Low Power and High Speed Multi Threshold Voltage Interface Circuits

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
October 2nd Karthik’s MS Defense DVF4: A Dual Vth Feedback Type 4-Transistor Level Converter Master’s Defense Karthik Naishathrala Jayaraman Department.
Advertisements

A Robust, Fast Pulsed Flip- Flop Design By: Arunprasad Venkatraman Rajesh Garg Sunil Khatri Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A.
1 A Single-supply True Voltage Level Shifter Rajesh Garg Gagandeep Mallarapu Sunil P. Khatri Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M.
Low-voltage techniques Mohammad Sharifkhani. Reading Text Book I, Chapter 4 Text Book II, Section 11.7.
Threshold Voltage Assignment to Supply Voltage Islands in Core- based System-on-a-Chip Designs Project Proposal: Gall Gotfried Steven Beigelmacher 02/09/05.
DC/DC Converter with Transparent Electronics for application on Photovoltaic Panels Romano Torres 19th July Supervisor: Vitor Grade Tavares Second.
Effects of Variation on Emerging Devices for Use in SRAM
Design of Robust, Energy-Efficient Full Adders for Deep-Submicrometer Design Using Hybrid-CMOS Logic Style Sumeer Goel, Ashok Kumar, and Magdy A. Bayoumi.
32-BIT ADDER FOR LOW VOLTAGE OPERATION WITH LEVEL CONVERTERS PRIYADHARSHINI S.
Power Reduction for FPGA using Multiple Vdd/Vth
POWER-DRIVEN MAPPING K-LUT-BASED FPGA CIRCUITS I. Bucur, N. Cupcea, C. Stefanescu, A. Surpateanu Computer Science and Engineering Department, University.
XOR-XNOR gates are investigated in this article, Design Methodologies for High-Performance Noise- Tolerant XOR–XNOR Circuits with Power, Area and Time.
THE INVERTERS. DIGITAL GATES Fundamental Parameters l Functionality l Reliability, Robustness l Area l Performance »Speed (delay) »Power Consumption »Energy.
MICAS Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) AID–EMC: Low Emission Digital Circuit Design Junfeng Zhou Wim Dehaene Update of the “Digital EMC project”
MICAS Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) Design-In for EMC on digital circuit October 27th, 2005 AID–EMC: Low Emission Digital Circuit Design.
Low Power – High Speed MCML Circuits (II)
XIAOYU HU AANCHAL GUPTA Multi Threshold Technique for High Speed and Low Power Consumption CMOS Circuits.
Minimum Energy Sub-Threshold CMOS Operation Given Yield Constraints Max Dreo Vincent Luu Julian Warchall.
Impact of Process Variation on Input Referred Current Offset in Current Sense Amplifiers Riya Shergill Meenakshi Sekhar.
Leakage reduction techniques Three major leakage current components 1. Gate leakage ; ~ Vdd 4 2. Subthreshold ; ~ Vdd 3 3. P/N junction.
Inverter Chapter 5 The Inverter April 10, Inverter Objective of This Chapter  Use Inverter to know basic CMOS Circuits Operations  Watch for performance.
Design and Analysis of A Novel 8T SRAM Cell December 14, 2010 Department of Microelectronic Engineering & Centre for Efficiency Oriented Languages University.
Pipelined ADC We propose two variants: low power and reliability optimized A. Gumenyuk, V. Shunkov, Y. Bocharov, A. Simakov.
M. Atef, Hong Chen, and H. Zimmermann Vienna University of Technology
High Gain Transimpedance Amplifier with Current Mirror Load By: Mohamed Atef Electrical Engineering Department Assiut University Assiut, Egypt.
Adiabatic Technique for Energy Efficient Logic Circuits Design
Yanqing Zhang University of Virginia On Clock Network Design for Sub- threshold Circuitry 1.
UNIT- II Rectifiers and Filters. Basic Rectifier setup, half wave rectifier, full wave rectifier, bridge rectifier, derivations of characteristics of.
Piero Belforte, HDT-CSELT: TECHNIQUES DE MODELISATION POUR LES COMPOSANTS ACTIFS E. Leroux, R. Ene F. Maggioni CEM COMPO 99 - TOULOUSE - 14, 15 Janvier 1999.
Logic Families.
YASHWANT SINGH, D. BOOLCHANDANI
Recall Last Lecture Biasing of BJT Applications of BJT
AIDA design review 31 July 2008 Davide Braga Steve Thomas
Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
THE CMOS INVERTER.
Seminar On Bicmos Technology
IV UNIT : GATE LEVEL DESIGN
Rectifiers and Filters
Alireza Shafaei, Shuang Chen, Yanzhi Wang, and Massoud Pedram
OPS - Energy Harvesting
Estimate power saving by clock slowdown for s5378 in 180nm and 32nm CMOS Chao Han ELEC 6270.
LOW-POWER COMPARATOR DESIGN BASED ON CMOS DYNAMIC LOGIC CIRCUIT
EE141 Chapter 5 The Inverter April 10, 2003.
EI205 Lecture 15 Dianguang Ma Fall 2008.
A KICK-BACK REDUCED COMPARATOR FOR A 4-6-BIT 3-GS/S FLASH ADC
Ali Fard M¨alardalen University, Dept
Downsizing Semiconductor Device (MOSFET)
Reading: Hambley Ch. 7; Rabaey et al. Sec. 5.2
ITC 2016 PO 16: Testing Yield Improvement by Optimizing the Impedance of Power Delivery Network on DIB Jintao Shi Zaiman Chen.
EE201C Modeling of VLSI Circuits and Systems Final Project
Analytical Delay and Variation Modeling for Subthreshold Circuits
Analytical Delay and Variation Modeling for Subthreshold Circuits
M.S. Thesis Defense Murali Dharan Advisor: Dr. Vishwani D. Agrawal
COMBINATIONAL LOGIC.
EE201C Modeling of VLSI Circuits and Systems Final Project
CSV881: Low-Power Design Multicore Design for Low Power
Downsizing Semiconductor Device (MOSFET)
ELEC 6970: Low Power Design Class Project By: Sachin Dhingra
Byong Wu “Bernard” Chong Dec. 11, 2008
Proposed Circuit. Proposed Circuit Notes Vo+ and Vo- should never be at a higher voltage than VDD This means that both devices must be powered on while.
Recall Last Lecture The MOSFET has only one current, ID
University of Colorado at Boulder
Combinational Circuit Design
Energy Efficient Power Distribution on Many-Core SoC
Day 18: October 20, 2010 Ratioed Logic Pass Transistor Logic
Characterization of C2MOS Flip-Flop in Sub-Threshold Region
CP-406 VLSI System Design CMOS Transistor Theory
Thermal Modeling for Modern VLSI Circuits
COMBINATIONAL LOGIC - 2.
Propagation Delay.
Presentation transcript:

Low Power and High Speed Multi Threshold Voltage Interface Circuits By Sherif A. Tawfik and Volkan Kursun Presented by Ramasamy Ethiraj

Contents Introduction Standard Feedback-Based Level Converters Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converters Delay and Power consumption of level Converters - Comparison of level converters - The performance of level converters under Supply Voltage and Process Parameter Variations - Multi Vth-CMOS Technology CONCLUSION

Introduction Scaling the supply voltage to reduce the power Lower supply will degrade the speed Multi-VDD Techniques and Conventional Level converters are introduced. Conventional Level converters will introduce DC current and feedback circuit (hence slow response) Multi-Vth Level converters will eliminate DC current and Feedback circuit.

Standard Level Converters 1 (LC1) VDDL is directly connected to M3 & M4 – DC path. So high power Feedback circuit – more delay. M1 & M2 should be large, because VDDL is directly connected. Result in large capacitance and area

Standard Level Converters 2 (LC2) VDDL is not directly connected to PMOS – still some DC current Feedback circuit – more delay. More device count- more delay and power M2 should be large, because VDDL is directly connected. Result in large capacitance and area

Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converter1 (PC1) Vth-M2 should be more negative than VDDL –VDDH to avoid DC current No feedback circuit – less delay. less device count- less delay, area and power Smaller transistor sizes.

Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converter2 (PC2) Vth-M2 should be more negative than VDDL –VDDH to avoid DC current Multi Vth is used for M3. Lowest delay compare to other converters No feedback circuit – less delay. Smaller transistor sizes.

Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converter2 (PC2) Vth-M2 should be more negative than VDDL –VDDH to avoid DC current M3,M4,C is removed for lower VDDL No feedback circuit – less delay. Smaller transistor sizes.

Simulation Setup 0.18um technology VDDH = 1.8V Simulated for different VDDL : 0.5, 1 and 1.2V Wn = Wmin, Wp = 2.5Wn Delay is measured between input of ID and Node2 Power consumption measured for entire setup

Optimum Delay and Power measurements

Normalized to LC2

The performance of level converters under Supply Voltage and Process Parameter Variations

Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs. PC2 for Power optimized circuit (VDDL = 1.2V)

Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs. PC1 for Power optimized circuit (VDDL = 1V)

Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs. PC1 for Power optimized circuit (VDDL = 0.5V)

Vth-M2 vs. Power and Delay

Conclusions • Multi-Vth level converters has up to 78% less delay compare to standard level converters 70% less power consumption Less Device count and size – minimum Area Wide range of threshold voltages High speed and low power.

Thank You