research, education, innovation and enterprise at DIT GrangeGorman” Joseph P. Lane, University.
Need to Knowledge Model: A framework for achieving market Innovations through sponsored R&D Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
KT for TT – Ensuring Use and Impact from Technology R&D Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University.
From Theory to Practice: Operationalizing Knowledge Translation for Successful AT Commercialization Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for.
National Institute of Standards and Technology U.S. Department of Commerce TheTechnology Innovation Program (TIP) Standard Presentation of TIP Marc G.
Best Practices in Technology Transfer Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer University at Buffalo.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT University.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer School.
NHMRC Development Grants Overall Objectives The aim of a Development Grant is to progress research to a stage where it can attract investment from.
Analytic Tools: Ensuring industry relevance for university-based R&D projects intending transfer. Joseph P. Lane & James Condron Center on Knowledge Translation.
Bridging the Evidence Gap: Level Of Knowledge Use Survey - LOKUS as a Validated Instrument Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology.
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for.
The Case for Industry Leadership in STI Policy Implementation. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Technology Transfer Principles: Methods, Knowledge States and Value Systems Underlying Successful Technological Innovation Joseph P. Lane, Director Center.
Evidence-based Management of R&D Projects Intending Market Deployment Joseph P. Lane, Director Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Balancing Objectives and Needs of Industry and Academia: the Role of Government Presentation by Mary Cryan Meeting of National Councils for S&T Policy.
Stages of Research and Development
Fostering Valorisation of Publicly Funded Research Dr Pat Frain
Technology Transfer Office
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Stephen Bauer NIDILRR Program Officer
What is €5 billion worth? Magda Gunn, IMI Scientific Project Manager.
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Change Agents Why your Transformational IT Initiative Will Fail Without Them Terri Campbell Sr. Director of Change Leadership.
Where do Market Innovations come from? Not the Stork!
From Theory to Practice: Operationalizing Knowledge Translation for Successful AT Commercialization Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
KT for AT: Knowledge Translation Tools for R&D Projects
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
The Social Model for A/T Technology Transfer – AAATE 2010 “From Problem Identification to Social Validation: An Operational Model” Joseph P. Lane,
Bridging the Deliverable Gap: Improving Government’s approach to innovation intending social benefit. Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Translating New Knowledge from Technology Based Research Projects: an End-of-Grant Intervention Evaluation Study. Rationale and Methods Vathsala I. Stone.
Managing & Communicating Knowledge in Three States
Joseph P. Lane, University at Buffalo
Expanding Product Accessibility with Primary Market Research Techniques Jennifer L Flagg Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, University.
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
Tools for Technical, Business & Consumer Analysis in AT Product Development: Expanding the Need to Knowledge Model Joseph P. Lane, Center on KT4TT.
Joseph P. Lane & James Condron
Disseminating, Tracking and Evaluating New Knowledge in P&O
Industry – The missing link between S&T Policy and Societal Benefit.
Three States of Knowledge in Technological Innovation
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer (KT4TT)
The Case for Industry Leadership in STI Policy Implementation.
AEA Annual Meeting , Nov , 2009 Achieving Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer: Implications for Evaluation Presenter: Vathsala I. Stone.
RESNA 2018 Annual Conference
Knowledge Translation Across RERC Activities
Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
Reconciling Government Policies and Programs with Public Expectations: The Case of Innovation in AT Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation.
Knowledge Utility results from Rigor in Methods & Relevance in Content
The Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model: Orienting Scholar “Technology Grantees” to Best Practices in Transfer & Commercialization Joseph P. Lane, Director.
EC Strategy, Globalization, and SMEs
Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer
COMMERCILIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLANGES
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
BUFFALO FUND: ACCELERATOR Full Proposal Presentation
Minnesota State University, Mankato
What is your impact pathway?
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

Need to Knowledge Model: A framework for achieving market Innovations through sponsored R&D Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, Center on Technology Transfer School of Public Health & Health Professions University at Buffalo (SUNY), USA Funded by NIDRR, US Department of Education, PR# H133A060028

NtK Model Utility Clarifies mechanisms and processes underlying technology-based Innovation, by integrating academic & industry literature. Establishes linkages between three distinct methods and their respective knowledge outputs. Offers structure to sponsors/grantees for program/project planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation.

Recurring Themes Science, Engineering, Industry. Research, Development, Production. Discovery, Technology, Product. Know what, Know how, Know why. Long term, Medium term, Short Term. Conceptual, Prototype, Commercial. Translation, Transfer, Transaction. Discovery, Invention, Innovation.

Falcon Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2 "It is a marvelous research and development exercise, we've learned a lot about hypersonic speeds, et cetera. But I just don't see the practicality in it." Lt. General Tom McInerney

Focus of Need to Knowledge Model The NtK Model is relevant to government sponsors and grantees conducting Research & Development projects which are expected to create beneficial socio-economic impacts in short-term through technology-based Innovations. The NtK Model is not relevant to government sponsors or grantees conducting basic or inquiry-driven “R&D” projects, which have no explicit intent to generate socio- economic impacts, nor any expectations for application in any specific field or in any defined timeframe.

“Innovation” implies Utility Calls for public investment in technology- based Innovations set 3 expectations: 1. New/improved devices/services with EoS that contribute to societal Quality of Life. 2. Sufficient ROI through sales to sustain company, pay taxes and compete globally. 3. Benefits realized in short-term (5–10 yrs). Innovation’s Context is Commerce.

Market Innovation = Socio-Economic Impact

Need to Knowledge (NtK) Model Orientation – Actors in innovation process “need to know” the problem, the decision makers, the appropriate methods, and their respective roles in advancing toward the goal of socio-economic impacts. Integration – Product Development Managers Association (PDMA) New Product Development practices for implementation; with the Canadian Institutes of Health (CIHR) Knowledge to Action Model for dissemination. Validation – Supporting evidence of over 1,000 excerpts drawn from a scoping review of relevant academic and industry literature published in past 25 years.

NtK Model

schematic

Go to NtK Model http://kt4tt.buffalo.edu/knowledgebase/model.php

Discussion of NtK Model

NtK Applications in Enterprise Ireland?

NtK Model Assumptions Socio-economic impacts start with a validated need, recognized by stakeholders, addressed through delivery of innovations via market mechanisms. Industry is customer for R&D outputs due to ability to design & deploy market innovations in short term. Three different methods (R/D/P) create knowledge outputs in three different states (discovery, invention, innovation), each with unique value. Decision to adopt/implement knowledge rests with recipient stakeholders not with the producers.

NtK Model in Use Technology Grantees (actual): Organizations (actual): Structure proposal content. Plan Tech Transfer / Commercialization. Organizations (actual): PDMA’s “The Source”; Tech Transfer Tactics; ATIA. DoEd, NIH, NSF, NIST; CIHR; EU Framework (Cardiac). Program Sponsors (potential): Frame RFP; Assess proposals; Monitor progress; Collect outcome/impact evidence.

EI follows many paths to Innovation Basic (Mode 1) vs. Applied (Mode 2) Research – Moot issue. Supply Push – Solutions in search of problems. Demand Pull – Academia serving Industry as customer. Corporate Collaboration – Partnerships for progress can enrich all.

Demand Pull/Collaboration Competence Centers & Industry-led Research Network Programme (ILRP) Targeted technology-based efforts to direct Research towards Development in the context of Corporate needs = NtK Model. Leverages publicly supported expertise and infrastructure – Domestic constraint? Q/A on Faculty contributions (FTE)? Leverage R&D outputs into non-targeted applications via translation/transfer?

Industry Needs Fundamental discoveries and Prototype inventions from Academia for: Tools, Processes and Products/Services. Building knowledge base is necessary but not sufficient support for Industry. Absorptive Capacity vs Knowledge Absorbability Valley of Death vs. Darwinian Sea – critical market validation beyond technical proof.

Milestones inside the Black Box of Innovation 19

Milestones inside the Black Box of Innovation (cont.) Evidence Milestones Research Discovery Development Invention Product Innovation Claim/Protect Intellectual Property Copyright (automatic) Invention Disclosure/ Patent Application Patent Family/Fencing Continuous Improvement External Quality Examination Peer Review of method rigor and contribution USPTO examines claimed novelty and feasibility Government certification or Industry standard External Quality Verification Manuscript accepted/ In press Patent issued Device/Service approved Output Disclosure & Dissemination Discovery disclosed in Journal paper by external publisher Invention disclosed in Patent issues by U.S. Government Innovation disclosed in press release by Manufacturer

Milestones inside the Black Box of Innovation (cont.) Evidence Milestones Research Discovery Development Invention Production Innovation Stakeholder Awareness (STO1) Subscriber base, web hits, queries IP Office inquiries, hits on disclosure Press releases, web hits, industry chatter Stakeholder Interest (STO2) Letters to editor, email queries Request for package confidentiality forms Vendor, customer, distributor queries Stakeholder Adoption (STO3) Author citation, quotations, plagiary Negotiations for sale or lease, emulation Advanced orders, licenses, corporate espionage Intermediate Outcome – Use by Stakeholder Attributions and citations in literature, or plagiarism IP transferred via license or practiced illegally via infringement Innovation purchased & promoted in marketplace, or reverse engineered Establish Merit Acclaim, Promotion, Invitations, Rebuttals Related Collaborations and new funding Ramp-up, Spin-off products, Competition Establish Worth Textbook references, International honors License royalties, sponsors, partners Sales revenues, ROI, market share, efficacy Establish Impact Advance state of science within scholarly discipline Advance state of art for field of engineering application Advance state of Industry & Societal Quality of Life

R and D paths distant from desired Impacts Milestones Research Development Production Identify Opportunity Knowledge Gap in Literature Supply Push or Demand Pull Project Output Journal Publication Patent Issued Stakeholder Outcome Discovery Use & Citation Practice/License Claim Impact Societal QoL & Industry Economic Stature

Formula for S&T = Innovation Identify and scope problem/solution in context of stakeholders in marketplace. Scientific Research → Conceptual Discovery [translate] Engineering Development → Prototype Invention [transfer] Industry Production → Commercial Product [transact]. Support Industry application of R & D knowledge outputs; Deploy in market to achieve Impact. UD = Design for more = Market Broadening.

U.S. Department of Education. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This is a presentation of the Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer, which is funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education, under grant #H133A080050. The opinions contained in this presentation are those of the grantee and do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education.