2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Advertisements

Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Justin Johnson.
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
 Restrictions ◦ 4 cycle ◦ Less than 610cc ◦ Runs on gas or ethenol  4 cycles  Intake  Compression  Power  Exhaust
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Club Iowa State University 2015 SAE International Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2014 Polaris Indy ® 800 SP.
University of Minnesota – Duluth Design Presentation 2006 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of New Hampshire Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2006.
Eric Buddrius Amanda Bolland Ian Lootens Greg Hilbert STEALTH CAT’S.
U NIVERSITY O F W ATERLOO T EAM E CO -S NOW. T EAM B ACKGROUND Team Eco-Snow is a student organization at the University of Waterloo The project is managed.
1 Presenters: Ozzie Goodman Zak Parker. Design Objectives  Create Efficient Snowmobile Fueled by 16%-32% Isobutanol  Emissions Reductions  Noise 
Page 1 5th meeting of GRB Informal Group ‘ASEP’ Potentials of exhaust systems with valves Filip Dörge.
Design Intent  Improve upon the Best Available Technology (BAT) standard of the power sports industry to enhance fuel efficiency while reducing emissions.
North Dakota State University Ross Larson Justin Omdalen.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
2006 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Matt Prusak - Team Leader Wes Barrett – Vice President.
Presented By Dillon Savage & Crystal Green UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO TWO-STROKE WITH DIRECT INJECTION AND SOUND REDUCTION.
University Of Maine Clean Snowmobile The Rock!. Introduction Maine – New England Snowmobiling! The Economic Impact –3000 full time equivalent jobs* –Jobs.
Kettering University Clean Snowmobile Challenge March 23 rd – April 1 st, 2001 Presented by: Kyle Schwulst and Andrew Stahr.
University of Wisconsin Madison Presented by: Eric Schroeder Adam Schumacher 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation.
2005 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Greg Davis David Meyer Advisor: Dr. Bernhard Bettig Incorporation of a High Performance, Four-Cylinder, Four-Stroke.
2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Rich Stueber Pryce Nutting.
Kettering University Presenters: Chad Swartz John Stimpson.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Joe Lofgren Brandon Salaba Kyle Schroer Kyle Levanen Dylan Dahlheimer UMD University.
Direct Injection Reduced Emissions Improved Efficiency Presented By: Andrew Findlay Russell Schiermeier.
University of Minnesota Duluth 2015 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Dylan Dahlheimer Ryan Schefers Brenden Bungert Mark Boeckmann UMD University.
2015 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy  Develop a platform that meets competition objectives while providing a significant design challenge.
Michigan Technological University Bill GieldaMax Farrell Development and Implementation of Flex Fuel Technology of a 2014 Yamaha Phazer 500.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2014 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
2006 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Team Members: Steve Battaglia, Brian Belmont, Dan Bughbee, Kevin Gastle Mike Ide, Kelly McRory, Eric Peckham, Dan Sweeney,
Minnesota State University Mankato Dylan Brandt, Nick Perkins, Abdulsalam Hamud, Wayne Minnichsoffer, Andrew Pickle.
Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2005 Minnesota State University, Mankato.
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Competition Presented by: Pryce McDaniel, Josh McCoy, Mike Waloch 3/7/16.
Development of a Flexible Fueled Snowmobile for the 2016 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of Minnesota Clean Snowmobile Team. Overview Our Team Goals Design Objectives Development Process Current Snowmobile.
2016 University of Waterloo Clean Snowmobile. Philosophy ●Embrace design challenges ●Engage students and public through originality ●Open and safe learning.
University of Waterloo 2014 Clean Snowmobile. Strategy Four-stroke engine Weber MPE 750 Turbo (2 cyl) Lightweight cross-country chassis Better control.
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Club Iowa State University 2016 Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
Jeff Robinson Eric Gleich
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
Team Members Jacob Schofield - President Nels Eide – Driveline / Testing Mark Boeckmann - Engine Keith Propson – Sound / Exhaust.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2017 Clean Snowmobile Team
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Clarkson University Electric Knights E54
Re-Engineering a 2015 Polaris Indy
Presented By Ian Sullivan
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
St. Cloud State University Slick Cylinders
Iowa State Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Iowa State University Design Presentation
Clarkson Winter Knights
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
2018 IC Design Presentation
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
Overview Project Management Base Sled Selection Engine Management
Who We Are Samuel Wick – President Blake Thurnbeck – Engine Packaging
2018 North Dakota State University Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities
2019 SAE CLEAN SNOWMOBILE CHALLENGE DESIGN PRESENTATION
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Iowa State University Clean Snowmobile Challenge
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
University at Buffalo SAE Clean Snowmobile Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Last Year’s Foundation
Presentation transcript:

2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation Ferris State Clean Snowmobile 2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Design Presentation

Overview Team Goals Design Process Fuel Management Muffler Catalytic Converter Other Modifications MSRP

Team Goals Qualify for CSC 2018 Complete All Events Prove Reliability Improve Noise Quality Reduce Emissions Maintain Rider Experience Learn from Mistakes

Design Process 2017 SAE CSC Visit Polaris Sled Donation Formation of Project Groups Design and Simulations Fabrication Testing 2018 SAE CSC

Fuel Management Ethanol Sensor Engine Tuning

Fuel Management Strategy Lean AFR Targets 1.05 for Efficiency Too Lean Causes Knock Engine Enters Limp Mode 1.05 for Efficiency 1.2-1.3 for Emissions Unrealistic for a 2-Stroke Much More Research Needs to be Done

Lambda (Assuming Stock Map at Pure Stoich) Fuel Management Lambda (Assuming Stock Map at Pure Stoich)   Throttle Position (%) 2 5 10 15 20 40 60 80 100 Engine RPM 500 1.00 750 1000 1250 1.15 0.97 0.94 0.91 1500 0.88 1750 1.09 0.85 2000 2250 2500 2750 1.12 3000 3250 3500 3750 1.06 4000 4250 4500 4750 5000 5250 5500 5750 6000 6250 6500 6750 7000 7250 7500 7750 8000 8250 8500 8750 9000 9250 9500 Mode 1 Very Poor Limp Mode Mode 2 Good Mode 3 Mode 4 Mode 5 Poor

Custom Muffler Shell Development Internal Geometry Original volume conservation with addition of catalyst Ease of fabrication Internal Geometry Designs simulated to predict best Insertion Loss

Simulations Attenuation Targets High Frequencies Above 500 Hz Unpleasant to Human Ear Perforate Location on Pipes Optimized for High Frequencies

Final Design Sound Cancelling Geometry Perforated Baffle Perforated Pipe 3.56 dBA Reduction on Average Above 500 Hz

Emissions Treatment Rationale Design Considerations Cost Effective Feasibility Design Considerations Space Constraints and Heat Dissipates Heat Quickly Durable Against Mechanical Vibrations Backpressure Low Cell Density Emissions

Stock and Custom Flow Comparison Flow characteristics were a primary consideration so that engine performance and operation were not drastically effected

Simulated Backpressure Stock: 95.1 kg/hr New System: 86.1 kg/hr

Emissions Average Percent Difference: 92.2% decrease in HC, 87.0% decrease in NO, 58.4% increase in CO₂ , and a 61.6% decrease in O₂

Estimated including hourly wage of welder MSRP Component Cost Comments Stock Sled $13,999 Muffler $1,200 Estimated including hourly wage of welder Catalyst $97.71 Ethanol Sensor $349 Traction Studs $228 Runners $60 Resonator Removal (-703.99) PN: 1262701 Total 15,299.72

Lessons Learned AFR is too Lean Improve Catalyst Insulation Method Run Closer to Stoich Improve Catalyst Insulation Method Tune Suspension for Improved Handling Use Emissions Data to Improve Catalyst Substrate Perform Engine Dyno Tests Before Competition

College of Engineering and Computing Technology Dean’s Office Thank You Sponsors College of Engineering and Computing Technology Dean’s Office

2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile MSRP Presentation Ferris State Clean Snowmobile 2018 SAE Clean Snowmobile MSRP Presentation

Overview Stock Sled Custom Muffler Catalytic Converter Ethanol Sensor Traction Control Deleted Parts

Stock Sled 2017 Polaris 800 Switchback Assault 144 $13,999

Muffler Wholesale Cost Retail Cost 304 Stainless Steel and Heat Wrap $300 Welding Man-Hours $500 Retail Cost $800 x 1.5 Multiplier $1200

Catalyst MagnaFlow Universal Spun Catalyst Metallic Substrate 200 CPI $97.71

Ethanol Sensor Zeitronix ECA-2 Heads-up Display $349

Traction Control Studs $228 Runners $60

Stock Resonator Removal AXYS Resonator (-$703.99) PN: 1262701

Estimated including hourly wage of welder Total Component Cost Comments Stock Sled $13,999 Muffler $1,200 Estimated including hourly wage of welder Catalyst $97.71 Ethanol Sensor $349 Traction Studs $228 Runners $60 Resonator Removal (-703.99) PN: 1262701 Total 15,299.72

Questions?