Ethics in Research and International Cooperation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ethical standards in biomedical research: the acquis and projects of the Council of Europe Laurence Lwoff Bioethics Division Council of Europe
Advertisements

4 th Meeting of the EC International Dialogue on Bioethics Copenhagen, June 19 th, 2012 Large research and medical databases in clinical and research multi-centred.
Respect for participants Dr Enoka Corea. maintaining the privacy of the participant by ensuring confidentiality ensuring that participants may withdraw.
Post Research Benefits Mandika Wijeyaratne MS, MD, FRCS Dept. of Surgery, Colombo.
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
Information Sharing 1. Overview Inquiries into sexual violence incidents are extremely sensitive. Collecting and sharing information on GBV can be dangerous,
Human Research and Ethics Dr Michèle de Courcy Chair, Faculty of Education HEAG University of Melbourne.
ETHICAL GUIDELINES IN THE CONDUCT OF HEALTH RESEARCH Michael Jhon M. Tamayao, M.Phil. SEMINAR WORKSHOP ON HEALTH RESEARCH Cagayan State University.
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
Integrating Ethics in EU Research
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Legal and ethical issues EHES Training Material. Definition of “legislation” and “ethics” and their relationship Legislation A law or legal regulation.
Human Subject Research Ethics
Good Clinical Practice GCP
What Does the Right to Health Mean from a Human Rights Perspective?
The European Research Council
Ethics in projects involving nanomaterials Ms. Timea Balogh Ethics Sector DG Research and Innovation European Commission.
Clinical Research Conference 2012 Legal, Ethical, and Social Dimensions of Clinical Research Takis Vidalis, Ph. D., Hellenic National Bioethics Commission.
What and Why HUMAN SUBJECTS.  Science – explanation and prediction  What is the purpose of those explanations and predictions?  Science as a social.
Workshop on Health Examination Surveys (HES) Legal and ethical issues Susanna Conti, M. Kanieff, G. Rago Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) (National Public.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
A S Nanivadekar Introduction to GCP. A S Nanivadekar Outline Definition and scope Definition and scope Purpose of clinical research Purpose of clinical.
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
Transnational Studies IRB’s evaluation of a researcher’s plan for complying with local laws and customs when conducting transnational research.
Refugee reception in Quebec and health care National Resettlement Assistance Program Conference Vancouver, February 2007.
European Standards on Confidentiality and Privacy in Healthcare Dr Colin M Harper Division of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Queen’s University.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH ETHICS IN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
The Global Health Network Marijke Geldenhuys 19 September 2014 Adhering to the GCP Principles.. what does that even mean?
Research Ethics Board (REB)
Ethics: The Challenges in International Research Prof Wendy Moyle, Deputy Director RCCCPI, Griffith University Asia-Pacific Research Symposium, Gold Coast.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
European Standards on Confidentiality and Privacy in Healthcare Dr Colin M Harper Division of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Queen’s University.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Other important considerations for RECs Retha Britz.
Chapter 5 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Describing ethical competences - caveats turning ethical principles into competences is a challenge: nonetheless competences have been described for some.
Identifying current and potential ethical challenges and Dilemmas in HIV prevention Research Ethics in clinical research: challenges linked.
Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning Chapter 6 Ethical Considerations in Experimental Research.
Thorny Issues in HIV Vaccine Trials Saul Walker Policy Advisor IAVI.
ETHICAL ISSUES AND INFORMED CONSENT Juan M. Lozano, MD, MSc Department of Paediatrics and Clinical Epidemiology Unit School of Medicine, Javeriana University.
Elements of Ethical Review of Study Documents Dr.C.H.Shashindran Director-Professor & Head Department of Pharmacology JIPMER.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
Horizon 2020 Ian Devine European Advisor – UK Research Office University of Manchester, 11 September 2014.
Chapter 2: Ethical Issues in Program Evaluation. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) Federal mandate for IRBs –Concern during 1970s about unethical research.
Ethical Code of IMAGINE Project Roel Jongeneel (LEI WageningenUR & Wageningen University) Imagine project meeting Wageningen team 29 September 2015, Radix.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Dr. Sophia Kisting Director, ILO Programme on HIV and AIDS and the world of work Joint ILO and WHO guidelines on Health Services and HIV/AIDS.
A proposed process for participatory decision on standards of care Daniel Tarantola, M.D., The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia IAS Conference,
Tanzania, August 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Bioequivalence dossier requirements for the prequalification project WHO Training Workshop.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Monitoring Practices
National Food Control Systems
Criteria for Assessing MHPSS Proposals Submitted through the CAP, CERF and HRF Funding Mechanisms to the Protection Cluster.
Patricia M. Alt, Ph.D. Dept. of Health Science Towson University
Research on Populations Prone to Being Vulnerable
ICH-GCP Avinash Kondawar M. Pharm Lead CRA
The International Plant Protection Convention
Ethics Review and the FP7 Ethics Framework
Research Ethics George Masterton.
Oman Experience on Telecommunications Emergency Plan
Gem Complete Health Services
BWHS Science Research Project Guidelines for
Role of the Council of Europe - International Partner Organisation Justice Programme Prague, 20 March 2019 Criminal Law Cooperation Unit Action against.
Draft revision of ISPM 6: National surveillance systems ( )
Role of the Council of Europe - International Partner Organisation Justice Programme Prague, 20 March 2019 Criminal Law Cooperation Unit Action against.
Community Engagement and Participation
Presentation transcript:

Ethics in Research and International Cooperation Dany Hilmanto

Developing Countries Continuous(ongoing) Emerging Economy Countries Major Problem Ethic problems in research project

Main problem : Vulnerability of the people in the country 1. Participant Affect the ability to give Informed Consent (Participation to a Study without Prejudice/PSP) • Right to deny participation in study research • Lack of access to healthcare services • Low level of education • Limited Knowledge 2. Research Team/Local Ethic Commitee: • Study design /research methodologies : difficult to do (from ethic view) • Conflict of interest improve the local research infrastructure

Fundamental Ethical Considerations 1. Be responsive to the needs of the country where research is carried out  added value for the health  welfare of the intended participants/community/ country 2. Scientific Value 3. Abide by the relevant international guidelines.

Specific Issues Related to Ethical Review Process 1. Sponsors &Researchers  must comply with the relevant EU/ national legislation (Declaration of Helsinki) & Host and Funding countries 2. Benefit Provide Benefit for : Stakeholders Participant Community Local Researcher Local Health System Impact

Vulnerable specific attention To ensure Informed Consent understanding 3. Healthy Volunteers Vulnerable specific attention To ensure Informed Consent understanding To ensure their safety To inform risk and benefit completely during informed consent 4. Standard of Care Declaration of Helsinki (Revision) “ The benefits, risks, burdens and effectiveness of a new intervention must be tested against those of the best current proven intervention” Standard of care provided to the research participants comply with the relevant international rules & recommendations

5. Ethical review process Ethical Review Commitee (ERCs) must be identified in the submitted document International Guideline : require approval by two ERCs Local ( where the study is being held) Sponsorship Country 6. Informed consent / Assent Developing Countries Environment & Culture factor involve other community figures and/or family members Will not face any risk that relates to their refusal to participate in the planned study

7. Data Protection and Privacy The research must describe in detail how, for how long and by whom study data will be handled, protected, stored Cross-country data transmission between countries Material Transfer Agreement (MTA)/Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (recommended) 8. Animal Welfare  Research projects must comply with the applicable EU/national legislation governing animal experimentation  To building of capacity (e.g. in terms of training on animal experiments and/or facilities).

Thank you for your cooperation