Colorado Superintendents’ Modernized School Finance Formula

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From Districts To Schools: The Distribution Of Resources Across Schools In Big City School Districts Leanna Stiefel New York University Ross Rubenstein.
Advertisements

1 MFP 101 Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula FY
1 Governor’s Budget Proposal. Governor’s Budget Governor declares that deficit is erased Second budget in a decade without a projected deficit.
Senate Bill 16 Overview October  Adequacy—provides a level of funding sufficient for a high quality education.  Simplicity—provides districts.
State Superintendent Evers Fair Funding for our Future Plan For more details visit: Fairfundingforourfuture.org.
FAIR EDUCATION FUNDING: Recommendations of the Education Finance Working Group Tom Melcher Schools for Equity in Education Meeting November 30, 2012.
School Finance Partnership Beyond the Base: Adjusting for Unique District and Student Needs Mary Wickersham, Colorado Children’s Campaign.
Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How do we know if they learned it? School and Educator.
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED.
Initial Proposed Changes to How Schools Are Funded in DPS 1.
Student Achievement in Chicago Public Schools
Cost-of-Education Index Study Presentation to the Joint Committee on Public School Finance January 24, 2002.
LOCAL CONTROL FUNDING FORMULA (LCFF) JANUARY 24, 2014 PRESENTED BY: RAUL A. PARUNGAO ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
(c) 2008 The McGraw ‑ Hill Companies 1 School District Budgeting.
School Finance Partnership Programs Outside of Per Pupil: What Other States Are Doing Mary Wickersham, Colorado Children’s Campaign.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance August 20, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Education Funding – A National Perspective Providence, Rhode Island November 13, 2007 Michael Griffith School Finance Analyst Education Commission of the.
Finance 101. School Boards = Prisoners of Information.
Idaho School Funding Work Group Michael Griffith School Finance Strategist May, 2016.
Modernizing The Nevada Plan for School Finance Senate Bill 508 (2015 Session) 1.
CASBO 2016 Conference “Will New LCFF Base Revenues be Sufficient to Fund Your District's New Annual Costs?” Increasing Costs for New and Ongoing State.
Stacy L. Haney, Esq. (804) General Assembly Stacy L. Haney, Esq. (804)
Equity Implementation Committee June 21, 2016
A Look at the New Basic Education Funding Formula
Local Control Accountability Plan Board of Education June 25, 2015 Alvord Unified School District Students | Teachers | Instructional Content.
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
The 85th Legislative Session
The Conundrum of School Finance 2017 Action Summit April 21, 2017
Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office
Vocational and Skill Center Program Funding Priorities
Commission on Innovation and Excellence in Education (Kirwan Commission) Formed in June 2016.
Governor Dayton’s 2017 E-12 Budget
FIXING THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA
EADM 284 State Budget Summary
GASBO Conference November 10, 2016 Angela Palm
Presentation to the Senate Select Committee on School Funding Fairness
Supplement, Not Supplant Demonstration Under Title I, Part A
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues
Financial Transparency Working Group: Common Reporting Standards Part 2 August 25, 2017 By: Marguerite Roza Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University.
School Finance Mary Lynn Christel
School Finance CASBO Leanne Emm, Associate Commissioner
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Graduation Requirements Update
Costing Out the Resources Needed to Meet
Legislative Council Study Committee on the Identification and Management of Dyslexia Dee Pettack, Legislative Liaison Barb Novak, Literacy Consultant.
Leanne Emm, Associate Commissioner School Finance Division
Student Centered Funding Formula
Aspiring Principals May 7,2013.
Update on Foundation Budget Review Commission
Minimum Foundation Program (MFP) Past, Present & Future
Funding Committee April 28, 2015
Costing Out the Resources Needed to Meet
FIXING THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA
New York State Education Department Rate Setting Update
Michigan School Testing Conference
The True Cost of Educating a Child in Michigan
Goal Identification Identify what the you raise will support. Flight
FY2019 Budget Update Good Morning/Afternoon! Today we begin the process of planning our school’s budget for FY19. I know we are all here for the same reason.
L E G I S L A T I V E U P D A T E February
Beecher Hills Elementary School
Serving our students and community today and tomorrow
Special Finance, Budget and Enrolment Committee
Leonie Haimson Class Size Matters Jackson Heights education forum
Fair School Funding Plan A comprehensive, fair school funding plan for Ohio Slide Sponsors: State Representatives Bob Cupp & John Patterson.
Costing Out the Resources Needed to Meet
Graduation Requirements Update
STAFFING ALLOCATION PROCESS OVERVIEW
School Finance Update CASE Nuts & Bolts
Humphries Elementary School
Spring Regional Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Colorado Superintendents’ Modernized School Finance Formula House Bill 18-1232 Colorado Superintendents’ Modernized School Finance Formula and its impact on the Hanover 28 School District The modernized school finance formula proposed by Colorado Superintendents aspires to provide all 178 Colorado school districts with an increased level of funding for all students, while at the same time establishing a more equitable distribution of funding for students who are underserved and/or face the greatest challenges to achieving Colorado’s Graduation Guidelines and finishing high school ready for college and career. Since passage of the existing Public School Finance Act of 1994, expectations of Colorado’s public schools have increased substantially both in terms of expected outcomes of students and levels of public accountability for schools and school districts. During this same period, the programming and services Colorado’s schools must provide to meet the increasing needs and challenges of students have also expanded exponentially. In response to these challenges, Colorado Superintendents began work on developing a school finance formula that supports the current needs of all of Colorado’s public schools and the students they serve

Background Better able to meet Graduation Guidelines and be Career & College Ready More equitable distribution of funding for students Tools and Resources all students deserve to reach their full potential Colorado Superintendents are the right people to work on a new formula for the distribution of funds to districts, because they have first hand knowledge of what it takes to meet the expectations set by communities and law makers. Pg 2

Values-Driven Update Meet the needs of students Recognize student differences Provide resources for innovative solutions to challenges Allocate resources to support graduation requirements Streamline funding formula so it is transparent and easy to follow Meet the needs of schools/communities Recognize district size and geographic differences Provide stability for basic functions so we can focus on innovative solutions Supporting a quality educator in every classroom Still recognize aspects of formula that are necessary The creation of this distribution formula was guided by research of school finance formulas across the country and numerous interviews with Colorado educators determining what it takes to have sufficient resources to meet expectations of communities and Colorado law. Pg 3

Objectives Student-weighted Distribution Recognizing District Differences Students living in poverty English Language Learners Gifted and Talented students Special Education needs Cost differences related to size Impacts of geography Cost of doing business Competitive teacher salaries The Colorado Superintendent’s modernized school finance formula as it exists today was developed to achieve the following objectives: Pg 4

Equity & Adequacy Dual Focus Student-centric Equity Adaptability for: Poverty ELL Special Education Gifted and Talented Full-day Kindergarten Preschool District Differences Stability of communities Solid base funding Enrollment (size) Distance from the metro area Cost of doing business Ability to hire and retain quality teachers in all schools Equity & Adequacy Here is another look at the balance of Equity and Adequacy. It is the balance of student-centric and district differences. It is the balance of student programming and the ability for every system to meet the needs of students even without specialized programs. Pg 5

Old to New Comparison 1994 Act Modernized Formula Complicated formula (multiplicative and confusing) Not tied to educational outcomes Student characteristics considered outside of the formula Heavily impacted by a cost of living adjustment Accounts for impacts of size of district Modernized Formula More transparent (additive and simple) Built on current expectations of schools Needs of students are the central focus of the new formula Student-centric Accounts for impacts of different size school districts Our state has changed over the past 20 plus years. The expectations on our schools have changed significantly as well. The Superintendents’ Modernized School Finance Formula’s greatest change is shifting from a formula that was not tied to educational outcomes to a system that is primarily focused on the programming needs of students to get them to meet our new statewide graduation requirements. Pg 6

What does it look like for my school district? Impact for Hanover 28 School District These numbers are based on non-partisan Legislative Council’s analysis of House Bill 18-1232 and incorporates enrollment figures as of February 2018. The numbers are subject to change during this process. Now for the question that has been on your mind since the first slide. What would this modernized formula mean to us? Pg 7

Additive, Student-centric Formula The math in this modernized formula changed significantly too. The 1994 formula had factors multiplied against each other making the order of operations very significant, and drastically compounding the impacts of the first parts of the formula. This formula is primarily additive, putting the student characteristics is weighted by the value in the formula, not in the order in which is placed in the math. Transparency of the formula was a goal as well. Pg 8

Impact for Hanover 28 School District Modernized Formula Total Number of Pupils 290 Special Education Students 43 Students in Poverty 166 English Language Learners 41 Gifted and Talented Students 3 Pre-K Students 26 Notes to Presenters: Take time to verify your numbers prior to the presentation. Know these numbers come from CDE data pulls and therefore are not necessarily your best current number, but rather the best number submitted in a count previously. If you find that the numbers are significantly different, contact the Superintendents’ Planning Group or the Colorado School Finance Project. Walk your audience through the numbers on the next few slides. Pg 9

Impact for Hanover 28 School District Base Per Pupil Funding ( 288 students) (Excludes Online and Extended High School) $6,546.20 Total District Base Funding for students grades PK-12 Includes: Kindergarten Funding (Full-day = 1 FTE Half-day = .5 FTE) Pre-K Students Funding (.5 of base amount for students served) $ 1,883,996 Notes: In the modernized formula, Kindergarten funding reflects the kind of program you offer. If you offer half-day kindergarten, it is 0.5 funding. If you offer a full-day kindergarten program, you receive full funding, 1.0. Pg 10

Impact for Hanover 28 School District English Language Learners Funding (Adjusted for size for smallest districts) (Excluding NEP) (Range: .35 to .29 of base) 41 0.35 of base $ 93,938 Gifted and Talented Funding (Adjusted for size for smallest districts) (Range: .18 to .15 of base) 3 0.18 of base $ 3,535 Poverty Funding (Federal requirements of free and reduced lunch) 166 .31 of base $ 336,867 Notes The factor funding for ELL, GT and Poverty reflects district size. There is an efficiency with district size which impacts specialized programming. It costs more per student to educate 20 gifted students than it does if the district has 100 gifted students. Therefore, the funding has a different weight if you are an extremely small school district. Schools under 495 students receive the higher weight, school larger than 1700 students get the smaller weight, and all schools in between are on a consistent slope so that the weight reflects the enrollment. Pg 11

Impact for Hanover 28 School District Special Education Students Funding Tier A - Mild (Adjusted for size for smallest districts) (Range: .38 to .67 of base) 36 0.60 of base $ 141,398 Special Education Students Funding Tier B - Moderate (Adjusted for size for smallest districts) (Range: .88 to 1.27 of base) 7 1.18 of base $ 54,072 Total from Student-centric Factors (Excludes Categoricals: Severe Special Education, NEP, CTE and Transportation) $ 629,810 Notes The factor funding for ELL, GT and Poverty reflects district size. There is an efficiency with district size which impacts specialized programming. It costs more per student to educate 20 gifted students than it does if the district has 100 gifted students. Therefore, the funding has a different weight if you are an extremely small school district. Schools under 495 students receive the higher weight, school larger than 1700 students get the smaller weight, and all schools in between are on a consistent slope so that the weight reflects the enrollment. Pg 12

Impact for Hanover 28 School District Base Funding (based on pupil count of 288 ) $ 1,883,996 Total from Student-centric Factors $ 629,810 Cost of Living Adjustment (Maximum factor value of 5%) $ 91,318 Size Adjustment (if applicable and based on enrollment) $ 1,753,643 Notes: To show the formula on one slide, all the student-centered factors are totalled from the other pages into one number here so you can see how they are added to the base before the cost of living adjustment and the size adjustment. Pg 13

Impact for Hanover 28 School District Online / Extended High School Students $ 12,438 Minimum funding equal to 95% of statewide average (If applicable and follows current state statute) $ - Hold Harmless (if applicable) NEW Total Program Funding (TPF) $ 4,371,205 Notes Not every district is subject to Minimum Funding. This is a component that is in current law. Only 7 districts with unique situations recieve hold harmless funding. This is designed to make sure that despite local characteristics, every school receives funding at a minimum of prior to the Budget Stabilization Factor (Negative Factor). Pg 14

Impact for Hanover 28 School District What is currently funded to Hanover 28 under 1994 SFA: $ 2,943,037 What would be funded under the Modernized School Finance Formula: $ 4,371,205 Impact for Hanover 28 School District (Total Program Funding does not include categorical funding for Special Education, ELL, GT, CTE, Transportation and Small Attendance Centers) (New Total Program Funding includes funding for ELL, GT and Mild/Moderate Special Education) Notes: This slide shows the impact compared to what you receive today. Your “Current” funding is after the Budget Stabilization Factor (formerly Negative Factor) This is displayed this way because it is the true comparison of what you are able to buy with your dollars today compared to what you will be able to buy under this system if funded Pg 15

What Questions Do You Have? Call Superintendent, Dr. Grant Schmidt 719-382-1260 OR email gschmidt@hanoverhornets.org Tell You Legislators to Vote YES !! Senator Kevin Grantham 303-866-4877 Kevin.grantham.senate@state.co.us Representative Paul Lundeen 303-866-2924 Paul.lundeen.house@state.co.us Representative Lois Landgraf 303-866-2946 Lois.landgraf.house@state.co.us House Bill 18-1232 Pg 16